桑切斯在法国巴黎参加援助乌克兰"志愿联盟"会议期间告诉媒体记者，美国对委内瑞拉采取军事行 动，"开创了一个可怕且极其危险的先例，把世界推向一个充满不确定性和不安全的未来"。他表示，西 班牙不认为这种违反国际法的军事行动具有合法性，并说"这一行动的唯一目的似乎只为更换一个国家 的政府，以便夺取其自然资源"。 责编：张青津、卢思宇 桑切斯同时警告，他绝不接受美国总统特朗普"威胁丹麦的领土完整"，并强调西班牙不会对违反国际法 的干涉行为保持沉默，将利用一切可行手段维护多边主义和以国际法为基础的国际秩序。 美国3日凌晨对委内瑞拉发起大规模军事行动，突袭委首都加拉加斯等地，强行控制委总统马杜罗及其 妻子并将他们带至美国。马杜罗夫妇5日在纽约一家联邦法院出庭，拒绝美方一切指控。国际社会广泛 谴责美国此举严重侵犯委内瑞拉主权。 新华社马德里1月6日电（记者孟鼎博）西班牙首相佩德罗·桑切斯6日严厉批评美国对委内瑞拉采取军事 行动，称这一行为是"极其危险的先例"、似乎只为"夺取自然资源"，强调必须尊重国际法和国家主权。 特朗普4日接受美国媒体采访时称，委内瑞拉可能不会是美国干涉的最后一个国家，并称美国"绝对需 要"作为丹麦自治 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal proceedings against Venezuelan President Maduro and his wife in the U.S., highlighting public protests against U.S. intervention in Venezuela and concerns over the implications of such actions for international order and regional security [1][3][5]. Group 1: Public Sentiment and Protests - Protesters in New York demand the release of Maduro and criticize U.S. intervention as lacking legitimacy, viewing it as a political performance [1]. - Many protesters argue that U.S. actions create dangerous precedents and negatively impact regional security and international order [3]. - The protests reflect a broader sentiment that the U.S. is overstepping its bounds as a global power, with calls for an end to military interventions [5]. Group 2: Political Reactions in the U.S. - U.S. lawmakers express strong concerns regarding the legality of military actions against Venezuela, fearing that such interventions could lead to uncontrollable consequences [5][7]. - Senator Chuck Schumer warns that the situation in Venezuela could escalate, drawing parallels to past U.S. military interventions that resulted in significant costs for American families [7]. - Senator Bernie Sanders emphasizes the need for the U.S. government to focus on domestic issues rather than attempting to manage foreign nations, criticizing the imperialistic motives behind the intervention [9]. Group 3: Expert Opinions on U.S. Military Actions - Experts warn that the U.S. misuse of military force and violation of international law could destabilize the region and exacerbate issues like illegal immigration and drug trafficking [10]. - Historical analysis suggests that U.S. military interventions often lead to disastrous outcomes, with unpredictable consequences [12]. - Political scientists highlight the long-term negative effects of continuous warfare on U.S. society, including militarism and xenophobia, echoing historical warnings about the dangers of prolonged conflict [14].

Group 1 - The Organization of American States (OAS) held a special meeting on January 6 to address the situation in Venezuela, where multiple countries condemned the U.S. actions as violations of international law [1][3] - Uruguay expressed deep concern over the U.S. actions, emphasizing adherence to fundamental principles of international law and stating that such actions violate the United Nations Charter and the OAS Charter [1] - Chile called for a peaceful resolution to the crisis in Venezuela, advocating for respect for human rights and a process that addresses the legitimate demands of the Venezuelan people, aiming for free elections and international support [1] Group 2 - Mexico highlighted that U.S. military actions exacerbate conflict and undermine the social structure of nations, asserting that intervention has never led to democracy or lasting stability [1] - Colombia firmly opposed any use of force or threats against its territory and condemned unfounded statements made by the U.S. regarding President Petro [1] - Brazil characterized the forced control of Maduro as "kidnapping," marking it as a serious infringement on Venezuela's sovereignty and setting a dangerous precedent for the international community [2]

