其二，产业生态完整性的降维优势。风险投资家马克·安德森曾直言，"AI的未来是机器实体化"。而中 国构建了从芯片设计、精密制造到终端应用的完整产业链，既能生产算力服务器，也能制造传感器、执 行器，这种"全链条能力"让依赖全球供应链，却因地缘政治博弈频繁面临断供的硅谷企业望尘莫及。更 关键的是，中国制造业规模与市场需求形成共振，加速了技术迭代，这是硅谷仅靠资本难以复制的生态 优势。 来源：环球时报 "当中国全速前进，以机器般的速度流转货物、人员和信息时，我们可能正被困在过去。"美国风险投资 公司安德烈森·霍洛维茨近期在一篇博客文章中警告。该文一改对中国科技的"轻视模仿论"，反而用"惊 叹"口吻描述中国人工智能（AI）在产业端的落地速度、新能源领域的技术突破，字里行间透着好奇、 焦虑与羡慕。而这并非孤例。《纽约时报》将这种弥漫在硅谷企业家和政客间的情绪转变，总结为"硅 谷陷入对中国的痴迷"。 硅谷的变化折射出其长期存在的对华错误认知正被现实击碎——从将中国科技发展简化为"非市场化奇 迹"，到不得不正视"中美创新双极"的事实，硅谷的认知矫正，本质上是对自身困境与全球格局的重新 审视。 过去，硅谷的对华错误认知集中表现 ...

Core Viewpoint - The report from the U.S. House of Representatives Special Committee on China claims that the Pentagon has funded hundreds of research projects in collaboration with Chinese universities and defense-related institutions, many of which are blacklisted by the U.S. government due to ties with the Chinese military [1][2]. Group 1: Funding and Research Collaboration - The report states that approximately 1,400 research papers published between June 2023 and June 2025 acknowledged support from the U.S. Department of Defense and involved collaboration with Chinese partners, funded by over 700 defense grants totaling more than $2.5 billion [1]. - More than half of these publications are linked to institutions associated with China's defense technology industry [1]. Group 2: Specific Cases and Concerns - An example cited in the report involves a geophysicist from the Carnegie Institution of Washington, who held a position in a Chinese research institution while participating in U.S. Department of Defense-supported research, raising concerns about taxpayer funds being used to advance Chinese military capabilities [2]. - The report emphasizes that these projects enable China to gain military benefits from research collaborations with the U.S. amid ongoing technological and military competition between the two nations [2]. Group 3: Responses and Context - The Chinese Embassy in the U.S. has dismissed the report as baseless and expressed strong opposition to its claims [2]. - The Carnegie Institution clarified that it complies with all U.S. laws, stating that its work is basic research, publicly available, and not classified, with funding sourced from the National Science Foundation rather than the Pentagon [2]. - In recent years, under pressure from U.S. congressional Republicans, many American universities have terminated collaborations with Chinese institutions, and while a government-to-government science cooperation agreement was renewed last year, it remains largely inactive [3].

Core Insights - The event held by the Chinese Academy of Sciences focused on the release of significant research outcomes related to Chinese-style modernization, including various reports and a big data platform [1] Group 1: Chinese-style Modernization Reports - The "China-style Modernization Development Report 2024" indicates significant progress in population modernization, economic vitality, and green development across various provinces, with Guangdong and Zhejiang leading in population quality and digital economy [2] - The report highlights the need for regional collaboration, emphasizing the roles of economic growth areas like the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, the Yangtze River Delta, and the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area in driving coordinated development [2] - China's modernization level ranks 8th among 82 countries, positioning it as a global economic growth driver and governance leader [2] Group 2: Theoretical Framework and Pathways - The book "Advancing Research on Chinese-style Modernization" outlines the unique characteristics of Chinese-style modernization and provides actionable recommendations for transforming distinctive features into competitive advantages [3] - It emphasizes the importance of an independent and inclusive approach to modernization, integrating beneficial elements from global civilizations while remaining rooted in Chinese conditions [3] Group 3: Sino-U.S. Technological Cooperation - The "Sino-U.S. Technology Cooperation White Paper" reviews the achievements in technology collaboration between China and the U.S., highlighting joint efforts in basic research and talent development [4] - It calls for a new balance in technological cooperation to address global challenges such as environmental protection and public health crises [4] Group 4: Technological Advancements and National Strength - The book "Seizing Technological High Ground and Chinese-style Modernization" discusses the importance of technological innovation for national strength, noting China's shift from imitation to independent innovation [5][6] - It stresses the urgency for China to secure competitive advantages in strategic fields like artificial intelligence and quantum information amidst intense international competition [6]