Group 1 - The article highlights the rise of a new form of online violence known as "opening boxes" which involves maliciously disclosing personal information of individuals online [1][2] - The report indicates that the judicial system is actively combating online violence, with a significant number of convictions for crimes related to the infringement of personal information and defamation [2][5] - The involvement of minors in both perpetrating and being victims of online violence is emphasized, showcasing their vulnerability and lack of awareness regarding online safety [1][2][6] Group 2 - A specific case involving a streamer named Fangfang illustrates the severe consequences of online harassment, including threats and the unauthorized sharing of personal information [3][4] - The judicial outcomes for the perpetrators involved in the case demonstrate the legal repercussions for engaging in such online violence, with sentences and fines imposed [5][6] - The article discusses the role of online platforms in managing and preventing the spread of harmful content, stressing the need for higher accountability and proactive measures [7][10] Group 3 - The article outlines the challenges faced by victims in collecting evidence for online violence cases, highlighting the anonymity and rapid spread of information in the digital space [2][6] - Recent judicial guidelines aim to improve the legal framework for addressing online violence, particularly focusing on the protection of minors and the responsibilities of online service providers [6][9] - The need for enhanced education on digital literacy and legal awareness among minors is emphasized to prevent future incidents of online violence [10]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the conflict between the founder of Pang Donglai and the influencer Chai Dui Dui, highlighting the broader implications of online defamation and the challenges faced by businesses in a digital environment where negative information spreads rapidly and often without accountability [2][9][12]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The conflict began on April 5, when Chai Dui Dui accused Pang Donglai of making excessive profits from selling jade, claiming to have evidence [3]. - Pang Donglai responded by publicly sharing sales data, pricing standards, and even third-party product testing results, while also offering refunds for quality issues [3]. - The situation escalated between May 2 and 3, with Pang Donglai threatening to withdraw from his business and shut down operations if legal actions were not taken against Chai Dui Dui [4]. Group 2: Industry Implications - The article emphasizes that this incident reflects a larger issue within the industry, where businesses are often forced to prove their integrity in the face of unfounded accusations, leading to a reactive rather than proactive stance [9][10]. - Similar incidents have occurred in the industry, such as with Jinlongyu and Three squirrels, where companies faced public scrutiny despite their efforts to clarify and rectify issues [11][12]. - The article argues that the current environment rewards those who spread negativity while punishing honest businesses, creating a cycle of distrust and fear [11][12]. Group 3: The Role of Social Media and Capital - The article points out that social media platforms prioritize emotionally charged content over factual accuracy, leading to a situation where negative information spreads faster than positive [18][19]. - It highlights that the current economic model incentivizes controversy and emotional engagement, with capital backing those who create divisive content [19][20]. - The article suggests that this environment has led to a "data Darwinism" where honest businesses struggle to survive while those engaging in negative practices thrive [22][29]. Group 4: Business Practices and Future Considerations - Pang Donglai's business model, which includes high employee benefits and a commitment to transparency, is presented as a potential solution to the current challenges faced by businesses [30][31]. - The article argues for a shift towards a more humane capitalism that values long-term trust and value creation over short-term emotional engagement [34][35]. - It concludes by calling for a cultural awakening where consumers consciously choose to support ethical businesses and reject low-quality, sensational content [34][35].

