美国"政治新闻网"22日称，万斯对俄乌冲突找到和平解决方案"没有信心"。这番言论是迄今为止美国高 级官员"对和平前景最悲观的评估之一"。据报道，包括领土等棘手问题始终没有得到解决，反映俄乌双 方立场仍存在巨大差距。 据俄《消息报》网站23日报道，俄总统新闻秘书佩斯科夫22日表示，俄美在迈阿密就乌克兰问题举行的 会谈"不能被视为突破"。谈判工作仍在进行中，最重要的是从美方获悉其与乌和欧洲会谈的结果，在此 基础上，俄方才能了解这些进展同俄美此前在美国阿拉斯加州安克雷奇达成的共识的契合程度。 本报驻俄罗斯特派记者 肖新新 据乌通社22日报道，乌克兰总统泽连斯基当日在一场活动上透露，俄乌20点"和平计划"草案的基本框架 已就位，有些事乌克兰不准备接受，"我确信俄罗斯也有不准备接受的事"，美方还需同俄方继续谈判。 乌克兰代表团本月19日在美国与美方及欧洲方面就俄乌"和平计划"草案开始新一轮磋商。美国和乌克兰 方面21日各自发布几乎完全相同的声明，称双方代表团以及欧洲方面过去3天的一系列会谈"富有成效和 建设性"。声明未显示各方会如何就结束乌克兰危机的分歧统一立场，被外媒认为并无"显著突破"。 据报道，美国总统特朗普当地 ...

他呼吁乌克兰的伙伴们做出决定，利用欧盟境内近2500亿美元的被冻结俄罗斯主权资产（其中大部分由 比利时的欧洲清算银行持有），来支持一项对乌克兰的贷款。 欧盟各国政府上周同意无限期冻结这些资产，而不是每六个月投票一次来延长这一状态。一些欧洲领导 人反对该计划，因为他们担心这会让他们面临法律风险。 泽连斯基呼吁合作伙伴，特别是美国，不仅要关注莫斯科最近的声明，还要做出回应。他说： "今天，我们再次听到来自莫斯科的信号，他们正准备将明年变成'战争年'。这些信号不仅 是给我们的。至关重要的是，我们的伙伴也必须看到这些信号，而且不仅要看到，还要做出 回应——尤其是美国的伙伴，他们经常说俄罗斯想要结束。然而，来自俄罗斯的信号恰恰相 反，是以正式命令的形式下达给军队的。这种俄罗斯的思维方式必须被认识到，并采取行 动。" 在欧盟就莫斯科冻结资产举行关键峰会之前，乌克兰总统泽连斯基周三呼吁乌克兰的盟友确保对基辅的 支持，并向俄罗斯表明继续冲突是"毫无意义的"。 泽连斯基在当地时间晚间的讲话中说，"这些会议的结果——对欧洲来说的结果——必须让俄罗斯感觉 到，它想要明年继续战斗的愿望将是徒劳的，因为乌克兰将获得支持。" 周三在莫斯 ...

【白银期货行情表现】12月3日，沪银主力暂报13582元/克，涨幅0.67%，今日沪银主力开盘价13485元/ 克，截至目前最高13866元/克，最低13430元/克。 打开APP，查看更多高清行情>> 在会晤前，普京警告欧洲，如果与俄罗斯开战，他们将很快被击败，并称欧洲方面提出的乌克兰和平替 代方案"完全不可接受"。普京同时指责欧洲试图阻挠和平进程。 特朗普多次表示希望结束俄乌冲突，但迄今努力未果，包括8月在阿拉斯加与普京举行峰会，以及与乌 克兰总统泽连斯基的多次会谈。 俄罗斯总统外交政策助理乌沙科夫周三表示，俄罗斯和美国未能就乌克兰和平达成妥协，和平既没有更 近一步，也没有变得更遥远。 【机构观点】 五矿期货：当前白银价格已经进入加速上涨阶段，预计其本周价格仍能出现当日大幅上涨的情况，以旗 形等高计算重点关注上方14500元/千克压力位。价格若在日内出现走弱则需及时止盈离场，在这一阶段 新开多单或是逢高做空均具备较大的风险。沪金仍处于三角收敛末端的突破形态，策略上建议逢低布局 多单。沪银主力合约参考运行区间12366-14500元/千克。 【宏观消息】 俄罗斯总统普京周二(12月2日)在克里姆林宫会见了美 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the tension between the U.S. and Europe regarding Trump's 28-point plan, which is perceived as undermining European involvement in the resolution of the Russia-Ukraine conflict [1][3][5] - European leaders, particularly Hungary's Prime Minister Orban, express concerns that the plan excludes Europe from critical discussions about security and conflict resolution, emphasizing that any solution must involve European nations [1][3] - The 28-point plan is seen as a strategic move by the U.S. to regain control over the negotiation process, while Europe insists on its role in any decisions affecting its security and interests [5][7] Group 2 - The articles illustrate the complex dynamics at play, where Europe desires a swift resolution to the conflict but resists being sidelined in decision-making processes, indicating a struggle for autonomy in international diplomacy [3][5] - The response from European countries is unified in stating that any proposals regarding European security must be agreed upon by European nations and NATO members, highlighting a firm stance against unilateral actions by the U.S. [3][5] - The ongoing geopolitical chess game involves Ukraine navigating between U.S. initiatives, Russian positions, and European interests, with the outcome of the 28-point plan dependent on the willingness of all parties to coordinate and agree on its legitimacy [5][7]

