Core Viewpoint - The establishment of the Wei Shi Philosophy Research Institute at Liaoning University aims to promote theoretical innovation and deepen academic originality, responding to the profound changes in society and emphasizing the connection between academia and practice [3][5]. Group 1: Event Overview - The first Wei Shi Philosophy Seminar and the unveiling ceremony of the Wei Shi Philosophy Research Institute were successfully held at Liaoning University, attended by renowned experts and scholars from various institutions [1]. - The opening ceremony was hosted by the Dean of the Philosophy Department, who emphasized the importance of theoretical and methodological self-awareness in Chinese philosophy [3]. Group 2: Institutional Goals and Philosophy - The Wei Shi Philosophy Research Institute adheres to the "three realities" concept of reality, truth, and pragmatism, aiming to engage with societal needs and promote philosophical innovation [5]. - The institute plans to follow a three-step approach: moving out of the campus, engaging with society, and advancing to the forefront of philosophical research [5]. Group 3: Expert Contributions - Professor Zhang Ke, the chief expert of the institute, discussed the stagnation in methodological innovation within the philosophy community and proposed Wei Shi as a new philosophical methodology centered on facts and reality [14]. - Various scholars presented their insights on the significance of Wei Shi philosophy, emphasizing its potential to address real-world issues and contribute to the development of a Chinese philosophical discourse [41][43]. Group 4: Methodological Discussions - The conference featured discussions on the application of Wei Shi methodology in various fields, including ethics, history, and political philosophy, highlighting its relevance in contemporary philosophical discourse [31][39]. - Scholars emphasized the need for a return to facts and the integration of emotional realities within the framework of Wei Shi philosophy, advocating for a comprehensive understanding of facts [39].

会议现场 开幕式 2025年12月20日，"学术原创力与构建中国自主知识体系的青年自觉"研讨会暨《探索与争鸣》40年发展 座谈会在中国浦东干部学院举行。 吴尚之发表讲话 开幕式上，中国期刊协会会长吴尚之发表讲话。他充分肯定了《探索与争鸣》40年来紧紧围绕党和国家 对哲学社会科学和学术期刊的要求和部署，积极探索综合性学术期刊发展之路，形成鲜明办刊特色的发 展历程，认为其聚焦重大主题、服务时代需求，坚守办刊初心、推动学术繁荣，创新办刊模式、促进融 合发展的办刊实践，是一份宝贵的经验。他提出，《探索与争鸣》要以40周年为新起点，引领学术创 新、提高办刊质量，强化数智赋能、提高传播力与影响力，筑牢人才根基、培育更多青年人才，为构建 中国自主知识体系作出应有的新的贡献。 权衡发表致辞 上海市委宣传部副部长、上海市新闻出版局局长权衡发表致辞。他指出，《探索与争鸣》40年历程不仅 见证了我国哲学社会科学的繁荣发展，更以其鲜明的学术风格和坚定的思想立场，为上海哲学社会科学 事业的繁荣发展注入了强劲动力，其服务青年、面向未来的办刊传统，不仅是刊物的宝贵财富，也彰显 了上海学术期刊界的活力与底蕴。他希望刊物持续坚持正确导向、筑牢 ...

Core Viewpoint - The conference emphasizes the urgent need to construct a Chinese knowledge system that reflects "Chinese-style modernization," which is seen as a significant innovation in human modernization history, breaking existing Western theoretical paradigms [3][5]. Group 1: Conference Highlights - Wang Weisong highlighted the mission of the philosophical and social sciences community to respond to "Chinese practices" with "Chinese theories," advocating for a systematic knowledge service to national strategies and global governance [3]. - The conference featured notable scholars discussing the theoretical foundations, practical logic, and global significance of Chinese-style modernization, indicating a collaborative effort across various academic institutions [9]. - The event was marked by a strong academic atmosphere, aiming to provide new momentum for the construction of a theoretical system for Chinese-style modernization and its international narrative [23]. Group 2: Key Contributions from Scholars - Professor Jiang Yihua from Fudan University analyzed the critical role of Chinese farmers in the modernization process, emphasizing the importance of the worker-peasant alliance [10]. - Professor Yang Guorong from East China Normal University stressed the necessity of creative thinking in constructing a Chinese philosophical knowledge system, advocating for a synthesis of Eastern and Western insights [12]. - Professor Marek Hrubec from the Czech Academy of Sciences discussed the empowering effects of initiatives like the Belt and Road and the Global Civilization Initiative on developing countries, proposing that Chinese-style modernization offers systematic alternatives for global governance [13]. Group 3: Thematic Discussions - The conference included three sub-forums focusing on various aspects of Chinese-style modernization, such as its implications for social governance and the role of youth in the digital age [23]. - The discussions spanned multiple disciplines, including political science, philosophy, history, economics, and artificial intelligence ethics, showcasing an active interdisciplinary approach to building a Chinese knowledge system [23]. - The dual keywords of "practical experience" and "knowledge system" were central to the conference, reflecting the Chinese social sciences community's commitment to engaging in global civilizational dialogue [23].

Core Viewpoint - The forum aims to promote the construction of a Chinese autonomous knowledge system in the context of global knowledge restructuring and the integration of Eastern and Western thoughts [3][6][45]. Group 1: Forum Overview - The "First Academic Forum on the Development of Chinese and Foreign Literary Theory and the Construction of China's Autonomous Knowledge System" was held on June 6, 2025, at Shanghai International Studies University [3]. - The forum was organized by the School of Literature at Shanghai International Studies University, with support from various academic teams and editorial departments [3][4]. Group 2: Key Participants - Notable participants included professors from various universities, such as Chen Zhongyi from the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and Nie Zhenzhao from Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, who engaged in discussions on significant topics [4][6]. - The opening ceremony featured speeches from university leaders, emphasizing the importance of constructing an autonomous knowledge system [6][45]. Group 3: Thematic Discussions - Discussions focused on the need for a Chinese autonomous knowledge system that responds to contemporary challenges, particularly in the context of AI and the fourth industrial revolution [8][11]. - The concept of "Dao and Qi" was highlighted as a critical philosophical framework for integrating humanistic values with technological advancements [8][11]. Group 4: Challenges and Strategies - The forum addressed the challenges posed by Western-centric narratives and emphasized the importance of rewriting civilization history to establish a more balanced understanding of cultural exchanges [13][16]. - Strategies for constructing an autonomous knowledge system included promoting cultural confidence and integrating diverse linguistic and cultural perspectives [16][20]. Group 5: Future Directions - The need for a dynamic and open knowledge system that evolves with societal changes was emphasized, advocating for a system that is not rigid but adaptable [16][29]. - The forum concluded with a call for more engagement from younger scholars to expand the theoretical boundaries of Chinese literature research [45][49].

Group 1 - The concept of "two combinations" serves as a methodology for constructing China's independent knowledge system, focusing on China's realities and addressing Chinese issues [1][8][9] - "The second combination" reinforces cultural subjectivity, establishing a foundation for the path of socialism with Chinese characteristics and opening up spaces for innovation [2][5] - "The first combination" emphasizes the practical methodology of seeking truth from facts, which is essential for problem-solving and theoretical liberation [3][4] Group 2 - The relationship between "the first combination" and "the second combination" can be understood through the three characteristics of practice: objectivity, subjectivity, and creativity [4][5] - "The second combination" represents a further liberation of practical subjectivity and creativity, breaking away from dogmatic theories and fostering a new cultural paradigm [5][7] - The historical process of Marxism's sinicization illustrates that Marxism is a practical truth that evolves with time, rather than a static dogma [7][9]