Group 1: Administrative Law Enforcement - The provincial government is advancing a special action to standardize administrative law enforcement related to enterprises, focusing on addressing prominent issues raised by businesses to optimize the business environment and support high-quality development in Shaanxi [1] - The approach emphasizes a cycle of "rectification - standardization - enhancement," increasing efforts to investigate and rectify previously identified issues, while ensuring effective implementation of various tasks [1] - The government aims to create a coordinated "one chess game" framework, enhancing responsibility and guidance across all levels to ensure the special action is effectively implemented [1] Group 2: Food and Drug Safety - The meeting underscores the political and public significance of food and drug safety, advocating for the strictest standards, regulations, penalties, and accountability to ensure consumer safety [2] - A problem-oriented approach is emphasized, with a focus on enhancing local management responsibilities and supervision in key areas such as school canteens, farmers' markets, and emerging sectors like live-streaming sales [2] - Continuous improvement of local food and drug safety standards is encouraged to facilitate the transformation and upgrading of the province's specialty food and drug industries, thereby enhancing overall safety levels [2]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the significant reduction in enterprise inspections in Q1 2025, with a decrease of over 50% compared to the same period last year, as reported by multiple government departments in Qianjiang City [1][3] - Qianjiang City has implemented a comprehensive approach to optimize the business environment, including the establishment of a "comprehensive check once" system to streamline inspections across multiple departments [1][3] - The city has organized a special action to standardize administrative law enforcement, focusing on five major rectification priorities and three phases of task lists, with a total of 5,318 law enforcement items published by municipal departments [3] Group 2 - The city government has created a public column on its official website to disclose administrative inspection information, enhancing transparency and allowing for social supervision [3] - Future plans include improving the administrative law enforcement supervision system, strengthening the supervisory team, and exploring the establishment of a unified smart supervision platform for administrative law enforcement [3]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of strict regulation of administrative law enforcement related to enterprises to enhance legal administration, optimize the business environment, and stabilize market expectations [1] - Since the launch of the special action in April, a total of 1,135 problem clues have been identified, with 739 directly investigated by administrative law enforcement coordination and supervision agencies, resulting in 329 supervision opinions and 1,065 required rectifications [1] - The action focuses on issues such as arbitrary charges, fines, inspections, and seizures, with measures including the issuance of a notice on the management of administrative inspections related to enterprises and the establishment of a long-term regulatory mechanism for enterprise-related charges [1] Group 2 - To address issues of illegal cross-regional law enforcement and profit-driven behavior, a public SMS campaign was launched to collect clues about administrative law enforcement problems, resulting in 11 clues received and 9 rectified [2] - A survey of 220 enterprises was conducted to tackle inconsistent enforcement standards, leading to the promotion of a standardized enforcement system and the recruitment of 340 social supervisors for administrative law enforcement [2] - The revision of the Administrative Law Enforcement Certificate Management Measures aims to strengthen personnel control and eliminate over 4,000 non-compliant certificates, alongside online training for law enforcement personnel [3]

Core Viewpoint - The meeting aimed to optimize the business environment and standardize administrative law enforcement related to enterprises in Guoluo Prefecture, enhancing the protection of legitimate rights and interests of businesses and promoting high-quality economic development [1][3]. Group 1: Meeting Objectives and Background - The Guoluo Prefecture Justice Bureau organized a special action meeting to discuss the standardization of administrative law enforcement concerning enterprises, inviting representatives from various businesses and legal experts to address legal consultation issues [1][3]. - The meeting highlighted the achievements made in the special action for standardizing administrative law enforcement and outlined the overall requirements and key tasks of the initiative [3]. Group 2: Feedback from Enterprises - During the meeting, business representatives expressed their needs for simplified enforcement processes, reduced frequency of inspections, improved efficiency, clearer enforcement standards, and enhanced training for enforcement personnel [3][5]. - The Justice Bureau recorded the suggestions and concerns raised by the representatives, providing guidance on issues related to administrative law enforcement and business management [3]. Group 3: Future Actions - The Guoluo Prefecture Justice Bureau plans to use the insights gained from the meeting to advance the special action for standardizing administrative law enforcement, addressing the prominent issues raised by businesses to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests [5].