Group 1 - The article discusses the large-scale military strike by the U.S. against Venezuela, which has raised serious concerns and widespread condemnation from the international community [1] - China emphasizes the importance of respecting the sovereignty of nations and advocates for a peaceful resolution to international disputes through dialogue and cooperation [2] - China firmly opposes the U.S. actions that violate Venezuela's sovereignty and legal rights, supporting the Venezuelan government and its people [3] Group 2 - The article highlights that no country should impose its own rules over international law, reiterating China's call for the U.S. to release President Maduro and ensure his safety [4]

Core Viewpoint - The Prime Minister of Greenland, Jens Frederik Nielsen, expressed gratitude for the support from seven countries, including France, Germany, and Italy, and called for respectful diplomatic dialogue with the United States based on international law and territorial integrity [1] Group 1 - The joint statement from seven countries supporting Greenland was acknowledged by its Prime Minister [1] - Nielsen emphasized the importance of dialogue with the United States being rooted in mutual respect and international law [1] - The call for dialogue highlights Greenland's stance on maintaining its territorial integrity [1]

Core Viewpoint - The United Nations Security Council held an emergency meeting to condemn the recent U.S. military actions against Venezuela, with multiple countries emphasizing the need to adhere to international law, particularly the United Nations Charter [2][3]. Group 1: International Reactions - Various countries, including Russia, Colombia, Brazil, Chile, and Cuba, condemned the U.S. military actions, asserting that it violated Venezuela's sovereignty and political independence [2][3]. - The UN Secretary-General António Guterres expressed concern over the U.S. actions, stating they did not respect international law and emphasized the importance of all member states adhering to the UN Charter [2]. - The Colombian representative at the UN highlighted that the U.S. military strike constituted an illegitimate use of force against another nation [3]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife appeared in a U.S. court, where they denied the charges against them, with Maduro claiming he was kidnapped [4][5]. - The court session lasted approximately 30 minutes, and Maduro was ordered to appear again for a hearing on March 17 [6]. Group 3: Political Developments - Following the U.S. military action, the Venezuelan Supreme Court appointed Vice President Rodríguez as the acting president [7]. - U.S. President Trump stated that Venezuela would not hold new elections in the next 30 days and mentioned the potential for U.S. funding to rebuild Venezuela's energy infrastructure [7][8]. - Trump characterized the U.S. actions as a fight against "drug traffickers" rather than a war with Venezuela, indicating a possible second military action if cooperation from the acting president ceases [8].

转自：北京日报客户端 当地时间1月5日，一场备受国际瞩目的会议，与一场同样备受瞩目的"庭审"在同一天于美国纽约举行。 在位于曼哈顿的联合国总部大楼内，安理会召开紧急会议，讨论因美国针对委内瑞拉总统马杜罗采取军 事行动所引发的紧张局势。联合国秘书长、多个安理会成员以及众多国家代表，均强调必须遵守《联合 国宪章》，反对以武力方式处理国际争端。这种跨地区、跨立场的共识，本身就说明维护国际法并非某 一国的"利益选择"，而是国际社会的基本共识。 如果华盛顿试图通过公然羞辱他国总统的画面来传递恐吓和震慑效果，那么它显然低估了国际社会的共 识与底线。无论基于何种视角，美方相关行动没有任何正义性与合法性可言：这种赤裸裸的入侵与绑 架，严重背离了《联合国宪章》确立的所有核心规范与关键原则。无论以何种名义，在未经安理会授 权、也不存在正当自卫条件的情况下，对身为联合国会员国的主权国家动用军事力量、绑架国家元首， 都是一种赤裸裸的侵略行径。事后美国政府的辩解更是欲盖弥彰，将一国国内基于不严谨甚至是虚假证 据的所谓司法指控凌驾于国际法之上，以单方面军事行动替代多边外交机制，本质上就是单边霸权行 径，从根本上挑战乃至否定国际法的普遍约 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent U.S. actions against Venezuela have raised international concerns, with implications for U.S.-Russia relations, particularly regarding the ongoing Ukraine conflict [1][3]. Group 1: U.S. Actions and Implications - The U.S. has reportedly "kidnapped" Venezuelan President Maduro, which is seen as a significant blow to Russia, a key ally of Venezuela [3]. - Fiona Hill, a former U.S. National Security Council official, revealed that Russia had informally suggested a deal where the U.S. could act freely in Venezuela in exchange for U.S. concessions in Ukraine [1][3]. - The U.S. and Russia are believed to be discussing ways to end the Ukraine conflict, with Russia aiming to maintain a balance without making significant concessions [3]. Group 2: Russia's Response - Russia has condemned the U.S. actions, calling them a violation of international law and demanding the release of Venezuela's legitimate president [4]. - Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council, criticized the U.S. for its actions, suggesting that such behavior could lead to broader conflicts [3][4]. - Russia's representative at the UN emphasized that the U.S. actions signify a return to lawlessness, which could destabilize other nations [4].