Group 1 - The meeting between Russian President Putin and US President Trump is still on the agenda, with Russia emphasizing the need for the meeting to be "meaningful" [1][3] - Russia believes that both sides should adhere to the framework established during their previous meeting in Anchorage, Alaska, and hopes the US will take necessary actions to create conditions for another meeting [3] - Trump had previously announced the cancellation of the planned meeting in Budapest, citing that the timing was not right and that the meeting could not achieve its goals, while Putin indicated that the meeting should be viewed as postponed rather than completely canceled [3] Group 2 - Trump expressed a desire for Ukraine to accept a new 28-point plan proposed by the US to end the Russia-Ukraine conflict by the end of the month, while Putin acknowledged receipt of the proposal through existing communication channels [3]

Group 1 - The article discusses a new 28-point plan drafted by the U.S. aimed at ending the Russia-Ukraine conflict, with Ukraine's delegation set to participate in talks in Switzerland [1][4] - The U.S. officials, including Middle East envoy and Secretary of State, will attend the discussions alongside representatives from several European countries [2][4] - There are significant differences in positions among the U.S., Russia, Ukraine, and European nations regarding the new plan [1][5] Group 2 - Ukrainian President Zelensky has approved the delegation for the talks and emphasized the need for a viable alternative to the U.S. proposal, stating that Ukraine will not give the enemy a reason to claim it does not want peace [10][11] - Trump has pressured Ukraine to accept the plan by a specific date, indicating that failure to do so could prolong the conflict [7][8] - Russia has expressed a positive attitude towards the plan, suggesting it could serve as a basis for a final resolution, although they remain cautious about potential changes from the U.S. [14][15] Group 3 - European nations feel sidelined as they were not involved in drafting the plan, leading to concerns about their role in negotiations regarding European security [16][20] - EU Commission President von der Leyen stated that the initial draft of the plan needs further refinement and emphasized the importance of not altering borders by force [17][18] - Hungary's Prime Minister Orban has rejected proposals for continued financial support to Ukraine, arguing that Europe should not be obligated to fund a war deemed likely to fail [19]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the urgent situation regarding the proposed 28-point plan by the U.S. for ending the Russia-Ukraine conflict, highlighting the pressures faced by Ukraine and the responses from both U.S. and Russian leaders [1][5][12]. Group 1: U.S. Position - President Trump expressed that Ukraine should accept the 28-point plan by the 27th of the month, indicating that this date is appropriate despite the possibility of extension depending on circumstances [3][5]. - Trump emphasized that Ukraine is losing territory and will continue to do so in the short term, suggesting a sense of urgency in the negotiations [3][5]. - The 28-point plan was reportedly drafted in secret by the White House and discussed with Russia, requiring Ukraine to withdraw from certain areas it currently controls, which has been previously rejected by Ukraine [5][11]. Group 2: Ukraine's Response - President Zelensky stated that Ukraine is facing a "very difficult choice" but will not betray the nation, indicating the high stakes involved in the decision-making process [7][9]. - Zelensky acknowledged the unprecedented pressure on Ukraine and the potential consequences of accepting the difficult 28-point plan, which could lead to losing dignity or a key partner [9][11]. - Following a call with U.S. Vice President, Zelensky expressed willingness to cooperate with the U.S. and Europe on national security matters to make the path to peace viable [5][9]. Group 3: Russian Perspective - President Putin indicated that the 28-point plan could serve as a basis for a final peace resolution, although he noted that the U.S. has not yet discussed the specifics of the plan with Russia [12][15]. - Putin criticized Ukraine and its European allies for their hopes of achieving a strategic defeat of Russia on the battlefield, suggesting that refusal to discuss the plan could lead to further military actions by Russia [16][15].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the urgency of a new 28-point plan proposed by the U.S. for Ukraine to end the conflict with Russia, with a deadline suggested by President Trump for Ukraine to accept the plan by November 27. Ukrainian President Zelensky faces difficult choices regarding the plan, while Russian President Putin indicates it could serve as a basis for peace negotiations [1][2][11]. Group 1: U.S. Proposal and Deadline - President Trump stated that Ukraine should accept the 28-point plan by November 27, although he mentioned the possibility of extending the deadline depending on circumstances [2]. - Trump emphasized that Ukraine is losing territory and will continue to do so in the short term if the plan is not accepted [2]. - The 28-point plan was reportedly drafted in secret by the White House and discussed with Russia, requiring Ukraine to withdraw from parts of Donetsk, which Ukraine had previously rejected [5]. Group 2: Ukrainian Response - President Zelensky described the situation as a "very difficult choice," asserting he would not betray his country [6][9]. - He acknowledged unprecedented pressure on Ukraine and the potential consequences of accepting the plan, including loss of dignity or a key partner [9]. - Zelensky expressed a commitment to work with the U.S. and European partners to seek constructive solutions while ensuring that Ukrainian dignity and freedom are not overlooked in the negotiations [9][10]. Group 3: European Reaction - European leaders, including the President of the European Commission and the President of the European Council, plan to meet to discuss the situation in Ukraine and consider alternative proposals that may be more favorable to Ukraine [5]. - There is skepticism among some Ukrainian media and experts regarding the feasibility of the 28-point plan, particularly concerning territorial concessions and the implications for Ukraine's NATO aspirations [10]. Group 4: Russian Position - President Putin indicated that the 28-point plan could serve as a foundation for a final peace solution, although he noted that the U.S. has not yet discussed the specifics of the plan with Russia [11][13]. - He expressed concern that Ukraine and its European allies are still holding onto unrealistic expectations of achieving a strategic defeat of Russia on the battlefield [13].

