11月7日上午，中国高校科技期刊研究会第29次年会开幕式在陕西省西安市举办。年会以"服务创新策源 ·培育一流方阵：新时代高校科技期刊的使命"为主题。会议得到西安交通大学期刊中心协办，近20家国 内外期刊服务机构支持。 教育部科学技术与信息化司副司长邹晖在视频致辞中表示，教育部制定了世界一流科技期刊建设的工作 方案，部署实施六大工程，聚焦信息、海洋、生命等重点学科领域，着力打造一批品牌期刊，并支持高 等教育出版社、清华大学出版社、浙江大学出版社开展集群化试点。她强调，高校科技期刊一要聚焦国 家战略，尤其关注学科空白领域的新刊创办；加强资源汇聚，吸引海外期刊加入；坚持守正创新，将期 刊建设纳入本校科研创新和学科建设整体工作中，不断提升办刊质量，规范学术出版秩序。 西安交通大学党委副书记孙早介绍，西安交通大学以"服务创新策略、培育一流方阵"为主题，明确科技 期刊聚焦原创成果本土发表与集群化建设两大方向。自2020年启动期刊集约化改革、整合全校期刊资源 以来，先后有10种期刊入选中国科技期刊卓越行动计划。 中国科协科学技术创新部部长刘兴平作了题为"科技期刊集群建设与发展策略"的主旨报告。他表示，随 着中国科技期刊卓越 ...

Group 1 - The meeting focused on promoting the gathering of international scientific organizations in Beijing to enhance the city's role in global technological innovation [1][2] - Emphasis was placed on the importance of high-level scientific journals as platforms for showcasing and disseminating research results, with a call for more journals to be established in Beijing [2][3] - The need for continuous adjustment and optimization of academic disciplines and professional settings in higher education was highlighted, aligning with technological development and national strategic needs [2][3] Group 2 - The cultivation of outstanding engineers was identified as a key area for integrating education development, technological innovation, and talent training, with a focus on practical engineering skills [3] - The global postdoctoral incentive plan was discussed as a means to build a high-level talent hub, emphasizing collaboration between central and local authorities to enhance postdoctoral station construction [3]

Group 1: International Science Organizations - The meeting emphasized the importance of attracting more international science organizations to Beijing to enhance the city's role in global technological innovation [1] - It highlighted the need for a dual approach of attracting and nurturing leading enterprises and institutions to establish international science organizations [1] - The development of a first-class environment and the construction of headquarters clusters for international science organizations were underscored [1] Group 2: High-Level Scientific Journals - The meeting stressed the significance of scientific journals as platforms for showcasing and disseminating research results [2] - It called for the establishment of more high-level scientific journals in Beijing, focusing on strategic and emerging fields [2] - The need for improved publishing platforms and a better ecosystem for scientific journal development was highlighted [2] Group 3: Academic Discipline Optimization - The meeting pointed out that academic disciplines are crucial to modern higher education systems and should align with technological development and national strategic needs [2] - It advocated for the adjustment of academic disciplines to meet urgent industry demands, particularly in artificial intelligence and emerging industries [2] - The importance of interdisciplinary integration and innovative training models was emphasized to cultivate high-quality, versatile talents [2] Group 4: Excellence in Engineering Education - The meeting identified the need to build a world-class training system for outstanding engineers, focusing on national strategic directions [3] - It emphasized the integration of education and industry, promoting collaboration between schools and enterprises [3] - The establishment of new city-level industry-education integration bases in key fields like AI and biomedicine was discussed [3] Group 5: Postdoctoral Incentive Program - The meeting recognized the postdoctoral incentive program as a key initiative for building a high-level talent hub [3] - It called for enhanced collaboration between central and local governments to improve postdoctoral station construction [3] - The need for dynamic evaluation and policy measures to support postdoctoral work in Beijing was highlighted [3]

Group 1: International Science Organizations - The meeting emphasized the importance of attracting more international science organizations to Beijing to enhance the city's role in global technological innovation [1] - It highlighted the need for a dual approach of attracting and nurturing leading enterprises and institutions to establish international science organizations [1] - The focus is on creating a first-class development environment and optimizing services for foreign talent [1] Group 2: High-Quality Scientific Journals - The meeting underscored the role of scientific journals as platforms for showcasing and disseminating research findings [2] - It called for the establishment of more high-level scientific journals in Beijing, leveraging local resources and encouraging collaboration between central and local entities [2] - There is a focus on strategic areas and emerging fields to enhance academic leadership and improve the ecosystem for scientific journal development [2] Group 3: Academic Discipline Optimization - The meeting recognized academic disciplines as a key pillar of modern higher education and stressed the need for continuous adjustment based on technological development and national strategic needs [2] - It advocated for a demand-driven approach to establish urgently needed disciplines, particularly in artificial intelligence and emerging industries [2] - The importance of interdisciplinary integration and innovative training models was also highlighted to cultivate high-quality, versatile talent [2] Group 4: Excellence in Engineering Education - The meeting identified the need for a world-class system for cultivating outstanding engineers, focusing on national strategic directions and practical engineering education [3] - It emphasized the integration of education and industry, promoting collaboration between schools and enterprises to align talent development with industry needs [3] - Policy support and a stable evaluation mechanism were deemed essential for enabling engineers to achieve results in the industry [3] Group 5: Postdoctoral Incentive Program - The meeting discussed the postdoctoral incentive program as a key initiative for building a high-level talent hub [3] - It stressed the importance of collaboration between central and local authorities to enhance the quality of postdoctoral stations [3] - Dynamic evaluation and comprehensive policy measures were highlighted to create a favorable environment for innovation and entrepreneurship [3]