1.4 亿流量，这个数字足以让无数人眼红，在流量经济时代，它似乎等同于 "一夜暴富""成名在望" 的入场券。可当这 "泼天富贵" 真正降临，有人却选择 报警求助—— 01 流量成 "烫手山芋" 2024年11月，博主"大福在成长"发布了一则"失业后发现出门旅行并不快乐"的日常记录视频。视频中，她坦诚分享了自己失业后的迷茫与焦虑，原本只是 想在社交平台上寻求共鸣，却因视频被多个营销号搬运、二次剪辑，迅速登上热搜，话题阅读量突破1.4亿，相关讨论达数万条。 这场突如其来的流量狂欢并未给"大福"带来期待中的机遇，反而让她陷入了一场现实噩梦。随着视频的广泛传播，她的真实姓名、工作经历、社交账号， 甚至家庭住址都被网友扒出。熟人圈纷纷发来询问，前同事的议论、亲友的误解接踵而至，更有甚者在评论区进行恶意揣测，失控的舆论演变成一场针对 她个人生活的集体审判。 面对汹涌的网络暴力，"大福"最终选择报警，并在社交平台发布声明，要求搬运者删除视频、停止侵权。但即便如此，她的生活已无法回到从前，现实社 交关系也因舆论压力变得紧张。 这种"被动爆红"与李子柒等专业博主的"主动经营"形成鲜明对比。李子柒通过长期的内容规划、品牌塑造，逐 ...

作者丨好看的 01 大家还记得因一首"在小小的花园里挖呀挖呀挖"走红网络的黄老师吗？ 最近，她突然冲上了热搜榜第一位。 事情的起因，是有网友指出，黄老师靠着挖呀挖赚了一个"小目标"。 据这位网友所推算："黄老师两天赚75万，一年不得挖出一个亿？" 此话一出，立即引发全网热议： "知道网络赚钱，没想到这行业如此暴利啊" "是谁酸了我不说，黄老师真的是老天爷送饭吃" "幼儿园老师逆袭成亿万富婆，这是什么逆袭文女主？" ..... 随着传言愈演愈烈，黄老师也再一次被推上了舆论的风口浪尖。 但没过多久，这个传言就被黄老师本人亲手掐灭。 在访谈节目《生活的N次方》中，黄老师首次公开回应： 关于"挖出一个亿"纯属谣言，简直离谱。 她表示，这是根本没有的事情。自己在下班后，也是去家里饭店帮忙。 除此之外，黄老师也回应了关于"流量焦虑"的问题。 她坦言，其实自己并没有那么在乎流量。 如果真的在乎，就不会在爆火的时候隐退去生小孩了。 当然，如今还是会用心打磨每条视频内容，但不会太过焦虑。 在她看来，"有些东西能拥有过就已经非常幸运了。" 说实话，这份通透很难得。 尤其是作为曾火爆全网的"大网红"来说。 但很理解她，毕竟这几年， ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights a case of "opening boxes and hanging people," a new form of online violence that has led to severe consequences for victims, including mental health issues. The case involved a PhD student in cybersecurity and a college student, who were sentenced to prison for their actions, indicating the legal repercussions of such behavior [1][2][3]. Group 1: Legal and Regulatory Response - The Central Cyberspace Administration of China has intensified efforts to combat "opening boxes and hanging people," categorizing it as a significant issue requiring urgent attention [1]. - In November 2023, a campaign was launched to address this issue, particularly focusing on protecting minors from such online violence [1][2]. - The Supreme People's Court reported that in 2024, 292 individuals were convicted for violating personal information laws, emphasizing the legal consequences of online harassment [3]. Group 2: Social and Educational Implications - There is a concerning normalization of online violence among certain groups, where minor conflicts can escalate into severe harassment, as seen in the case of the PhD student [2]. - The need for enhanced legal education in higher education institutions is highlighted to foster a better understanding of the risks and ethical implications of online behavior [2]. - A collaborative mechanism involving schools, families, and social institutions is necessary to address the involvement of minors in online violence and ensure appropriate corrective education [2]. Group 3: Platform Responsibility and Community Management - Online platforms are urged to take greater responsibility in monitoring and managing content to prevent the occurrence of "opening boxes and hanging people" [3]. - Regular information oversight, handling of violating accounts, and identification of sensitive information are essential for platforms to eliminate the environment that allows such behaviors to thrive [3]. - The article calls for a comprehensive approach to governance that includes legal improvements, personal information protection, and effective community management to create a safer online space [3].

