Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the announcement by the Quanzhou Public Security Bureau in Fujian Province, which offers rewards for information leading to the capture of Taiwanese internet celebrities Wen Ziyu (alias "Ba Jiong") and Chen Baiyuan (alias "Min Nan Lang") for their alleged involvement in activities promoting "Taiwan independence" and spreading anti-China sentiments [1][3]. Summary by Sections - The Quanzhou Public Security Bureau has issued a reward notice seeking information on Wen Ziyu and Chen Baiyuan, who have been labeled as "Taiwan independence" agents by the State Council's Taiwan Affairs Office [1][3]. - The two individuals are accused of disseminating divisive rhetoric such as "anti-China" and "relying on the U.S. to seek independence," while also attacking policies beneficial to Taiwan from the mainland [1][3]. - The authorities emphasize the importance of recognizing the dangers of "Taiwan independence" and encourage the public to report any relevant criminal activities, offering rewards ranging from 50,000 to 250,000 RMB for useful information [3][4].

Core Points - The Fujian Provincial Public Security Bureau issued a reward notice on November 13 for information regarding Taiwanese internet celebrities Wen Ziyu (nickname "Ba Jiong") and Chen Baiyuan (nickname "Min Nan Lang") for their alleged criminal activities [1] - Both individuals were listed by the State Council's Taiwan Affairs Office on March 26 as "Taiwan independence" agents, accused of spreading separatist rhetoric and attacking mainland policies [1] - The authorities emphasized the dangers of "Taiwan independence" and encouraged Taiwanese citizens to distance themselves from such forces, offering rewards ranging from 50,000 to 250,000 RMB for useful information leading to arrests [1] Summary by Categories Legal Actions - The individuals are accused of long-term dissemination of anti-China and pro-independence messages, which have had a negative impact [1] - Their actions are classified as inciting national division and undermining national sovereignty and territorial integrity [5] Public Engagement - The Public Security Bureau is calling on the Taiwanese public to recognize the extreme dangers posed by "Taiwan independence" and to actively provide information on related criminal activities [1][6] - A reward system is in place to incentivize the public to assist in the apprehension of these individuals, with potential rewards based on the significance of the information provided [1][6]

Core Viewpoint - The call for cross-strait dialogue by Su Chi, Honorary Chairman of the Taipei Forum Foundation, emphasizes the need for Taiwanese political parties to unite in facing unprecedented changes, suggesting that collaboration is the only way forward to avoid a "deadlock" in the current situation [1] Group 1 - Su Chi urges Taiwanese political parties to engage in dialogue to address the current crisis, describing it as a "once-in-a-century change" [1] - Chen Binhua, spokesperson for the Taiwan Affairs Office, asserts that the historical process of cross-strait unification is unstoppable and that "Taiwan independence" is a dead end [1] - The spokesperson emphasizes the importance of promoting cross-strait relations towards complete unification to ensure lasting peace in the Taiwan Strait and to create long-term benefits for the Chinese nation [1] Group 2 - Chen Binhua expresses willingness to engage in extensive democratic consultations with various Taiwanese parties and representatives on cross-strait relations and Taiwan's future, based on the principle of one China and opposition to "Taiwan independence" [1] - The spokesperson calls for Taiwanese political parties and individuals to recognize historical trends and uphold national integrity to maintain peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait [1] - The aim is to work together towards national rejuvenation and the unification of the motherland, creating a promising new situation [1]

Group 1 - The spokesperson Chen Binhua criticized the "Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China" (IPAC) as a small group of extreme anti-China elements, opposing their actions regarding Taiwan [3] - The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is accused of colluding with such organizations, which is seen as a farce that only brings ridicule and humiliation to themselves [3]

Core Viewpoint - The 10th anniversary of the historic meeting between cross-strait leaders highlights the importance of the "1992 Consensus" as a political foundation for peaceful development of cross-strait relations and calls for a return to this consensus to ensure the well-being of the Taiwanese people [4][5]. Group 1: Historical Context - The meeting on November 7, 2015, was a significant initiative led by the central government to promote peaceful development and national reunification, marking a milestone in cross-strait political interaction [4]. - The meeting established direct dialogue between the leaders of both sides, elevating political interactions to a new level [4]. Group 2: Political Stance - The spokesperson emphasized that adherence to the "1992 Consensus" and opposition to "Taiwan independence" are crucial for peaceful development and stability in the Taiwan Strait [4][5]. - The rejection of the "1992 Consensus" and the pursuit of "Taiwan independence" would lead to increased hostility and jeopardize the interests of the Taiwanese people [4]. Group 3: Future Outlook - The spokesperson expressed a willingness to strengthen dialogue with various Taiwanese parties, including the Kuomintang, to promote cross-strait relations and national reunification [5]. - The call for unity among Taiwanese compatriots to work towards peaceful development and oppose external interference was reiterated [5].

