随着事态失控，这场斗争变得抽象起来。 范思奇称唐靖人看不懂代码，自己创立的公司被搞成"犯罪窝点"，结果反被踢了出去。唐靖人称，靖奇只是走了一个Quant，并祝范思奇早日恢复健康。 更不可思议的是，唐靖人向笔者表示，收到了不明人士寄来的三双寿鞋。 两者纠纷不断升级，从抢夺公众号的麦克风，到小红书开小号揭老底，这场男人之间狂野的键盘肉搏持续了三个月，很难想象此前亲密无间的二人走到这 番境地。 三年前，唐靖人回忆，2008 年金融危机后，家庭负债 12 亿，"范思奇是当时没有抛弃他的朋友之一，能和好朋友一起创业是非常幸运的事[1]。"在普遍从 古代典籍中寻找命名灵感的量化行业，以创始人姓名"靖"、"奇"命名足矣证明两人的感情。 唐靖人说，"两人虽然偶有争执，但吵完架还是照样吃饭。因为年龄相仿，认错也不存在障碍[1]。"不过这次争执之后，他们再也回不到一张桌子上吃饭 了。 量化基金赚钱靠的是模型，但作为合伙企业而言，私募的商业根基是人与人之间的相互信任和认可，再理想一些，是相互的欣赏与分享。最顶级的量化模 型或许能应对金融市场的系统性风险，却永远预测不了法人的行为，而后者的一句疯话足以毁掉一切。 封面来源：shotd ...

截至公告披露日，千鑫恒持有佳士科技股份20,409,006股，占公司总股本的4.29% 。其中，千鑫恒所持 有公司股份累计被质押20,402,906股，占其所持有公司股份数量的99.97%，占公司总股本的4.28%；累 计被冻结20,409,006股，占其所持有公司股份数量的100.00%，占公司总股本的4.29%。 此次减持计划期限届满，千鑫恒未进行减持操作，其目前的持股状态及股份质押冻结情况，或对公司股 权结构及未来发展产生一定影响，市场将持续关注佳士科技后续动态。 2025年5月26日，深圳市佳士科技股份有限公司披露《关于股东减持股份的预披露公告》，公司股东深 圳市千鑫恒投资发展有限公司计划自减持预披露公告之日起15个交易日后的3个月内，以集中竞价和大 宗交易方式减持公司股份不超过14,287,494股，占公司总股本的3.00%。 近日，佳士科技收到千鑫恒出具的《关于减持计划期限届满的告知函》。截至2025年9月16日，本次减 持计划期限已届满，千鑫恒在减持计划期间内未减持公司股份。 声明：市场有风险，投资需谨慎。 本文为AI大模型基于第三方数据库自动发布，任何在本文出现的信 息（包括但不限于个股、评论 ...

Group 1 - Yangzhou Xiyue has received feedback from the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) regarding its application for overseas listing in the United States [1] - The CSRC has requested clarification on the compliance of the company's equity control structure, including foreign exchange management and tax compliance [1] - The company was asked to explain the reasons why Hu Jiahui, the spouse of the actual controller Xiong Bin, was not recognized as a joint actual controller [1] Group 2 - The CSRC requires Yangzhou Xiyue to provide details on the shareholding structure before and after the equity restructuring, including any inconsistencies in shareholding ratios [1] - The company must clarify the pricing and payment details related to the capital increase of Andaman Construction in Hangzhou Wukong and other entities [1] - The CSRC has also requested information on the fairness and compliance of zero-cost transfers of shares in certain subsidiaries [1] Group 3 - The CSRC has asked for additional information regarding related party loans provided by Hangzhou Jialin to various entities, including the background and repayment arrangements [2] - The company needs to disclose the registered capital payment status of its domestic entities and any implications for normal business operations [2] - There is a requirement to explain the implications of a frozen shareholding in a subsidiary and its potential impact on the listing process [2] Group 4 - Yangzhou Xiyue must provide details on its business operations, including compliance with foreign investment restrictions and the nature of its subsidiaries' activities [2][3] - The company is required to clarify its digital business practices, including data collection and user information protection measures [3] - The company was established in 2024 in Jiangsu Province, focusing on software and information technology services, with a registered capital of 3 million RMB [3][4]

