2025年新纳入失信名单233.98万人次，同时有266.96万人次通过信用修复回归市场。日前，最高人民法院公布 有效解决执行难工作情况。据介绍，以交叉执行为牵引，人民法院的执行质效持续高位运行，执行规范化建 设成效不断显现，着力保障当事人合法权益依法"兑现"。 "信用修复人次连续7个季度超过新纳入失信名单人次，累计1865.18万被执行人迫于失信惩戒压力主动履行义 务。"最高人民法院执行局局长黄文俊表示，人民法院坚持失信惩戒精准化与信用修复常态化，以失信"失 能"分级分类助力信用经济建设。 2025年6月，最高人民法院联合最高人民检察院、公安部出台《关于办理拒不执行判决、裁定刑事案件若干问 题的意见》，严厉打击恶意规避执行、逃避执行的拒执行为。2025年，共计4461人被依法追究拒不执行判 决、裁定罪，显示出司法部门对失信行为保持高压态势。 数据显示，2025年，民事裁判自动履行率61.01%，同比增长2.7个百分点。在执行案件量同比增长15.43%的情 况下，执行到位率达到50.59%，执行完毕率39.29%。执行到位金额约2.2万亿元，连续3年超过2万亿元。 黄文俊介绍，人民法院重点聚焦"骨头案""信访 ...

2025年新纳入失信名单233.98万人次，同时有266.96万人次通过信用修复回归市场。日前，最高人民法 院公布有效解决执行难工作情况。据介绍，以交叉执行为牵引，人民法院的执行质效持续高位运行，执 行规范化建设成效不断显现，着力保障当事人合法权益依法"兑现"。 "信用修复人次连续7个季度超过新纳入失信名单人次，累计1865.18万被执行人迫于失信惩戒压力主动 履行义务。"最高人民法院执行局局长黄文俊表示，人民法院坚持失信惩戒精准化与信用修复常态化， 以失信"失能"分级分类助力信用经济建设。 2025年6月，最高人民法院联合最高人民检察院、公安部出台《关于办理拒不执行判决、裁定刑事案件 若干问题的意见》，严厉打击恶意规避执行、逃避执行的拒执行为。2025年，共计4461人被依法追究拒 不执行判决、裁定罪，显示出司法部门对失信行为保持高压态势。 数据显示，2025年，民事裁判自动履行率61.01%，同比增长2.7个百分点。在执行案件量同比增长 15.43%的情况下，执行到位率达到50.59%，执行完毕率39.29%。执行到位金额约2.2万亿元，连续3年超 过2万亿元。 黄文俊介绍，人民法院重点聚焦"骨头案""信 ...

（来源：新华日报） 海事法院凝聚交叉执行合力，在盐城弶港滩涂现场挂图作战，稳慎推进662张虾棚有序拆除，妥善化解 涉养殖户纠纷。 俞经旻 摄 站在盐城弶港沿海这片滩涂上，执行法官们极目远望，成方连片的高标准农田呈现眼前。农田上麦苗露 出新绿，空气中弥漫着泥土与新苗的芬芳。 就在一年前，这里还是一片片坑坑洼洼的虾塘，养殖户们拒不腾退，亟待推进的盐碱地复垦整治项目阻 碍重重…… 662张拒拆的虾棚 冲突一触即发 上世纪90年代末，省属国企仓某公司在弶港沿海滩涂进行开发，形成约2.45万亩盐碱地。其后部分滩涂 盐碱地陆续发包给养殖户从事鱼虾等水产养殖。 为保障国家粮食安全，贯彻落实高标准农田建设的政策要求，"十四五"期间，弶港仓东片区这块2.45万 亩的滩涂盐碱地需要"退渔还耕"，作为全省宜耕后备资源。 "集团把任务交给我们。今年是'十四五'收官之年，任务完成迫在眉睫。前期推进很顺利，没想到最后 卡在养殖户未依约返还的这443亩滩涂上，阻力很大，困难重重。"2025年10月，仓某公司总经理成小锋 回顾该案时说。 根据生效法律文书，养殖户赵某（化名）应向仓某公司交还滩涂443亩，但赵某未依约返还。2024年2 月，仓 ...

最高人民法院26日举行新闻发布会，介绍人民法院以交叉执行为牵引，有效解决执行难工作情况。2025 年，新纳入失信名单233.98万人次，同时有266.96万人次通过信用修复回归市场，信用修复人次连续7个 季度超过新纳入失信名单人次；累计1865.18万被执行人迫于失信惩戒压力主动履行义务；追究拒不执 行判决、裁定罪4461人，保持了对失信行为的高压态势。 最高法执行局局长黄文俊介绍，2025年，民事裁判自动履行率达61.01%，同比增长2.7个百分点。在执 行案件量同比增长15.43%的情况下，执行到位率达50.59%，执行完毕率为39.29%，执行到位金额约2.2 万亿元。 人民法院聚焦人民群众关注的"骨头案""疑难案""长期未结案"等，全面推进交叉执行落地落实。2023年 10月以来，全国法院已交叉执行47.7万件，22.25万件难案积案取得实质进展或者化解。 (责任编辑：朱赫) ...

