公司内控
Search documents
 梦洁股份今年前三季净利润同比增29%,董事陈洁却对财报投反对票
 Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-10-26 13:27
每经记者|于垚峰 每经编辑|文多 一名董事投反对票 直指财务问题与内控缺陷 现金流方面,梦洁股份前三季度经营活动产生的现金流量净额为1.27亿元,而上年同期为-7183.80万 元。公司就此介绍,主要是因报告期支付的间接费用及承兑保证金减少。 10月26日晚,梦洁股份(SZ002397,股价3.98元,市值29.76亿元)披露2025年第三季度报告。报告显 示,公司前三季度营业收入为10.99亿元,同比下降7.97%,归母净利润为2651.76万元,同比增长 28.69%,扣非后净利润为2475.21万元,同比大幅增长105.37%。 但对这份业绩报告,公司董事会内部却存在不同声音。董事陈洁对三季报投反对票,质疑报告存在财务 数据失真等问题。公司针对陈洁的质疑也一一作出回应。 增利不增收 前三季业绩喜忧参半 单就今年第三季度来看,梦洁股份营收为3.66亿元,同比增长9.76%,归母净利润为110.26万元,同比 增长131.11%,扣非后归母净利润为77.67万元,同比增长121.75%。可见,公司第三季度的营收与利润 双双实现同比增长,缓解了此前的增长压力。 梦洁股份同日发布的公告显示,梦洁股份在2025年 ...
 开源证券1.26亿元执行案浮出水面:IPO折戟、合规失守、保荐业务现“滑铁卢”
 Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-07-26 16:20
 Core Viewpoint - The recent developments surrounding Kaiyuan Securities highlight significant governance, compliance, and risk control issues, culminating in a 126 million yuan enforcement case and the failure of its IPO application after a lengthy review process [3][4].   Group 1: Enforcement and Legal Issues - Kaiyuan Securities has a new enforcement record with a case number (2025) Shaanxi 01 Executive Recovery 165, filed on May 28, 2025, involving a subject amount of 126 million yuan [1][2]. - The enforcement case amount aligns with a previously disclosed arbitration in its IPO application from December 2024 [2].   Group 2: IPO and Market Position - Once recognized as the "King of New Third Board" due to its leading position in the market from 2018 to 2021, Kaiyuan Securities faced a setback when its IPO application was terminated by the Shenzhen Stock Exchange on June 28, 2025, after three years of waiting [2][3]. - The company had submitted its IPO application in July 2022 but faced withdrawal from its sponsor, Guolian Minsheng Securities, leading to the termination of the review process [2].   Group 3: Compliance and Regulatory Challenges - In October 2024, the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) imposed a six-month suspension on Kaiyuan Securities' bond underwriting business due to violations, including misleading statements in fundraising documents and improper financing practices [4]. - The suspension resulted in the cancellation of 8.5 billion yuan worth of bond projects, leading to a 45.89% drop in investment banking revenue for 2024 [4].   Group 4: Internal Control Issues - The Dalian branch of Kaiyuan Securities faced regulatory penalties in March 2025 for multiple compliance failures, including issuing false income statements for investor qualifications and improper management of qualified investor recognition [5]. - The branch was ordered to rectify its practices and faced a six-month suspension on related business activities [5].   Group 5: Financial Performance - From 2021 to mid-2024, the brokerage business profits of Kaiyuan Securities plummeted from 192 million yuan to 10 million yuan, with commission income from agency trading dropping from 242 million yuan to 85 million yuan [5].
 上市公司案例分析:神雾集团
 Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-05-10 03:29
 Core Viewpoint - Shenwu Group, once a leading environmental technology enterprise, has experienced significant ups and downs in its development, leading to its eventual operational failure due to various internal and external factors.   Group 1: Company Background and Performance - Shenwu Group acquired controlling interest in the listed company "Tianli Environmental" through judicial transfer and restructured it to become "Shenwu Environmental," which was subsequently listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange [2] - Shenwu Group also owns another listed company, Shenwu Energy, which successfully went public in A-shares in 2016 through a reverse merger [2] - Shenwu Environmental's revenue surged from 1.215 billion yuan in 2015 to 3.125 billion yuan in 2016, representing a year-on-year growth of 91% and 157% respectively; net profit increased from 181 million yuan to 706 million yuan, with growth rates of 96% and 289% [2]   Group 2: Profit Quality Issues - The proportion of related party transactions increased significantly, reaching 58% in 2016, which raised operational risks and affected profit quality [3] - By 2016, nearly 54% of the company's accounts receivable were from related parties, leading to poor operating cash flow despite high net profits [3] - The company faced liquidity issues in the second half of 2017 due to delayed collections and large payments to suppliers and subcontractors [3]   Group 3: Internal Control Failures - Shenwu Environmental's internal control measures, such as the "External Guarantee Management System," were not effectively implemented [4]   Group 4: Financial and Legal Issues - The company provided substantial guarantees to its controlling shareholder Shenwu Group and its subsidiaries without proper approval, totaling approximately 1 billion yuan, which were not disclosed in a timely manner [6] - Due to debt defaults by the controlling shareholder, Shenwu Environmental was sued as a joint liability guarantor, exacerbating its financial difficulties and damaging its reputation [7]   Group 5: Governance and Structural Problems - The ownership structure of Shenwu Environmental allowed the controlling shareholder to dominate decision-making and information disclosure, undermining the company's independence [8] - There were overlapping roles among the management team, leading to a lack of independent governance and control by minority shareholders [9]   Group 6: Market Environment Changes - The tightening of environmental regulations and increased technical barriers in the industry placed Shenwu Group at a competitive disadvantage, contributing to its operational challenges [10]