记者丨李山 编辑丨黄敏 虚增收入1.57亿元、虚增营业成本1.58亿元——聚石化学（688669）2023年半年度财务造假细 节随着监管罚单正式曝光。伴随调查定性落地，相关投资者索赔窗口也已明确：在2023年8月 29日至2025年11月21日期间买入该股票并遭受损失的投资者，可 关注"投资快报"公众号，通 过右侧"股民索赔"菜单栏参与索赔。 投资者索赔条件明确 聚石化学于2026年2月3日发布公告称，收到中国证监会广东监管局的《行政处罚决定书》。 经查明，该公司及其子公司通过开展虚假贸易业务虚增收入、成本和利润，2023年半年度虚增 营业收入合计1.57亿元、虚增营业成本合计1.58亿元。 同时，上海证券交易所也对聚石化学及有关责任人予以公开谴责，并对该公司及时任董事长陈 钢、时任总经理周侃、时任财务总监伍洋、时任董事会秘书包伟予以监管警示。 根据相关法律规定，投资者需要同时满足以下条件才享有索赔资格：在上市公司实施了虚假陈 述行为后购买股票，并且一直持有股票到上市公司虚假陈述行为被公开揭露或者自行更正后。 而此次正式处罚的送达也为投资者索赔提供了有力证据。 上海沪紫律师事务所刘鹏律师表示，在2023年8月 ...

登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 受损股民可至新浪股民维权平台登记该公司维权：http://wq.finance.sina.com.cn/ 2023年11月3日，豪美新材在《投资者关系活动记录表》披露，汽车轻量化业务客户覆盖了宝马、奔 驰、本田、丰田等合资车型，广汽埃安、比亚迪、华为问界、长安等国产品牌。经查，宝马、华为问界 等整车厂不是豪美新材的直接客户，你公司关于客户情况的信息披露不准确，且未在2023年11月9日以 及2023年11月13日披露的《股票交易异常波动公告》中及时更正澄清。上述情形违反了《上市公司信息 披露管理办法》（证监会令第182号）第三条第一款、第五条第二款等规定。 专门从事股票索赔法律事务的上海久诚律师事务所主任许峰律师认为，在2023年11月6日到2023年 11月15日之间买入豪美新材股票，并且在2023年11月15日后卖出或继续持有股票的投资者，目前还可发 起索赔。（豪美新材维权入口） （本文由许峰律师供稿，不代表新浪财经立场。许峰律师，上海久诚律师事务所主任，2008年起律师执 业，执业服务范围涉及虚假陈述、内幕交易、操纵市场等证券欺诈领域索赔代理。十几年来已 ...

Group 1 - Baoxin Technology (002514) and its actual controller Ma Wei received a notice from the CSRC regarding an investigation for suspected violations of information disclosure laws [1] - Investors who purchased Baoxin Technology shares between September 1, 2022, and January 31, 2026, may prepare to initiate claims [1] - The law firm Shanghai Jiucheng has been actively pursuing claims for investors in Huatie Co., Ltd. (000976), with previous cases resulting in favorable judgments [1] Group 2 - Huatie Co., Ltd. received an administrative penalty decision from the CSRC for false disclosures in its 2020 and 2021 annual reports [2] - The company inflated revenue and profits through fictitious trades involving its subsidiary Qingdao Yatongda Railway Equipment Manufacturing Co., Ltd. [2] - Huatie Co., Ltd. failed to disclose related party transactions properly, leading to significant omissions in its annual reports from 2019 to 2022 [2]

Core Viewpoint - The news discusses ongoing legal actions regarding investor claims against companies Yingfeituo (002528) and Xiangrikui (300111) due to alleged violations of information disclosure laws, with both cases currently in various stages of litigation [1][2][3][4][5]. Group 1: Yingfeituo (002528) - The law firm represented by attorney Xu Feng has submitted a new case for investor claims against Yingfeituo to the Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court on February 3, 2026 [1][4]. - A previous ruling in favor of investors has been made, with Yingfeituo appealing the decision, which has now entered the second trial phase [1][4]. - The company received a notice from the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) on January 24, 2025, regarding an investigation into alleged information disclosure violations [4]. Group 2: Xiangrikui (300111) - On February 3, 2026, attorney Xu Feng also submitted a new case for investor claims against Xiangrikui to the Shaoxing Intermediate People's Court, which is awaiting further court arrangements [2][4]. - The company received a notice from the CSRC on January 14, 2026, regarding an investigation into misleading statements related to its restructuring proposal [3][5]. - Investors who purchased Xiangrikui shares between September 22, 2025, and December 26, 2025, and sold or held them after December 26, 2025, are eligible to file claims [5].

