（来源：新华日报） 回访环节，"回访小组"推行"一人一策"。针对一名思想包袱重的被处分干部，小组先通过同事"换位思 考"疏导情绪，再解读政策解思想"疙瘩"，还协调解决其家庭就医难题，让关怀直抵人心。 为补业务短板，街道组建"帮扶小组"，由分管领导、部门负责人任"业务导师"，以"传帮带"提能力；依 托"师徒结对"定期开展培训，形成"互帮互促"生态。 "要是没有街道的容错机制，我可能还陷在失误的自责里。现在卸下了包袱，干起工作更有劲儿了！"近 日，泰州市海陵区城中街道一名曾因工作失误面临问责的干部，在街道党工委容错认定与精准帮扶后， 以饱满状态重返重点工作一线。这生动一幕，正是街道党工委落实"三个区分开来"、深化容错激励机制 的鲜活注脚。 为激活党员干部干事创业"一池春水"，推动"有错"向"有为"转变，城中街道党工委聚焦容错纠错、激励 赋能、考核导向三大核心环节靶向发力，既为敢担当者筑牢纪法"防护网"，更注入干事"推动力"，让干 部敢为的氛围愈发浓厚。 容错纠错划底线：精准定责"不跑偏" "绝不能让干事者流汗又流泪，必须把失误与违纪、敢为与乱为的界限辨明白。"街道党工委相关负责人 表示，已联合多部门建立"研判小组 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the "washing dishes effect," which suggests that the more one engages in activities, the higher the probability of making mistakes. This phenomenon is linked to the need for innovation and the acceptance of errors in the process of doing work [1][2] - Xi Jinping emphasizes the importance of encouraging innovation while also holding individuals accountable, advocating for a nuanced approach to handling mistakes through the principle of "three distinctions" [3][4] - The article highlights the historical context of the Communist Party's development, noting that the party has grown stronger through a process of learning from mistakes and fostering a culture of tolerance towards errors [1][3] Group 2 - The article stresses that in the context of reform and innovation, mistakes are inevitable, and a rigid approach to accountability can stifle initiative and creativity among party members [2][4] - It outlines the "three distinctions" principle, which differentiates between various types of mistakes, such as those made in exploratory efforts versus intentional violations of rules [3][4] - The need for a supportive environment for those who take risks and make mistakes is emphasized, suggesting that organizations should provide backing to encourage proactive behavior among their members [4]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the "washing dishes effect," which suggests that the more one engages in activities, the higher the likelihood of making mistakes. It emphasizes the need for a balanced approach to managing errors in the context of innovation and responsibility, advocating for a system that encourages taking risks while also providing a framework for accountability [1][2][3][4]. Group 1: Error Management and Accountability - The concept of "three distinctions" is introduced to differentiate between various types of errors made by officials, emphasizing the importance of context in evaluating mistakes [3][4]. - The article highlights the historical perspective of the Communist Party, noting that it has grown stronger through a process of learning from mistakes and fostering a culture of tolerance towards errors [1][2]. - It stresses that a rigid, one-size-fits-all approach to accountability can stifle innovation and discourage proactive behavior among officials [2][4]. Group 2: Encouragement of Innovation - The article calls for a supportive environment where officials feel empowered to take risks and innovate without the fear of harsh repercussions for honest mistakes [3][4]. - It emphasizes the need for leadership to actively support and defend those who take initiative, thereby creating a culture that values effort and learning over perfection [4]. - The establishment of mechanisms for both encouragement and correction is deemed essential for fostering a proactive and responsible workforce [4].