更多详情点击进入专题 来源丨央视新闻 编辑丨金珊 十四届全国人大四次会议议程定了 大会发言人回应中美关系发展趋势 SFC 21君荐读 2 智能 悦 读 · 权 威 n o 扫码点击下载 十四届全国人大四次会议今天（3月4日）在人民大会堂举行新闻发布会，大会发言人娄勤俭就 大会议程和人大工作相关问题回答中外记者提问。 娄勤俭表示，中方高度关注伊朗局势。伊朗国家主权、安全和领土完整应该得到尊重。 中方 呼吁立即停止军事行动，避免紧张事态进一步升级，恢复对话谈判，维护中东地区和平稳定， 中方愿为此继续发挥负责任大国作用。 中方一贯认为，大小国家相互尊重、一律平等是历史进步的要求，也是联合国宪章首要原则。 任何国家都没有控制国际事务、主宰他国命运、垄断发展优势的权力，更不能在世界上我行我 素。 ...

End 十四届全国人大四次会议今天（3月4日）在人民大会堂举行新闻发布会，大会发言人娄勤 俭就大会议程和人大工作相关问题回答中外记者提问。 出品 | 中国能源报（c n e n e rg y） 娄勤俭表示，中方高度关注伊朗局势，伊朗国家主权、安全和领土完整应该得到尊重， 中方呼吁立即停止军事行动， 避免紧张事态进一步升级，恢复对话谈判，维护中东地区 和平稳定，中方愿为此继续发挥负责任大国作用。 编辑丨赵方婷 欢迎分享给你的朋友！ 中方一贯认为，大小国家相互尊重、一律平等是历史进步的要求，也是联合国宪章首要原 则。 任何国家都没有控制国际事务、主宰他国命运、垄断发展优势的权力，更不能在世 界上我行我素。 来源：央视新闻客户端 ...

十四届全国人大四次会议今天（3月4日）在人民大会堂举行新闻发布会，大会发言人娄勤俭就大会议 程和人大工作相关问题回答中外记者提问。 娄勤俭表示，中方高度关注伊朗局势，伊朗国家主权、安全和领土完整应该得到尊重，中方呼吁立即停 止军事行动，避免紧张事态进一步升级，恢复对话谈判，维护中东地区和平稳定，中方愿为此继续发挥 负责任大国作用。 中方一贯认为，大小国家相互尊重、一律平等是历史进步的要求，也是联合国宪章首要原则。任何国家 都没有控制国际事务、主宰他国命运、垄断发展优势的权力，更不能在世界上我行我素。 #看两会看东方 来源｜央视新闻 编辑 ｜瑜见 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that territorial sovereignty should not be treated as a commodity, and any attempts to buy or sell land are fundamentally against modern civilization principles [1] Group 1 - The article criticizes the fluctuating tariff policies and the insistence on "purchasing" Greenland, arguing that such actions should be abandoned [1] - It asserts that national sovereignty and territorial integrity are non-negotiable and cannot be traded [1] - The piece highlights that any actions that price people and land are a fundamental departure from modern civilization [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Uruguayan government, led by President Luis Lacalle Pou, firmly opposes any form of foreign intervention, particularly in the context of the U.S. attack on Venezuela, emphasizing the importance of national sovereignty and international law [1] Group 1: Uruguayan Government's Position - The Uruguayan government maintains a four-point stance against foreign interference in domestic affairs, particularly through military means [1] - The government advocates for peaceful resolution of disputes as a fundamental principle of international relations [1] - It emphasizes the principle of equal sovereignty among nations, ensuring that both strong and weak countries are treated equally in international matters [1] Group 2: International Cooperation - Uruguay plans to collaborate with multiple countries to promote a multilateral approach in addressing the Venezuelan issue [1] - The government aims to seek a peaceful resolution to the current situation in Latin America, particularly concerning Venezuela [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the significant geopolitical implications of the U.S. military action against Venezuelan President Maduro, which is seen as a move to assert U.S. dominance in Latin America and address domestic political challenges for President Trump [1][2] - The U.S. military operation is characterized as a culmination of escalating actions in the Caribbean over the past six months, driven by Trump's need for a notable personal achievement and a strong interest in Venezuela's oil resources [1] - Analysts predict that the U.S. aims to force the current Venezuelan government to surrender, subsequently supporting a pro-U.S. government, and involving certain individuals in the management of Venezuela [1] Group 2 - The military action has sparked strong backlash from Latin American countries, with the resistance within Venezuela remaining firm despite Maduro's capture, particularly among leftist factions [2] - The international community, including the UN Secretary-General, has expressed alarm over the potential precedent set by this action, which is viewed as a violation of principles of national sovereignty and equality [2] - In the long term, this operation is expected to create a "chilling effect" on other Latin American nations, raising concerns about U.S. military intimidation and the stability of their own governments, especially among leftist regimes [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Zakharova, asserts that any attempts by the EU to freeze, confiscate, or utilize Russian assets lack legal basis and will face consequences [1] Group 1: Legal Implications - Zakharova emphasizes that freezing Russian sovereign assets and any attempts to utilize their proceeds violate international law, including principles of state sovereignty and non-interference [1] - The Russian Central Bank is prepared to use all available legal mechanisms to protect its interests [1] Group 2: EU Actions and Responses - The EU Council announced on December 12 that it has decided to indefinitely freeze Russian assets within the EU [1] - Zakharova criticizes the EU's decision to continue funding Ukraine, claiming it will prolong the crisis [1] - Russian media reported that the Central Bank has filed a lawsuit in the Moscow Arbitration Court seeking compensation of over 18 trillion rubles from the European Clearing Bank, which holds a significant amount of frozen Russian assets [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Mexican President, Sinbloom, stated that Mexico does not accept any form of military intervention from any country, particularly in response to comments made by U.S. President Trump regarding assistance in combating crime groups in Mexico [1] Group 1: U.S.-Mexico Relations - Sinbloom emphasized that cooperation between the U.S. and Mexico should be based on mutual respect and equality of sovereignty [1] - The current framework of cooperation between the U.S. and Mexico defines their bilateral relationship as one of "cooperation and coordination," with a core focus on respecting Mexico's sovereignty and territorial integrity [1] Group 2: Military Assistance - Sinbloom mentioned that while the U.S. has expressed willingness to send troops to assist Mexico in fighting crime, any actions within Mexico must be conducted by Mexican authorities [1] - The U.S. can provide support in areas such as intelligence sharing, but the operational control remains with Mexico [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government strongly criticizes the recent U.S. visa restrictions targeting Central American citizens and their families, asserting that these actions represent unilateral sanctions and a violation of international law, undermining the sovereignty of affected nations [1] Group 1: U.S. Actions and Responses - The U.S. has announced visa restrictions against Central American citizens collaborating with the Chinese Communist Party, threatening local business figures against engaging with Chinese state-owned enterprises [1] - The Chinese government has previously articulated its firm stance against these U.S. measures and has engaged in serious diplomatic discussions with the U.S. regarding this issue [1] Group 2: Chinese Government's Position - The Chinese government accuses the U.S. of using "law and order" as a pretext for illegal actions, claiming that such unilateral sanctions constitute political oppression and economic coercion [1] - The Chinese government emphasizes that these actions violate the principles of national sovereignty and non-interference in domestic affairs, characterizing them as typical hegemonic behavior [1] Group 3: Future Relations - The Chinese government asserts that the U.S. attempts to interfere in the normal exchanges between Central American countries and China are unfounded and disrespectful [1] - The Chinese government reaffirms its commitment to being a good friend and partner to Central American nations, aiming for mutual development and the establishment of a China-Latin America community of shared destiny [1]