上海市社会科学界联合会党组书记、专职副主席王为松，上海立信会计金融学院党委书记、上海市社会科学创新研究基地中国知识体系构建研究中心主任 解超教授分别致辞。 王为松在致辞中指出，中国式现代化是人类现代化史上的重大创新，已突破既有西方理论范式的解释边界，亟需构建具有主体性、系统性和世界性的知识 体系。他从理论原创、学理提炼、共同体建设、话语传播四个维度，提出了哲学社会科学界的时代使命与路径选择，呼吁学界以"中国学说"回应"中国实 践"，以系统化知识服务国家战略、赋能全球治理。 解超回顾了新时代中国哲学社会科学发展的历程，强调构建中国自主知识体系尤其是"中国式现代化知识体系"的迫切性和基础性。他介绍了近年来上海立 信会计金融学院在该领域的探索进展，包括开展国家社科基金重大与重点课题的研究、建设研究中心、打造省部级创新研究基地、组织专项课题研究等举 措，并对会议的召开寄予厚望，期待思想交锋激发理论创新。 开幕式由上海立信会计金融学院党委副书记、院长杨力教授主持。他指出，中国式现代化不仅深刻地改变了中国，也在为世界现代化版图注入新的活力、 提供新的范式。深入梳理其丰富的实践经验，系统构建其知识体系，不仅是理论创新的迫切 ...

Core Viewpoint - The forum aims to promote the construction of a Chinese autonomous knowledge system in the context of global knowledge restructuring and the integration of Eastern and Western thoughts [3][6][45]. Group 1: Forum Overview - The "First Academic Forum on the Development of Chinese and Foreign Literary Theory and the Construction of China's Autonomous Knowledge System" was held on June 6, 2025, at Shanghai International Studies University [3]. - The forum was organized by the School of Literature at Shanghai International Studies University, with support from various academic teams and editorial departments [3][4]. Group 2: Key Participants - Notable participants included professors from various universities, such as Chen Zhongyi from the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and Nie Zhenzhao from Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, who engaged in discussions on significant topics [4][6]. - The opening ceremony featured speeches from university leaders, emphasizing the importance of constructing an autonomous knowledge system [6][45]. Group 3: Thematic Discussions - Discussions focused on the need for a Chinese autonomous knowledge system that responds to contemporary challenges, particularly in the context of AI and the fourth industrial revolution [8][11]. - The concept of "Dao and Qi" was highlighted as a critical philosophical framework for integrating humanistic values with technological advancements [8][11]. Group 4: Challenges and Strategies - The forum addressed the challenges posed by Western-centric narratives and emphasized the importance of rewriting civilization history to establish a more balanced understanding of cultural exchanges [13][16]. - Strategies for constructing an autonomous knowledge system included promoting cultural confidence and integrating diverse linguistic and cultural perspectives [16][20]. Group 5: Future Directions - The need for a dynamic and open knowledge system that evolves with societal changes was emphasized, advocating for a system that is not rigid but adaptable [16][29]. - The forum concluded with a call for more engagement from younger scholars to expand the theoretical boundaries of Chinese literature research [45][49].

Group 1 - The concept of "two combinations" serves as a methodology for constructing China's independent knowledge system, focusing on China's realities and addressing Chinese issues [1][8][9] - "The second combination" reinforces cultural subjectivity, establishing a foundation for the path of socialism with Chinese characteristics and opening up spaces for innovation [2][5] - "The first combination" emphasizes the practical methodology of seeking truth from facts, which is essential for problem-solving and theoretical liberation [3][4] Group 2 - The relationship between "the first combination" and "the second combination" can be understood through the three characteristics of practice: objectivity, subjectivity, and creativity [4][5] - "The second combination" represents a further liberation of practical subjectivity and creativity, breaking away from dogmatic theories and fostering a new cultural paradigm [5][7] - The historical process of Marxism's sinicization illustrates that Marxism is a practical truth that evolves with time, rather than a static dogma [7][9]