Group 1 - The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz is investigating Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. for potential violations of federal securities laws [1] - The investigation is initiated on behalf of investors who may have lost money on Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. [1] - Investors are encouraged to inquire about pursuing claims to recover their losses [1]

Core Viewpoint - Kaskela Law LLC is investigating the proposed acquisition of Green Dot Corporation to assess whether the transaction is fair to shareholders or undervalues the company's shares [1][3]. Group 1: Acquisition Details - On November 24, 2025, Green Dot announced agreements for acquisition by Smith Ventures and CommerceOne Financial Corporation, with Smith Ventures acquiring Green Dot's non-bank financial technology assets and CommerceOne acquiring Green Dot Bank [2]. - The proposed transaction includes an exchange of each share of Green Dot common stock for $8.11 in cash and 0.2215 shares of the new publicly traded bank holding company [2]. Group 2: Investigation Findings - The investigation has identified significant conflicts of interest in the transaction, suggesting that the sales process and consideration may be unfair to shareholders [3].

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against StubHub Holdings, Inc. for allegedly making false and misleading statements in its Offering Documents related to its September 2025 initial public offering [1]. Group 1: Allegations Against StubHub - The complaint claims that StubHub failed to disclose significant changes in the timing of payments to vendors, which adversely affected its free cash flow [3]. - It is alleged that these undisclosed changes rendered StubHub's free cash flow reports materially misleading [3]. - The lawsuit asserts that the positive statements made by StubHub regarding its business operations and prospects were materially false and lacked a reasonable basis due to the aforementioned issues [3]. Group 2: Lead Plaintiff Process - Investors in StubHub have until January 23, 2026, to seek appointment as a lead plaintiff representative in the class action [4]. - A lead plaintiff is typically the investor or small group of investors with the largest financial interest and who are representative of the class [4]. - The lead plaintiff will select counsel to represent the class, and participation as a lead plaintiff does not affect the ability to share in any recovery [4].

Core Viewpoint - The United States District Court for the Central District of California has allowed a securities fraud class action against WEBTOON Entertainment Inc. to proceed, indicating that the company may have misled investors regarding its Monthly Active Users (MAU) metrics during its IPO [2][3]. Group 1: Allegations of Misleading Information - The court found that the plaintiff adequately alleged that WEBTOON misrepresented the stability and growth potential of its MAU metrics at the time of its IPO, despite internal knowledge of declining user levels [3]. - WEBTOON allegedly characterized its MAU levels as "stable," "durable," and "consistent," while internally tracking a decline in these metrics leading up to the IPO [3]. - The delay of a promised AI recommendation tool was cited as a contributing factor to the weakening user metrics, which the company allegedly failed to disclose [3]. Group 2: Risk Disclosures - The court held that WEBTOON's risk disclosures were misleading, as the company only warned that MAU declines "could" occur, despite these risks having already materialized prior to the IPO [4]. - The complaint suggested that management was aware of the adverse trends but withheld this information from investors, creating a misleading impression of the company's performance [4]. Group 3: Actions for Shareholders - Shareholders who purchased WEBTOON shares around the June 27, 2024 IPO are encouraged to seek corporate reforms and the return of funds, with no cost involved [1][5].

Accessibility StatementSkip Navigation NEW YORK, Dec. 2, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Purcell & Lefkowitz LLP announces that it is investigating Eightco Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ORBS) on behalf of the company's shareholders. The investigation seeks to determine whether Eightco Holdings Inc.'s directors breached their fiduciary duties in connection with recent corporate actions. If you are a shareholder of Eightco Holdings Inc. and are interested in obtaining additional information about your rights and options, pleas ...

RADNOR, Pa., Dec. 01, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The law firm of Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP (www.ktmc.com) informs investors that a securities class action lawsuit has been filed against James Hardie Industries plc (“James Hardie”) (NYSE: JHX) on behalf of those who purchased or otherwise acquired James Hardie common stock between May 20, 2025, and August 18, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”). The lead plaintiff deadline is December 23, 2025. CONTACT KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER & CHECK, LLP: If you suffe ...

NEW YORK, Dec. 01, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Levi & Korsinsky, LLP notifies investors in James Hardie Industries plc. ("James Hardie Industries plc." or the "Company") (NYSE: JHX) of a class action securities lawsuit. CLASS DEFINITION: The lawsuit seeks to recover losses on behalf of James Hardie Industries plc. investors who were adversely affected by alleged securities fraud between May 20, 2025 and August 18, 2025. Follow the link below to get more information and be contacted by a member of our team: htt ...

NEW YORK, Dec. 01, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (NYSE: FCX) and certain of the Company’s senior executives for securities fraud after significant stock drops resulting from the potential violations of the federal securities laws. If you invested in Freeport, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/freeport-mcmoran-inc-clas ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against CarMax, Inc. and certain senior executives for securities fraud following a significant stock drop attributed to potential violations of federal securities laws [2][4]. Company Overview - CarMax, Inc. is a retailer specializing in used cars, which has recently faced legal challenges due to allegations of misleading statements regarding demand for its vehicles [5]. Financial Performance - CarMax reported disappointing financial results for Q2 of fiscal year 2026, with a 5.4% decline in retail used unit sales, a 6.3% decline in comparable store used unit sales, and a 2.2% decline in wholesale units [7]. - The company's net income for Q2 was approximately $95.4 million, down from $132.8 million in the previous year [7]. Stock Performance - Following the announcement of poor financial results on September 25, 2025, CarMax's stock price fell by $11.45 per share, or roughly 20%, from $57.05 to $45.60 [8]. - The unexpected departure of CEO Bill Nash on November 6, 2025, along with a weak preliminary Q3 outlook, led to an additional stock price drop of over 24% [8]. Legal Proceedings - Investors have until January 2, 2026, to request to lead the class action case, which is currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland [4]. - The lawsuit asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of CarMax investors [4].

Core Insights - Napster, formerly known as Infinite Reality, announced a $3 billion funding round in January, which has now been revealed to be non-existent, as the promised funds will not materialize [2][3][4] - The company claims to be a victim of misconduct and is cooperating with investigations by the SEC and the Department of Justice regarding the funding and its mysterious investor [3][4][10] Funding and Investor Details - The CEO John Acunto had previously stated that a mysterious investor would inject $3.36 billion at a valuation of $12 billion, which would have been one of the largest funding rounds of the year [2][4] - Following the announcement, Napster's communications indicated that the investor was a consulting firm named Sterling Select, which later clarified it was not an investor but had referred other potential investors [6][9] - The company has faced multiple lawsuits from creditors alleging unpaid debts, including a $22 million claim from the former owners of a virtual reality company it acquired [7][9] Company Operations and Challenges - Napster has been transitioning from a focus on the metaverse to artificial intelligence, acquiring several companies in the process, but has faced significant operational challenges, including layoffs of about one-third of its workforce [5][7] - The company has repeatedly promised shareholders opportunities to cash out through buyouts, but these promises have not materialized, leading to frustration among investors [3][4][7] - Allegations of inflated partnerships and financial misrepresentation have surfaced, raising questions about the company's credibility and operational integrity [4][5][6] Legal and Regulatory Scrutiny - The SEC and DOJ are investigating the circumstances surrounding the funding and the company's disclosures, with the SEC's inquiry initially focused on a canceled reverse merger [3][10] - If it is proven that Napster knowingly misled investors about the funding, the company could face severe consequences, including potential securities fraud charges [10]