网友爆料 " 坐落在南京栖霞紫东创意园 XXXX，趁我下班之后偷看我电脑，看到我电脑里有 git 拉的代码说我干 私活要把我开了。后面我找我的直属领导对质，他承认偷看我的电脑，人事想着息事宁人，就让我继续 干。 然后我请了一天假，第三天来上班又要把我开了。那就赔偿就行了，沟通了多次，最后还和老板 XXX 沟通了，多次威胁我要扣我绩效。 网友回复： - EOF - 推荐阅读 点击标题可跳转 1、 "IT 部门在传统行业的地位是最低的，公司两部门大佬入职，晚上聚餐老板唯独没带 IT 老大…" 2、 "前同事是技术大神，代码写得比谁都漂亮，却总在晋升时被卡住…" 我太年轻了，低估了这种公司的不要脸的能力，我辛辛苦苦干了一个半月，没请过一次假，天天加班， 1.2 万的工资最后扣了只剩 4900，我被迫只能申请劳动仲裁。" ...

因为求职者有过劳动仲裁记录而不予录用，是一种隐性就业歧视，但绝非完全无法应对。有关劳动 部门对背调行为做出进一步明确和规范，就是一种解法。劳动法规定，用人单位有权了解劳动者与劳动 合同直接相关的基本情况，劳动者应当如实说明。但哪些信息属于上述"基本情况"，目前并无更明确的 规定，这也就使得不少企业单位将背调范围扩大化。 背调变滥调、暗调，不仅有向前公司追问劳动者先前待遇、仲裁记录的，甚至求职者作为业主曾与 物业管理有过诉讼纠纷，竟也成为了某公司不予录用的理由。劳动者是否愿意披露相关个人信息，应该 以规范的书面形式进行告知和授权，而究竟什么信息可纳入背调范围，更应当有明确的边界。在此次事 件中，即便余女士签署了相关授权，但如果相关背调并不合理，同样也是对个人权益的侵犯。 除了规范背调行为，用人单位也要改改观念了。劳动仲裁尤其成为公司人力的眼中钉，不外乎是觉 得这样的求职者"爱找麻烦""不够稳定"，为何存在这样的偏见?究其原因或在于，一些单位对于自身的 管理和待遇是否公平合理，本来就底气不足。说到底，劳动仲裁经历绝不是求职污点，用人单位要理解 这一点，就要设身处地地理解员工，才能实现更高效、人性化的管理，从而真正 ...

Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint - The announcement details the ongoing litigation involving New Dazhou Holdings Co., Ltd. and the implications of a recent ruling by the Supreme People's Court of China regarding a loan dispute with Cai Laiyin, which has led to the freezing of certain assets and a potential sale of shares to settle debts [2][3]. Group 1: Litigation Overview - New Dazhou disclosed the lawsuit initiated by Cai Laiyin against multiple parties, including New Dazhou, in October 2019, related to a loan dispute [2]. - The Guangdong High People's Court ruled that New Dazhou is liable for half of the unpaid loan principal and interest owed to Cai Laiyin [2]. - As a result of the litigation, several bank accounts and equity interests of New Dazhou have been frozen, including profits from its stake in Inner Mongolia Yakeshi Wujiu Coal Group Co., Ltd. [2]. Group 2: Recent Developments - On June 6, 2025, New Dazhou received a civil ruling from the Supreme People's Court, which accepted its application for retrial regarding the previous judgment [3]. - The ruling includes a suspension of the execution of the original judgment, which had ordered the auction of New Dazhou's 44.918% stake in Wujiu Group to satisfy the debt [5]. - The company continues to accrue interest based on the original judgment while awaiting the outcome of the retrial [5]. Group 3: Impact on the Company - The suspension of the original judgment's execution may provide temporary relief for New Dazhou, but the final outcome of the retrial remains uncertain [5]. - The board of directors will monitor the situation closely and fulfill disclosure obligations as required by law [5].