Group 1 - The core message from the recent phone call between the leaders of China and the U.S. emphasizes mutual respect, peaceful coexistence, and cooperation for common prosperity, despite not explicitly mentioning the Taiwan issue [1] - The dialogue is seen as a positive step towards stabilizing U.S.-China relations, which are considered crucial for global peace and stability [1] - The remarks made by the Chinese leader during the call are interpreted as a counter to the separatist sentiments in Taiwan, particularly against the backdrop of rising tensions [1] Group 2 - Taiwan's leadership, particularly Lai Ching-te, is criticized for promoting a narrative of "defense resilience" while allegedly pursuing separatist agendas, which could lead to increased tensions with mainland China [2][3] - Lai's claims about Taiwan facing challenges from "natural environment" and "authoritarian expansion" are viewed as attempts to justify military spending and procurement from the U.S., including a proposed defense budget reaching 5% of GDP by 2030 [3] - The commitment to purchase over $10 billion worth of U.S. agricultural products over the next four years is seen as a strategic move to strengthen ties with the U.S. amid ongoing tariff negotiations, raising concerns about the economic implications for Taiwan [4] Group 3 - The Taiwanese government's military procurement and defense strategies are criticized as ineffective and potentially harmful to the local economy, with claims that these measures serve more to consolidate power than to ensure genuine security [4][5] - The introduction of a new "National Defense Handbook" is perceived as a tool for instilling fear rather than providing real security guidance, with accusations that it politicizes ordinary issues and misrepresents the sources of threats [5] - Overall, the current approach of Taiwan's leadership is characterized as reckless and detrimental to the well-being of its citizens, with predictions of failure for their separatist ambitions [5][6]

林剑说，无论民进党当局如何炒作所谓"大陆威胁"，渲染台海紧张，拿着台湾老百姓的血汗钱企图"倚 外谋独"，都改变不了两岸同属一个中国的客观事实，更阻挡不了中国终将统一、也必将统一的历史大 势。送给邱垂正之流一句话，靠出卖民族利益，搞"台独"分裂，不过是蝇营狗苟、小丑跳梁，终是枉 然，必遭失败。 责任编辑：王许宁 【环球时报-环球网报道 记者 索炎琦】外交部发言人林剑主持9月15日例行记者会。会上有记者提问 称：我们注意到中国台湾地区陆委会主委邱垂正近期窜访美国时，与美国会两党议员会面，并在美智库 传统基金会演讲，期间邱称中国大陆是台海和平稳定的"最大威胁"，炒作所谓"大陆武力攻台"，感谢美 重申对台承诺，请问发言人对此有何评论？ 林剑对此表示，世界上只有一个中国，台湾是中国领土不可分割的一部分，这是台海的真正现状，"台 独"分裂和外部势力纵容支持是台海和平稳定的最大威胁。中方坚决反对任何形式的美台官方往来和军 事勾连，坚定捍卫国家主权和领土完整。我们敦促美方切实恪守一个中国原则和中美三个联合公报，停 止向"台独"分裂势力发出错误信号。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government asserts that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China and views external support for Taiwan independence as the primary threat to peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait [1] Group 1: Taiwan's Political Situation - Taiwan's Mainland Affairs Council Chairman, Chiu Chui-cheng, recently visited the United States, where he met with bipartisan congressional members and claimed that mainland China poses the greatest threat to peace in the Taiwan Strait [1] - Chiu expressed gratitude for the U.S. reaffirming its commitment to Taiwan during his speech at the Heritage Foundation [1] Group 2: China's Response - The Chinese Foreign Ministry firmly opposes any form of official exchanges and military collusion between the U.S. and Taiwan, emphasizing the need to uphold the One China principle and the three joint communiqués between China and the U.S. [1] - The Chinese government criticized the Democratic Progressive Party's attempts to leverage external support for Taiwan independence, stating that such actions will not change the fact that both sides of the Taiwan Strait belong to one China [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government emphasizes its stance on sovereignty and territorial integrity regarding Taiwan and expresses concerns over international relations, particularly with the U.S. and the Middle East situation [2][3][4][5][6]. Group 1: Taiwan Strait and Military Activities - The Fujian aircraft carrier's passage through the Taiwan Strait is described as a normal arrangement for scientific testing and training, not targeting any specific goal [2]. - The Chinese government reaffirms that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China and opposes any official exchanges between Taiwan and other countries, particularly in Europe [3]. Group 2: U.S. Relations and Statements - The Chinese government condemns illegal violence and opposes U.S. politicians who use China as a scapegoat, as well as the spread of false information about China [4]. - There is a strong opposition to unilateral sanctions imposed by the U.S. on entities like the Houthi movement in Yemen, which is viewed as a violation of international law [6]. Group 3: Middle East Situation - The Chinese government expresses deep concern over the escalating situation in the Middle East, condemning actions that violate the sovereignty and security of Middle Eastern countries and calling for peace and negotiation efforts [5].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes China's stance on sovereignty and territorial integrity, particularly regarding Taiwan and its military activities in the Taiwan Strait [2][3][4] - The article highlights China's condemnation of foreign interference in its internal affairs, specifically regarding Taiwan's international engagements and the actions of certain U.S. politicians [3][4] - It expresses China's concerns over the escalating situation in the Middle East, advocating for peace and dialogue rather than violence [5][6] Group 2 - The article discusses China's opposition to unilateral sanctions imposed by the U.S., labeling them as violations of international law and norms [6] - It reiterates China's commitment to its national interests and the principle of one China, urging other nations to respect this stance [3][4] - The article calls for international cooperation to address regional conflicts and emphasizes the importance of restoring stability through negotiation [5]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly opposes any official exchanges between Taiwan and countries that have diplomatic relations with