Workflow
《平价医疗法案》补贴
icon
Search documents
政府停摆逼近历史纪录,民主党敦促特朗普介入谈判
Jin Shi Shu Ju· 2025-11-03 01:59
SHMET 网讯:随着政府停摆进入关键一周,僵局持续时间即将创下历史最长纪录,美国家庭和旅客承受的压力持续加剧,民主党参议员再次敦促特朗 普直接参与谈判以结束停摆。 上周晚些时候,议员们表示终于在重启政府运作的谈判中取得进展,并开始讨论如何处理即将到期的《平价医疗法案》强化补贴问题。这些补贴的终止 将使数百万美国人的医保账单急剧增加。民主党人已将对医疗保健的谈判作为投票支持结束停摆的条件,并多次阻止了共和党提出的重启政府运作法案。 由于主要机场人员短缺,上周日部分旅客经历了异常漫长的延误。根据美国联邦航空管理局的数据,飞往纽瓦克自由国际机场的航班平均延误超过三个 小时。从休斯顿乔治·布什洲际机场出发的旅客被告知,等候时间可能超过90分钟。 弗吉尼亚州民主党参议员蒂姆·凯恩(Tim Kaine)上周日表示,参议员们继续跨党派讨论可能达成的协议,以解决医疗保健问题并阻止白宫向民主党施 压的努力。自政府停摆开始以来,行政当局一直在解雇政府工作人员,并冻结数十亿美元用于蓝色州和城市(选民倾向于投票给民主党的州和城市)项目的 资金。 凯恩在美国广播公司《本周》节目中说:"我只希望找到一条能让人们账单不激增的路径,我希望 ...
白宫首席经济顾问研判:政府关门可能本周结束!
Jin Shi Shu Ju· 2025-10-20 13:26
Group 1 - The White House Chief Economic Advisor, Hassett, predicts that the government shutdown "may end sometime this week" but warns of "stronger measures" if cooperation from Democrats is not achieved [1][3] - The government shutdown has entered its third week, becoming the third longest in U.S. history, with no clear end in sight due to partisan struggles over federal funding priorities [1][2] - The economic cost of the shutdown is expected to increase, with key federal workers facing their first "no-pay day" this week, impacting the payroll schedule [1][2] Group 2 - The delayed September CPI data is set to be released this week, amidst the ongoing government shutdown affecting various sectors from agriculture to real estate [2] - The core of the deadlock revolves around healthcare disputes, with Democrats aiming to extend subsidies under the Affordable Care Act, while Republicans refuse to negotiate until the shutdown ends [2][3] - Hassett mentions that moderate Democrats may push forward to resolve the shutdown, allowing for negotiations on desired policies once the government reopens [3]
美国政府又面临“关门”!民主党开条件,不满足“9月底就关门”
Hua Er Jie Jian Wen· 2025-09-14 01:21
Core Points - The U.S. government is on the brink of a shutdown as the September 30 deadline for federal funding approaches, with Democrats demanding the extension of Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies as a condition for supporting any funding agreement [1][2] - Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has threatened to vote against the Republican short-term funding bill unless it includes provisions for healthcare needs [1][3] - The expiration of enhanced ACA subsidies could lead to significant premium increases for millions of Americans, potentially causing political backlash ahead of the 2026 midterm elections [2][3] Group 1: Political Standoff - The core of the standoff revolves around the extension of enhanced ACA subsidies, which were initially passed as part of COVID-19 relief measures and significantly reduced premiums for low-income and middle-class consumers [3][4] - Approximately 24.3 million Americans are enrolled in ACA plans, with around 22.4 million receiving subsidies; the termination of these subsidies could result in an average monthly premium increase of over 75% for those affected [3][4] Group 2: Republican Dilemma - Republicans face a challenging decision as they have long opposed ACA and related subsidies, but the potential political fallout from rising premiums is concerning, especially with narrow control of Congress [4][6] - The Congressional Budget Office estimates that making the enhanced subsidies permanent could increase the deficit by $335 billion over the next decade [4][6] Group 3: Legislative Dynamics - The current congressional landscape complicates the passage of any bill, with Republicans holding a slim majority in the House and needing bipartisan support in the Senate [6][7] - Some Republican leaders are showing signs of compromise regarding the extension of subsidies, while others remain firm on fiscal discipline [6][7] Group 4: Political Pressures - External and internal political pressures are complicating the situation, with former President Trump opposing any compromise with Democrats and progressive Democrats pushing for a strong stance [7] - The focus remains on ACA subsidies, as they may garner some Republican support, contrasting with other healthcare funding issues that are less likely to attract bipartisan agreement [7]