行吟信息科技 （上海） 有限公司，即小红书的关联公司，成立于2013年，位于上海市，是一家以从事 专业技术服务业为主的企业。企业注册资本100万人民币，已于2024年完成了E轮。 此外，新浪科技注意到，行吟信息科技（上海）有限公司于2025年6月被上海市黄浦区人民法院列为被 执行人。 | 被执行人 | 行吟信息科技 (上海) 有限公司 | 组织机构代码 | 91310114074***922G | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 执行标的 | 0元 | 执行法院 | 上海市黄浦区人民法院 | | 立室日期 | 2025-06-04 | 案号 | (2025)沪0101执4932号 | 责任编辑：李昂 据天眼查显示，近日，小红书运营方行吟信息科技（上海）有限公司被TVB旗下的上海翡翠东方传播有 限公司起诉，案号为（2025）沪0101民初26542号，案由是侵害作品信息网络传播权纠纷。该案件将于 2025年10月13日14：00在上海市黄浦区人民法院合肥路四楼中法庭开庭审理。 新浪科技就此询问小红书，公司暂无回应。 | 婆台 | (2025) 沪0101民初26542号 | 泰田 | 侵 ...

Core Viewpoint - The court ruled that the chemical company is not liable for damages due to the use of a third-party video segment in its promotional material, as it acted without intent to infringe and took prompt action to remove the content upon notification [2][4]. Group 1: Case Background - A chemical company was sued for using a 3-second clip from a copyrighted work in a promotional video, leading to a claim for 50,000 yuan in damages [1]. - The promotional video was created by a third-party media company, and the chemical company had paid 137,000 yuan for its production [1]. Group 2: Court's Findings - The court found that the chemical company did not have subjective intent to infringe and had exercised reasonable care in commissioning the video [2][4]. - The court acknowledged that while the chemical company infringed on the copyright, it was not liable for damages due to the legitimate source defense, as it had acted responsibly and promptly removed the infringing content [2][4]. Group 3: Legal Implications - The ruling highlighted the application of the legitimate source defense in copyright cases, indicating that if a party can demonstrate they exercised reasonable care and had no intent to infringe, they may not be held liable for damages [4]. - The court did not require the chemical company to issue a public apology, considering its lack of malicious intent and prompt action to cease the infringement [2].