本报成都1月26日电 记者杨傲多 四川省委依法治省办与省高级人民法院今天通报2025年度全省法院执行 暨服务保障法治化营商环境工作情况。2025年，全省法院共受理各类执行案件62.27万件，执结55.04万 件，执行到位金额1078.5亿元，执行到位金额连续四年排名全国前五位，全省法院涉执信访量同比下降 20.47%，人民群众司法获得感不断增强。 2025年，全省法院以交叉执行为总牵引，聚焦难案积案，化 解信访积案和化解终本旧案，推动执行工作取得新进展。2025年，四川高院从涉执信访中筛查启动交叉 执行案件351件，取得实质进展258件，执行到位金额5.43亿元，实质化解一批信访"骨头案"，促推全省 法院涉执信访中反映消极、拖延执行问题占比下降31.56个百分点。聚焦"终本库"中1万元以下涉民生等 小标的额案件、1亿元以上大标的额案件、1000万元以上在案财产未处置案件等重点案件，以交叉执行 为主要手段推动出清；2025年，全省法院恢复执行14.18万件，化解9.44万件，执行到位金额379.21亿 元。 在维护企业合法权益方面，四川高院出台《关于执行工作服务保障法治化营商环境建设的若干意 见》，全年执结企业 ...

黄文俊介绍，人民法院坚持失信惩戒精准化与信用修复常态化。去年，新纳入失信名单233.98万人次， 同时有266.96万人次通过信用修复回归市场，信用修复人次连续7个季度超过新纳入失信名单人次。累 计1865.18万被执行人迫于失信惩戒压力主动履行义务。与此同时，联合最高人民检察院、公安部发布 《关于办理拒不执行判决、裁定刑事案件若干问题的意见》，严厉打击恶意规避执行、逃避执行的拒执 行为，去年追究拒不执行判决、裁定罪4461人，保持了对失信行为的高压态势。 黄文俊称，交叉执行攻坚克难成效显著。重点聚焦人民群众关注的"骨头案""信访案""疑难案""长期未 结案"，全面推进交叉执行落地落实。2023年10月以来，全国法院已交叉执行47.7万件，22.25万件难案 积案取得实质进展或者化解，执行到位金额1668.82亿元，基本实现交叉执行全国法院（除西藏部分地 区以外）"全覆盖"。 南都讯记者刘嫚发自北京 1月26日，最高人民法院召开"人民法院以交叉执行为牵引有效解决执行难工 作情况"新闻发布会，最高人民法院执行局局长黄文俊介绍，去年，累计1865.18万被执行人迫于失信惩 戒压力主动履行义务，追究拒不执行判决、裁 ...

