Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government emphasizes that it has never and will never require companies to illegally collect or store data, highlighting its commitment to data privacy and security [1]. Group 1: Response to Allegations - In response to allegations that Alibaba Group provided technical support to the Chinese military targeting U.S. interests, the Chinese government asserts that the concerned companies have already addressed these claims [1]. - The Chinese government expresses its strong stance on protecting data privacy and security, stating that it does not engage in illegal data practices [1]. Group 2: Stance on Sanctions - The Chinese government consistently opposes unilateral sanctions that lack international legal basis and are not authorized by the United Nations Security Council [1].

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing sanctions against Russia due to the Ukraine conflict have now extended to steel, with Germany's Vice Chancellor calling for a complete ban on Russian steel, placing the EU in a precarious position between geopolitical pressures and economic realities [1][3]. Group 1: EU's Internal Conflicts - The call for a ban on Russian steel has caused significant discord within the EU, revealing that while there is a collective stance, individual member states have differing interests [3][5]. - Eastern European countries are particularly vulnerable, as many small and medium enterprises rely heavily on Russian steel, risking production halts and potential unemployment [3][5]. - Western European nations may face increased costs if they seek alternative suppliers from countries like India and Brazil, potentially raising prices by at least 30%, which could further exacerbate inflation [5][10]. Group 2: Germany's Strategic Moves - Germany's push for a ban appears to be a strategy to solidify its leadership role within the EU while also pressuring its domestic steel industry to reduce reliance on Russian imports [8][10]. - A special summit is scheduled for November 6, where German officials will discuss measures to mitigate the impact of the ban on the domestic steel sector, highlighting the importance of steel to Germany's manufacturing base [8][10]. - The contradiction in Germany's approach—calling for a ban while simultaneously seeking ways to cushion its domestic industry—illustrates the complex balancing act between political posturing and economic stability [10][12]. Group 3: Russia's Response and Market Dynamics - Russia has responded defiantly to the sanctions, asserting that it can overcome the challenges posed by Western restrictions and suggesting that the sanctions may ultimately harm the global economy [12][14]. - As a major steel exporter, Russia's products are difficult to replace in the short term, and a complete ban could lead to Russia redirecting its exports to emerging markets in Asia and Africa [14][15]. - The EU's search for alternative suppliers is likely to be a lengthy process, and a sudden ban could lead to further disruptions in supply chains, complicating the situation for European businesses [15][17]. Group 4: Broader Implications of Sanctions - The current situation highlights the challenges of using sanctions as a tool to undermine a significant global player, suggesting that such measures may not yield the intended results and could destabilize the global economy [17]. - The internal divisions within the EU regarding the sanctions may lead to some member states circumventing the ban, making it difficult for Germany's call for a complete embargo to be fully realized [17].

