中方坚决反对有关国家强推安理会启动"快速恢复制裁"机制 中新社联合国9月19日电 中国常驻联合国代表傅聪19日在安理会表决继续解除对伊朗制裁措施决议草案 后发言表示，中方坚决反对有关国家强推安理会启动"快速恢复制裁"机制。 当天，安理会以4票赞成、9票反对、2票弃权的表决结果未能通过旨在继续豁免伊朗遭受制裁的决议草 案。中国、俄罗斯、巴基斯坦、阿尔及利亚投了赞成票，美国、英国、法国等9国投了反对票，韩国和 圭亚那弃权。 由于伊核协议参与方英国、法国、德国8月28日已通知安理会启动"快速恢复制裁"机制，若安理会未能 在30天内就继续解除对伊朗制裁通过决议，联合国对伊朗的相关制裁将恢复。目前，伊朗同有关国家仅 剩约一周时间进行外交磋商。 傅聪发言指出，造成当前伊朗核问题困局的根源是，美国单方面退出全面协议，破坏全面协议的正常执 行，恢复并不断升级对伊单边制裁，采取"极限施压"措施，致使伊无法享有协议赋予的经济红利，被迫 减少履行协议义务。美国还置自身信誉于不顾，悍然对伊核设施发动军事打击，破坏由其自身发起的谈 判进程。 傅聪表示，在这种情况下，英国、法国、德国援引安理会第2231号决议，执意启动"快速恢复制裁"机 ...

英法德三国外长8月28日就伊朗核问题发表联合声明称，三国当天通知联合国安理会，启动"快速恢 复制裁"机制，如果安理会未能在30天内就延长对伊制裁豁免期限通过决议，相关制裁将恢复。 阿拉格齐提及伊朗最近与国际原子能机构就恢复核查展开合作，说现在轮到欧方把握机会，继续走 外交途径，"防止出现本可避免的危机"。他强调，伊朗已准备好为实现一个"公平、平衡"并能保障各方 利益的解决方案而努力。而实现这一目标，要求英法德三国采取"负责任且独立"的态度，避免受到其他 国家影响。 新华社德黑兰9月17日电（记者陈霄 沙达提）伊朗外交部长阿拉格齐17日晚与英国、法国、德国外 长以及欧盟外交与安全政策高级代表卡拉斯举行电话会谈，呼吁欧方继续通过外交途径，寻求"公平、 平衡"的方案以解决伊朗核问题。 根据伊朗外交部发表的声明，阿拉格齐重申伊朗致力于通过外交途径寻求解决方案，批评欧方触 发"快速恢复制裁"机制的做法"缺乏法律和逻辑依据"。 ...

Group 1 - The foreign ministers of the UK, France, and Germany announced the initiation of a "snapback sanctions" mechanism regarding Iran's nuclear issue, which will take effect if the UN Security Council does not extend the sanctions waiver within 30 days [1] - Iran's Foreign Minister Zarif condemned the actions of the three European countries, stating that it complicates diplomatic efforts to resolve the nuclear issue [1][3] - The three European countries proposed three conditions to delay the reactivation of the "snapback sanctions" mechanism, including direct talks between Iran and the US, full cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, and disclosure of the latest locations of enriched uranium [3] Group 2 - Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesperson criticized the actions of the three European countries as allowing the "greatest violator of rules" to dominate the situation, referencing the US's unilateral withdrawal from the nuclear agreement in 2018 [3] - Iranian parliamentary officials revealed that an emergency procedure has been initiated to draft a proposal for a complete withdrawal from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons [3]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the ongoing diplomatic efforts between Iran and the UK, France, and Germany regarding the nuclear issue, highlighting Iran's commitment to seeking a mutually beneficial solution through dialogue [1][3][11] - Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister, Ali Bagheri Kani, stated that the three European countries and the UN Security Council should make the right choice by allowing time and space for diplomacy [1][3] - The article discusses the "snapback sanctions" mechanism outlined in UN Security Council Resolution 2231, which allows signatories to respond to Iran's violations, with a deadline approaching on October 18 [3][9] Group 2 - The negotiations held in Geneva did not yield a new consensus, reflecting a lack of foundational agreement between Iran and the European nations [5][6] - Iran continues to assert that the European countries should not follow the U.S. in imposing illegal sanctions and should adopt a more independent policy regarding the nuclear issue [5][6] - The urgency for the European nations is highlighted, as they must complete the snapback sanctions process by the end of September to avoid procedural obstacles, with August 31 being a critical deadline [9][10] Group 3 - The cooperation between Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) remains unestablished, with Iran demanding fair treatment and assurance against the misuse of verification data [10] - There is a significant lack of mutual trust between Iran and the West, particularly due to perceived U.S. dishonesty during negotiations [10] - The expiration of the 2015 nuclear agreement on October 18 poses a risk, as there is currently no replacement agreement in place, which could lead to miscalculations among the parties involved [10][11]

Group 1 - The Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson announced that Iran will hold talks with the UK, France, and Germany on August 26 in Geneva regarding the nuclear issue and other matters [1] - This meeting is a follow-up to the conversation between the Iranian Foreign Minister and the foreign ministers of the UK, France, Germany, and the EU High Representative on August 22 [1] - The discussions will cover the lifting of sanctions, the nuclear issue, and the future direction of UN Security Council Resolution 2231 [1]

