网络暴力
Search documents
20本超级棒的科技书籍
3 6 Ke· 2025-06-23 00:07
Group 1 - The article presents a list of 20 books that explore the stories behind the technology industry and major tech companies, aiming to inspire readers [1] - Each book offers unique insights into various aspects of technology, innovation, and the impact of these companies on society [1] Group 2 - "The Soul of a New Machine" by Tracy Kidder reveals the internal workings of Data General in the 1970s, highlighting the tension between management and engineers [4] - "Doppelganger: A Trip Into the Mirror World" by Naomi Klein critiques capitalism and the role of social media in fostering narcissism [7] - "Steve Jobs" by Walter Isaacson provides an in-depth look at the life of Apple co-founder Steve Jobs, detailing his passion for innovation and the rise of Apple and Pixar [10] - "So You've Been Publicly Shamed" by Jon Ronson examines the dark side of online mob mentality and the impact of social media on public shaming [13] - "In the Plex" by Steven Levy offers insights into Google's internal operations and its influence on technology and society [17] - "Bad Blood" by John Carreyrou tells the shocking story of Theranos and its founder Elizabeth Holmes, emphasizing the dangers of pretending to succeed [20] - "You Look Like a Thing and I Love You" by Janelle Shane humorously explores the limitations of artificial intelligence and machine learning [22] - "The New New Thing" by Michael Lewis discusses the shift in Silicon Valley power dynamics from wealthy individuals to innovative thinkers [24] - "The Code" by Margaret O'Mara explains how Silicon Valley has dominated technological innovation and the role of government in its rise [28] - "An Ugly Truth" by Sheera Frenkel and Cecilia Kang reveals Facebook's sacrifices of user privacy in pursuit of growth [30] - "Meme Wars" by Joan Donovan et al. investigates the role of internet memes in cultural warfare and their impact on democracy [33] - "Billion Dollar Loser" by Reeves Wiedeman chronicles the rise and fall of WeWork, highlighting the thin line between visionary leadership and deception [36] - "Sid Meier's Memoir!" by Sid Meier provides insights into the gaming industry and the creation of the Civilization series [39] - "Hatching Twitter" by Nick Bilton details the founding of Twitter and the conflicts among its creators [42] - "Race After Technology" by Ruha Benjamin discusses the biases embedded in technology and their implications for systemic racism [45] - "Amazon Unbound" by Brad Stone explores Jeff Bezos's control over Amazon and the company's strategies for dominance [48] - "Samsung Rising" by Geoffrey Cain narrates Samsung's rise in the tech industry and its relationship with the South Korean government [51] - "Against Technoableism" by Ashley Shew challenges the notion that technology should "fix" disabilities, advocating for a more inclusive approach [54] - "Elon Musk" by Ashlee Vance provides a comprehensive look at Musk's ventures, including Tesla and SpaceX, and his impact on technology [56] - "Tracers in the Dark" by Andy Greenberg investigates the rise of digital crime in the cryptocurrency era and the efforts to combat it [59]
被网暴如何维权?如何收集保存证据?法官解答
Yang Shi Xin Wen Ke Hu Duan· 2025-06-13 08:10
Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the increasing incidents of online harassment and defamation among fans, particularly in the context of celebrity culture, and emphasizes the legal implications of such actions [1][10]. Group 1: Case Overview - A notable case involves a fan, Ms. Chen, who faced severe online harassment after expressing her views on a performance by a well-known comedian, leading to a public outcry from other fans [3][6]. - The harassment escalated to the point where Ms. Chen received threats and her personal information was shared publicly, resulting in significant emotional distress [5][6]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - Ms. Chen collected evidence, including screenshots and videos, and filed a lawsuit against the fan account responsible for the harassment, seeking removal of defamatory content and compensation for damages [6][9]. - The court found that the actions of the fan account constituted a clear violation of Ms. Chen's right to reputation, leading to a ruling in her favor [8][9]. Group 3: Legal Implications and Responsibilities - The case serves as a reminder that online anonymity does not exempt individuals from legal accountability for their actions, as laws protect individuals from defamation and harassment [10]. - The article stresses the importance of responsible online behavior and the need for individuals to refrain from spreading false information or engaging in harassment [10]. Group 4: Evidence Collection - The article provides guidance on how individuals can collect and preserve evidence in cases of online harassment, including identifying account details and documenting content through screenshots and recordings [11][12].
