把握好坚持依法治国和依规治党有机统一基本要求 习近平法治思想是中国特色社会主义法治理论的重大创新发展，是新时代全面依法治国的根本遵循和行动指 南。图为日前，党员干部在北京图书大厦阅读《习近平法治文选》第一卷，通过读原著、学原文、悟原理， 不断提高法治思维和法治能力。尉承栋 摄 党的十八大以来，以习近平同志为核心的党中央时刻保持解决大党独有难题的清醒和坚定，将全面从严治党 和全面依法治国纳入"四个全面"战略布局，坚持全面依法治国，坚持制度治党、依规治党，完善党内法规制 度体系，将管党治党各方面、全过程、各领域纳入制度化、规范化、程序化轨道，新时代全面从严治党取得 了历史性成就。2016年12月，习近平总书记强调："我们党要履行好执政兴国的重大历史使命、赢得具有许 多新的历史特点的伟大斗争胜利、实现党和国家的长治久安，必须坚持依法治国与制度治党、依规治党统筹 推进、一体建设。"党的十九大报告提出，依法治国和依规治党有机统一。党的二十大报告强调："坚持制度 治党、依规治党，以党章为根本，以民主集中制为核心，完善党内法规制度体系，增强党内法规权威性和执 行力，形成坚持真理、修正错误，发现问题、纠正偏差的机制。"制度治 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent suicide of a hospital director due to prolonged online harassment highlights the severe impact of cyberbullying and the urgent need for effective legal measures to protect individuals' rights in the digital space [1][2]. Group 1: Cyberbullying and Its Implications - Cyberbullying, referred to as "keyboard violence," is increasingly recognized as a serious infringement on individuals' legal rights, leading to tragic outcomes [1][2]. - The phenomenon of "keyboard violence" is complex, involving the need to define the boundaries between orderly and disorderly behavior in society [2][3]. - The anonymity of online interactions allows individuals to express grievances and frustrations that they cannot address in real life, contributing to the prevalence of cyberbullying [3][4]. Group 2: Legal and Regulatory Framework - Establishing a legal framework that correlates online identities and activities with real-world governance is essential to ensure that the internet is not a lawless space [2][3]. - Online platforms must be held accountable for the content they host, as they play a crucial role in either facilitating or mitigating cyberbullying [2][3]. - A balanced approach is necessary to prevent platforms from overstepping their bounds while ensuring they do not ignore their responsibilities in cases of online harassment [2][3]. Group 3: Social Environment and Information Asymmetry - The rise of social discontent and the low likelihood of accountability for online actions contribute to the persistence of cyberbullying [3][4]. - Reducing information asymmetry and transaction costs in addressing online harassment is vital for protecting individuals' rights [4]. - The lack of consequences for cyberbullying not only disrupts social order but also poses risks to future industries, particularly as online behavior increasingly informs AI training [4].

Core Viewpoint - The drama "In the Name of Law" reflects the hidden function of prosecutorial investigation, emphasizing the importance of judicial supervision and fairness in the context of recent political directives [1][3]. Group 1: Theme and Content - The shift in the theme of "In the Name of Law" from anti-crime to prosecutorial investigation was influenced by the need to highlight judicial fairness as a critical societal value [1][3]. - The series is considered potentially the only one to depict prosecutorial investigation due to the sensitive and confidential nature of the subject matter, which limits the possibility of similar future productions [3][6]. - The production process involved extensive internal review and collaboration with legal experts to ensure accuracy while maintaining artistic expression [20][21]. Group 2: Audience Engagement and Perception - Concerns exist regarding audience focus on the issues presented in the drama rather than the judicial progress it aims to showcase, highlighting the challenge of managing public discourse [7][26]. - The casting choices reflect a challenge in finding new faces that embody the legal profession's characteristics, leading to a reliance on familiar actors [9][10]. - The series aims to reshape the public perception of lawyers, presenting them as integral to the legal community rather than as antagonists [13][22]. Group 3: Production Insights - The collaboration between the production team and legal experts was crucial, with real cases serving as inspiration for the narrative, ensuring a blend of realism and artistic storytelling [20][21]. - The series' length of 36 episodes was a strategic choice to provide a comprehensive narrative, countering the trend towards shorter formats in the industry [28][29]. - The production team emphasized the importance of content quality over market trends, aiming for a broad audience appeal while addressing serious themes [28][29]. Group 4: Future Implications - The series is seen as a tool to promote understanding of the prosecutorial role and its relevance to the public, contributing to the broader goal of advancing legal education and awareness [33][34]. - The impact of previous works like "In the Name of the People" has set a precedent for increasing interest in legal professions, which the current series aims to continue [22][34].