Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes that cross-strait communication and negotiation must be based on the One China principle, and that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must acknowledge the "1992 Consensus" for dialogue to resume [1][2] - The DPP's refusal to recognize the "1992 Consensus" has led to a halt in cross-strait communication since 2016, and the current administration's insistence on "Taiwan independence" is seen as a barrier to peace [1][2] - The spokesperson criticized the DPP's claims of "equal dignity" in negotiations, arguing that it attempts to alter historical and legal facts regarding cross-strait relations, which will ultimately hinder dialogue [2] Group 2 - The DPP's recent statements about strengthening defense capabilities and increasing defense budgets are viewed as a misguided approach that could harm the welfare of Taiwanese citizens [2] - The spokesperson highlighted that the DPP's actions, including reliance on external forces and military posturing, are detrimental to Taiwan's social welfare and security [2] - Criticism was directed at the DPP for attempting to deflect responsibility for its governance failures by blaming external factors, which has led to widespread discontent among the Taiwanese populace [3] Group 3 - The DPP's policies are accused of creating instability for cross-strait families, particularly for spouses from the mainland, by imposing political pressures and undermining their rights [3][4] - The spokesperson pointed out that the DPP's actions against cross-strait marriages are aimed at fabricating issues related to nationality and manipulating the concept of "two countries" [3][4] - The DPP's governance is characterized as oppressive and detrimental to the well-being of individuals living in Taiwan, particularly those with ties to the mainland [4]

Core Viewpoint - The Taiwan authorities, under Lai Ching-te, are increasing defense spending, aiming for over 3% of GDP next year and over 5% by 2030, while maintaining a stance of "Taiwan independence" which is criticized as detrimental to Taiwan's future and welfare [1] Group 1 - Lai Ching-te's administration insists on strengthening defense capabilities, which is seen as a move towards "Taiwan independence" and reliance on external forces [1] - The Taiwan Affairs Office spokesperson, Chen Binhua, argues that this approach leads to wasteful spending of public funds and does not guarantee safety or peace for Taiwan [1] - The spokesperson emphasizes that the future and security of Taiwan depend on peaceful development of cross-strait relations and reunification with the mainland [1] Group 2 - Lai Ching-te's notion of "equal dignity" is viewed as an attempt to engage in dialogue without recognizing the One China principle, which is seen as an obstacle to cross-strait negotiations [1] - The Taiwan authorities are accused of trying to alter historical and legal facts regarding cross-strait relations, which is deemed futile [1]

Geopolitical Risk & Sino-Japanese Relations - China's Foreign Ministry sanctions Japanese Senator Ishii Taira (石平) for spreading misinformation on Taiwan, Diaoyu Islands, history, Xinjiang, Tibet, and Hong Kong issues [1] - The sanction is due to Ishii Taira's (石平) alleged violation of the spirit of the four Sino-Japanese political documents and the One China principle [1] - The sanction is also due to Ishii Taira's (石平) alleged interference in China's internal affairs and damage to China's sovereignty and territorial integrity [1] Sanctions & Restrictions - China will freeze Ishii Taira's (石平) assets (movable and immovable) and other types of property within China [1] - Chinese organizations and individuals are prohibited from engaging in transactions and cooperation with Ishii Taira (石平) [1] - Visa restrictions and entry bans (including Hong Kong and Macau) are imposed on Ishii Taira (石平) and his immediate family members [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the historical significance of the anti-fascist struggle shared by China and Kyrgyzstan, highlighting their joint efforts during World War II to defeat fascism and the deep friendship formed through this struggle [1][2]. - Both countries have maintained a commitment to uphold the results of World War II, supporting the international order based on the United Nations and international law, with a specific focus on the One China principle [2][3]. - The strategic partnership between China and Kyrgyzstan has been elevated to a new level, with China being the largest trade partner, import source, and investment source for Kyrgyzstan, indicating strong economic ties [3]. Group 2 - The construction of the China-Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan railway project is highlighted as a significant development that will enhance connectivity and economic cooperation between the two nations [3]. - Both countries share similar positions on major international and regional issues, advocating for an open world economy and a multilateral trade system centered around the World Trade Organization [3]. - The partnership aims to continue the legacy of World War II victories, fostering a closer community of shared destiny between the two nations for a better future for their peoples [3].

Core Viewpoint - The academic seminar commemorating the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Anti-Japanese War and Taiwan's liberation was held in Xiamen, emphasizing the importance of the one-China principle and the need for unification [1] Group 1: Event Overview - The seminar took place from August 30 to 31 in Xiamen, organized by the Taiwan History Research Center of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Xiamen University Taiwan Research Institute, and Fujian Normal University Min-Tai Regional Research Center [1] - Over 100 experts and scholars from both sides of the Taiwan Strait, as well as Japan and South Korea, attended the event [1] Group 2: Key Statements - Zhang Haipeng, Director of the Taiwan History Research Center, highlighted the significance of recognizing the one-China principle and the necessity for China to unify through its own strength [1] - Qi Jialin, President of Taiwan's "Motherland" magazine and Honorary Chairman of the United Alliance Party, emphasized the importance of objective historical research to commemorate the anniversaries and assert the historical origins of both sides belonging to one China [1] Group 3: Discussion Topics - Experts and scholars presented academic reports and engaged in discussions on topics such as Taiwan's anti-Japanese history, Taiwan's liberation history, and cross-strait relations [1]

