Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the significance of Chu bamboo slips as vital historical evidence of Chinese legal culture, showcasing their unique role and value in the context of global legal civilization [1]. Group 1: Historical Significance - The Chu bamboo slips, discovered since the 1950s, have been reshaping the understanding of pre-Qin legal history for over seventy years [1]. - The documents cover a wide range of content, including legal texts, administrative documents, and philosophical writings, providing first-hand materials for studying the legal system of the Chu state [2]. Group 2: Legal Content and Structure - The legal information contained in the Chu slips is extensive, with notable examples including the Guodian slips, which encompass 18 texts from Daoist and Confucian traditions, and the Baoshan slips, which document official judicial documents [2]. - The Chu legal system is characterized by a clear hierarchy and defined functions, as evidenced by specialized judicial terms and processes outlined in the slips, indicating a mature judicial system [2]. Group 3: Philosophical and Governance Insights - The Chu slips reflect a blend of philosophical influences, particularly from Daoism and Confucianism, which contributed to a unique legal thought system that emphasizes the integration of ethics and law [3]. - The governance model depicted in the slips combines moral governance with legal enforcement, showcasing a multifaceted approach to law and order in the Chu state [3]. Group 4: Contemporary Relevance - The insights derived from the Chu slips are crucial for the innovative development of traditional Chinese culture and legal studies, providing a foundation for understanding the evolution of Chinese legal thought [4][5]. - The slips offer a new perspective on the historical continuity of Chinese legal systems, linking early legal principles to later developments in the Han dynasty and beyond [5].

Group 1 - The conference titled "Wisdom Gathering in Tianjin: Leading the Future" was held by Tianjin Normal University, focusing on the role of think tanks in promoting high-quality development in Tianjin, with over 400 experts and scholars in attendance [1] - The university released significant results in areas such as Tianjin culture, innovative talent cultivation, and the construction of a Chinese independent knowledge system, and signed strategic cooperation agreements to advance collaborative development of new-type think tanks [1][2] - A large-scale historical and cultural series titled "Wenjin Library," edited by Professor Wang Zhenliang, was showcased, which aims to promote the dissemination of Tianjin's local culture and support the inheritance of Tianjin's cultural heritage [1] Group 2 - The book "Let Talent Better Serve Human Development" led by Professor Bai Xuejun is the first comprehensive study of international experiences in cultivating top innovative talents from a national education management perspective, covering 19 countries [2] - The conference released 18 specialized think tank reports and 6 sets of independent knowledge system reports, focusing on various topics such as the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Tianjin Summit, industrial chains, business environment, and rural revitalization, providing valuable decision-making references [2] - The "Yusuda 3.0" platform was launched, which is a multimodal open-source data intelligence analysis platform for public events, utilizing comprehensive data and deep learning models for data aggregation and analysis [3] Group 3 - Strategic cooperation agreements were signed between Tianjin Normal University and the Tianjin Municipal Committee of the Chinese Democratic League, as well as the Municipal Social Work Department, to promote high-quality development of think tanks [3] - The collaboration aims to establish a "Political Literacy - Participation Ability - Governance Wisdom" training system and focus on theoretical research, public opinion monitoring, and skills training in key areas such as grassroots governance [3]

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of the Wei Shi Philosophy Research Institute at Liaoning University aims to promote theoretical innovation and deepen academic originality, responding to the profound changes in society and emphasizing the connection between academia and practice [3][5]. Group 1: Event Overview - The first Wei Shi Philosophy Seminar and the unveiling ceremony of the Wei Shi Philosophy Research Institute were successfully held at Liaoning University, attended by renowned experts and scholars from various institutions [1]. - The opening ceremony was hosted by the Dean of the Philosophy Department, who emphasized the importance of theoretical and methodological self-awareness in Chinese philosophy [3]. Group 2: Institutional Goals and Philosophy - The Wei Shi Philosophy Research Institute adheres to the "three realities" concept of reality, truth, and pragmatism, aiming to engage with societal needs and promote philosophical innovation [5]. - The institute plans to follow a three-step approach: moving out of the campus, engaging with society, and advancing to the forefront of philosophical research [5]. Group 3: Expert Contributions - Professor Zhang Ke, the chief expert of the institute, discussed the stagnation in methodological innovation within the philosophy community and proposed Wei Shi as a new philosophical methodology centered on facts and reality [14]. - Various scholars presented their insights on the significance of Wei Shi philosophy, emphasizing its potential to address real-world issues and contribute to the development of a Chinese philosophical discourse [41][43]. Group 4: Methodological Discussions - The conference featured discussions on the application of Wei Shi methodology in various fields, including ethics, history, and political philosophy, highlighting its relevance in contemporary philosophical discourse [31][39]. - Scholars emphasized the need for a return to facts and the integration of emotional realities within the framework of Wei Shi philosophy, advocating for a comprehensive understanding of facts [39].