Core Viewpoint - The spokesperson emphasizes that the historical process of cross-strait unification is unstoppable and that "Taiwan independence" is a dead end, advocating for dialogue and cooperation among Taiwanese political parties to ensure peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait [4][5]. Group 1 - The spokesperson, Chen Binhua, asserts that the only way to ensure lasting peace in the Taiwan Strait is to promote cross-strait relations towards complete unification with the motherland [4]. - The call for collaboration among various Taiwanese political parties and representatives is aimed at conducting extensive democratic consultations regarding cross-strait relations and Taiwan's future [5]. - The spokesperson expresses hope that all political parties and individuals in Taiwan will recognize the historical trend and uphold national righteousness to maintain peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait [5].

Core Points - The Japanese government awarded a medal to former Taiwanese representative to Japan, Hsieh Chang-ting, which has been interpreted as a violation of the One China principle, provoking strong opposition from China [1][3] - Japan's Foreign Minister, Toshimitsu Motegi, provided a dismissive response, claiming that similar awards have occurred in the past and asserting that Japan's stance on Taiwan remains unchanged since the 1972 Japan-China Joint Communiqué [3] Group 1 - The act of awarding Hsieh Chang-ting, a known proponent of Taiwan independence, is seen as a direct support for separatist forces and a serious provocation against China's sovereignty [3] - Motegi's justification of past similar cases is viewed as an attempt to normalize actions that undermine China-Japan relations and support Taiwan independence [3] - The contradiction in Japan's claim of adhering to the 1972 Joint Communiqué while honoring a pro-independence figure highlights Japan's double standards and insincerity regarding Taiwan [3] Group 2 - The awarding of the medal to Hsieh is perceived as a dangerous signal to pro-independence factions, potentially escalating tensions in the Taiwan Strait and threatening regional stability [3] - The One China principle is emphasized as the political foundation of China-Japan relations, and any violation of this principle is seen as a significant setback for bilateral relations [3] - China's response underscores a firm commitment to defending national sovereignty and territorial integrity, warning Japan against underestimating China's resolve [3]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government has expressed strong disapproval of Taiwanese politicians' activities in the European Parliament, emphasizing that such actions do not represent the official stance of the European Parliament and reiterating the importance of adhering to the One China policy [1]. Group 1: Chinese Government's Position - The Chinese government has lodged a serious protest with the European Parliament regarding the activities of "Taiwan independence" politicians in Brussels [1]. - The European Parliament has reaffirmed its commitment to the One China policy, stating that the meeting and individuals involved did not receive official invitations and that personal actions of individual members do not reflect the Parliament's official position [1]. Group 2: Criticism of Taiwanese Politicians - The Chinese government characterized the "International Parliamentary Alliance on China" as a tool used by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to gain credibility through foreign support, labeling it as lacking in credibility [1]. - The actions of "Taiwan independence" politicians are described as self-promotional political theatrics, with the Chinese government asserting that their schemes will not succeed [1]. Group 3: Call for Adherence to One China Principle - The Chinese government urged the European Parliament to recognize the truth and maintain a clear distinction between right and wrong, emphasizing the need to uphold the One China principle [1]. - It was stated that no matter the actions taken by the DPP and "Taiwan independence" forces, they will only expose their shameless attempts at division and will not hinder China's eventual reunification [1].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of the "1992 Consensus" in fostering peaceful cross-strait relations and economic exchanges between Taiwan and mainland China, as stated by KMT Chairman Zheng Liwen [1] - Zheng Liwen highlighted that the period from 2008 to 2016 saw significant interactions based on the "1992 Consensus," leading to a more favorable environment for Taiwan's development [1] - The current political stance of the DPP government, which rejects the "1992 Consensus," is seen as a reason for the lack of dialogue and increased tensions across the Taiwan Strait [1][2] Group 2 - Former Taiwanese leader Ma Ying-jeou pointed out that the DPP's "anti-China" policies have led to a stagnation in cross-strait relations, with exchanges nearly coming to a halt [2] - Ma Ying-jeou criticized the DPP's recent proposals, such as the "New Two Countries Theory," which he believes further deteriorate the relationship between Taiwan and mainland China [2]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes that the "1992 Consensus" has historically facilitated peaceful exchanges and improved cross-strait relations, which are essential for Taiwan's development and economic vitality [1][2] - The Kuomintang (KMT) party asserts its commitment to being a proactive peace builder, advocating for continued dialogue and cooperation across the Taiwan Strait [1] - Experts at the seminar express concern that the current DPP administration's stance on "Taiwan independence" and "anti-China" policies has led to a lack of formal communication channels, putting Taiwan in a precarious situation [1] Group 2 - Former Taiwanese leader Ma Ying-jeou highlights the detrimental impact of the DPP's "anti-China" policies on cross-strait relations, which have resulted in a significant decline in exchanges and communication [2] - Ma Ying-jeou criticizes the DPP's recent proposals, such as the "New Two-State Theory," which further exacerbate tensions and push cross-strait relations to a low point [2]