Workflow
供应链策略调整
icon
Search documents
对华能源出口几乎归零!特朗普终于发现不对劲,他不能再轻举妄动,中方说到做到,连断美3条财路
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-07-28 04:58
Group 1: Energy Sector - China's imports of coal, crude oil, and liquefied natural gas from the U.S. dropped to nearly zero in June, with crude oil imports falling from $800 million in the same month last year to zero, marking the first complete supply cut in three years [1] - The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) reported a 92% decrease in crude oil exports to China for 2024 compared to the previous year, with liquefied natural gas exports to China also at zero for four consecutive months [1][3] - The imposition of tariffs by China on U.S. coal (15%), liquefied natural gas (15%), and crude oil (10%) has significantly reduced the price competitiveness of U.S. energy products, leading to a halt in drilling activities in U.S. shale oil regions [3] Group 2: Technology Sector - U.S. semiconductor companies are facing revenue declines due to export restrictions to China, with Applied Materials reporting a 25% drop in revenue from China and Lam Research seeing a 10% decrease [3][4] - Nvidia anticipates a loss of $5.5 billion in revenue due to U.S. government restrictions on H20 chip exports to China, highlighting the significant impact of missing out on the Chinese AI market [3] - China's self-sufficiency in semiconductor production has increased to 35% in 2024, with over 50% of mature process chip capacity being consumed domestically, indicating a rapid rise in China's semiconductor industry [3][4] Group 3: Agricultural Sector - The U.S. Department of Agriculture reported that China has zero forward purchases of U.S. soybeans and corn for the 2025-26 season, compared to $12.8 billion and $3.5 billion in exports for these products in 2023 [6] - Canada has significantly increased its crude oil exports to China, while Brazil has seen a 33% increase in beef exports and a 25% increase in soybean exports to China, filling the gap left by U.S. agricultural products [6] - The U.S. agricultural sector is experiencing a price war, with U.S. soybeans priced 15% lower than Brazilian counterparts, yet still unable to attract Chinese buyers due to higher effective costs after tariffs [7] Group 4: Strategic Adjustments - China's cessation of U.S. crude oil imports reflects a strategic shift towards diversifying energy sources and reducing reliance on the U.S., with Russia becoming the largest supplier of natural gas to China [6][9] - The U.S. energy industry is beginning to reassess its policies towards China, as trust issues arise with Chinese importers no longer willing to sign new liquefied natural gas contracts with the U.S. [6] - The changes in trade dynamics illustrate China's proactive adjustment of its supply chain strategy in the global economic landscape, emphasizing the importance of maintaining strategic autonomy [9]
德迅大中华区总裁倪晓荣:美线舱位将更为紧张 建议出口企业做好调整供应链策略的准备
Core Viewpoint - The recent US-China Geneva trade talks have led to a significant reduction in bilateral tariffs, resulting in a surge in demand for shipping services as companies rush to fulfill backlogged orders within a 90-day grace period [1] Group 1: Market Demand and Shipping Capacity - Following the tariff reduction, there has been a notable increase in shipping demand, particularly on North American routes, with some shipping companies experiencing capacity constraints [1] - The president of DSV Greater China reported that the demand for shipping services is expected to continue rising over the next two weeks, with significant increases in cargo volumes from regions like Shanghai and South China [1] - Booking volumes for shipping have surged, with a 10% increase in week 20 and a 30% increase in week 21, indicating a positive shift in market expectations for US trade [1] Group 2: Operational Challenges and Risks - The rush to export goods has led to operational challenges, as shipping companies may struggle to quickly meet the increased demand, particularly on the East Coast where shipping cycles can take up to 85 days [1] - Exporting companies are advised to develop more reasonable strategies regarding transportation arrangements, contract management, and inventory levels in light of rising shipping costs due to upcoming General Rate Increases (GRI) [2] - The pressure on shipping capacity and the potential for imbalanced supply and demand dynamics could pose risks for companies engaged in international trade [1][2]