转自：扬子晚报 丹麦首相梅特·弗雷泽里克森5日说，美国总统特朗普若下令袭击丹麦自治领地格陵兰岛，已存在70余年 的北约军事同盟恐将终结。 这是2025 2025年3月 据美国《国会山》日报报道，弗雷泽里克森称，格陵兰岛作为丹麦领土，受北约集体安全机制保护，并 且丹麦先前已允许格陵兰岛向美国大范围开放。她因此"强烈呼吁美国停止威胁其亲密历史盟友"，重申 丹麦领土不会"挂牌出售"。 格陵兰岛自治政府总理延斯-弗雷德里克·尼尔森也在社交媒体上"喊话"特朗普，称"够了，别再施压、影 射或幻想吞并"。"我们就对话持开放态度，但必须经由恰当渠道且尊重国际法。"尼尔森称，应积极与 美方接触，并呼吁民众不要恐慌。 格陵兰岛位于北美洲东北部，是世界第一大岛。该岛资源丰富，国防和外交事务由丹麦政府掌管，内政 高度自治。美国目前在格陵兰岛有一个军事基地。特朗普2025年重返白宫以来多次扬言要得到格陵兰 岛，并声称不排除动用武力。2025年12月21日，特朗普任命路易斯安那州州长杰夫·兰德里为美国格陵 兰岛特使，称其将推动美国相关利益，并强调格陵兰岛对美国国家安全的重要性。 特朗普还多次称，格陵兰岛海岸充斥俄罗斯等国船只。代表格陵兰 ...

美军3日凌晨对委内瑞拉发动大规模军事打击，强行控制委总统马杜罗夫妇并将他们带到美国。哈撒韦 随后在接受美国《纽约客》杂志电话采访时作出上述表态。 哈撒韦说，《联合国宪章》规定各国拥有自卫权，允许各国在遭受武装袭击时使用武力进行自卫，但 （自卫权）从未被用于针对贩毒这类行为。因此，美军过去几个月对所谓"贩毒船"的打击，尽管以"自 卫"来合理化，但不符合国际法规定。 新华社华盛顿1月6日电（记者黄强 徐剑梅）美国国际法学会候任主席、耶鲁大学法学院教授乌娜·哈 撒韦日前表示，特朗普政府以"打击毒贩的自卫行动"为借口发动对委内瑞拉军事行动缺乏法律依据，不 符合国际法。 哈撒韦说，《联合国宪章》有禁止使用武力的相关条款，各国不得自行决定对其他国家使用武力。如果 仅仅因为毒品来自某个国家就因此发动入侵并推翻该国政府，实际上等于取消了对使用武力的任何限 制。 她说，人们正在从一个以和平方式解决问题的世界走向一个以军事力量解决问题的世界，这将是灾难性 的。（完） 责任编辑：刘万里 SF014 新华社华盛顿1月6日电（记者黄强 徐剑梅）美国国际法学会候任主席、耶鲁大学法学院教授乌娜·哈 撒韦日前表示，特朗普政府以"打击毒贩的自 ...