Report Industry Investment Rating - The report is optimistic about the investment value of the non - banking financial sector, believing it can enjoy both Beta and Alpha [4]. Core Viewpoints of the Report - Policy interpretation: Since 2022, reform measures for public funds have been gradually implemented, focusing on fees, assessment, and compensation. Future reforms are expected to be fully rolled out in the next three years. Floating fees will expand coverage, and fee reform phases are about to be implemented. Benchmark constraints and assessment will influence industry allocation and investment focus [4]. - Impact on public funds: The industry pattern will be optimized, with benchmark constraints potentially forcing active equity funds to become "quasi - passive". Investment research will first follow the benchmark and then pursue excess returns. Passive products will continue to develop, and channels, talent, and back - end operations will face corresponding adjustments [4]. - Impact on securities companies: The profit contribution of publicly - held funds by securities companies will show greater differentiation, and the advantage of securities companies in selling equity index funds will expand [4]. - Investment analysis opinion: The non - banking financial sector is a sector that can enjoy both Beta and Alpha, and its investment value is promising [4]. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 1. Policy Interpretation: Promote the High - quality Development of the Public Fund Industry in Multiple Dimensions - Regulatory roadmap: Since 2022, the roadmap and schedule for the high - quality development of public funds have become clearer. Reforms started with fee reduction and are now being comprehensively rolled out. The "Action Plan" covers aspects not implemented in the 2022 "Opinions" [8][10][12]. - Comparison of 2022 and 2025 reform requirements: The 2025 requirements are more detailed and quantitative, covering aspects such as overall requirements, differentiated development, long - term incentive constraints, and product innovation [13]. - Key points of the "Action Plan": It includes establishing a floating management fee mechanism, reducing investor costs, increasing the scale and proportion of equity investment, establishing a performance - based assessment system, strengthening regulatory classification evaluation, and enhancing compensation management [14][15][16][18][19][20]. - Reasons for the "Three - Year Goal": Investor risk preferences have declined, leading to a slowdown in the growth of public funds, especially new equity funds. The "Long - term Capital Market Entry" has set a 10% quantitative requirement for public fund capital entry [27][25]. - Fee reform: It aims to establish a floating fee mechanism linked to performance and reduce investment costs. It also expands the scope of fee reduction and promotes the development of floating - rate funds [31][32][36]. - Differentiated competition: Fee reduction and classification supervision will optimize the industry pattern, benefiting public funds strong in equity and index products [44][48]. - Benchmark constraints and long - term assessment: In the short term, industry allocation will be adjusted; in the long term, the focus will return to fundamental research, and turnover will decrease [49][50]. - Product innovation: The development of equity and fixed - income + products will be promoted to meet market demand [53][57]. - Research and investment capabilities: The co - management model may become the future development trend of the industry [58]. 2. Impact on Public Funds: Analysis from Research and Investment, Products, Channels, Talent, and Back - end Operations - Research and investment: Benchmark constraints may force active equity funds to become "quasi - passive". The co - management model may be adopted to improve research and investment capabilities [63][58]. - Products: The passive trend will continue, and equity index products and fixed - income + products will have development opportunities [69][74]. - Channels: Public funds should strengthen self - sales and investment advisory channels to reduce dependence on代销 channels. The combination of fund investment advisory and direct sales platforms may bring opportunities for large public funds to enter the wealth management market [78][84]. - Talent: For researchers, the "department wall" between research and investment should be broken; for fund managers, hierarchical management should be implemented [90][93]. - Back - end operations: Fee reduction will raise the break - even point, and financial technology may be an effective means to cope with fee reduction in the short term [94][95]. 3. Impact on Securities Companies: Analysis from Public Fund Business, Sales, and Allocation - Public fund business: The "Action Plan" will directly impact the income of publicly - held funds by securities companies, potentially compressing their profit contribution in the short term [102]. - Sales: The similar classification evaluation mechanism will benefit securities companies' sales, and they will maintain their advantage in selling equity index funds [106]. - Allocation: Securities companies should strengthen research on high - weight benchmark targets and explore non - public fund customers [4]. 4. Investment Analysis Opinion - The non - banking financial sector can enjoy both Beta and Alpha, and its investment value is promising. The Beta logic lies in the promotion of the transformation of household savings into investments and the entry of long - term funds into the market. The Alpha logic is that the non - banking financial sector is under - allocated and has low valuations [4].

