Group 1 - The "Private Economy Promotion Law" is China's first foundational law regarding the development of the private economy, officially implemented on May 20 this year [1] - The Supreme Court's guiding opinions consist of 25 articles aimed at ensuring the law's implementation, including the establishment of judicial mechanisms for administrative litigation related to investment agreements [1][2] - The law emphasizes that private enterprises must comply with local laws and respect local customs when operating abroad, with guidance provided for enterprises to understand applicable foreign laws [1] Group 2 - The guiding opinions aim to enhance the judicial role of courts in implementing the Private Economy Promotion Law, thereby encouraging and supporting the development of the private economy [2] - Key highlights include strengthening property rights protection and safeguarding entrepreneurs' rights, clarifying the boundaries between legitimate financing and illegal fundraising, and ensuring judicial fairness [3] - Innovative measures to address financing difficulties for private enterprises include regulating financial institutions' behaviors and expediting the resolution of overdue payments to small and micro enterprises [3]

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court issued the "Guiding Opinions on Implementing the Law on Promoting the Development of the Private Economy," aiming to enhance legal support for the healthy development of the private economy through 25 specific measures [1] Group 1: Legal Framework and Market Environment - The Guiding Opinions emphasize the need for equal legal treatment of private enterprises and the establishment of a fair and transparent business environment [1] - It highlights the importance of strengthening anti-monopoly and anti-unfair competition judicial efforts to ensure fair market participation [2] - The Opinions call for the implementation of a national negative list for market access to eliminate local protectionism and hidden barriers [2] Group 2: Financial and Debt Issues - The Opinions address the common issues of debt defaults and financing difficulties faced by private enterprises, proposing mechanisms for debt collection and enforcement [4] - It mandates the regulation of financial institutions' practices regarding loan conditions to protect the rights of private enterprises [4] - The document also emphasizes the need to combat illegal lending practices and enhance the financing environment for private businesses [4] Group 3: Dispute Resolution and Credit System - To reduce the costs of dispute resolution for private enterprises, the Opinions propose improvements to the credit repair and punishment mechanisms [5] - The document states that over 1.1 million individuals have returned to the market through credit repair initiatives in the first half of the year [5] - It also outlines the need for a dynamic adjustment mechanism for credit ratings based on compliance with obligations [5] Group 4: Technological and Data Protection - The Opinions include provisions for the judicial protection of technological innovation and the handling of data rights disputes [3] - It emphasizes the need for stronger intellectual property protections while curbing malicious litigation in the tech sector [2]

营商环境是经营主体生存发展的土壤。8月8日，珠海市人民检察院召开"优化法治化营商环境 护航高质量发展"新闻发布会，通报检察机关服务本地法治化 营商环境建设工作情况，并发布《优化法治化营商环境白皮书》及10个典型案例。 92 appealante . 近年来，珠海检察机关主动融入全市经济社会发展大局，通过多维度举措优化法治化营商环境。 在维护市场秩序方面，审查办理各类侵犯企业合法权益犯罪案件348件597人，办理扰乱市场秩序和破坏金融管理秩序犯罪案件319件706人。联合相关单位出 台反洗钱协作文件强化监督办案质效，并开展"空壳公司"违法犯罪专项治理，核查出250余家疑似"空壳公司"移交行政主管部门处理。 围绕打造更优营商环境，检察机关以"四大检察"全面履职，办理涉企民事检察案件474件、行政检察案件154件、公益诉讼案件19件。其中，督促履行工程竣 工验收备案管理职责行政检察监督案获评最高检指导性案例，"白蕉海鲈"地理标志保护行政公益诉讼案入选全国、全省知识产权保护典型案例。 在深化专项监督护企方面，持续清理涉企刑事诉讼"挂案"185件并防范新生"挂案"；"检察机关依法护企"专项行动中，督促保护预制菜食品安全 ...