二是立审执"一盘棋"效能有效发挥。 三是交叉执行攻坚克难成效显著。重点聚焦人民群众关注的"骨头案""信访案""疑难案""长期未结案"，全面推进交叉执行落地落实。2023年10月以来，全国 法院已交叉执行47.7万件，22.25万件难案积案取得实质进展或者化解，执行到位金额1668.82亿元，基本实现交叉执行全国法院(除西藏部分地区以外)"全覆 盖"。 四是执破衔接激活市场要素动能释放。贯彻落实党的二十届四中全会重大部署，推动司法判决执行与破产制度有机衔接。全力开展"终本出清"活动，累计 963.82万件终本案件通过执破衔接、恢复执行、被执行人自动履行等退出终本程序；此外，移送破产案件4.84万件，1.58万家企业实现"出清"。通过执行与 破产全方位衔接，实现僵尸企业"移得出"、危困企业"治得早"，最大程度以法治化方式促推要素市场化配置。 经济观察网据央视新闻客户端消息，今天，最高人民法院召开新闻发布会，介绍"人民法院以交叉执行为牵引、有效解决执行难"的相关情况。 近年来，人民法院持续深化执行改革，稳步推进执行工作规范提升三年专项行动，在以交叉执行为牵引，立审执协调、终本出清、失信惩戒分级分类、队伍 建设协同支 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court has released typical cases of governance on wage arrears, emphasizing the legal protection of workers' wage rights, particularly for migrant workers, and highlighting various effective execution measures taken by local courts [1]. Group 1: Case Summaries - Case 1: The court in Chuzhou, Anhui, utilized a government-court linkage mechanism to resolve execution difficulties, successfully freezing receivables from schools to ensure payment of over 1.16 million yuan to 61 workers [2][3][5]. - Case 2: The court in Wenzhou, Zhejiang, implemented a cross-execution mechanism, coordinating with other courts to secure the payment of over 1.39 million yuan to 62 migrant workers within a month [6][7]. - Case 3: The court in Suqian, Jiangsu, effectively managed the liquidation of perishable goods to recover 380,000 yuan owed to 51 workers, transitioning to bankruptcy proceedings to ensure payment [8][9][10]. - Case 4: The court in Jinshan, Shanghai, employed punitive measures against a non-compliant employer, leading to the full payment of wages owed to seven workers through coercive actions [11][12]. - Case 5: The court in Ganzhou, Jiangxi, facilitated a self-disposal process for a packaging company to quickly liquidate assets worth over 1.5 million yuan to pay 61 workers, demonstrating effective conflict resolution [13][14][15]. - Case 6: The court in Guanxian, Shandong, conducted thorough field investigations to uncover rental income, leading to the successful payment of over 600,000 yuan to 34 workers [16]. Group 2: Mechanisms and Strategies - The "government-court linkage" mechanism has proven crucial in executing cases related to wage arrears, enhancing efficiency and pressuring non-compliant parties to fulfill their obligations [5]. - The "cross-execution" mechanism allows for coordinated efforts across different jurisdictions, showcasing the advantages of information sharing and asset control in resolving wage disputes [7]. - The integration of execution and bankruptcy procedures provides a model for addressing complex wage arrears cases, ensuring that workers' rights are prioritized even in challenging circumstances [10]. - The use of punitive measures and collaborative enforcement strategies effectively deters non-compliance and reinforces the legal framework protecting workers' rights [12].

Core Viewpoint - The news emphasizes the importance of protecting the legal rights of private enterprises in the context of economic development, highlighting the role of the judiciary in facilitating a favorable business environment and ensuring fair execution of legal judgments [3][4][13]. Group 1: Economic Contribution of Private Enterprises - The private economy is a crucial force for stable growth, innovation promotion, job creation, and improvement of people's livelihoods [3]. - In the Xiaodian District of Taiyuan, there are over 250,000 business entities, accounting for 31% of the total in the city, with a significant number of high-quality private enterprises [3][4]. - The district has cultivated 134 provincial-level specialized and innovative enterprises, representing about 30% of the city's total, leading in both recognition and market share [3]. Group 2: Judicial Support for Private Enterprises - The Xiaodian District Court aims to address the challenges of "difficult execution" and "slow execution" through fair and efficient judicial practices, thereby providing a legal safeguard for the development of private enterprises [4][5]. - The court has implemented a "fast track" for execution cases involving key enterprises, significantly reducing the average case processing time by 35% [5]. - A flexible execution model has been adopted, allowing enterprises to continue using essential assets under supervision, and facilitating settlements for companies facing temporary difficulties [6]. Group 3: Collaborative Efforts and Mechanisms - The court has established a collaborative mechanism with local government and administrative bodies to enhance service for private enterprises, addressing issues such as employee placement and policy alignment [8]. - A joint mechanism with law enforcement has been created to combat non-compliance with court orders, enhancing the effectiveness of execution [8][9]. - The court has actively engaged in community outreach, providing legal services directly to enterprises and addressing their concerns [9][10]. Group 4: Training and Capacity Building - The court has conducted specialized training for its personnel on common legal issues faced by private enterprises, enhancing their ability to handle cases effectively [10][12]. - A comprehensive supervision mechanism has been established to ensure transparency and accountability in the execution process [12]. Group 5: Promoting a Supportive Legal Environment - The court has focused on publicizing successful cases of legal protection for private enterprises, thereby fostering a culture of respect for business and legal rights [13]. - Efforts have been made to create a favorable atmosphere for private enterprises through legal education and outreach activities [13].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of executing court decisions to protect the legal rights of winning parties, with a focus on a "100-day offensive" initiative to enhance execution quality and efficiency [1] - The initiative targets key issues, cases, and regions, aiming to convert "paper rights" into "real money" through precise efforts in execution [1] - The initiative includes collaboration between courts and government, addressing long-standing unresolved cases related to labor disputes, maintenance fees, and personal injury compensation through cross-execution strategies [1] Group 2 - The standardization of execution is identified as crucial for the high-quality development of execution work, with the provincial court organizing a guide based on research to improve execution practices [2] - A new guideline has been established to publicly disclose key progress information in execution cases, promoting transparency and accountability in the execution process [2] - The initiative aims to enhance the execution team's quality and efficiency by adhering to established norms and standards while addressing practical challenges in execution [2]