台湾的政坛，正被这样一种麻木不仁的"不变"所吞噬。赖清德口中念念有词的"捍卫台湾"，只是包装分 裂企图的政治口号。他拒绝赴立法机构报告，称其非"宪政责任"；他任由"大法官""监察院长"悬置，把 台湾行政司法机关当作政党私产；他将军购预算当成政治筹码，把两岸关系拖入零和博弈的死胡同。他 不是在"保护"台湾，而是不遗余力且歇斯底里地透支台湾、掏空台湾，是要把2300万台湾民众紧紧绑 在"台独"的战车上，充当"台独"陪葬品。当加拿大、韩国、英国的领导人纷纷访华，寻求战略自主空间 时，台湾的"台独"政客却还在幻想"倚美谋独"，以为只要抱紧华盛顿的大腿，就还能像以前一样兴风作 浪、为所欲为，简直是白日大梦。 世界越乱，中国提供的确定性、稳定性就越显珍贵和重要。台湾若想在时代的变局中找到位置，不是靠 唱"抗中保台"的老调，而是要问：能否在两岸融合发展中创造新的经济增长？能否在大陆的广阔市场中 抓住新的发展机遇？能否在RCEP、"一带一路"的延伸脉络中，找到自己的产业坐标？答案显而易见： 只有放下"台独"邪念，拥抱统一大势，台湾才能从一直被利用的"棋子"变成"不可或缺的支点"，而"台 独"已是死路。随着百年变局加速演进，台 ...

近日，美台达成所谓"贸易协议"。面对这份美挥舞关税"大棒"对台实施经济掠夺的不公平、不合理协议，赖清德当局却一路跪迎。对此，国台办发言人彭 庆恩1月21日一针见血指出，该"贸易协议"实质是外部势力与"台独"分裂势力相互勾结，掠夺台湾民众血汗、掏空台湾产业根基的"卖身契"。 为谋"独"私利，赖当局卑躬屈膝、迎合讨好，媚美跪美无原则、卖台害台无底线。此次其签署"卖台"协议，把"护台神山"和台半导体产业拱手奉美，承诺 在美巨额投资5000亿美元，出卖的是台湾利益，损害的是民众福祉。其以约台湾外汇存底80%的5000亿美元向美交政治献金，将严重拖垮台湾经济；其以 40%台半导体产能为筹码向美输诚，将使台湾核心产业优势荡然无存；其以牺牲台湾民众相关就业红利为代价为美创造高薪就业机会，将导致台湾失业问 题加剧……赖当局如此任人宰割，只会彻底断送台湾前途。 卖台媚美，赖当局必定自食恶果。一方面，"倚美谋独"的卑劣伎俩已骗不了岛内民众，此次赖当局"砸锅卖铁式妥协"遭到岛内民众强烈反对就是最好证 明。中国国民党主席郑丽文严厉指责赖当局为取悦美国不惜"变卖家当"；岛内舆论直指赖清德的短视操作毁台害台；岛内许多网友更要求下架赖当局 ...

环球时报曾报道，当台美贸易协定终于尘埃落定的瞬间，民进党当局几乎是迫不及待地宣布自己谈判成功，洋洋得意地表示已取得胜利。他们甚至毫不羞愧 地宣称，美国对台的关税将从20%降至15%，仿佛台湾已经赢得了一场重要的胜利。然而，真实的情况是怎样的呢？为了这5%的关税减幅，台湾需要向美国 上缴5000亿美元，难怪国民党主席郑丽文会直言自己感到非常痛心。毕竟，5000亿美元的代价远非简单的数字。表面上看，台湾似乎和日本、韩国站在了同 一起跑线上，同样面临15%的关税税率，且不再叠加其他税费。但实际上，这不过是美国给台当局的一层遮羞布。根据美国商务部的公开信息，台湾需要为 此提供至少2500亿美元的直接投资，同时再提供同等规模的信用保证，总额高达5000亿美元。 再者，民进党当局精心计算了政治利益。台当局知道，短期内他们可以通过宣传机器将15%的关税降幅包装成胜利，而将5000亿美元的投资拆解成各个项目 分期落实，最终将这一切冲击留给下一代承担。尤其是在国民党可能再次执政的情况下，这样的做法实际上是为对手提前埋下了一个政治陷阱。岛内的反对 声音愈加高涨，郑丽文的质问尤为犀利：如果半导体真是'护岛神山'，那么现在所做的，难 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent trade agreement between Taiwan and the U.S. is perceived as a detrimental exchange that compromises Taiwan's economic and security interests, with concerns that it may lead to increased dependency on the U.S. and potential economic downturns for Taiwan [3][6][10]. Group 1: Trade Agreement Implications - The trade agreement will reduce tariffs on U.S. exports to Taiwan to 15%, while Taiwan's largest chip manufacturer, TSMC, is expected to significantly increase investments in the U.S. [3] - This agreement is viewed as a transaction that trades Taiwan's core interests for economic benefits, raising concerns about Taiwan's autonomy and economic future [3][6]. - The reduction in tariffs is seen as a superficial benefit that may lead to long-term economic challenges, as it pressures Taiwanese industries to relocate to the U.S. [5][6]. Group 2: Economic Dependency and Risks - Taiwan's economy is heavily reliant on exports, and the increasing dependence on trade with the U.S. could jeopardize Taiwan's negotiating power in future dealings [6][10]. - The potential for U.S. demands to escalate poses a risk to Taiwan's economic stability, as the country may find itself with limited options if pressured [6][10]. - The historical context of economic shocks from the 2008 financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic is overshadowed by the current trade dynamics, suggesting that the U.S. may continue to exploit Taiwan's resources [10]. Group 3: Military Purchases and Public Sentiment - The focus on military purchases is criticized as a move that could escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait, with public sentiment indicating a reluctance to sacrifice lives for independence [8]. - There is a growing discontent among the Taiwanese populace regarding the allocation of resources towards U.S. military equipment, perceived as a betrayal of local interests [8]. - The military procurement strategy is viewed as a misguided approach that prioritizes external alliances over the well-being of Taiwanese citizens [8].