周六闲聊，给你们分享下今天我摄入的有意思的信息。 白天占据微博和知乎两大社区的最火话题，是某个知名数码博主翻车了。起因是下面这个帖子，直接把简中最大的两个文字社区都点炸了。 很多人初看这段话会隐隐觉得不舒服，但一下子也说不上来到底哪里不舒服。不过互联网上面有的是嘴替，我觉得说的最到位的一句话是，向上拒绝才是 克服讨好型人格，向下拒绝只不过是欺软怕硬。 在这个case里大部分网民选择和网约车司机共情，所以铺天盖地的指责涌向了发帖人，非常可怕的网络暴力，现在对于当事人来说可以算是出道以来的至 暗时刻。 我看到热搜的时候第一反应是惊讶，作为一个成名四五年的，粉丝千万+的知名博主，不应该说出网感这么差的话，我甚至都有点怀疑他是不是已经长时 间脱离互联网内容一线了。 吃互联网这口饭的人，最忌讳在话题上和弱势群体产生对抗，因为当今网络最大的政治正确就是向下共情。李佳琦当初一不小心说出一句"你们是不是不 够努力"就犯了众怒，哪怕之后在镜头前哽咽道歉，个人形象也已经遭受不可逆的损失。 一个客观事实是网络博主在成名后，大都在收入上有了质的飞跃，实现了财富阶层升级，经济基础决定上层建筑，这时的博主很容易在世界观上脱离平民 视角， ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the emergence and implications of the "opening box" industry, which allows individuals to easily access personal information about others, leading to significant privacy concerns and potential abuse [3][4][81]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The article begins with the incident involving a Baidu executive's daughter, clarifying that the data accessed was not from Baidu but from foreign software [3][4]. - It highlights the ease with which personal information can be accessed through the "opening box" service, likening it to an upgraded version of "human flesh search" [5][6]. Group 2: Evolution of Information Access - The transition from an anonymous internet era to one where personal information is easily exposed is discussed, emphasizing the role of social media in this shift [9][10][13]. - The article explains how "human flesh search" initially served as a form of public oversight but has evolved into a tool for online violence due to its accessibility [14][15]. Group 3: The "Opening Box" Industry Chain - The "opening box" industry has developed a complete supply chain, with data leaks primarily originating from social engineering and insider threats [17][18]. - Social engineering is defined as exploiting human weaknesses to gain access to sensitive information, making it difficult to ensure data security [19][20]. Group 4: Data Leakage Mechanisms - The article describes how hackers can easily breach databases and sell the information, with two main methods: spontaneous and customized data extraction [22][25]. - The concept of "credential stuffing" is introduced, where hackers exploit reused passwords across different platforms to gain unauthorized access [29][30]. Group 5: Role of Insiders - Insiders, such as employees with access to sensitive data, pose a significant risk, as they may sell information for personal gain [33][34]. - The article illustrates how the vast and unregulated data systems in China contribute to the ease of data leaks [34][35]. Group 6: Social Engineering Databases - The "social engineering database" serves as a middle layer in the "opening box" industry, where data is aggregated and sold to various entities, including fraudsters [42][45]. - The article notes that these databases allow for the creation of comprehensive profiles on individuals, leading to severe privacy violations [54][55]. Group 7: Market for Personal Information - The primary customers for social engineering databases are often involved in fraudulent activities, as they can purchase large volumes of personal data [60][61]. - The article explains how the ease of accessing personal information has led to a rise in scams and targeted harassment [62][63]. Group 8: Legal and Regulatory Challenges - Existing laws regarding online privacy and data protection are discussed, highlighting the challenges in enforcement and the need for more robust regulations [83][84]. - The article emphasizes that while there are laws against data misuse, the execution and effectiveness of these laws remain questionable [87][88]. Group 9: Future Implications - The article concludes by stressing the urgent need for national attention to the "opening box" industry, likening it to the fight against fraud [98][99]. - It calls for a comprehensive approach to protect individual privacy and dignity in the digital age, as the current trajectory poses significant risks to society [96][97].