新发浮动费率基金深度观察：非对称上下浮动，锚定基准不放松 ——《推动公募基金高质量发展行动方案》研究学习系列 3 评级： 增持（维持） 执业证书编号：S0740525040002 Email：geyx01@zts.com.cn 分析师：蒋峤 执业证书编号：S0740517090005 Email：jiangqiao@zts.com.cn | 上市公司数 | 83 | | --- | --- | | 行业总市值(亿元) | 70,492.15 | | 行业流通市值(亿元) | 68,046.25 | 配金融股的观察——《公募基金高质 量发展行动方案》研究观察系列 2》 2025-05-30 述》2025-05-21 3、《迎接公募基金的重塑与破局》 2025-05-15 非银金融 证券研究报告/行业点评报告 2025 年 06 月 11 日 报告摘要 请务必阅读正文之后的重要声明部分 分析师：葛玉翔 首批浮动管理费公募基金问世，新发产品数量占比约七成。我们通过 Wind 基金日历 功能截取了自 5 月 27 日首只浮费基金问世起所有新发基金，其中浮动管理费率基金 分 4 批开始认购，共 24 只，均为主动权益类 ...

1）参考量化指数增强的优化框架，在选股的同时针对基准指数控制成分股的投资比例、行业权重偏离、个股权重偏 离； 2）分仓位投资，一部分仓位用于基准指数的投资或尽可能跟住指数，另一部分仓位仍按照原来的主动管理思路。 下面部分中，我们将首先讨论这两种方案的效果，另外最后部分中我们也将参考海外绩优产品的实际偏离情况给予启 发。 1. 《行动方案》强化业绩比较基准的约束作用 5月7日，中国证监会发布《推动公募基金高质量发展行动方案》（以下简称"《行动方案》"），提出了推进公募行业 高质量发展的七大项25项具体举措，其中明确提出强化业绩比较基准的约束作用，基金公司评价体系、公司高管的考 核以及基金经理的考核都将与业绩比较基准密切相关。以基金经理为例："对三年以上产品业绩低于业绩比较基准超过 10个百分点的基金经理，要求其绩效薪酬应当明显下降；对三年以上产品业绩显著超过业绩比较基准的基金经理，可 以合理适度提高其绩效薪酬"。 在此前后明星时代公募基金研究的系列报告中我们也曾经测算，过去10年美国主动权益基金相对其业绩比较基准的年 化跟踪误差多数在3~6%之间，平均水平不足5%，而国内偏股基金过去5年平均跟踪误差接近15%， ...

华夏时报（www.chinatimes.net.cn）记者 叶青 见习记者 栗鹏菲 北京报道 日前，中国证监会发布的《推动公募基金高质量发展行动方案》（下称"《方案》"）将行业目光再度聚焦至"业绩 比较基准约束"这一核心命题。《方案》明确要求，将基金业绩与基准的偏离度纳入基金公司评价、评奖体系及基 金经理薪酬考核体系，对长期显著跑输基准的基金经理实施绩效薪酬约束。在此背景下，部分长期偏离业绩基准 的基金产品及其投资策略引发市场关注。 记者梳理发现，嘉实智能汽车股票、金鹰多元策略混合A、天治新消费混合三只基金近三年跑输业绩基准均超过 60个百分点，成为行业典型样本。这些产品或因赛道选择失误，或因策略稳定性不足，或因行业周期错判，最终 导致业绩与基准大幅偏离。在监管强化业绩基准约束的当下，此类案例为行业敲响警钟。 产业周期逆行，嘉实智能汽车的"上游执念" 作为新能源赛道曾经的明星产品，嘉实智能汽车股票基金近年陷入"成也萧何，败也萧何"的困局。截至2025年一 季度，该基金近三年净值逆势跑输基准81.83个百分点，成为全市场偏离度较高的股票型基金。 基金定期报告显示，该基金比较基准为"中信汽车行业指数×80%+中债 ...