Core Viewpoint - Hubei Meirya Co., Ltd. (ST Meirya) has been penalized by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) for failing to disclose non-operating fund occupation and related party transactions, leading to potential legal actions from affected investors [1][4][10]. Group 1: Regulatory Findings - The CSRC found that ST Meirya and its actual controller, Zheng Jiping, were involved in non-operating fund occupation amounting to 103.72 million yuan, which was used for Zheng and his affiliates' daily operations or debt repayment [2][8]. - From November 2022 to March 2023, ST Meirya failed to disclose related party transactions totaling 71.5 million yuan and 32.22 million yuan, which represented 9.42% and 5.12% of the company's latest audited net assets, respectively [2][8]. - The company did not follow the required procedures for disclosing related party transactions, including those with its indirect controlling shareholder, Beijing Zhongfang Silk Road Investment Management Co., Ltd., which involved a transaction of 5.4 million yuan in 2022 [3][9]. Group 2: Financial Reporting Issues - ST Meirya's 2022 annual report contained inaccurate financial data, necessitating a correction announcement in April 2024 [3][9]. - The company has since recovered 105.92 million yuan related to the non-operating fund occupation, with 102.22 million yuan disclosed in its 2023 annual report [2][8]. Group 3: Investor Compensation - Affected investors who purchased ST Meirya's securities between April 29, 2023, and April 29, 2024, may register for compensation claims [10][5]. - Legal representatives are collecting claims from investors who suffered losses due to the company's violations, emphasizing the importance of the administrative penalty as a prerequisite for civil lawsuits [10][11].

登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 受损股民可至新浪股民维权平台登记该公司维权：http://wq.finance.sina.com.cn/ 关注@新浪证券、微信关注新浪券商基金、百度搜索新浪股民维权、访问新浪财经客户端、 新浪财经首页都能找到我 一、监管出手立案调查 2026年1月30日，宝馨科技（维权）发布公告，因涉嫌信息披露违法违规，中国证监会决定对公司及实 际控制人马伟立案。此次立案调查可能与公司过去的控股股东与关联方的非经营性资金占用情况有关。 根据宝馨科技在2024年4月30日披露的关于自查非经营性资金占用情况及整改报告，2022年9月至2023年 10月，公司控股股东及关联方累计发生非经营性占用公司资金8800万元。 截至2023年10月31日，上述资金占用已全部收回，并以资金占用金额、资金占用天数按6%的年化利率 计算利息，于2024年4月收取全部利息154.45万元。公司已完成对该事项的深查与整改，而此次被立案 调查涉及对该事项的追溯处罚。 二、投资者索赔要求 上海沪紫刘鹏律师表示信息披露违法违规的背后，往往隐藏着不法关联交易、违规资金占用、财务造假 等严重违法行为。依据相关法 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal actions and financial misconduct involving Haiyue Energy, highlighting the company's failure to disclose non-operational fund occupation by its controlling shareholder, Gaoxin Financial Holdings, and the subsequent financial implications for investors [1][2][3]. Group 1: Legal and Financial Issues - Haiyue Energy has been involved in a compensation case where investors have received settlement payments, with ongoing efforts to accept further claims [1][4]. - The company was found to have failed to disclose the non-operational fund occupation by its controlling shareholder, Gaoxin Financial Holdings, which held 100% of the shares in a subsidiary that controlled 19.21% of Haiyue Energy [1][4]. - From 2021 to 2022, under the direction of Gaoxin Financial, Haiyue Energy transferred funds to suppliers, constituting non-operational fund occupation, with amounts reaching up to 68.8 million yuan in 2022, representing 20.67% of the company's net assets at that time [2][5]. Group 2: Accounting Errors - Haiyue Energy acknowledged accounting errors in its 2022 semi-annual report, leading to an overstatement of revenue and costs by 302.08 million yuan, which accounted for 49.33% and 50.51% of the reported figures, respectively [3][6]. - The company failed to disclose these issues in its financial reports for 2021 and 2022, raising concerns about the accuracy and completeness of its financial statements [5][6]. Group 3: Investor Claims - Investors who purchased Haiyue Energy shares between August 31, 2021, and April 29, 2023, and those who buy shares between April 29, 2023, and April 20, 2024, may still initiate claims for compensation [3][6].