Group 1 - The visit of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Deputy Director General Massimo Aparo to Iran marks the first high-level engagement since Iran suspended cooperation with the IAEA in June [1] - Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister criticized the IAEA for failing to fulfill its responsibilities during aggressive actions by Israel and the U.S. against Iran, and expressed demands for reforming the IAEA's management procedures regarding Iran's nuclear issues [1][2] - The dialogue between Iran and the IAEA is intended to signal Iran's willingness to resolve nuclear issues through political means, amidst pressures from Europe regarding potential sanctions if no agreement is reached by the end of August [2][5] Group 2 - Iran's parliament's previous decision to suspend cooperation with the IAEA remains in effect, and Iran is currently only engaging in political dialogue without allowing technical inspections of its nuclear facilities [5] - The IAEA must address Iran's core concerns and provide necessary assurances before Iran considers resuming technical cooperation [5] - Egypt is positioning itself as a regional mediator in the current Middle Eastern tensions, reflecting a desire for regional countries to address crises through their own efforts rather than external intervention [8]

Core Viewpoint - Iran is willing to accept certain limitations on its nuclear program in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions, but it will not agree to completely halt uranium enrichment activities [1][2]. Group 1: Iran's Position on Uranium Enrichment - Iran can show flexibility regarding its uranium enrichment capabilities and limitations, but it will not agree to stop enrichment entirely, as it is deemed necessary for self-reliance [2]. - The Iranian official emphasized that if the U.S. insists on zero uranium enrichment, no agreement will be reached [2]. Group 2: U.S.-Iran Negotiations and Military Actions - The statement comes amid stalled U.S.-Iran nuclear negotiations, with five rounds of indirect talks held since April, and the sixth round canceled due to Israeli airstrikes on Iran [3]. - Iran asserts that the U.S. must guarantee no further military actions against Iran if negotiations are to continue [3][4]. Group 3: Compensation for Military Strikes - Iran claims it has the right to demand compensation for the damages caused by U.S. airstrikes on its nuclear facilities, although this is not a precondition for future negotiations [4]. - The Iranian official criticized the U.S. for conducting military actions while engaging in negotiations, calling it deceptive [4]. Group 4: Ongoing Diplomatic Efforts - Iran is open to dialogue with the U.S. through intermediaries, but warns of a strong response to any threats from the U.S. [4]. - European nations have warned that if negotiations do not progress by the end of August, they will push for the reinstatement of UN sanctions under the 2015 nuclear agreement framework [4]. Group 5: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Engagement - A senior official from the IAEA is visiting Iran, marking the first visit since Iran suspended cooperation with the agency in June [5][9]. - Discussions between Iran and the IAEA will focus on a new cooperation framework, with no inspections or visits to nuclear facilities planned during this visit [7].

Core Viewpoint - The Iranian Foreign Minister, Zarif, emphasized the need for the U.S. to take concrete trust-building measures to resume negotiations with Iran, stating that a demand for "zero uranium enrichment" would hinder any potential agreement [1]. Group 1: U.S.-Iran Relations - Zarif expressed a deepening trust crisis regarding U.S. President Trump due to U.S. attacks on Iran during negotiations, indicating that the U.S. must explain these actions and ensure they do not recur [1]. - The path to negotiations is described as narrow but not impossible, with Zarif urging the U.S. to seek a "win-win" solution to resolve the long-standing deadlock over Iran's nuclear program [1]. Group 2: Recent Negotiation Efforts - Since April, there have been five rounds of indirect negotiations between the U.S. and Iran concerning the nuclear issue and the lifting of sanctions [1]. - The sixth round of talks, originally scheduled for June 15, was canceled due to an Israeli attack on Iran, during which the U.S. conducted airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities [1].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the largest sanctions imposed by the U.S. Treasury Department against Iran since the "maximum pressure" campaign began in 2018, targeting a shipping network controlled by Iranian businessman Mohammad Hossein Shahmohammadi, involving over 50 entities and individuals, as well as more than 50 oil tankers and container ships [1]. Group 1 - The U.S. Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control announced sanctions against a shipping network linked to Mohammad Hossein Shahmohammadi, marking the largest sanctions since 2018 [1]. - The sanctioned shipping network is responsible for transporting Iranian and Russian oil, oil derivatives, and other goods globally [1]. - The sanctions also include 20 entities involved in the trade and transportation of Iranian oil and petrochemical products, along with the freezing of 10 vessels [1]. Group 2 - The article references the 2015 nuclear agreement between Iran and several world powers, highlighting the U.S. withdrawal in May 2018 and the subsequent re-imposition of sanctions [1]. - Since April of this year, there have been five rounds of indirect negotiations between the U.S. and Iran regarding the nuclear issue and the lifting of sanctions, with a sixth round canceled due to military conflicts involving Israel [1]. - The U.S. has conducted airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities during the military conflict between Israel and Iran [1].

Core Points - The U.S. Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control announced sanctions against a shipping network controlled by Iranian businessman Mohammad Hossein Shahriari, involving over 50 entities and individuals, as well as more than 50 oil tankers and container ships [1] - This is the largest scale of sanctions implemented since the U.S. government's "maximum pressure" campaign against Iran began in 2018 [1] - The shipping network is responsible for transporting Iranian and Russian oil, oil derivatives, and other goods worldwide [1] Sanctions Details - The U.S. State Department also announced sanctions against 20 entities involved in the trade and transportation of Iranian oil and petrochemical products, and froze assets of 10 ships [1] - The sanctions are part of a broader context following the U.S. withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal in May 2018, which led to the reimposition of various sanctions against Iran [1] Negotiation Context - Since April, there have been five rounds of indirect negotiations between the U.S. and Iran regarding the nuclear issue and the lifting of sanctions [1] - The sixth round of negotiations, originally scheduled for June 15, was canceled due to an Israeli attack on Iran [1] - During the military conflict between Israel and Iran, the U.S. conducted airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities [1]