相声演员粉丝超话账号“挂人”号召网暴,法院:构成名誉侵权
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-06-12 07:04
Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the legal consequences of online harassment and the responsibilities of account managers in protecting individuals' rights, emphasizing the need to prevent online violence and defamation [1][2]. Group 1: Case Details - The case involves a well-known crosstalk actor's fan account that publicly shamed an individual, Chen, after a disagreement over a performance review, leading to online harassment [1]. - The court ruled that the account managers, Meng and Gao, must delete the harmful information, publicly apologize, and compensate Chen for damages due to the infringement of his reputation [2]. Group 2: Legal Implications - The Supreme Court's ruling serves to enhance public legal awareness regarding the misuse of online platforms for defamation and harassment, stressing that both individuals and organizations must refrain from such actions [2]. - The judgment aims to maintain social order and reduce instances of online violence, indicating a broader societal impact beyond the individual case [2].
守护好1.96亿未成年人的网络童年
Zhong Guo Qing Nian Bao· 2025-06-10 23:25
Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court released a report detailing the juvenile trial work from 1978 to 2024, highlighting the significant issue of minors being exposed to harmful online content [1] - The report indicates that the number of civil disputes involving minors' online rights is increasing, with a notable rise in cases related to in-game purchases and online tipping [4] - The implementation of the "Regulations on the Protection of Minors in Cyberspace" on January 1, 2024, aims to create a healthier online environment for minors by defining responsibilities for various stakeholders [2][4] Group 2 - The report emphasizes the need for a multi-faceted approach to ensure minors can navigate the internet safely and healthily, involving cooperation from families, schools, and the government [3][12] - There is a growing concern regarding the impact of internet culture on minors' values and the psychological effects of internet addiction, including risks of fraud and bullying [2][5] - The report notes that many minors are circumventing existing anti-addiction systems by using others' identities to access online games, indicating a gap in enforcement and parental guidance [8][9][10] Group 3 - The rise in online gaming and streaming has led to a significant increase in minors' online activity, with a reported 1.96 billion minor internet users in China, achieving a penetration rate of 97.3% [1] - The report highlights that the financial stakes in disputes involving minors can be substantial, with some cases exceeding 3 million yuan, far above typical spending levels for minors [4] - The need for improved online safety measures is underscored, as many platforms prioritize economic gain over the protection of minors, leading to a proliferation of harmful content [7][12]
陈芋汐遭网暴,抖音回应
21世纪经济报道· 2025-05-28 15:36
Group 1 - The article discusses the issue of online bullying faced by Chinese diver Chen Yuxi, particularly after her recent victories at the National Diving Championships [3][4] - Douyin's official account responded to reports of online harassment, stating that they have taken measures to clean up abusive and insulting comments directed at athletes and are actively combating online violence in sports [1][3] - The article highlights a broader concern regarding the normalization of online bullying in sports, which could hinder the development of a healthy sports culture among youth and impact the overall value of sports in society [4] Group 2 - The article references a recent piece from China Sports News that discusses the negative impact of online bullying on athletes, including examples from other sports events [3][4] - It notes that despite winning championships, athletes like Chen Yuxi still face significant online backlash, indicating a troubling trend in public perception and treatment of sports figures [3][4]
抖音回应陈芋汐被网暴
证券时报· 2025-05-28 11:45
最新回应。 5月28日,抖音黑板报微博发文称,经核查,平台已全面清理针对相关运动员的攻击、侮辱、极端、不友善言 论。平台持续针对体育饭圈现象展开专项治理,严厉打击涉体育领域的网暴、诽谤、煽动对立和非理性追星行 为。平台也呼吁广大用户理性表达支持,抵制网络戾气。 END 点击关键字可查看 潜望系列深度报道丨 股事会专栏 丨 投资小红书 丨 e公司调查 丨 时报会客厅 丨 十大明星私募访谈 丨 比亚迪,突然刷屏!发生了什么? 丨 沙特等4国,免签! 丨 涨停潮!热门赛道大爆发! 丨 昨 夜,大涨!道指猛拉超700点 丨 明日停牌!两家A股公司,控制权拟变更 丨 拼多多,盘前大跌!陈 磊最新发声! 丨 项目暂停!兴业银行致歉!字节跳动也澄清 丨 农药概念午后拉升,有个股20%涨 停!"新消费"股崛起! 丨 美私募公司拟竞购澳达尔文港,外交部回应 据反馈,2025年全国跳水冠军赛,陈芋汐与掌敏洁双人10米台夺冠后,抖音上出现大量针对陈芋汐的攻击、侮 辱言论。 值得一提的是,中国体育报在最新发布的《算法茧房正在编织体育的困局》中提到:"在前不久的多哈世乒赛 上,国乒小将林诗栋输球被网暴,国乒选手之间的比赛继巴黎奥运会之 ...