Group 1 - European leaders issued a joint statement supporting an immediate ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine, aiming to initiate negotiations to end the ongoing conflict [1] - The statement was released following US President Trump's announcement of a meeting with President Putin to discuss peace solutions, emphasizing the need for a ceasefire and a freeze along the current front lines [1] - The joint statement, signed by leaders from Ukraine, Germany, France, the UK, Italy, and the EU, reiterated the principle that international borders should not be changed by force [1] Group 2 - The EU is set to approve a new plan to provide up to €1.4 billion in loans to Ukraine through frozen Russian central bank assets, alongside new sanctions targeting Kremlin's energy revenue [2] - A meeting of the "coalition of willing" countries, including the UK, France, Germany, and Ukraine, is scheduled to discuss military and reconstruction commitments to Ukraine [2] - European officials expressed concerns that a ceasefire based on current front lines could solidify Russian control over parts of Ukraine, potentially weakening Western resistance [2]

Core Viewpoint - The upcoming meeting between US President Trump and Russian President Putin is seen as a "test" to gauge Putin's readiness to end the Russia-Ukraine war [1][2]. Group 1: Meeting Context - Trump describes the meeting as a "test meeting" and anticipates constructive dialogue, aiming to persuade Putin to end the war [1][2]. - He believes he can determine the potential for an agreement within the first two minutes of their conversation [2]. Group 2: Potential Outcomes - Trump suggests that any potential agreement may involve "some land exchanges," indicating that both Russia and Ukraine would need to concede territory to resolve the conflict [5]. - He downplays the likelihood that the meeting will immediately end the war, stating that reaching an agreement is not solely within his control [6]. Group 3: Ukraine's Position - Ukrainian President Zelensky has expressed concerns about being marginalized in US-Russia negotiations, emphasizing the need for Ukraine's involvement in any discussions [7]. - Zelensky insists that Ukraine will not make concessions on territorial issues and calls for greater international pressure on Russia [8].