Core Viewpoint - The forum aims to promote the construction of a Chinese autonomous knowledge system in the context of global knowledge restructuring and the integration of Eastern and Western thoughts [3][6][45]. Group 1: Forum Overview - The "First Academic Forum on the Development of Chinese and Foreign Literary Theory and the Construction of China's Autonomous Knowledge System" was held on June 6, 2025, at Shanghai International Studies University [3]. - The forum was organized by the School of Literature at Shanghai International Studies University, with support from various academic teams and editorial departments [3][4]. Group 2: Key Participants - Notable participants included professors from various universities, such as Chen Zhongyi from the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and Nie Zhenzhao from Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, who engaged in discussions on significant topics [4][6]. - The opening ceremony featured speeches from university leaders, emphasizing the importance of constructing an autonomous knowledge system [6][45]. Group 3: Thematic Discussions - Discussions focused on the need for a Chinese autonomous knowledge system that responds to contemporary challenges, particularly in the context of AI and the fourth industrial revolution [8][11]. - The concept of "Dao and Qi" was highlighted as a critical philosophical framework for integrating humanistic values with technological advancements [8][11]. Group 4: Challenges and Strategies - The forum addressed the challenges posed by Western-centric narratives and emphasized the importance of rewriting civilization history to establish a more balanced understanding of cultural exchanges [13][16]. - Strategies for constructing an autonomous knowledge system included promoting cultural confidence and integrating diverse linguistic and cultural perspectives [16][20]. Group 5: Future Directions - The need for a dynamic and open knowledge system that evolves with societal changes was emphasized, advocating for a system that is not rigid but adaptable [16][29]. - The forum concluded with a call for more engagement from younger scholars to expand the theoretical boundaries of Chinese literature research [45][49].

Group 1 - The concept of "two combinations" serves as a methodology for constructing China's independent knowledge system, focusing on China's realities and addressing Chinese issues [1][8][9] - "The second combination" reinforces cultural subjectivity, establishing a foundation for the path of socialism with Chinese characteristics and opening up spaces for innovation [2][5] - "The first combination" emphasizes the practical methodology of seeking truth from facts, which is essential for problem-solving and theoretical liberation [3][4] Group 2 - The relationship between "the first combination" and "the second combination" can be understood through the three characteristics of practice: objectivity, subjectivity, and creativity [4][5] - "The second combination" represents a further liberation of practical subjectivity and creativity, breaking away from dogmatic theories and fostering a new cultural paradigm [5][7] - The historical process of Marxism's sinicization illustrates that Marxism is a practical truth that evolves with time, rather than a static dogma [7][9]