下一步，市委政法委(市司法局)将继续以企业商会的需求为导向，不断畅通政企沟通渠道，加强与各行 政执法单位的协作配合，持续规范涉企行政执法行为，积极探索更加高效的行政执法监督方式方法，提 高执法监督质效，以更高水平行政执法助力法治化营商环境建设，为全市高质量发展提供坚强的法治保 障。 来源：图们市委政法委(市司法局) 为深入贯彻落实中央和省、州关于规范涉企行政执法专项整治活动的决策部署，进一步规范涉企行政执 法行为，优化我市营商环境。6月11日，市委政法委(市司法局)组织召开规范涉企行政执法·优化营商环 境座谈会。市委政法委(市司法局)、市政协社法委和市诚爱商会负责同志及商会代表近30人参加会议。 座谈会上，市规范涉企行政执法专项行动工作专班人员详细介绍了规范涉企行政执法专项行动和整治违 规异地执法、趋利性执法、乱收费、乱罚款、乱检查、乱查封等问题方面工作开展情况，宣读了《关于 征集开展规范涉企行政执法问题线索的公告》《致广大企业和个体工商户的一封信》。 多名商会代表结合工作生活实际，围绕规范行政执法行为、化解社会民生热点问题和优化法治营商环境 等方面展开热烈讨论，对涉企行政执法工作提出多项意见建议。市司法局主 ...

Core Points - The article emphasizes the importance of reducing unnecessary administrative interference in business operations to optimize the business environment [1][3][4] - It highlights the implementation of the Private Economy Promotion Law, which aims to minimize the impact of administrative enforcement on private enterprises [1][3] Group 1: Administrative Enforcement Issues - Over 6,000 problem clues have been gathered, with more than 5,000 cases urged for handling, resulting in a total of 335 million yuan involved in rectified cases, saving nearly 100 million yuan for enterprises [1] - The article points out that excessive administrative inspections burden enterprises, with one case reporting 154 visits and 97 inspections in a year [2] - Various regions are actively exploring innovative practices to significantly reduce unnecessary inspections, such as Zhejiang's "comprehensive check once" initiative, which reduced inspections by over 10,000 [2] Group 2: Legal Framework and Enforcement Standards - The article stresses the need for legal frameworks to regulate administrative power and reduce interference, including improving the legal standards for administrative discretion [3] - It mentions the necessity of training and supervising enforcement personnel to avoid mechanical and rough enforcement due to inadequate understanding of policies [3] - The article also addresses the issue of inconsistent enforcement standards across departments, advocating for legal coordination to clarify enforcement rules and stabilize business expectations [3] Group 3: Balancing Enforcement and Business Operations - While reducing interference, it is crucial to maintain strict enforcement of laws, especially in sectors related to public safety, such as food and drug safety [4] - The article argues for equal protection of all business entities and the need for administrative enforcement to be both effective and considerate, achieving a balance between reducing burdens on businesses and enhancing enforcement efficiency [4]

