Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of high-quality and efficient handling of financial cases, which are often linked to significant property interests of the parties involved [1][2] - The Beijing Financial Court has developed a new securities investment loss calculation model to address information asymmetry in securities fraud disputes, resulting in a resolution for over 260 investors [1][2] - The "Hundred Questions in Court" model has been implemented to systematically summarize details from numerous securities fraud cases, leading to clearer legal relationships and more precise judgments [2][3] Group 2 - The challenges in financial trials are increasingly characterized by the collective nature of cases, which complicates procedures and raises costs for parties involved [3] - A "dual-track dual-platform" mechanism has been explored to efficiently resolve collective financial disputes by allowing representative parties to express their demands and by providing model judgments for typical cases [3] - In internet trials, the application of complex technologies and the rapid evolution of new business models present significant challenges for judges, particularly in cases involving online misinformation and intellectual property [4][5]