初冬的黄海之滨，赣榆大地处处涌动着高质量发展的热潮：石化产业园内塔吊林立、机器轰鸣，新项目 建设如火如荼；城市街头口袋公园绿意盎然，居民笑意盈盈；政务服务大厅里流程简化、效率提升，企 业办事便捷顺畅…… "十四五"以来，赣榆区始终坚守"工业立区、产业强区"战略定力，全面贯彻新发展理念，以"10+1"重点 工程为牵引，稳步推进经济社会高质量发展，向"千亿强区"目标坚实迈进。如今的赣榆，地区生产总值 接连跨越两个百亿台阶，三产比例实现从"二三一"到"三二一"的历史性转变；"四上"企业达1265家，实 体经济根基愈发坚实；累计完成固定资产投资1369.34亿元，产业有效投资668亿元，121个亿元以上项 目顺利投产，投资潜力全面释放；成功入选"全国投资潜力百强区"并位列第35位，在这片充满活力的土 地上，书写着"量质齐升、民富区强"的高质量发展答卷。 强链补链 夯实"千亿县区"硬支撑 11月5日，江苏省企业联合会发布2025江苏百强企业、江苏制造业百强企业、江苏服务业百强企业三张 榜单，赣榆区新海石化有限公司成功跻身江苏百强企业、江苏制造业百强企业双榜单。作为赣榆产业标 杆企业，新海石化先后斩获"全国石油和化学工业 ...

最高法发布典型案例，回应物业领域群众关注的问题 物业纠纷该注意哪些维权要点（法治聚焦） 本报记者 魏哲哲 近年来，业主与物业服务人之间矛盾时有发生，并呈现出易复发、化解难等特点。最高人民法院日前发 布5件物业服务合同纠纷典型案例，对物业费催收方式、物业服务合同终止后的"交接难"等物业领域群 众关注的问题进行回应，旨在充分发挥典型案例的示范引导效应，统一裁判规则，做好物业纠纷矛盾预 防化解。最高法积极回应群众关切，指导各级人民法院妥善应对物业领域的新情况新问题，实质性化解 包括物业服务合同纠纷在内的民事纠纷，着力促推解决人民群众急难愁盼问题。 物业服务人不能以限制使用门禁系统等方式催缴物业费 【案情】某小区业主张某发现，因其欠缴物业费被小区物业公司禁止使用所住单元电梯及门禁系统。与 某物业公司交涉无果后，张某诉至法院，要求恢复自己对电梯及门禁系统的使用功能。 法院审理认为，张某虽欠缴物业费，但某物业公司不应以不给业主激活门禁卡使其不能正常进入单元 门、不能正常使用电梯门禁系统等方式催缴物业费。张某欠缴物业费的违约行为，某物业公司可另行依 法维权。经法院依法释明后，某物业公司恢复了张某对门禁系统的使用。 【案情】 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the efforts of the Ganyu District in Lianyungang City to improve property management through community involvement and innovative governance models, emphasizing the importance of resident autonomy in urban renewal [1][5]. Group 1: Community Involvement - The Ganyu District has established a collaborative governance system involving homeowners' committees, property service agencies, and industry organizations, achieving a homeowners' committee formation rate of 54.3% with 75 committees established [5]. - The district has implemented a "one community, one strategy" model to enhance property management, ensuring transparency in service fees and financial operations through both online platforms and public announcements [9]. Group 2: Resident Autonomy - The establishment of homeowners' committees has empowered residents, allowing them to actively participate in decision-making regarding property management, which has led to the collection and processing of 70 suggestions for community improvement [9]. - The district aims for full coverage of homeowners' committees across all 15 towns, significantly enhancing grassroots governance effectiveness [11]. Group 3: Financial Transparency and Improvements - Property companies have been required to publicly disclose service fee expenditures, with one community investing 1.6 million yuan in renovations and upgrades, resulting in improved community aesthetics and increased resident satisfaction [9].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a legal case in Guangzhou regarding the replacement of an old elevator in a residential building, highlighting the necessity, legality, and rationality of homeowners collectively deciding to replace the elevator despite some dissenting opinions among the residents [2][5][6]. Group 1: Case Background - The residential building, known as "Yue Certain Pavilion," was built in 1999 and has 25 floors with 192 units sharing two elevators. The elevators were found to have significant wear and tear, necessitating replacement [3]. - Homeowners Chen and Liu organized a collective funding effort to replace the elevator, with 144 out of 192 homeowners voting in favor and paying their share before the contract was signed [3][4]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - After some homeowners refused to pay their share, Chen and Liu took the matter to court, seeking payment from the dissenting homeowners. The first instance court ruled in favor of Chen and Liu, stating the necessity of replacing the old elevator [4][5]. - The second instance court upheld the initial ruling, emphasizing the importance of community cooperation and the need for safety in residential buildings [5]. Group 3: Legal Considerations - The court evaluated the legality of the homeowners' actions, noting that the absence of a homeowners' association or formal meeting did not invalidate the collective decision-making process, as a significant majority supported the initiative [6]. - The court recognized the rationality of the homeowners' decision to replace the elevator, framing it as a selfless act that promotes community welfare and safety [7]. Group 4: Implications - The case sets a precedent for how homeowners can exercise their collective rights in the absence of formal governance structures, reinforcing the importance of community engagement and cooperation in residential management [6][7]. - The ruling reflects a broader legal recognition of the rights of homeowners to make decisions that enhance safety and quality of life in their communities, promoting a sense of shared responsibility [7].