Core Viewpoint - Zhongcheng Consulting's IPO at the Beijing Stock Exchange faced significant challenges, leading to a reduction in fundraising from 330 million yuan to nearly 200 million yuan due to regulatory scrutiny and operational issues [2][12]. Financial Performance - The company's revenue and net profit showed growth from 2022 to 2024, with revenues of 303 million yuan, 368 million yuan, and 396 million yuan, reflecting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.19%. Net profits were 64.36 million yuan, 81.06 million yuan, and 105 million yuan, with a CAGR of 27.97% [13][14]. - However, in the first half of 2025, revenue declined by 4.08% year-on-year to approximately 191 million yuan, and net profit decreased by 2.66% to 53.29 million yuan [17]. Order and Market Dependency - The company experienced a significant drop in new orders, with a 46.51% year-on-year decrease in the first five months of 2025, totaling 73.88 million yuan [17]. - Zhongcheng Consulting heavily relies on clients within Jiangsu province, with over 96% of its revenue coming from this region during the reporting period [4][18]. Corporate Governance and Ownership Structure - The company has a concentrated ownership structure, with founder Xu Xuelai controlling 86.98% of the shares, raising potential governance concerns [5][20]. - The transition of control from Xu to her husband, Lu Jun, has led to questions about the stability of the company's control [20]. Regulatory and Compliance Issues - Zhongcheng Consulting faced scrutiny from the Beijing Stock Exchange regarding the necessity of its fundraising projects, especially given its history of significant cash dividends and investments [11][12]. - The company has been penalized for accounting errors and inaccuracies in disclosing its actual controllers, indicating a need for improved internal management [23][24]. Strategic Challenges - The company has made strategic acquisitions to expand its service offerings, including engineering design and BIM services, but faces challenges in executing its growth strategy amid declining orders and revenue [7][8][19]. - The future profitability and growth resilience of Zhongcheng Consulting remain uncertain, with market observers closely watching its ability to expand beyond Jiangsu [19].

Core Viewpoint - Zhongcheng Consulting's IPO approval at the Beijing Stock Exchange has been marred by a significant reduction in fundraising from 330 million yuan to nearly 200 million yuan, reflecting ongoing regulatory scrutiny and the company's concessions [1][7]. Financial Performance - The company's revenue and net profit have shown growth from 2022 to 2024, with revenues of 303 million yuan, 368 million yuan, and 396 million yuan, representing a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.19%. Net profits were 64.4 million yuan, 81 million yuan, and 105 million yuan, with a CAGR of 27.97% [8][12]. - However, in the first half of 2025, revenue declined by 4.08% year-on-year, and new orders dropped by over 46% in the first five months [12][14]. Business Structure and Risks - Zhongcheng Consulting relies heavily on Jiangsu province for over 96% of its revenue, indicating a significant regional dependency risk [2][16]. - The company's ownership structure is highly concentrated, with the founder controlling 86.98% of the shares, raising potential governance concerns [2][17]. Fundraising and Regulatory Scrutiny - After three rounds of inquiries from the Beijing Stock Exchange, Zhongcheng Consulting reduced its fundraising projects and amounts, ultimately canceling the supplementary working capital project and the EPC business expansion project [5][7]. - The company faced questions regarding the necessity of fundraising given its substantial financial investments and cash dividends in previous years [6][18]. Management and Governance Issues - The transition of control from the founder to her husband has raised questions about the stability of the company's governance [17][20]. - The company has faced regulatory penalties for accounting errors and inaccurate disclosures, highlighting the need for improved internal management [20][21]. Future Outlook - The company forecasts a decline in revenue and net profit for 2025, projecting revenues of approximately 384 million yuan and net profits of about 101 million yuan, indicating ongoing challenges [16][21]. - The ability of the current management to expand beyond Jiangsu and stabilize the company's performance remains uncertain [21].

