印度外长：有理由相信巴基斯坦过去曾利用印度提供的证据来掩盖其行踪。 ...

智通财经5月8日电，阿联酋外交部发表声明称，苏丹安全和国防委员会发表的声明不会影响阿联酋与苏 丹及其人民之间根深蒂固的持久关系。阿联酋外交部在一份声明中强调，苏丹安全和国防委员会宣布与 阿联酋断绝外交关系，是其转移视线的策略，旨在破坏和平努力。阿联酋外交部强调，阿联酋在过去50 年中一直是苏丹最坚定的支持者之一，并将继续向苏丹人民提供支持和声援。 苏丹宣布与阿联酋断交后 阿外交部作出回应 ...

Core Viewpoint - India and Pakistan have escalated tensions following a terrorist attack in Indian-administered Kashmir, leading both countries to implement a series of diplomatic and strategic countermeasures against each other [1][6]. Group 1: India's Response - India has suspended the implementation of the Indus Water Treaty, halting water-sharing cooperation until Pakistan ceases support for cross-border terrorism [6]. - The Indian government has closed the Attari Integrated Check Post on its side of the border with Pakistan [6]. - India has prohibited Pakistani citizens from entering India using the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) visa exemption scheme, with all previously issued visas being canceled [7]. Group 2: Pakistan's Countermeasures - Pakistan's National Security Council has unanimously denied all accusations from India and decided to take the issue of India's violation of the Indus Water Treaty to international platforms [4]. - Pakistan has closed its airspace to all Indian-operated flights and suspended all trade with India, including indirect trade through third countries [4][5]. - Pakistani citizens holding the SAARC visa must leave India within 48 hours, and Indian military advisors in Pakistan have been declared "unwelcome" and must depart by April 30 [5][7]. Group 3: Incident Background - The terrorist attack in Indian-administered Kashmir on April 22 resulted in at least 26 deaths and is described as the most severe attack on civilians in the region in 25 years [7]. - Indian Prime Minister Modi condemned the attack and promised that those behind it would be brought to justice, while also shortening his visit to Saudi Arabia to return to India [7][8].

Core Points - The article discusses the heated debate in Australian politics regarding Russia's request to deploy military aircraft at the Manuhua Air Force Base on Biak Island, Indonesia [1][3] - Russian Ambassador to Indonesia, Torshinov, criticized Australia for interfering in Russia-Indonesia bilateral relations and warned about the risks posed by U.S. missile and nuclear submarine deployments in Australia [5] Summary by Sections - **Russia's Request**: In February, Russian Security Council Secretary Shoigu met with Indonesian Defense Minister Prabowo Subianto, leading to Russia's proposal for military aircraft deployment at the strategic Manuhua Air Force Base, located approximately 1,300 kilometers from Darwin, Australia [3] - **Australian Government's Response**: Australian Prime Minister Albanese expressed opposition to Russia but questioned the universal stance against it, suggesting that the discussion around Russia's request serves to promote Russian interests, which is not aligned with Australia's national interests [5] - **Political Tensions**: The focus of the political debate in Australia is not on Indonesia's denial of Russia's military presence but rather on whether Russia made such a request. The Australian government refused to provide security briefings to the opposition, leading to accusations of evasion and lack of transparency [5] - **Opposition's Criticism**: Opposition leader Peter Dutton accused the government of inconsistency and avoiding questions, suggesting that a lack of knowledge about Indonesia's stance would be a diplomatic disaster. Albanese sarcastically remarked on the opposition's demands for information [5] - **Clarifications from Officials**: Albanese previously stated that Australia does not want to see Russian influence in the region, while Defense Minister Marles confirmed communication with Indonesia, which denied the reports of Russian military aircraft potentially taking off from its territory [5]