Core Viewpoint - The special action to standardize administrative law enforcement related to enterprises has been fully launched nationwide since March, focusing on addressing key issues and areas that affect businesses [1][2]. Group 1: Key Issues Addressed - The action targets four prominent issues: arbitrary charges, fines, inspections, and closures; illegal cross-regional enforcement; inconsistent enforcement standards; and abuse of power and misconduct by law enforcement [1][2]. - A total of 6,232 problem clues have been collected, with 5,246 cases prompted for handling, involving an amount of 335 million yuan, recovering losses of approximately 9.88 million yuan for enterprises [2]. Group 2: Implementation and Coordination - The Ministry of Justice has established a working team to enhance coordination and guide local levels in forming their own teams, ensuring accountability at the municipal and county levels [2]. - Training has been provided to over 30,000 frontline law enforcement personnel through a combination of online and offline methods [2]. Group 3: Regulatory Framework and Enforcement - The State Administration for Market Regulation is actively revising pricing laws and establishing regulations to clarify legal responsibilities and increase penalties for illegal charges [2]. - The Ministry of Emergency Management is piloting non-site enforcement in nine provinces, utilizing big data and AI to reduce on-site inspections while promoting lenient enforcement measures [3]. Group 4: Legal and Economic Environment - The special action aligns with the spirit of the Private Economy Promotion Law, aiming to enhance legal compliance and protect the legitimate rights of various business entities, including private enterprises [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government has launched a special action to standardize administrative law enforcement related to enterprises, focusing on addressing prominent issues that affect businesses and optimizing the business environment for high-quality economic development [1][2]. Group 1: Issues Addressed - The special action targets four main issues: arbitrary charges, fines, inspections, and seizures; illegal enforcement practices; inconsistent enforcement standards; and abuse of power by law enforcement officials [1][2]. - As of May 21, the action has gathered 6,232 problem clues and prompted the handling of 5,246 cases, recovering 98.81 million yuan for enterprises from a total involved amount of 335 million yuan [1]. Group 2: Enforcement and Management - The initiative emphasizes the need for stricter management and training of law enforcement personnel to address issues like rough, arbitrary, and mechanical enforcement [2]. - In the ongoing action, 2,648 individuals not meeting administrative enforcement conditions were removed in Jiangxi, and 351 in Qingdao, with 1,140 clues sent to disciplinary inspection agencies and 1,068 personnel dealt with [2]. Group 3: Regulatory Framework - The Ministry of Justice is developing regulations to clarify the boundaries of law enforcement personnel's powers and behaviors, aiming to prevent abuse of power and ensure compliance with legal standards [3]. - The government is also working on a management approach for law enforcement personnel to establish a robust entry and exit mechanism [3]. Group 4: Fee Regulation - The government is addressing issues of arbitrary charges, particularly in sectors where some units exploit their advantageous positions to impose illegal fees [4]. - Measures include strict checks on unauthorized fee projects, excessive charges, and the forced collection of fees by industry associations [4]. Group 5: Long-term Mechanisms - The government is pushing for the revision of pricing laws and the introduction of measures to handle illegal fee practices, aiming to create a regulatory framework that deters violations [5]. - The implementation of the "Regulations on Administrative Inspections" has shown significant results, reducing unnecessary inspections and enhancing the efficiency of enforcement [6][7]. Group 6: Legislative Support - The newly enacted Private Economy Promotion Law aims to further standardize administrative enforcement and protect the legal rights of various business entities [8]. - The government plans to establish a long-term mechanism to prevent the recurrence of enforcement issues and ensure ongoing compliance and supervision [8].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is the introduction of the Special Action for Regulating Administrative Law Enforcement Related to Enterprises, which aims to prevent issues from recurring and establish a long-term mechanism for supervision and regulation [1] - The implementation of the Private Economy Promotion Law on May 20 provides a legal foundation for protecting the rights of private enterprises, which is crucial for the ongoing special action [1] - The special action is not a one-time effort; it emphasizes the need for a systematic approach to address the root causes of prominent issues faced by enterprises [1][2] Group 2 - Regularizing administrative law enforcement is essential for the standardized development of the private economy, requiring institutionalization of solutions to prominent issues and ensuring effective implementation of related systems [2] - There is a need for continuous training mechanisms for law enforcement personnel to improve understanding of regulations and enhance enforcement transparency [2] - Various departments are taking measures to ensure the legal protection of private enterprises, emphasizing the importance of law-based governance and institutional fairness in supporting the development of the private economy [2]

"开展规范涉企执法专项行动，是党中央从战略和全局高度作出的重大决策部署。"胡卫列说，这次专项 行动目标明确，聚焦企业反映强烈的突出问题，精准监督，动真碰硬，加大纠治力度，推进严格规范公 正文明执法，促进行政执法机关、执法人员依法履职，该严则严，当宽则宽，切实维护企业的合法权 益，持续优化营商环境，促进经济社会高质量发展。他介绍，这次专项行动坚持问题导向，紧盯重点问 题、重点领域、重点地区，聚焦纠治四类突出问题：一是乱收费、乱罚款、乱检查、乱查封问题；二是 违规异地执法和趋利性执法行为；三是执法标准不一致，要求不统一，加重企业负担的行为；四是滥用 职权、徇私枉法、该罚不罚、"吃拿卡要"、粗暴执法等违反执法规范要求的行为。 治理涉企乱收费是优化营商环境、激发市场活力的重要举措。"市场监管总局持续多年治理涉企乱收 费，取得了显著成效，但当前部分领域的乱收费问题仍然存在，企业对此反映比较强烈。"市场监管总 局市场稽查专员嵇小灵说，将坚持长短结合、标本兼治，靶向攻坚重点领域，严查政府部门及下属单位 擅自设立收费项目、超标准收费、转嫁审批成本等违规行为，整治行业协会商会利用行政影响力强制收 费问题，强化陆路、海运口岸等交 ...