唯成分论
Search documents
化妆品“唯成分论”乱象 检测屡陷“罗生门”
经济观察报· 2026-01-19 07:22
成分之争在某种意义上是企业营销之争,系单一成分概念营销 引发的侧面影响。 作者:叶心冉 封图:图虫创意 过去一段时间,有关化妆品成分含量的争端频繁出现。2025年,上美集团旗下韩束、巨子生物旗 下可复美均因产品成分含量检测引发争议。 不同检测机构出具的结论不一:有的第三方检测结果显示某成分含量未达宣称标准,而品牌方拿出 的监管部门或其他权威机构的核验报告,却证实产品成分含量符合标识标注。 "公说公有理、婆说婆有理"的争论,让消费者的判断与信任陷入无所适从的困境。 但精准性并非不可实现,只要依托标准化检测方法、配备高灵敏度仪器、建立严格的质控流程(如 空白对照、加标回收、能力验证),同时提升机构专业度,就能在复杂基质中实现精准测量。 多数结果争议的核心,往往是部分机构采用非适宜方法、操作不规范导致的,而非技术上无法达成 精准。 经济观察报 :目前,肽类、蛋白类等活性成分在化妆品领域的应用日益广泛,部分成分甚至成为 相关企业的核心竞争力。在此背景下,活性成分的精准检测面临哪些难点? 从科学论证的角度,我们是不是根本无法获得成分含量的精确性检测结果?而对于化妆品功效而 言,成分差几克或者差几毫克,是否会产生截然不同 ...
化妆品“唯成分论”乱象 检测屡陷“罗生门”
Jing Ji Guan Cha Wang· 2026-01-19 05:52
Core Viewpoint - The ongoing disputes regarding cosmetic ingredient content highlight the complexities of ingredient testing and the challenges consumers face in discerning accurate information [1][2][3] Group 1: Disputes and Testing Challenges - Different testing institutions yield varying results for the same cosmetic ingredient, leading to consumer confusion and mistrust [2][4] - The complexity of cosmetic formulations, which often contain numerous ingredients, complicates the accuracy of testing results [4][5] - The lack of standardized testing methods contributes to discrepancies in results, as different institutions may use varying techniques and protocols [4][5][6] Group 2: Consumer Guidance and Industry Practices - Consumers are advised to prioritize testing institutions with recognized qualifications, such as CMA and CNAS, and to be cautious of unqualified third-party tests [7] - The impact of ingredient content variations can be significant, especially for active ingredients present in low concentrations, where small differences can affect efficacy [8][9] - The rise of ingredient-focused consumers has prompted brands to disclose more product information, making testing results a critical factor in product valuation [9][10] Group 3: Industry Development and Recommendations - The cosmetic industry is encouraged to adopt a foundation based on skin science and evidence-based practices to address the ongoing disputes and improve consumer communication [11][12][13] - Establishing a unified standard for ingredient testing that incorporates evidence-based data and involves diverse stakeholders is essential for enhancing credibility [12][13] - The industry must shift focus from mere ingredient content to the actual effects of ingredients on skin, ensuring that product efficacy and safety are prioritized [13]