Core Points - Taiwan's belonging to China is an undeniable historical and legal fact, emphasized by the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs [1][2] - The return of Taiwan to China is a significant outcome of World War II and an essential part of the post-war international order, supported by international legal documents like the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation [1] - The One China principle is a widely accepted consensus in the international community, serving as the political foundation for China's diplomatic relations with 183 countries [1] - The UN General Assembly Resolution 2758, passed in 1971, restored the legitimate rights of the People's Republic of China in the UN and expelled representatives of Taiwan, eliminating the possibility of "two Chinas" or "one China, one Taiwan" [1] - The Taiwan issue is a core interest of China, with the resolution of this issue being a common aspiration of all Chinese people [2] - China's diplomatic mission is to safeguard national sovereignty, security, and development interests, with increasing international support against Taiwan independence movements [2] - The Taiwan issue is strictly an internal matter for China, and any foreign interference is deemed unacceptable [2]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes that Taiwan's return to China is an important part of the outcomes of World War II and the post-war international order [1][2] - The one-China principle is recognized as a fundamental norm in international relations, with 183 countries establishing diplomatic relations with China based on this principle [1] - The UN General Assembly Resolution 2758, passed in 1971, resolved the representation issue of Taiwan in the UN, eliminating the possibility of "two Chinas" or "one China, one Taiwan" [1] Group 2 - The Taiwan issue is described as the core of China's core interests, with a collective desire among the Chinese people for complete national unification [2] - The current international consensus on the one-China principle is strengthening, with widespread understanding and support for China's opposition to "Taiwan independence" [2] - The statement asserts that the Taiwan issue is purely an internal matter for China, rejecting any foreign interference [2]

Core Viewpoint - The event emphasizes the importance of peaceful development and the construction of a community with a shared future for mankind, particularly focusing on the Taiwan issue as a core interest of China [1] Summary by Relevant Sections - **Taiwan Issue**: The Taiwan issue is highlighted as the core of China's core interests, with a strong emphasis on the desire for complete national unification among all Chinese people [1] - **International Support**: There is a noted increase in international understanding and support for China's stance against "Taiwan independence" and the pursuit of complete national unification [1] - **Non-Interference**: The statement reiterates that the Taiwan issue is purely a domestic matter for China and should not be interfered with by external forces [1] - **Warning to External Forces**: A warning is issued to external forces attempting to use Taiwan to contain China, indicating that such actions are dangerous and will lead to self-destruction [1] - **Inevitability of Unification**: The narrative asserts that China's unification is an unstoppable trend [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes China's commitment to peaceful development and the construction of a community with a shared future for mankind, as highlighted during the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's Anti-Japanese War and the World Anti-Fascist War [1] Group 2 - The Taiwan issue is stated as a core interest of China, with a strong emphasis on national sovereignty and the collective desire for reunification among the Chinese people, rejecting any external interference [2] - The Chinese government asserts that the international community increasingly supports the one-China principle, and any attempts to use Taiwan to contain China are deemed reckless and destined to fail [2] Group 3 - China is positioned as a proactive contributor to global green development, having established the largest and fastest-growing renewable energy system in the world, and contributing to a quarter of the global increase in greening area [3] - Under the guidance of Xi Jinping's ecological civilization thought, China is advancing its "dual carbon" goals and has developed a comprehensive policy framework [3] Group 4 - The Chinese government expresses a willingness to engage with the United States in mutual respect and cooperation while firmly safeguarding its national sovereignty and development interests, indicating that pressure tactics against China will not succeed [4] - There is an intention to implement the important consensus reached by the leaders of both countries, maintain communication, manage differences, and expand cooperation [4]

Group 1 - The spokesperson for the Taiwan Affairs Office emphasized that the cross-strait dialogue mechanism has been suspended and can only be resumed by acknowledging the "1992 Consensus" and the fact that both sides belong to one country and one nation [1] - The Taiwan authorities are pressuring long-term residents from the mainland in Taiwan to provide proof of loss of original nationality, which has faced criticism from the local public and is seen as an attempt to promote "Taiwan independence" [1] - The mainland authorities will not accept requests from the Taiwan authorities unless they recognize the one-China principle and submit requests under the name of Taiwan Province [1] Group 2 - The Taiwan authorities have been cracking down on Taiwanese artists who engage with the mainland, with 25 artists notified to respond to inquiries or risk losing their opportunity to explain [2] - The crackdown on artists is viewed as an attempt to intimidate those who support cross-strait exchanges, which is detrimental to the interests of Taiwanese people [2] - The spokesperson reiterated support for cultural exchanges and cooperation, welcoming Taiwanese artists to develop in the mainland and pledging to protect their legitimate rights [2]