值得注意的是， 2024年2月， 来源：读创财经 可靠股份时任董事长、总经理兼董事会秘书金利伟与财务总监、副总经理李超楠对上述行为负有责任， 上述行为违反了《上市公司信息披露管理办法》（证监会令第182号）第四条、第五十一条的规定。根 据《上市公司信息披露管理办法》（证监会令第182号）第五十二条的规定， 浙江证监局对可靠股份采取出具警示函的监督管理措施，并记入证券期货市场诚信档案。对时任董事 长、总经理兼董事会秘书金利伟与财务总监、副总经理李超楠采取监管谈话的监督管理措施，并记入证 券期货市场诚信档案。 目前正陷入创始人夫妻离婚后内斗漩涡的可靠股份，因关联交易披露违规事项遭监管警示。 9月1日，根据浙江证监局发布的公告，截至2025年4月17日，可靠股份（301009）与广西杭港材料科技 有限公司（以下简称广西杭港） 的2025年度关联交易成交金额达到2112.24万元，成交金额占公司最近 一期经审计净资产绝对值的1.54%，达到董事会审议及信息披露标准，但未按规定及时履行审议程序和 信息披露义务，直至2025年4月24日，可靠股份董事会才审议通过并披露2025年度公司与广西杭港的关 联交易事项。公司上述行 ...

Core Viewpoint - The company, Haosai (002963), has received a warning letter from the Beijing Securities Regulatory Bureau due to allegations of unit bribery involving its controlling shareholder and actual controller, Dai Baolin, who was arrested on June 19, 2025 [1] Summary by Relevant Sections - **Company's Legal Issues** - The controlling shareholder, Dai Baolin, has been arrested for alleged unit bribery, leading to an investigation by the supervisory authorities [1] - The company failed to fulfill its information disclosure obligations regarding these legal issues [1] - **Management Accountability** - Key management personnel, including Dai Congqi (Chairman and General Manager), Hou Chunhui (Director and Deputy General Manager), and Wen Guoping (Director, Deputy General Manager, and Board Secretary), have violated relevant regulations of the "Management Measures for Information Disclosure of Listed Companies" [1] - **Regulatory Actions** - The Beijing Securities Regulatory Bureau has decided to issue a warning letter as an administrative regulatory measure against the company and the involved individuals, which will be recorded in the integrity archives of the securities and futures market [1]

浙江证监局在现场检查中发现公司部分投资事项未及时经董事会审议并对外披露，部分投资项目重大进 展情况未披露或未及时披露。 公司上述相关行为违反了《上市公司信息披露管理办法》(证监会令第182号)第三条第一款规定，公司 时任董事长李刚、总经理徐兰芝、时任总经理张珊珊、董事会秘书赵宇恺违反了《上市公司信息披露管 理办法》(证监会令第182号)第四条，第五十一条第一款、第二款规定。根据《上市公司信息披露管理 办法》(证监会令第182号)第五十二条规定，浙江证监局决定对公司、李刚、徐兰芝、张珊珊、赵宇恺 分别采取出具警示函的监督管理措施，并记入证券期货市场诚信档案。 万马股份(002276.SZ)发布公告，近日，公司及相关人员收到中国证券监督管理委员会浙江监管局(简 称"浙江证监局")出具的《关于对浙江万马股份有限公司及相关人员采取出具警示函措施的决定》 (〔2025〕177号)(简称《警示函》)。 登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 ...

Core Viewpoint - Beijing Oriental Yuhong Waterproof Technology Co., Ltd. has been found to have engaged in non-compliant financial practices, including the misuse of funds and improper financial accounting, leading to regulatory actions from the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) and Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE) [1][3][5]. Group 1: Fund Misuse - The company engaged in non-operational fund occupation, providing a total of 69.5 million yuan to its actual controller, Li Weiguo, from February 2023 to May 2024, with 20 million yuan in 2023 and 49.5 million yuan in 2024 [1][13]. - The funds were returned by May 2024, but the company failed to disclose this information in a timely manner [1][3]. Group 2: Financial Accounting Issues - The company exhibited non-compliance in financial accounting, including inaccurate revenue recognition for solar module sales, incorrect timing for project income recognition, and improper accounting for intermediary fees and debt restructuring [2][20]. - Specific issues included the inappropriate use of prepayments to offset accounts receivable and errors in the aging classification of other receivables [2][20]. Group 3: Regulatory Actions - The CSRC and SZSE issued warning letters and public reprimands to the company and its key executives, including Li Weiguo, Zhang Zhiping, Xu Wei, and Zhang Bei, for their roles in the violations [3][5][19]. - The company is required to improve its financial accounting practices and enhance the quality of information disclosure to prevent future violations [15][20].