Group 1 - The total government procurement scale in the region exceeded 22.7 billion yuan in the first half of the year [1] - The total retail sales in Hohhot reached 56.88 billion yuan, with a year-on-year growth of 8.9% [4] - The total expenditure of domestic tourists in Hulunbuir was 22.096 billion yuan, showing a year-on-year increase of 11.88% [7] Group 2 - The Inner Mongolia High People's Court launched the 12368 litigation service hotline for enterprises, aiming to provide high-quality and efficient judicial services [10] - The establishment of a legal service team by the Inner Mongolia Justice Department to offer legal advice and dispute mediation for major projects and various market entities [10] - The "One Enterprise, One Judge" service model was implemented in Bayannur, enhancing judicial support for key enterprises [11] Group 3 - The establishment of a dedicated service window for enterprises at the Bayannur Public Security Bureau, providing efficient and convenient services [12] - The Inner Mongolia procuratorial organs have set up the first "Intellectual Property Prosecutorial Workstation" to enhance legal protection for enterprises [13] - The focus on optimizing service processes and simplifying procedures to improve service quality and efficiency for enterprises [14] Group 4 - The Inner Mongolia judicial system has been actively working to protect enterprises' legal rights and interests, with a significant increase in the number of enterprise-related cases processed [16] - The total number of enterprise-related cases concluded in Ordos City reached 20,506, a year-on-year increase of 21.09% [16] - The average processing time for enterprise-related cases was reduced to 35.38 days, a decrease of 12.34% compared to the previous year [16] Group 5 - The Inner Mongolia police have implemented a "One Enterprise, One Police" system to enhance service efficiency for enterprises [17] - Various police departments are actively engaging with enterprises to address security and operational concerns [17] - The focus on providing tailored judicial services to support the growth and development of market entities [17]

无事不扰，精准监管，切实减轻企业负担 海南率先以地方性法规形式规范涉企行政检查 海南日报讯(海南日报全媒体记者 李梦瑶)《海南省涉企行政检查条例(试行)》(以下简称《条例》) 于日前经海南省第七届人民代表大会常务委员会第十九次会议审议通过，将自2025年9月1日起施行。 《条例》结合海南实际，率先以地方性法规形式规范涉企行政检查，依法约束行政权力，提升监管精准 性，切实减轻企业负担。 规范涉企行政检查，关键是厘清"看得见的手"的权力边界。《条例》共29条，明确了行政检查主体 资格、事项及程序等内容，规定实施行政检查的主体应当具备法定资格，行政检查事项应当列入经省人 民政府批准的省监管事项目录清单，并向社会公布。 针对"谁不能检查""不检查什么"的问题，《条例》也作出明确要求。除具有行政执法权的行政机 关，法律、法规授权的具有管理公共事务职能的组织以及受委托的组织外，任何组织和个人不得实施行 政检查;对未列入省监管事项目录清单的行政检查事项不得实施。 为着力破解涉企多头、重复、低效检查问题，杜绝运动式检查、变相检查、任性检查，《条例》坚 持理念创新和手段创新，通过实施分级分类监管、统筹实施"综合查一次"、全面推 ...

民生无小事，枝叶总关情。翻看河南政法系统今年32项爱民承诺事项清单：妥善审理预付式消费纠纷，让消 费者敢消费、愿消费、乐消费；开展农村集中饮用水供水站公益诉讼专项监督，守护饮水安全；身份证丢失 补领、损坏换领，户籍类证明开具等业务，符合条件的全程网办；开展规范涉企行政执法专项行动……件件 关键小事，既关乎群众司法获得感，更彰显法治力量与温度。 今年是河南政法系统连续第十年亮出承诺清单。目前，清单事项落地情况如何？群众的法治获得感有没有得 到实际提升？记者就此展开采访。 减少时间，提升体验。 省司法厅公共法律服务局相关负责人介绍，开展公证规范优质行动已被纳入今年的承诺事项。2018年，我省 首次公布36项"最多跑一次"公证事项清单，如今，清单紧随群众需求不断扩容，已增至150项。今年以来， 11.8万件公证实现当事人"最多跑一次"办妥。 郑州高新区法院立案庭干警在共享法庭与当事人沟通调解。秦祎洋 摄 郑州市公安局出入境管理处接待大厅，工作人员在指导市民使用自助设备办理业务。河南日报社全媒体记者 王富晓 摄 一站集成，办事便捷。 郑州高新区法院在郑东新区综治中心设置共享法庭，采用"调解员常驻+联络人对接"双轨模式 ...