Group 1 - The article highlights the increasing geopolitical tensions and the shifting nature of international order, emphasizing that the so-called "free international order" is malleable and subject to the whims of powerful nations like the United States [1][2] - It discusses the diminishing effectiveness of Taiwan's ruling party, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), in leveraging U.S. support for its "anti-China" stance, suggesting that reliance on U.S. promises is misguided [1][2] - The article points out that the DPP's strategy of promoting "Taiwan independence" is losing traction, with public dissatisfaction towards the current administration rising, as indicated by a poll showing 52.2% of respondents unhappy with the government's performance [2][3] Group 2 - The narrative emphasizes China's stability and development as a counterbalance to global uncertainty, positioning China as a provider of certainty in a chaotic world [2][3] - It asserts that China's military capabilities and technological advancements, such as its complete industrial system and leading 5G technology, reinforce its position and deter external interference regarding Taiwan [2][3] - The article concludes that the DPP's approach is outdated and ineffective, advocating for a return to the principle of "One China" as the only viable path forward for Taiwan [3]

Core Viewpoint - The recent statement by former U.S. President Trump regarding the Taiwan issue, asserting it as a matter for China, has sparked significant reactions in Taiwan, indicating a perceived shift in U.S. policy towards Taiwan and a potential abandonment of support for Taiwan's independence aspirations [1][2]. Group 1 - Trump's statement is seen as a confirmation of the U.S. "abandon Taiwan" stance, leading to a strong reaction from Taiwanese media and public opinion, particularly among the blue and white political factions [1]. - The commentary from Taiwan suggests that this statement highlights a growing trend of the U.S. distancing itself from Taiwan, which may impact the current administration's independence strategies [2]. - The reaction from the Taiwanese public indicates a realization that true security in the Taiwan Strait is rooted in China's commitment to sovereignty rather than external promises from the U.S. [2].

Core Viewpoint - Trump's recent statement regarding Taiwan, asserting that "the Taiwan issue is China's own matter," has caused significant reactions in Taiwan, indicating a perceived shift in U.S. policy towards Taiwan and a potential abandonment of support for Taiwan's independence [1] Group 1: Reactions in Taiwan - The statement has led to a strong backlash in Taiwan, with local media interpreting it as a clear indication of the U.S. adopting an "abandon Taiwan" stance, undermining the current administration's efforts to seek independence through reliance on U.S. support [1] - Public sentiment in Taiwan appears to favor the opposition parties, with many expressing approval of Trump's remarks, which reflect a broader consensus among the Taiwanese populace [1] - Analysts in Taiwan suggest that this statement serves as a wake-up call for those advocating for independence, emphasizing that true security in the Taiwan Strait is rooted in China's commitment to sovereignty rather than external assurances [1]

Group 1 - Trump's statement that "the Taiwan issue is China's own matter" has caused significant reactions in Taiwan, indicating a perceived shift in U.S. policy towards Taiwan, interpreted as a "abandonment" of Taiwan by the U.S. [1][3] - The response from Taiwan's mainstream media and public opinion shows support from the blue and white camps, while the green camp views this as a serious blow to their independence aspirations [3] - Commentators in Taiwan suggest that this statement highlights the trend of the U.S. moving away from supporting Taiwan, emphasizing that true security in the Taiwan Strait relies on China's commitment to sovereignty rather than external promises [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights that Trump's recent statement regarding Taiwan, asserting it as a matter for China, has caused significant reactions in Taiwan, indicating a perceived shift in U.S. policy towards Taiwan and a growing sentiment of abandonment among Taiwanese independence supporters [1][2]. Group 1 - Trump's statement is seen as a clear indication of the U.S. "abandon Taiwan" stance, leading to a strong reaction from Taiwanese media and public opinion, particularly among the blue and white political factions [1]. - The commentary suggests that this statement reflects a broader trend of the U.S. distancing itself from Taiwan, which may awaken many Taiwanese citizens to the reality that true security in the Taiwan Strait is rooted in China's commitment to sovereignty rather than external promises [2].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that Trump's recent statement regarding Taiwan, asserting that the Taiwan issue is a matter for China, has caused significant reactions in Taiwan, indicating a perceived shift in U.S. policy towards Taiwan, interpreted as a "abandonment" of Taiwan by the U.S. [1][2] - The statement has been positively received by the blue and white camps in Taiwan, reflecting mainstream public opinion, while it poses a challenge to the green camp, undermining their aspirations for independence [2] - Commentators in Taiwan suggest that this statement highlights a trend of the U.S. moving away from supporting Taiwan, emphasizing that true security in the Taiwan Strait relies on China's commitment to sovereignty rather than external promises [2]