Core Viewpoint - Yuan Chuang Technology Co., Ltd. is attempting its third IPO since 2021, facing significant challenges due to financial data and governance issues revealed in its latest prospectus [1][3][23] Group 1: Ownership and Governance Issues - Yuan Chuang Technology has a high family ownership ratio of 95.24%, raising concerns about corporate governance effectiveness [3][5] - The actual controller, Wang Wenjie, has a history of legal issues, including a bribery case, which has led to scrutiny from regulatory bodies [6][7] - The management team is also characterized by familial ties, with several key positions held by relatives of the actual controller, indicating a lack of professional governance [8] Group 2: Customer Dependency and Financial Risks - The company faces significant customer concentration risk, with the top five customers contributing over 46% of sales revenue from 2022 to 2024 [11] - A major customer, Wo De Agricultural Machinery, accounts for 22.91% of revenue but represents 40.43% of accounts receivable, indicating a potential cash flow crisis [12] - The overdue accounts from Wo De Agricultural Machinery have been substantial, with overdue amounts reaching 96.08 million yuan at the end of 2022 [12] Group 3: Financial Performance and Cash Flow Concerns - The company's revenue showed fluctuations, with 2024 net profit declining by 12.94% year-on-year, while accounts receivable surged by 35.18% [14] - The net cash flow from operating activities decreased by 35.88% in 2024, raising concerns about the company's ability to convert revenue into cash [16] - The company has distributed 47.16 million yuan in cash dividends from 2020 to 2023, while planning to raise 60 million yuan for working capital, raising questions about the rationale behind this financial strategy [16] Group 4: R&D and Capacity Expansion Issues - The company reported a sudden increase in patents and claimed to have 14 R&D personnel, despite previously stating a lack of dedicated R&D staff [18] - R&D expenditure remains low at 0.72% of revenue in 2024, which is below industry standards, questioning the claimed technological advantages [19] - The efficiency of fixed asset output has been declining, indicating potential issues with asset utilization amid expansion plans [20] Group 5: Regulatory Scrutiny and Data Discrepancies - The introduction of a rebate policy for traders during a period of declining performance raises concerns about potential financial manipulation [21] - Discrepancies in reported sales figures between the company and its major customer, Wo De Agricultural Machinery, have led to questions about financial transparency [21] - Changes in the educational qualifications of key technical personnel shortly after IPO scrutiny have raised further doubts about the company's credibility [21]

Core Viewpoint - TAL Education Group (stock code: "TAL") has submitted its 20-F filing to the SEC, revealing significant ownership and voting power held by its founder and CEO, Bangxin Zhang, as well as recent stock sales by executives [2][3][6]. Shareholding Structure - As of April 30, 2025, Bangxin Zhang owns 27.3% of the shares and holds 73% of the voting power [2]. - The total shareholding of directors and executive officers is 31.6%, with 78.5% voting power [3]. - Principal shareholder Bright Unison Limited holds 23.0% of the shares and 59.4% of the voting power [2]. Stock Performance - As of the latest closing, TAL's stock price is $10.66, with a market capitalization of $6.487 billion [4]. - Bangxin Zhang's net worth is approximately $1.751 billion (around 12.57 billion RMB), while COO Yachao Liu's net worth is about $272 million (around 1.953 billion RMB) [5]. Recent Executive Stock Sales - On April 28, 2025, CFO Alex Zhuangzhuang Peng sold 15,938 shares for $146,000 (approximately 1.05 million RMB) [6]. - On the same day, COO Yachao Liu sold 25,303 shares for $231,775 (approximately 1.67 million RMB) [10]. - This marks Liu's second sale in 2025, having previously sold 24,000 shares for $281,000 (approximately 2.04 million RMB) on January 7, 2025 [11]. Financial Performance - For the fiscal years ending February 28/29, TAL's revenues were $1.019 billion, $1.490 billion, and $2.250 billion, respectively [12]. - Operating losses were reported at $90.73 million, $69.23 million, and $3.16 million for the same periods [12]. - The net income figures showed a loss of $131.98 million, a loss of $4.14 million, and a profit of $84.26 million [12][13]. - The recovery of offline training centers has been noted, with increased student attendance during the summer [13].

