《亚洲时报》12月9日报道：特朗普政府最近发布的《国家防务战略》，在"确保美国继续保持全球第一 大经济体地位"这一点上，与前几任政府并没有太大的区别。简单来说，这份战略继续沿用了美国多年 来的两党共识：美国必须永远坐稳名义GDP第一的位置，而中国最好永远停留在第二的位置。然而，这 一立场完全是美国的一厢情愿。 一、两党共识的真面目 特朗普是一个大家都熟悉的人物。2025年，他将重新入主白宫，而他的风格依 旧是我们熟知的"特朗普味"——依靠推特治国、直言不讳、喜欢与媒体争锋。在国际事务中，特朗普上 任后便退出了一些国际组织，重新谈判了多个贸易协定，对中国更是采取了强硬态度，展现出一副"全 面开战"的姿态。 关税不断上调，科技领域的封锁清单也不断增加，像芯片、人工智能、量子计算等前 沿领域，几乎都被划上了"红线"。如果仅仅从这些动作来看，许多人会认为特朗普在试图将中美关系推 到不可挽回的地步。尽管中美经历了五轮经贸磋商，关税战暂时休战一年，并且特朗普还表示"预计明 年4月将访问中国"，但他在12月初发布的《国家防务战略》依然保持了既定的立场。 回顾一下民主党拜登政府的做法，甚至更早的奥巴马和小布什政府时期，你会发 ...

Group 1 - The article argues that the apparent competition between the two major political parties in the U.S. is misleading, as both parties ultimately aim to maintain U.S. hegemony through necessary adjustments [1][3][5] - The Biden administration has continued the strategies of the Trump era, including the Indo-Pacific strategy and the ongoing trade war with China, indicating a continuity in U.S. foreign policy rather than a significant shift [3][5] - The article highlights that the U.S. is using the Russia-Ukraine conflict as a strategic tool to consolidate Western resources against China, suggesting that geopolitical maneuvers are primarily aimed at preserving U.S. dominance [5][7] Group 2 - The article discusses Russia's initial stance during the U.S.-China trade war, where it adopted a passive approach, only to later find itself in a precarious situation due to the Russia-Ukraine conflict initiated by the Biden administration [9][11] - It emphasizes that China's support for Russia during the Ukraine conflict was a strategic move to counter U.S. actions, showcasing the importance of alliances in the current geopolitical landscape [11][13] - The article concludes that Russia's attempts to negotiate with the U.S. post-conflict may lead to further complications, as the U.S. continues to impose sanctions and maintain pressure on Russia despite any perceived cooperation [15][20]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the shifting dynamics of US-India relations, highlighting the contradictions in US policies and India's strategic responses amidst rising tensions and tariffs imposed by the US on Indian goods. Group 1: US-India Relations - The relationship between the US and India has fluctuated significantly over the past two decades, with varying degrees of cooperation and tension under different administrations [3] - Trump's administration has shifted focus from democratic values to defense contracts and anti-China alliances, leading to a breakdown in strategic trust between the two nations [3][5] - The imposition of tariffs by the US, while simultaneously offering aid to Pakistan, has angered India and raised questions about the reliability of the US as an ally [1][3] Group 2: India's Strategic Maneuvers - India is leveraging its position by seeking technology exchanges in sectors like semiconductors and renewable energy, while also accelerating free trade agreements with the EU to mitigate risks [5] - The Indian government is focusing on domestic manufacturing, particularly in the wake of reduced tariffs, to strengthen its economic independence [5] - India's military procurement decisions, such as signing submarine deals with France instead of the US, signal a desire for strategic autonomy and a balanced approach in international relations [5][7] Group 3: Broader Implications - The article suggests that the current US-India tensions reveal the underlying truth of Western alliances: they are driven by interests rather than enduring friendships [7] - As India continues to navigate its foreign policy, it may increasingly diversify its partnerships, potentially aligning more with Russia, the Middle East, and even China, while managing its relationship with the US [7] - The evolving dynamics may ultimately lead India to reduce its dependency on Western powers, a shift that could reshape regional geopolitics in the coming decade [7]