Core Viewpoint - The seminar on "Academic Originality and the Youth Consciousness in Building China's Independent Knowledge System" marks the 40th anniversary of the journal "Exploration and Controversy," highlighting its significant contributions to the development of philosophy and social sciences in China and its commitment to fostering academic innovation and supporting young scholars [6][7][9]. Group 1: Contributions and Achievements - The journal "Exploration and Controversy" has actively explored the development path of comprehensive academic journals over the past 40 years, focusing on major themes and serving the needs of the times [6][7]. - It has established itself as an important platform for academic exchange, recording the changes of the times and promoting theoretical innovation [11][23]. - The journal's commitment to nurturing young talent and responding to contemporary issues has injected vitality into the academic community [25][27]. Group 2: Future Directions - The journal aims to use its 40th anniversary as a new starting point to lead academic innovation, enhance publication quality, and strengthen its influence through digital empowerment [7][9]. - There is a call for the journal to continue focusing on real-world issues and to deepen its engagement with youth, fostering innovative vitality [9][29]. - The publication is encouraged to maintain its unique characteristics and to further explore interdisciplinary topics and collaborative research [43][45]. Group 3: Academic Community Engagement - Various academic leaders and scholars have expressed their support for the journal's role in promoting academic dialogue and nurturing young scholars [19][21][23]. - The journal has been recognized for its ability to adapt to the changing academic landscape and for its proactive approach in addressing contemporary challenges [59][61]. - The seminar included discussions among young scholars on the themes of academic originality and the construction of an independent knowledge system in China, emphasizing the importance of youth engagement in academia [73].

Core Viewpoint - The conference emphasizes the urgent need to construct a Chinese knowledge system that reflects "Chinese-style modernization," which is seen as a significant innovation in human modernization history, breaking existing Western theoretical paradigms [3][5]. Group 1: Conference Highlights - Wang Weisong highlighted the mission of the philosophical and social sciences community to respond to "Chinese practices" with "Chinese theories," advocating for a systematic knowledge service to national strategies and global governance [3]. - The conference featured notable scholars discussing the theoretical foundations, practical logic, and global significance of Chinese-style modernization, indicating a collaborative effort across various academic institutions [9]. - The event was marked by a strong academic atmosphere, aiming to provide new momentum for the construction of a theoretical system for Chinese-style modernization and its international narrative [23]. Group 2: Key Contributions from Scholars - Professor Jiang Yihua from Fudan University analyzed the critical role of Chinese farmers in the modernization process, emphasizing the importance of the worker-peasant alliance [10]. - Professor Yang Guorong from East China Normal University stressed the necessity of creative thinking in constructing a Chinese philosophical knowledge system, advocating for a synthesis of Eastern and Western insights [12]. - Professor Marek Hrubec from the Czech Academy of Sciences discussed the empowering effects of initiatives like the Belt and Road and the Global Civilization Initiative on developing countries, proposing that Chinese-style modernization offers systematic alternatives for global governance [13]. Group 3: Thematic Discussions - The conference included three sub-forums focusing on various aspects of Chinese-style modernization, such as its implications for social governance and the role of youth in the digital age [23]. - The discussions spanned multiple disciplines, including political science, philosophy, history, economics, and artificial intelligence ethics, showcasing an active interdisciplinary approach to building a Chinese knowledge system [23]. - The dual keywords of "practical experience" and "knowledge system" were central to the conference, reflecting the Chinese social sciences community's commitment to engaging in global civilizational dialogue [23].

Core Viewpoint - The forum aims to promote the construction of a Chinese autonomous knowledge system in the context of global knowledge restructuring and the integration of Eastern and Western thoughts [3][6][45]. Group 1: Forum Overview - The "First Academic Forum on the Development of Chinese and Foreign Literary Theory and the Construction of China's Autonomous Knowledge System" was held on June 6, 2025, at Shanghai International Studies University [3]. - The forum was organized by the School of Literature at Shanghai International Studies University, with support from various academic teams and editorial departments [3][4]. Group 2: Key Participants - Notable participants included professors from various universities, such as Chen Zhongyi from the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and Nie Zhenzhao from Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, who engaged in discussions on significant topics [4][6]. - The opening ceremony featured speeches from university leaders, emphasizing the importance of constructing an autonomous knowledge system [6][45]. Group 3: Thematic Discussions - Discussions focused on the need for a Chinese autonomous knowledge system that responds to contemporary challenges, particularly in the context of AI and the fourth industrial revolution [8][11]. - The concept of "Dao and Qi" was highlighted as a critical philosophical framework for integrating humanistic values with technological advancements [8][11]. Group 4: Challenges and Strategies - The forum addressed the challenges posed by Western-centric narratives and emphasized the importance of rewriting civilization history to establish a more balanced understanding of cultural exchanges [13][16]. - Strategies for constructing an autonomous knowledge system included promoting cultural confidence and integrating diverse linguistic and cultural perspectives [16][20]. Group 5: Future Directions - The need for a dynamic and open knowledge system that evolves with societal changes was emphasized, advocating for a system that is not rigid but adaptable [16][29]. - The forum concluded with a call for more engagement from younger scholars to expand the theoretical boundaries of Chinese literature research [45][49].

Group 1 - The concept of "two combinations" serves as a methodology for constructing China's independent knowledge system, focusing on China's realities and addressing Chinese issues [1][8][9] - "The second combination" reinforces cultural subjectivity, establishing a foundation for the path of socialism with Chinese characteristics and opening up spaces for innovation [2][5] - "The first combination" emphasizes the practical methodology of seeking truth from facts, which is essential for problem-solving and theoretical liberation [3][4] Group 2 - The relationship between "the first combination" and "the second combination" can be understood through the three characteristics of practice: objectivity, subjectivity, and creativity [4][5] - "The second combination" represents a further liberation of practical subjectivity and creativity, breaking away from dogmatic theories and fostering a new cultural paradigm [5][7] - The historical process of Marxism's sinicization illustrates that Marxism is a practical truth that evolves with time, rather than a static dogma [7][9]