廖向阳说，各地法院依法办理涉企案件，严肃整治突出问题，规范涉企执法司法专项行动取得积极成果 和扎实成效，为经济社会高质量发展提供了有力司法服务和保障。 具体来看，廖向阳介绍，坚持依法平等保护，切实增强企业发展信心。依法平等保护民营企业合法权 益。最高法院及时制定发布贯彻落实民营经济促进法指导意见，进一步细化相关裁判规则，指导各级法 院充分发挥审判职能作用，公正高效审理涉民营企业案件。依法保障各种所有制经济公平参与市场竞 争。各级法院坚决依法纠治搞地方保护、市场分割、行业壁垒等妨碍全国统一大市场建设的违法行为， 强化对垄断和不正当竞争行为的规制，依法惩治针对企业和企业家的敲诈勒索、造谣抹黑、恶意诋毁商 业信誉、商品声誉等违法犯罪行为。依法保障各种所有制经济平等使用生产要素。各地法院依法助力拓 宽中小企业融资渠道，建立健全制度机制，深化司法审判实践，助推破解融资难、融资贵问题。 ● 本报记者昝秀丽 2月4日，最高人民法院举行新闻发布会。最高人民法院行政庭副庭长杨科雄在回答中国证券报记者关 于"过去一年，在持续优化营商环境、服务保障全国统一大市场建设等方面，行政审判发挥了怎样的作 用？"的提问时表示，各级法院公正审 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese judicial system has actively engaged in actions to regulate enterprise-related law enforcement, significantly addressing the issue of government and institutional debts owed to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) [1][2] Group 1: Judicial Actions and Outcomes - From January to early September, courts resolved 9,166 cases of government and institutional debts to SMEs, recovering over 31.1 billion yuan [1] - The Supreme Court has emphasized equal legal protection and fair judicial practices in handling cases, aiming to enhance market confidence and stabilize expectations [1] - A total of 12,060 enterprises were subjected to "live sealing and live deduction" measures, involving 148,800 cases with an execution amount of 360.4 billion yuan, minimizing the impact of enforcement on normal business operations [2] Group 2: Legal Framework and Mechanisms - The Supreme Court has released various typical cases related to the protection of corporate reputation, anti-unfair competition, and anti-monopoly, clarifying judicial standards and stabilizing legal expectations [1] - A credit restoration and dishonesty punishment mechanism has been established, with 307,100 enterprises having their credit restored, distinguishing between "dishonesty" and "inability" [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court has issued a notification emphasizing strict and fair judicial practices in handling enterprise-related cases, aiming to protect various ownership rights and ensure equal legal protection for all enterprises [1][2] Group 1: Legal Protection and Principles - The notification stresses the importance of equal legal protection for all types of enterprises, ensuring that legal rights are upheld and violations are prosecuted [1] - It highlights the necessity to distinguish between economic disputes and criminal offenses, preventing the misclassification of economic issues as crimes [1] - The principles of equality before the law, legality of punishment, and presumption of innocence are reinforced, with a clear distinction made between contract disputes and fraud, as well as between legitimate financing and illegal fundraising [1] Group 2: Judicial Process and Enforcement - The notification calls for the regulation of case filing and jurisdiction in enterprise-related cases to combat local protectionism in law enforcement [2] - It emphasizes the need to minimize the impact of enforcement measures such as seizure and freezing on normal business operations [2] - The notification promotes fair adjudication of civil and administrative cases involving enterprises, ensuring that all market participants can compete fairly [2] Group 3: Mechanisms for Correction and Prevention - There is a focus on strengthening the mechanisms for handling appeals and retrials in cases involving enterprise property, aiming to prevent wrongful convictions [1][2] - The notification advocates for a dual approach of actively rescuing enterprises in distress while also ensuring timely liquidation when necessary [2] - It calls for precise identification and classification of cases to implement targeted measures effectively [2]