Group 1 - The company received a warning letter from the Jiangsu Securities Regulatory Bureau regarding financial accounting and disclosure issues related to accounts receivable and contract assets [2][3] - The warning letter highlighted that the company failed to adequately assess the impairment of accounts receivable and contract assets, violating relevant accounting standards [2] - The chairman and the financial director of the company were held primarily responsible for the violations and were instructed to enhance their understanding of securities laws and regulations [2][3] Group 2 - The company emphasized its commitment to addressing the issues raised in the warning letter and improving compliance with relevant regulations [3] - The regulatory measures imposed will not affect the company's normal production and operational activities [3] - The company will continue to fulfill its information disclosure obligations in a timely manner as per regulatory requirements [3]

证券代码：600289 股票简称：ST 信通 公告编号：2025－107 亿阳信通股份有限公司 关于收到中国证券监督管理委员会黑龙江监管局 《行政监管措施决定书》的公告 一、《行政监管措施决定书》内容 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述 或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 "亿阳信通股份有限公司、袁义祥、曹星、张秀琴、陶恒亮： 经查，亿阳信通股份有限公司（以下简称亿阳信通或公司，统一社会信用代 码：91230199128027157K）存在以下问题： 拟向北京多来点信息技术有限公司（以下简称多来点）投资不超过2.5亿元，持有 对方不超过7.692%的股权，并在协议生效之日起3个工作日内向多来点先行支付 投资事项问询函的部分回复公告》，表明公司将会审慎推进向多来点投资事项， 且投资具体事宜尚待进一步协商、推进和落实。此后公司未再披露相关事项进展， 迟至2024年4月30日公司才在《关于债权转让暨关联交易的公告》中披露，公司 已于2023年9月28日根据多来点付款指令向其支付2000万元诚意金，但双方最终 未能达成交易。公司未及时披露对外投资交易相关进展 ...

*ST元成（603388）公告，公司于2025年7月29日收到浙江证监局行政监管措施决定书。经调查，董事 长祝昌人未将代持股份事项告知公司，导致招股说明书及2017年至2021年定期报告中持股信息披露不准 确。公司违反了《证券法》和《上市公司信息披露管理办法》相关规定。浙江证监局对公司和祝昌人分 别采取出具警示函的监督管理措施并记入诚信档案。公司及相关责任方将按照要求及时进行整改。 ...

处 公司参股公司27家，包括上海齐闳房地产开发有限公司、上海亚岛新能源科技有限公司、上海泊岛酒店管理有限公司、上海亚通置业发展有限公司、上海西 盟物贸有限公司等。 在业绩方面，公司2022年至2024年营业收入分别为12.25亿元、13.05亿元和6.60亿元，同比分别增长-18.64%、6.52%和-49.41%。归母净利润分别为458.04万 元、244.42万元和635.64万元，归母净利润同比增长分别为-89.96%、-46.64%和160.06%。同期，公司资产负债率分别为66.55%、52.07%和72.53%。 在风险方面，天眼查信息显示，公司自身天眼风险155条，周边天眼风险613条，历史天眼风险6条，预警提醒天眼风险235条。 因此，上海证监局决定对亚通股份采取责令改正的行政监管措施，并要求公司在收到决定书后30日内提交书面整改报告。同时，公司时任董事长梁峻、总经 理翟云云、副总经理兼会计机构负责人顾培因未勤勉尽责被出具警示函。公司及相关人员表示将认真整改，加强法律法规学习，提高规范运作水平，确保信 息披露的真实、准确和完整。此次监管措施不会影响公司正常生产经营管理活动。 天眼查资料显示，亚 ...

Core Points - The former chairman of Jingyi Co., Ltd. resigned due to exposure of a dishonesty record, leading to the election of a new chairman, Gu Chong, who is a financial director born in the 1980s [1][5][6] - Gu Chong has a background in finance, having previously worked at Nantong Sanjian Group and its holding company, which is also a major shareholder of Jingyi [3][4] - Following the leadership change, Jingyi's stock price experienced significant volatility, reaching a recent high before a sharp decline on the day of the new chairman's election [4][6] Company Background - Jingyi Co., Ltd. was established in 1999 and listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in 2009, primarily engaged in copper processing products [4] - The company has faced substantial revenue fluctuations over the past five years, with a reported revenue drop of over 60% in 2022 and net profit consistently below 100 million yuan [4] Regulatory Context - The resignation of the former chairman was prompted by a regulatory decision from the Guangdong Securities Regulatory Commission, which highlighted failures in disclosing the chairman's dishonesty status [5][6] - The commission mandated Jingyi to rectify its governance issues and replace the chairman within two trading days of the decision [5]

Core Viewpoint - The company, Guandian Defense Technology Co., Ltd., has been penalized by the Beijing Securities Regulatory Bureau for violations related to fund occupation and inadequate disclosure of financial information [1][2][3]. Summary by Sections Regulatory Decision - The company was found to have occupied non-operating funds amounting to 142.5147 million yuan, with an outstanding balance of 96.9472 million yuan as of April 2025 [1]. - The actual controller, Gao Ming, admitted to the fund occupation and was involved in falsifying bank documents [1][2]. Violations and Responsibilities - The company's actions violated the "Management Measures for Information Disclosure of Listed Companies" and relevant regulatory guidelines [2]. - Key individuals, including Gao Ming and other executives, are held responsible for the violations [2]. Required Actions and Compliance - The company is mandated to take corrective actions and submit a written report to the regulatory authority within 15 working days [3]. - The company must enhance its internal controls and improve the quality of information disclosure to prevent future occurrences [3][4]. Company Response - The company has acknowledged the issues raised in the regulatory decision and is committed to strengthening compliance with relevant laws and regulations [4]. - The company assures that the regulatory decision will not impact its normal operations and will continue to fulfill its disclosure obligations [4].