General Provisions - The company aims to protect the legal rights of the company, shareholders, and creditors, and to regulate its organizational behavior according to relevant laws and regulations [2][4] - The company was established with approval from the Shanghai Municipal Construction Committee and has undergone registration with the Shanghai Market Supervision Administration [2][3] - The registered capital of the company is RMB 1,359,912,218 [3] Business Objectives and Scope - The company's business objective is to promote the development of the Waigaoqiao Free Trade Zone by leveraging favorable conditions and policies, attracting domestic and foreign investment, and introducing advanced international technology and management experience [6] - The business scope includes real estate development, bonded trade, international freight forwarding, and various consulting services [6] Share Issuance - The company issues shares in the form of stocks, with A-shares denominated in RMB and B-shares in USD [7] - The total number of ordinary shares approved for issuance is 1,359,912,218, with a current structure of 1,159,354,718 RMB ordinary shares and 200,557,500 domestic listed foreign shares [7][8] Shareholder Rights and Obligations - Shareholders have rights to dividends, attend meetings, supervise company operations, and transfer their shares [13][38] - Shareholders holding more than 5% of voting shares must report any pledges of their shares to the company [39] Shareholder Meetings - The company holds annual shareholder meetings within six months after the end of the fiscal year, and temporary meetings can be called under specific circumstances [45][46] - The company must provide adequate notice of meetings, including time, location, and agenda, ensuring transparency and participation [58][59] Voting and Resolutions - Resolutions can be classified as ordinary or special, with ordinary resolutions requiring a simple majority and special resolutions requiring a two-thirds majority [77][79] - Shareholder votes on significant matters affecting minority investors must be counted separately and disclosed [80]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the need to improve the modern enterprise system with Chinese characteristics, particularly focusing on the enhancement of enterprise property rights structure [1] - It highlights the importance of respecting independent legal person property rights of enterprises, aiming to establish a clear, reasonable, and smoothly flowing property rights system [1] - State-owned enterprises are encouraged to gradually adjust and optimize their equity structure based on functional positioning, leading to a diversified equity structure and effective internal constraints [1] Group 2 - The article advocates for private enterprises to develop a simple, clear, and transparent equity structure [1]

Core Viewpoint - Shenwu Group, once a leading environmental technology enterprise, has experienced significant ups and downs in its development, leading to its eventual operational failure due to various internal and external factors. Group 1: Company Background and Performance - Shenwu Group acquired controlling interest in the listed company "Tianli Environmental" through judicial transfer and restructured it to become "Shenwu Environmental," which was subsequently listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange [2] - Shenwu Group also owns another listed company, Shenwu Energy, which successfully went public in A-shares in 2016 through a reverse merger [2] - Shenwu Environmental's revenue surged from 1.215 billion yuan in 2015 to 3.125 billion yuan in 2016, representing a year-on-year growth of 91% and 157% respectively; net profit increased from 181 million yuan to 706 million yuan, with growth rates of 96% and 289% [2] Group 2: Profit Quality Issues - The proportion of related party transactions increased significantly, reaching 58% in 2016, which raised operational risks and affected profit quality [3] - By 2016, nearly 54% of the company's accounts receivable were from related parties, leading to poor operating cash flow despite high net profits [3] - The company faced liquidity issues in the second half of 2017 due to delayed collections and large payments to suppliers and subcontractors [3] Group 3: Internal Control Failures - Shenwu Environmental's internal control measures, such as the "External Guarantee Management System," were not effectively implemented [4] Group 4: Financial and Legal Issues - The company provided substantial guarantees to its controlling shareholder Shenwu Group and its subsidiaries without proper approval, totaling approximately 1 billion yuan, which were not disclosed in a timely manner [6] - Due to debt defaults by the controlling shareholder, Shenwu Environmental was sued as a joint liability guarantor, exacerbating its financial difficulties and damaging its reputation [7] Group 5: Governance and Structural Problems - The ownership structure of Shenwu Environmental allowed the controlling shareholder to dominate decision-making and information disclosure, undermining the company's independence [8] - There were overlapping roles among the management team, leading to a lack of independent governance and control by minority shareholders [9] Group 6: Market Environment Changes - The tightening of environmental regulations and increased technical barriers in the industry placed Shenwu Group at a competitive disadvantage, contributing to its operational challenges [10]