指数 名称 收盘 涨跌（％） （点） 1 日 5 日 1 月 上证指数 3368 0 2.77 -0.05 深证综指 1993 0.33 5.96 -0.55 | 风格指数 | 昨日表现 | 1 个月表现 | 6 个月表现 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | （％） | （％） | （％） | | 大盘指数 | -0.3 | 2.96 | -1.95 | | 中盘指数 | -0.04 | 2.5 | -6.81 | | 小盘指数 | 0.23 | 3.54 | -0.89 | | 行业涨幅 | 昨日涨 | 1 个月涨 | 6 个月涨 | | 化学纤维 | 3.28 | 12.88 | 10 | | 橡胶 | 2.83 | 9.11 | 2.33 | | 航运港口 | 2.73 | 10.28 | 2.74 | | 休闲食品 | 2.71 | 5.29 | 20.97 | | 个护用品 | 2.52 | 17.98 | 34.18 | | 行业跌幅 | 昨日跌 | 1 个月跌 | 6 个月跌 | | 白酒Ⅱ | -1.92 | -1.67 | -4.97 | | 电机Ⅱ | -1.2 ...

证 券 研 2025 年 05 月 19 日 基准约束下，多大比例的偏离较为 合适？ ——后明星时代公募基金研究系列之五 本研究报告仅通过邮件提供给 中庚基金 使用。1 证券分析师 沈思逸 A0230521070001 shensy@swsresearch.com 杨俊文 A0230522070001 yangjw@swsresearch.com 邓虎 A0230520070003 denghu@swsresearch.com 研究支持 杨俊文 A0230522070001 yangjw@swsresearch.com 联系人 杨俊文 (8621)23297818× yangjw@swsresearch.com 权 益 量 化 研 究 请务必仔细阅读正文之后的各项信息披露与声明 量 化 策 略 究 报 告 相关研究 - ⚫ 探讨如何在业绩比较基准的约束下调整投资策略：对于国内主动管理人来说，除了量化 指数增强产品一般有严格的约束，其他以自下而上选股为主的管理人此前往往未有相关 经验，如何在业绩比较基准的约束下调整投资策略成为当下关注的重点。本报告中，我 们重点讨论两种可能的调整方案，并关注不同方案下跑输基准一 ...

5月7日，证监会发布《推动公募基金高质量发展行动方案》（以下简称《行动方案》），通过全面深化改 革，强化公募基金行业与投资者的利益绑定，增强公募基金投资行为的稳定性，提升公募基金服务投资者 的能力，发展壮大权益类公募基金，进而更好发挥行业功能。 《行动方案》既涉及公募基金行业机构内部产品设计、投资运作、市场推广等方面制度机制的改革调整，也涉 及行政监管、行业自律等方面制度机制的优化完善。记者了解到，文件中涉及的改革举措，需要20余件配套法 规细化落地，证监会已逐一制定各项政策举措的落实时间表，后续将把握好改革推进节奏，成熟一项推出一 项。 强化业绩比较基准约束作用 《行动方案》从优化基金运营模式、完善考核评价制度、大力发展权益类基金、守牢风险底线、强化监管执 法、促进高质量发展等六方面提出了 25 条改革措施，着力引导行业机构努力实现从"重规模"向"重投资者回 报"转型，形成行业高质量发展的"拐点"，加快建设一流投资机构。 具体来看，《行动方案》全面建立以基金投资收益为核心的行业考核评价体系，将业绩比较基准对比、基金利 润率等直接关乎投资者利益的指标引入考核体系。 "强化业绩比较基准的约束作用在本次公募基金改 ...

最新解读来了。 5月7日，证监会发布《推动公募基金高质量发展行动方案》(以下简称《行动方案》)，通过全面深化改革，强化公募基金行业与投资者的利益绑定，增强 公募基金投资行为的稳定性，提升公募基金服务投资者的能力，发展壮大权益类公募基金，进而更好发挥行业功能。 《行动方案》既涉及公募基金行业机构内部产品设计、投资运作、市场推广等方面制度机制的改革调整，也涉及行政监管、行业自律等方面制度机制的优 化完善。记者了解到，文件中涉及的改革举措，需要20余件配套法规细化落地，证监会已逐一制定各项政策举措的落实时间表，后续将把握好改革推进节 奏，成熟一项推出一项。 强化业绩比较基准约束作用 《行动方案》从优化基金运营模式、完善考核评价制度、大力发展权益类基金、守牢风险底线、强化监管执法、促进高质量发展等六方面提出了25条改革 措施，着力引导行业机构努力实现从"重规模"向"重投资者回报"转型，形成行业高质量发展的"拐点"，加快建设一流投资机构。 具体来看，《行动方案》全面建立以基金投资收益为核心的行业考核评价体系，将业绩比较基准对比、基金利润率等直接关乎投资者利益的指标引入考核 体系。 "对主动管理权益类基金，推行与基金业绩 ...