国家自主贡献目标(NDC)
Search documents
生态环境部解读新一轮NDC顶层设计
2 1 Shi Ji Jing Ji Bao Dao· 2025-10-29 13:20
Core Points - The new Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) targets for China are summarized as "1+3+3," combining qualitative and quantitative goals, focusing on absolute emission reductions and systematic objectives in key areas and important systems [1][2][3] Group 1: Quantitative Goals - The first quantitative target is a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by 7%-10% from peak levels by 2035, which translates to a decrease of over 1 billion tons of CO2 equivalent, showcasing unprecedented ambition [2] - The first "3" includes three quantitative indicators for 2030: non-fossil energy consumption to exceed 30% of total energy consumption, wind and solar power capacity to reach over 360 million kilowatts (6 times the 2020 level), and forest stock to exceed 24 billion cubic meters [2] Group 2: Qualitative Goals - The second "3" introduces three qualitative indicators: new energy vehicles to become mainstream in new vehicle sales, the national carbon trading market to cover major high-emission industries, and the establishment of a climate-resilient society by 2035, with the carbon market expected to cover 80% of total emissions [2][3] - The inclusion of adaptation measures in the NDC reflects China's commitment to balancing mitigation and adaptation in climate change efforts [2] Group 3: Non-CO2 Emission Control - The NDC also marks the first time that non-CO2 greenhouse gases such as methane, nitrous oxide, and fluorinated gases are included in total emissions control, indicating a comprehensive approach to emission reduction [4][5] - The Ministry of Ecology and Environment has initiated a methane emission control action plan, with progress in key sectors like energy, agriculture, and waste management, including improved utilization of coal mine gas and livestock waste [4] Group 4: Future Directions - Future efforts will focus on enhancing the resource utilization of non-CO2 greenhouse gases and implementing existing control plans, while promoting carbon reduction, pollution reduction, and green growth [5]
专访马骏:银行要把握好NDC 对转型金融的催化机遇
2 1 Shi Ji Jing Ji Bao Dao· 2025-07-08 22:24
Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that green investment is increasing globally, but traditional high-carbon industries face financing bottlenecks for low-carbon transition projects, highlighting the need for transition finance [1] - Transition finance is becoming a focal point in global green finance, with significant potential for growth once policies and standards are established [1][2] - The G20 Transition Finance Framework includes five pillars and twenty-two principles, which are essential for guiding transition finance initiatives [2] Group 2 - Financial institutions are currently struggling to balance sustainable goals with profitability, and many have not yet established internal processes for transition finance [2][3] - There are two main challenges for banks: accurately identifying eligible clients and ensuring projects meet transition requirements [2] - Some regions, like Huzhou and Hebei, have made progress in transition financing, with Huzhou issuing approximately 20 billion yuan in transition financing [2] Group 3 - Banks need to enhance their internal capabilities, including improving business processes and risk control systems, to effectively attract clients for transition finance [3] - Training and guidance from industry experts can help high-carbon enterprises understand the benefits of transition finance, turning them into potential clients [3] - Government and industry associations should play a role in organizing training to raise awareness and urgency among high-carbon enterprises regarding transition finance [3] Group 4 - The upcoming announcement of China's NDC targets is expected to drive demand for transition finance, making it a necessity for companies aiming to meet carbon neutrality goals [4] - Companies need to establish short- and medium-term emission reduction targets in response to the NDC, making transition finance essential rather than optional [4] Group 5 - Many financial institutions and companies have not fully met the ISSB's requirements for ESG reporting, particularly in carbon-related disclosures [5][6] - There are significant gaps in carbon accounting, climate risk assessment, and the disclosure of transition plans among domestic enterprises and financial institutions [6][7] - A unified ESG disclosure framework is being developed in China, based on ISSB standards, which may lead to mandatory disclosure requirements in the future [8][9]