Group 1 - The event held by the Changchun Internet Court focused on "unlocking internet trials to promote the development of new business formats" and included representatives from MCN organizations and delivery workers experiencing the judicial process firsthand [1] - Participants toured various facilities, including the online litigation service hall and integrated court, gaining insights into judicial innovations aimed at enhancing convenience and optimizing trial modes [1] - A live observation of an online trial concerning a labor dispute between a network anchor and an MCN company showcased the court's professionalism and judicial care, culminating in a successful mediation [1] Group 2 - The event is part of the Changchun Internet Court's ongoing efforts to deepen the "Five Courts" brand and expand judicial transparency [2] - The court aims to use this event as a catalyst to enhance regular communication with new business format stakeholders and explore new judicial service paths that align with the digital economy [2] - The court is committed to improving the professionalism and intelligence of internet trials, contributing to a healthy and orderly legal environment for new business formats, and supporting high-quality economic and social development in Jilin [2]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of high-quality and efficient handling of financial cases, which are often linked to significant property interests of the parties involved [1][2] - The Beijing Financial Court has developed a new securities investment loss calculation model to address information asymmetry in securities fraud disputes, resulting in a resolution for over 260 investors [1][2] - The "Hundred Questions in Court" model has been implemented to systematically summarize details from numerous securities fraud cases, leading to clearer legal relationships and more precise judgments [2][3] Group 2 - The challenges in financial trials are increasingly characterized by the collective nature of cases, which complicates procedures and raises costs for parties involved [3] - A "dual-track dual-platform" mechanism has been explored to efficiently resolve collective financial disputes by allowing representative parties to express their demands and by providing model judgments for typical cases [3] - In internet trials, the application of complex technologies and the rapid evolution of new business models present significant challenges for judges, particularly in cases involving online misinformation and intellectual property [4][5]