Core Points - The article emphasizes the importance of providing precise services to enterprises in the context of promoting high-quality development [1] - The "Escort" police-enterprise liaison mechanism in Suzhou is highlighted as an innovative approach to support businesses [1] Group 1: Service Innovations - The local police in Suzhou have introduced a "packaged" service model to assist enterprises, allowing them to operate more efficiently [1] - Police officers proactively visit businesses to help them mitigate safety risks and expedite processes, leading to time and cost savings for the enterprises [3] Group 2: Case Study - A pharmaceutical and chemical company in Suzhou faced challenges in managing hazardous materials during a production line upgrade. The police liaison officer responded promptly to assist with safety management [4] - The police utilized AI technology to create a tailored service list for the company, addressing various needs such as safety inspections and intellectual property protection [6] Group 3: Policy and Strategy - The Suzhou Public Security Bureau has implemented several practical service measures, including the "Escort" liaison officer system, to transition from passive responses to proactive prevention [8] - The police aim to create a law-based business environment that reassures enterprises, thereby injecting strong "safety momentum" into high-quality development [8]

法治具有固根本、稳预期、利长远的保障作用。近年来，我国坚持依法鼓励、支持、引导民营经济发 展，持续创新体制机制、强化协同联动、完善法治保障，不断推动制度体系全面构建、地方创新接踵涌 现、法治根基日益稳固，在激发市场活力、破除准入壁垒、保障就业优先、拓宽融资渠道等方面，为各 类民营经济依法依规干事创业营造了良好环境。政府职能发生深刻转变，31个省（区、市）全面实 现"一件事"并联办理，在企业开办环节，整合登记注册、公章刻制、税务办理等程序，平均办理时限压 缩至4个工作日。同时，通过持续加强顶层设计，不断完善制度体系，陆续出台《优化营商环境条例》 《中华人民共和国外商投资法》等法律法规；"国家立法+地方配套"的立体规范体系基本形成，法治根 基不断筑牢。数据显示，2024年《公平竞争审查条例》施行后，当年全国共修改调整政策措施7312件， 提出审查意见近6000条，查办不正当竞争案件1.4万余件，各种形式地方保护和市场分割陆续破除，全 国统一大市场建设进入良性法治轨道。 不少地区也因地制宜，根据自身实际情况不断出台有力举措。例如，上海市推出国内首份省级《市场轻 微违法违规经营行为免罚清单》，率先开展轻微违法行为依法 ...

本报讯（记者 赵丽丽 通讯员 王立峰）8月1日，黑龙江省高级人民法院召开全省法院规范涉企执法 司法专项行动调度会，总结阶段性成效，部署下一步工作。 会议强调，要进一步增强抓紧抓实专项行动的政治自觉、思想自觉、行动自觉，结合地区营商环境 实际情况，在涉企纠纷多元化解、企业信用修复、维护企业合法权益等方面进行探索创新，保质保量开 展好专项行动工作。要严格依法公正办理涉企案件，依法平等保护各类经营主体合法权益，严格规范立 案、畅通企业投诉渠道，强化诉讼管辖，以"阅核制"为抓手，全面提升涉企案件审判质效，不断提升涉 企案件执行工作规范化水平。要加强统筹协调，把开展专项行动同扎实开展深入贯彻中央八项规定精神 学习教育、贯彻落实人民法院"六五改革纲要"要求结合起来，形成上下联动、一体推进工作格局，在纠 治涉企审判执行突出问题工作中积极发挥监督、促推作用，不断提高业务指导专业性、针对性，努力形 成一批典型实践成果，切实把专项行动抓出成效，持续助推法治化营商环境建设。 据悉，黑龙江高院今年4月已专题动员部署全省法院规范涉企执法司法专项行动，并制定《全省法 院规范涉企执法司法专项行动方案》，力图通过14条务实举措严格依法公正办 ...

Core Points - The Shenzhen Municipal Political Consultative Conference held a special democratic supervision seminar to optimize the business environment [1] - A democratic supervision group was formed in May to investigate enterprise-related law enforcement, involving various committees and collecting feedback through surveys [1] - Six government departments participated in the seminar, discussing law enforcement work and responding to survey feedback [1] Group 1 - The seminar aims to provide suggestions for improving the business environment in Shenzhen [1] - The government departments reported on their law enforcement activities and the results of the questionnaire survey [1] - Participants emphasized the importance of law enforcement in building a rule-of-law government and the need for enhanced collaboration and technology use [1] Group 2 - There is a call for increased publicity to build social consensus and to further promote standardized law enforcement [1] - The goal is to enhance the "sense of gain" for enterprises and achieve new results in creating a law-based business environment [1]