China, emphasizing that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China and that any attempts to promote "Taiwan independence" will ultimately fail [1] Group 1 - The spokesperson, Lin Jian, highlighted that the individual in question is merely a local foreign affairs official from Taiwan [1] - The Chinese government has expressed strong dissatisfaction and has lodged formal representations with relevant countries regarding their interactions with Taiwan [1] - There is a call for European countries to adhere to the One China principle and take effective measures to prevent visits by "Taiwan independence" figures [1] Group 2 - The Chinese government warns the Taiwan authorities that the pursuit of "Taiwan independence" is a dead end [1] - Any attempts to create the notion of "two Chinas" or "one China, one Taiwan" in the international community are destined to fail [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government reaffirms its stance that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China and opposes any official exchanges between Taiwan and countries that have diplomatic relations with China [1] Group 1 - The Chinese Foreign Ministry emphasizes that there is only one China and that Taiwan is a part of its territory [1] - The Ministry expresses strong dissatisfaction and firm opposition to any support for "Taiwan independence" activities and has lodged serious representations to relevant countries [1] - The Ministry urges European countries to adhere to the one-China principle and take effective measures to prevent visits by "Taiwan independence" figures [1] Group 2 - The Chinese government warns Taiwan authorities that "Taiwan independence" is a dead end and that any attempts to create the notion of "two Chinas" or "one China, one Taiwan" will ultimately fail [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes that cross-strait communication and negotiation must be based on the One China principle, and that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must acknowledge the "1992 Consensus" for dialogue to resume [1][2] - The DPP's refusal to recognize the "1992 Consensus" has led to a halt in cross-strait communication since 2016, and the current administration's insistence on "Taiwan independence" is seen as a barrier to peace [1][2] - The spokesperson criticized the DPP's claims of "equal dignity" in negotiations, arguing that it attempts to alter historical and legal facts regarding cross-strait relations, which will ultimately hinder dialogue [2] Group 2 - The DPP's recent statements about strengthening defense capabilities and increasing defense budgets are viewed as a misguided approach that could harm the welfare of Taiwanese citizens [2] - The spokesperson highlighted that the DPP's actions, including reliance on external forces and military posturing, are detrimental to Taiwan's social welfare and security [2] - Criticism was directed at the DPP for attempting to deflect responsibility for its governance failures by blaming external factors, which has led to widespread discontent among the Taiwanese populace [3] Group 3 - The DPP's policies are accused of creating instability for cross-strait families, particularly for spouses from the mainland, by imposing political pressures and undermining their rights [3][4] - The spokesperson pointed out that the DPP's actions against cross-strait marriages are aimed at fabricating issues related to nationality and manipulating the concept of "two countries" [3][4] - The DPP's governance is characterized as oppressive and detrimental to the well-being of individuals living in Taiwan, particularly those with ties to the mainland [4]

Core Viewpoint - The Taiwan authorities, under Lai Ching-te, are increasing defense spending, aiming for over 3% of GDP next year and over 5% by 2030, while maintaining a stance of "Taiwan independence" which is criticized as detrimental to Taiwan's future and welfare [1] Group 1 - Lai Ching-te's administration insists on strengthening defense capabilities, which is seen as a move towards "Taiwan independence" and reliance on external forces [1] - The Taiwan Affairs Office spokesperson, Chen Binhua, argues that this approach leads to wasteful spending of public funds and does not guarantee safety or peace for Taiwan [1] - The spokesperson emphasizes that the future and security of Taiwan depend on peaceful development of cross-strait relations and reunification with the mainland [1] Group 2 - Lai Ching-te's notion of "equal dignity" is viewed as an attempt to engage in dialogue without recognizing the One China principle, which is seen as an obstacle to cross-strait negotiations [1] - The Taiwan authorities are accused of trying to alter historical and legal facts regarding cross-strait relations, which is deemed futile [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles revolves around the controversy surrounding Lai Ching-te's remarks on the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Anti-Japanese War, which are seen as an attempt to distort history and provoke division between Taiwan and mainland China [1][3][12] - Experts emphasize that the victory in the Anti-Japanese War and Taiwan's return to China should be commemorated as a shared honor for both sides, rather than inciting hatred [1][3][7] - Lai's use of the term "end of war" instead of "victory in the Anti-Japanese War" is criticized for downplaying the aggressor's responsibility and attempting to sever ties between the two sides [5][9][11] Group 2 - The articles highlight the historical context of Taiwan's struggle against Japanese colonial rule, noting that many Taiwanese sacrificed their lives for the cause, and that the victory in the Anti-Japanese War was crucial for Taiwan's liberation [11][12][14] - Lai Ching-te's comments are viewed as aligning with Japanese right-wing ideologies, which is seen as a betrayal of historical facts and a disservice to the sacrifices made by ancestors [7][9][14] - The current political climate is described as one where Taiwan's leadership is increasingly reliant on external powers, particularly Japan, due to changing perceptions from the United States [9][18]