一方面，减持是股东正常行使财产权利，只要减持行为建立"公平、公正、公开"等三公原则及合规等基 础上，股东有权行使正当权益； 另一方面，由于资本市场信息的不对称性，作为上市公司大股东或高管的内部人，其减持行为或也可以 作为普通投资者观察上市公司一个参考信号，即其内部关键人减持是否或可能意味着其对公司未来发展 可能缺乏信心或公司当前股价可能存在高估的水分基本面难以支撑等信号？这种"内部人"减持信号或值 得投资者高度关注。 据公开资料显示，*ST返利前身是ST昌九。2020年3月，ST昌九公告重组预案，将以发行股份及现金购 买的方式，购买上海中彦信息科技有限公司（以下简称"中彦科技"）100%股权，中彦科技系 互联网 电 商导购平台"返利网"的经营主体，交易成功后，返利网顺利借壳ST昌九登陆A股市场。 近期，市场行情持续向好， 上证指数 一度突破四年新高，与之对应的是，个股也随之"水涨船高"。然 而，在市场情绪氛围较浓之际，上市公司大股东或高管却抛出减持计划。对于普通投资者，又该如何理 解这种减持行为？ 基于上述一系列背景，我们将对近期公司相关减持进行系列复盘。 9月15日， *ST返利 公告，股东江西昌九集团计划 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent market rally has led to an increase in stock prices, yet major shareholders and executives of listed companies are announcing plans to reduce their holdings, raising questions about the implications of such actions for ordinary investors [1] Group 1: Shareholder Actions - Shareholders have the right to reduce their holdings as a normal exercise of property rights, provided that the actions are conducted fairly and transparently [1] - Insider selling by major shareholders or executives may signal a lack of confidence in the company's future or suggest that the current stock price is overvalued [1] Group 2: Company Overview - *ST Fanli, formerly known as ST Changjiu, underwent a major asset restructuring in 2020, acquiring 100% of Shanghai Zhongyan Information Technology Co., which operates the e-commerce platform "Fanli.com" [2] - The company has established partnerships with major e-commerce platforms and local service providers, but its overall revenue is currently shrinking, with projected revenue for 2024 expected to be less than 300 million yuan [2] Group 3: Financial Performance - In the first half of 2025, *ST Fanli reported approximately 186 million yuan in revenue, a year-on-year increase of 36.01%, but incurred a net loss of about 33.28 million yuan [4] - The company's sales expenses have significantly outpaced revenue growth, with sales expenses increasing by 100% compared to the revenue growth of 36% [4] Group 4: Regulatory Issues - The company received a warning from the Jiangxi Securities Regulatory Bureau due to inaccuracies in its financial disclosures, which violated regulations regarding information disclosure [5] - The inaccuracies were related to the estimation of variable consideration in advertising contracts for the first quarter of 2024, but the corrections did not affect previously disclosed financial reports for the year [6]

Group 1 - A silent capital harvesting is occurring in the A-share market, with major shareholders of numerous listed companies extracting value, leaving retail investors struggling amid plummeting stock prices [2] - The downfall of ST Pavo, a once-prominent new energy materials company, highlights the harsh reality of the new energy bubble, with losses of 248 million yuan in 2023 and a projected increase to 487 million yuan in 2024, leading to a stock price drop from 38 yuan to 10 yuan, erasing 73% of shareholder wealth [3] - The company’s actual controller, Zhang Bao, faced investigation for fund occupation and information disclosure violations, marking the beginning of the delisting countdown [3] Group 2 - A collective trend of shareholders reducing their stakes is evident, with companies like Changqing Technology and Zhongqi New Materials seeing significant sell-offs shortly after their stock prices surged [5] - For instance, Changqing Technology's shareholders announced a complete sell-off of 5.98% of their shares, cashing out 180 million yuan after a 90% price increase [5] - Other companies, such as Union Medical and EDA leader GeLun Electronics, also witnessed substantial reductions in shareholding, indicating a broader trend of institutional and shareholder exits [5] Group 3 - Certain types of companies are becoming targets for capital abandonment, including technology semiconductors, biopharmaceuticals, new energy vehicles, and chemical materials, as evidenced by significant shareholder reductions in these sectors [7] - The semiconductor sector, represented by companies like Longxin Zhongke and Zhangqu Technology, is facing immense challenges, prompting executives to sell off shares [7] - The biopharmaceutical sector is similarly affected by procurement policies, leading to shareholder exits from companies like Maike Audi and Fudan Zhangjiang [7] Group 4 - Financial risks are closely linked to shareholder reductions, with companies like RenZhi Co. and Youyou Food seeing executives cashing out despite poor performance, signaling potential distress [7] - These companies often share characteristics of tight cash flow, with major shareholders' sell-offs indicating a desperate attempt to salvage their investments [7] Group 5 - The capital game reveals hidden harvesting techniques, with companies like Shengyang Technology and Beijing-Shanghai High-Speed Railway employing methods such as block trading and strategic selling to manipulate stock prices [8] - The comparison between TCL Technology and SMIC illustrates that major shareholder reductions are not inherently negative but can reflect information asymmetry and strategic profit-taking [8] - The overall scenario presents a brutal capital landscape, urging retail investors to remain vigilant and rational in their investment decisions [8]