Market Overview - The textile and apparel sector has shown a performance in line with the broader market since August, with textile manufacturing outperforming branded apparel, recording increases of 4.2% and 3.4% respectively [13][19] - Key companies leading the upward trend include Xtep International (+9.4%), Bosideng (+8.5%), and Li Ning (+8.1%) [13][19] Brand Apparel Insights - In July, the retail sales of clothing grew by 1.8% year-on-year, reflecting a slight deceleration compared to the previous month [21] - E-commerce sales saw a significant rebound, particularly in outdoor apparel, with growth rates of 26% for outdoor clothing and 11% for sportswear [21][28] - Notable brands with double-digit growth include Descente (+63%), Puma (+41%), and Lululemon (+39%) [21] Textile Manufacturing Insights - Vietnam's textile exports accelerated in July, with a month-on-month growth of 16.7%, while China's textile exports showed a modest increase of 0.5% [2] - The PMI for Vietnam, Indonesia, and India rose by 3.5, 2.3, and 0.7 respectively, indicating improved manufacturing conditions [2] - The cotton prices have shown slight fluctuations, with domestic prices decreasing by 0.7% and international prices increasing by 1.8% since August [2] Company Performance and Forecasts - Non-sport apparel brands have generally faced challenges due to macroeconomic conditions, leading to a decline in revenue and increased inventory impairment [4] - Sports apparel brands have maintained robust fundamentals, with management teams optimistic about meeting annual performance targets despite a slowdown in growth [4] - Companies like Shenzhou International and Huayi Group are expected to show significant earnings resilience post the current low point in Q2 and Q3 [4][7] Investment Recommendations - Focus on companies with strong fundamentals and low valuations, particularly those with high performance in mid-year reports [3][7] - Recommended stocks include Anta Sports, Xtep International, and Li Ning for branded apparel, and Shenzhou International and Huayi Group for textile manufacturing [7][8]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the performance benchmarks of private equity funds in China, highlighting the challenges and expectations of Limited Partners (LPs) regarding return timelines and the importance of data transparency in the industry [4][5][7]. Group 1: Fund Performance Metrics - The report indicates that achieving a DPI (Distributions to Paid-In capital) of 1 within 7 years is considered excellent, while 9 years is the norm, and 13 years is a warning sign for fund performance [14][27]. - For funds established for 5 years, an excellent DPI can reach 50%, while those in the bottom quartile may take approximately 13 years to break even [14][27]. - The performance data from 2008 to 2023 shows that the top quartile funds have consistently outperformed, with a DPI of 2.03 in 2008 and declining to 0.00 by 2023 [15]. Group 2: Comparison with U.S. Funds - The article compares the performance of Chinese VC funds with U.S. VC funds, revealing similar return timelines: top quartile U.S. funds take 7-8 years to break even, while median funds take around 9 years [16][27]. - The findings suggest that the perceived slowdown in DPI is not unique to China but reflects a broader trend in the VC industry [18]. Group 3: Importance of Data Transparency - The report emphasizes the need for improved data transparency in the Chinese private equity market, as the current lack of transparency complicates the accurate assessment of fund performance [7][28]. - The Benchmark report serves as a critical tool for LPs to evaluate their investments and assess new funds, highlighting the importance of reliable data in establishing industry standards [8][28]. Group 4: Performance Realization - The article introduces the "performance realization degree" metric, which measures how much of the total value (TVPI) has been returned to LPs as cash (DPI), indicating that Chinese funds have a higher realization degree compared to their U.S. counterparts [22][28]. - The findings suggest that while the overall performance of Chinese funds appears strong, the realization of returns in cash is crucial for true value creation [28].