【西街观察】莫让“开盒”继续狂欢
Bei Jing Shang Bao· 2025-05-27 15:24
Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the urgent need for enhanced regulation and legal frameworks to address the growing issue of personal information leakage and the phenomenon known as "opening boxes" which exposes individuals' private information online [1][2][3]. Group 1: Regulatory Response - The Central Cyberspace Administration has issued a notice to strengthen the management of "opening boxes" by blocking information dissemination, improving early warning mechanisms, increasing punitive measures, and optimizing protective measures [1]. - There is a societal expectation for stronger regulations to combat the rampant issue of personal information leakage and the associated risks of online violence [1][2]. Group 2: Nature of the Problem - "Opening boxes" refers to the online exposure of personal privacy, which has escalated fears regarding information leakage, with the severity of such leaks surpassing public awareness [2]. - The prevalence of app-based over-collection of personal data, harassment calls, and targeted telecom fraud highlights the pervasive nature of personal information collection [2][3]. Group 3: Legal Framework and Challenges - Current laws protecting personal biometric information are fragmented across various legal texts, making enforcement challenging [4]. - Despite the introduction of guidelines to punish online violence, many cases remain unresolved due to insufficient evidence and difficulties in cross-platform evidence collection [4]. - There is a pressing need for clearer legal standards regarding the punishment of information misuse and for establishing a cross-platform defense mechanism to enhance personal information protection [4].
“开盒”明码标价 网信办点名多平台要求“零容忍”
Bei Jing Shang Bao· 2025-05-27 10:58
Core Viewpoint - The rise of "open box" behavior, a new form of online violence and illegal activity, has prompted regulatory bodies to take action to combat this issue, emphasizing the need for stricter measures and enhanced protection for personal information [1][7][11]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The Central Cyberspace Administration of China has issued a notice outlining requirements to combat "open box" issues, including blocking information dissemination, improving early warning mechanisms, increasing punitive measures, and enhancing protective measures [1][11]. - Major platforms such as Weibo, Tencent, Douyin, Kuaishou, Baidu, Xiaohongshu, Zhihu, Bilibili, and Douban have been instructed to implement these requirements and take responsibility for curbing "open box" activities [7][11]. - Three large websites have been penalized for failing to comply with regulations regarding "open box" behavior, highlighting the government's zero-tolerance approach [7]. Group 2: Nature of "Open Box" Behavior - "Open box" behavior involves maliciously disclosing personal information such as names, ID numbers, phone numbers, and addresses, inciting online harassment and abuse [2][8]. - Investigations revealed that illegal services for obtaining personal information are still prevalent on various online platforms, with some sites openly advertising their services [2][4][6]. - The pricing for these illegal services ranges from hundreds to thousands of yuan, depending on the sensitivity of the information requested [2][6]. Group 3: Legal Framework and Consequences - Recent guidelines from the "Two Highs and One Department" emphasize the legal repercussions for organizing "human flesh searches" and illegally collecting and disseminating personal information, which can lead to severe penalties under criminal law [10]. - The Civil Code affirms individuals' rights to privacy, making unauthorized disclosure of personal information a violation that can result in legal action [10]. - Legal experts warn that the consequences of "open box" behavior can include civil liability for damages and potential criminal charges for severe violations [8][10]. Group 4: Future Measures and Recommendations - The Central Cyberspace Administration plans to continue its high-intensity crackdown on "open box" issues while enhancing protective measures for personal information [11]. - Recommendations include improving data collection and usage boundaries on platforms, implementing desensitization of sensitive information, and utilizing AI to identify malicious content [10][11]. - Users are encouraged to increase their awareness of "open box" risks and take proactive steps to protect their personal information [11].