3月1 9日晚，百度正式回应"开盒"事件：开盒信息并非源自百度，已就造谣内容报案。 近日，"谢广军女儿开盒"事件引发争议。百度在3月1 9日声明称，坚决谴责这种窃取和公开他 人隐私的网络暴力行为。百度对于任何侵犯用户隐私的行为都是零容忍。实际上，百度内部实 施了数据的匿名化、假名化处理;数据存储和管理实行严格隔离和权限分离，任何职级的员工 及高管均无权限触碰用户数据。百度安全部门反复调取了相关日志，并查验当事人权限。结果 表明， 开盒信息并非源自百度。 作 者丨孔海丽 编 辑丨骆一帆 江佩佩 据2 1世纪经济报道，3月1 7日下午，百度安全负责人陈洋在公司内网做出了一段回应说明，表 示在接到举报后，已经展开了调查并完成取证，结果显示，"谢广军女儿开盒事件"数据并非从 百度泄露。 其中提到两点： 本期编辑 江佩佩 "谢广军女儿开盒事件"，百度回应！ 腾讯，重磅发布！马化腾发声 从230亿加价到320亿，谷歌为何一定要买它？ SFC 21君荐读 一是百度内部做了数据的匿名化、假名化处理，并做了权限分离，没有人能有权限拿 到数据，谢广军也没有数据库的任何相关权限。 二是通过对此次开盒事件脉络的模拟调查，发现可以在海 ...

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving the daughter of Baidu's vice president, Xie Guangjun, has raised concerns about privacy and data security, with claims that personal information was not leaked from Baidu's database but rather sourced from overseas social media [2][3][4]. Group 1: Incident Overview - Baidu's security head stated that the data related to the "Xie Guangjun daughter opening box incident" was not leaked from Baidu, emphasizing that internal data was anonymized and access was restricted [2]. - Xie Guangjun publicly apologized for his daughter's actions, which involved sharing private information from overseas social media during an online dispute [3][4]. - The incident has gained significant attention, trending as the number one topic on social media [5]. Group 2: Online Harassment and Privacy Concerns - The incident has led to speculation that Xie Guangjun's daughter may have utilized Baidu's database to obtain personal information, although this remains unverified [6][10]. - Reports indicate that the daughter, under the alias "Yanzhou," has been involved in online harassment, exposing personal details of individuals, including a pregnant woman, leading to widespread backlash [7][8]. - There are allegations that "Yanzhou" has multiple social media accounts and may have fabricated evidence to support claims of her identity and connections to Baidu [9][10]. Group 3: Legal and Social Implications - The act of "opening boxes," which refers to maliciously exposing others' private information, has been linked to broader issues of online violence and privacy violations, with legal repercussions outlined by the Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission [11]. - Recent statistics indicate that in 2024, 292 individuals were convicted for violating personal information laws, highlighting the seriousness of such offenses [11].

Group 1 - The core issue of online violence is highlighted through the tragic story of a young girl, Zheng Linghua, who faced severe online bullying leading to her death after six months of harassment [1] - Zheng Linghua's case illustrates the difficulties victims face in seeking legal recourse against online violence, as her attempts to pursue justice were met with emotional distress and ultimately halted by her passing [1] - The article raises questions about the accountability for online violence and the challenges in defining legal boundaries for such actions, emphasizing the need for effective legal frameworks [1] Group 2 - The "Express Delivery Defamation Case" marks a significant milestone as China's first public prosecution of online violence, highlighting the evolving legal landscape regarding cyberbullying [2] - The victim, Xiao Gu, faced a fabricated narrative that emerged from a video taken without her consent, leading to a complex legal battle that involved nearly 200 pieces of evidence [2] - The case underscores the challenges faced by law enforcement in handling online violence, as it was a novel situation with no prior examples to guide the investigation and prosecution [2]