Core Viewpoint - Peng Bo Shi (鹏博士) has faced legal challenges due to violations related to financial disclosures and has been involved in investor compensation cases following these violations [2][5]. Group 1: Legal Violations - Peng Bo Shi failed to disclose related party transactions as required by regulations [2][5]. - The company also did not disclose significant contracts, leading to further scrutiny from regulatory authorities [2][5]. - Between 2012 and 2022, Peng Bo Shi's annual reports contained false records, including a profit inflation of 42,456,137.95 yuan in 2012, which constituted 17.43% of that year's total profit [3][5]. Group 2: Financial Misstatements - From 2012 to 2015, Peng Bo Shi inflated its assets in annual reports, with a notable asset and profit inflation of 162,000,000 yuan in 2016, representing 17.48% of that year's total profit [3][5]. - The company reported a reduction in net assets of 196,000,000 yuan annually from 2020 to 2022, which accounted for 21.77%, 14.27%, and 18.51% of the net assets at the end of 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively [3][5]. Group 3: Investor Compensation - Some investors have successfully won compensation through legal proceedings, and the legal team continues to accept claims from other investors [4][5]. - Investors who purchased shares between April 12, 2013, and July 18, 2023, and sold or held them after July 18, 2023, are eligible to initiate claims for compensation [3][5].

受损股民可至新浪股民维权平台登记该公司维权：http://wq.finance.sina.com.cn/ 关注@新浪证券、微信关注新浪券商基金、百度搜索新浪股民维权、访问新浪财经客户端、 新浪财经首页都能找到我 登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 上海久诚律师事务所股票索赔律师许峰提示，红相股份（维权）（300427）虚假陈述引发的投资者索赔 案已有胜诉先例，目前该案已经进入倒计时，提醒投资者注意。（许峰律师专栏） 许峰律师代理的红相股份投资者索赔案已多次向法院提交立案，目前正在等待法院的下一步安排。律师 团队还在继续推进后续案件的立案工作，还在继续接受其他投资者的索赔委托。 2024年4月3日晚，红相股份公告收到证监会厦门监管局《行政处罚决定书》，经查明，红相股份及相关 人员存在以下违法事实： 一、信息披露违法违规 红相股份2017年-2022年年度报告存在虚假记载。红相股份及其子公司厦门红相信息科技有限公司等通 过虚构销售业务、虚构原材料采购、虚增固定资产等方式，2017年虚增营业收入10，489.44万元，虚增 利润总额5，972.44万元，分别占当期披露金额的14.10%、38.03%； ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing legal actions against Guangyuyuan (stock code: 600771) for false statements leading to investor claims, with the law firm representing investors continuing to accept new claims and awaiting court decisions [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The law firm, Shanghai Jiucheng Law Firm, has submitted multiple claims to the Taiyuan Intermediate People's Court regarding investor compensation related to Guangyuyuan's false statements [1]. - The firm is actively pursuing further claims and has begun to receive judgments in some cases [1]. - Investors who purchased Guangyuyuan stock between March 21, 2017, and December 29, 2023, and sold or held the stock after December 29, 2023, are eligible to initiate claims [2]. Group 2: Regulatory Findings - On April 11, 2024, Guangyuyuan received an administrative penalty decision from the Shanxi Regulatory Bureau of the China Securities Regulatory Commission, confirming violations from 2016 to 2021 [1]. - The company misrepresented its "buyout sales" model in annual reports, leading to premature revenue recognition and incorrect handling of sales expenses [1]. - These violations resulted in false records in Guangyuyuan's annual reports from 2016 to 2022 and the semi-annual report for 2023 [1].