Core Points - The European Union (EU) has included Chinese companies and major oil refineries in its latest round of sanctions against Russia, which has drawn strong criticism from China [1][3] - China asserts that these sanctions violate previous agreements between China and the EU and threaten global energy security [3][10] Group 1: Impact on Trade and Economy - The trade relationship between China and the EU is expected to reach €840 billion in 2024, indicating a strong economic interdependence [5] - Sanctions against Chinese companies could disrupt their operations and lead to lost collaboration opportunities for European firms [5] - European consumers reliant on Chinese imports may face higher prices and fewer choices, particularly in the solar energy sector where 80% of photovoltaic components are sourced from China [6] Group 2: Political and Diplomatic Consequences - The EU's actions undermine political trust between China and the EU, jeopardizing previous cooperation on global governance and climate change [8] - This behavior may lead to perceptions of the EU as biased in international affairs, diminishing its global influence [8] Group 3: Global Energy Market Effects - The sanctions on Chinese refineries have caused immediate fluctuations in international oil prices, with Brent crude rising by 1.6% and Shanghai crude by 2.3% [10] - The EU's sanctions against Russian oil have previously led to an energy crisis in Europe, highlighting the potential for self-harm through such measures [12] Group 4: Broader Implications of Sanctions - The EU's sanctions are perceived as being influenced by the United States, which has profited from the situation by selling liquefied natural gas at inflated prices to Europe [14] - China maintains a neutral stance in the Russia-Ukraine conflict and has called for the EU to reconsider its actions to avoid becoming a scapegoat [14]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly opposes the UK's unilateral sanctions against 11 Chinese companies under the pretext of Russia-related issues, emphasizing that such actions lack international legal basis and negatively impact Sino-British economic relations [1][1][1] Group 1: Response to Sanctions - The Chinese government has expressed strong disapproval of the UK's sanctions, stating that they are unjustified and detrimental to the normal cooperation between Chinese and Russian enterprises [1] - It is highlighted that China adheres to strict regulations regarding the export of dual-use items and that normal business interactions should not be hindered by external pressures [1][1] - The Chinese government urges the UK to correct its actions and withdraw the sanctions to maintain the overall framework of Sino-British economic cooperation [1][1][1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly opposes the UK's unilateral sanctions against 11 Chinese companies under the pretext of Russia-related issues, emphasizing that such actions lack international legal basis and negatively impact Sino-British economic relations [1] Group 1: Response to Sanctions - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce stated that China has consistently controlled the export of dual-use items in accordance with laws and regulations, and that normal cooperation between Chinese and Russian enterprises should not be disrupted [1] - The UK’s actions are described as unilateral sanctions without international legal justification or United Nations authorization [1] - The Chinese government urges the UK to correct its mistakes and lift the sanctions to maintain the overall cooperation between China and the UK [1] Group 2: Impact on Economic Relations - The imposition of sanctions by the UK is expected to have a negative impact on the positive momentum of Sino-British economic and trade relations [1] - The Chinese government emphasizes its commitment to safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly opposes the UK's unilateral sanctions against 11 Chinese companies under the pretext of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, asserting that such actions lack international legal basis and negatively impact Sino-British economic relations [2]. Group 1: Response to Sanctions - The Chinese government emphasizes that it strictly controls the export of dual-use items in accordance with laws and regulations, and that normal cooperation between Chinese and Russian enterprises should not be disrupted [2]. - The Chinese side urges the UK to correct its erroneous actions and withdraw the sanctions to maintain the overall framework of Sino-British economic cooperation [2]. - The Chinese government asserts its commitment to safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises affected by these sanctions [2].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly opposes the UK's unilateral sanctions against 11 Chinese companies under the pretext of Russia-related issues, emphasizing that such actions lack international legal basis and negatively impact Sino-British economic relations [2]. Group 1: Response to Sanctions - The Chinese government has stated that it strictly controls the export of dual-use items in accordance with laws and regulations, and that normal cooperation between Chinese and Russian enterprises should not be disrupted [2]. - The UK’s actions are viewed as a disregard for China's diplomatic efforts and the positive momentum in Sino-British economic relations, prompting a call for the UK to correct its mistakes and lift the sanctions [2]. - The Chinese government asserts its commitment to safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises affected by these sanctions [2].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly opposes the UK's unilateral sanctions against 11 Chinese companies under the pretext of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, emphasizing that such actions lack international legal basis and negatively impact Sino-British economic relations [2]. Group 1 - The UK announced a new round of sanctions on October 15, targeting 11 Chinese companies [2]. - China maintains that it strictly controls the export of dual-use items and that normal cooperation between Chinese and Russian enterprises should not be disrupted [2]. - The Chinese government urges the UK to correct its actions and withdraw the sanctions to preserve the overall framework of Sino-British economic cooperation [2].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government expresses strong dissatisfaction and firm opposition to the European Union's decision to include Chinese companies in its 19th round of sanctions against Russia, marking the first time large Chinese oil refineries and traders have been sanctioned [1]. Group 1: Response to Sanctions - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce criticizes the EU for ignoring China's repeated negotiations and warnings, proceeding with sanctions against Chinese enterprises [1]. - The Chinese government emphasizes its long-standing opposition to unilateral sanctions that lack international legal basis and are not authorized by the United Nations [1]. Group 2: Impact on China-EU Relations - The sanctions are viewed as a violation of the consensus spirit between China and EU leaders, significantly damaging the overall economic and trade cooperation between China and the EU [1]. - The Chinese government warns that such actions could disrupt global energy security [1]. Group 3: Future Actions - China urges the EU to immediately cease the inclusion of Chinese companies in the sanctions list and avoid further escalation of the situation [1]. - The Chinese government indicates it will take necessary measures to firmly protect the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises, as well as safeguard its energy security and economic development [1].

Core Points - The European Union (EU) has included Chinese companies in its 19th round of sanctions against Russia, marking the first time it has sanctioned large Chinese oil refineries and oil traders [2] - China has expressed strong dissatisfaction and firm opposition to the EU's actions, emphasizing that such unilateral sanctions lack international legal basis and are not authorized by the United Nations [2] - China urges the EU to stop listing Chinese companies and warns that it will take necessary measures to protect the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises and ensure its own energy security and economic development [2] Group 1 - The EU has sanctioned 12 Chinese companies and 3 Indian companies, claiming these companies assist Russia in circumventing Western sanctions, particularly in technology transfer and military production [3] - China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs has stated that China is not a party to the Ukraine crisis and has not provided lethal weapons to any side, emphasizing its commitment to promoting peace talks [3] - The Ministry criticized the EU for lacking the qualification to comment on normal interactions between Chinese and Russian enterprises, asserting that the EU's actions are detrimental to the healthy and stable development of China-EU relations [3]