打击“开盒挂人”等网暴行为 司法如何发力
Zhong Guo Qing Nian Bao· 2025-05-13 22:39
Group 1 - The article highlights the rise of a new form of online violence known as "opening boxes" which involves maliciously disclosing personal information of individuals online [1][2] - The report indicates that the judicial system is actively combating online violence, with a significant number of convictions for crimes related to the infringement of personal information and defamation [2][5] - The involvement of minors in both perpetrating and being victims of online violence is emphasized, showcasing their vulnerability and lack of awareness regarding online safety [1][2][6] Group 2 - A specific case involving a streamer named Fangfang illustrates the severe consequences of online harassment, including threats and the unauthorized sharing of personal information [3][4] - The judicial outcomes for the perpetrators involved in the case demonstrate the legal repercussions for engaging in such online violence, with sentences and fines imposed [5][6] - The article discusses the role of online platforms in managing and preventing the spread of harmful content, stressing the need for higher accountability and proactive measures [7][10] Group 3 - The article outlines the challenges faced by victims in collecting evidence for online violence cases, highlighting the anonymity and rapid spread of information in the digital space [2][6] - Recent judicial guidelines aim to improve the legal framework for addressing online violence, particularly focusing on the protection of minors and the responsibilities of online service providers [6][9] - The need for enhanced education on digital literacy and legal awareness among minors is emphasized to prevent future incidents of online violence [10]
于东来事件,谁在逼着企业家沉默?
虎嗅APP· 2025-05-06 09:30
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the conflict between the founder of Pang Donglai and the influencer Chai Dui Dui, highlighting the broader implications of online defamation and the challenges faced by businesses in a digital environment where negative information spreads rapidly and often without accountability [2][9][12]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The conflict began on April 5, when Chai Dui Dui accused Pang Donglai of making excessive profits from selling jade, claiming to have evidence [3]. - Pang Donglai responded by publicly sharing sales data, pricing standards, and even third-party product testing results, while also offering refunds for quality issues [3]. - The situation escalated between May 2 and 3, with Pang Donglai threatening to withdraw from his business and shut down operations if legal actions were not taken against Chai Dui Dui [4]. Group 2: Industry Implications - The article emphasizes that this incident reflects a larger issue within the industry, where businesses are often forced to prove their integrity in the face of unfounded accusations, leading to a reactive rather than proactive stance [9][10]. - Similar incidents have occurred in the industry, such as with Jinlongyu and Three squirrels, where companies faced public scrutiny despite their efforts to clarify and rectify issues [11][12]. - The article argues that the current environment rewards those who spread negativity while punishing honest businesses, creating a cycle of distrust and fear [11][12]. Group 3: The Role of Social Media and Capital - The article points out that social media platforms prioritize emotionally charged content over factual accuracy, leading to a situation where negative information spreads faster than positive [18][19]. - It highlights that the current economic model incentivizes controversy and emotional engagement, with capital backing those who create divisive content [19][20]. - The article suggests that this environment has led to a "data Darwinism" where honest businesses struggle to survive while those engaging in negative practices thrive [22][29]. Group 4: Business Practices and Future Considerations - Pang Donglai's business model, which includes high employee benefits and a commitment to transparency, is presented as a potential solution to the current challenges faced by businesses [30][31]. - The article argues for a shift towards a more humane capitalism that values long-term trust and value creation over short-term emotional engagement [34][35]. - It concludes by calling for a cultural awakening where consumers consciously choose to support ethical businesses and reject low-quality, sensational content [34][35].