Market Overview - A-shares continue to rise, with major indices reaching new highs, particularly in technology growth sectors like communications and electronics [1] - Industry leaders are achieving historical stock price highs, indicating strong market performance [1] Future Market Outlook - Analysts predict that the realization of profit improvement expectations will be the main driver for the next phase of market trends [1][4] - Investment strategies should focus on sectors with genuine profit realization or strong industrial trends, such as resource stocks, innovative pharmaceuticals, gaming, and military industries [4][5] Regulatory Developments - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) is enhancing the classification and evaluation system for securities companies to promote high-quality development and support differentiated growth for small and medium-sized institutions [2] Investment Recommendations - Citic Securities suggests focusing on sectors with real profit realization and strong industrial trends, highlighting opportunities in resource stocks, innovative pharmaceuticals, gaming, and military sectors [4] - Guojin Securities recommends three main investment lines: industrial metals (copper, aluminum, steel), insurance and brokerage, and food and beverage, as well as power equipment [5] - Industrial metals are expected to maintain an upward trend, supported by historical data showing a reverse correlation with the US dollar index [8] Sector Insights - The robotics sector is poised for a new round of growth driven by policy support, accelerated technological iteration, and successful implementation in various scenarios [8] - Many industries are currently trading at price-to-earnings ratios below the 50th percentile of the past 15 years, indicating potential investment opportunities [7]

Report Industry Investment Rating - The report is optimistic about the investment value of the non - banking financial sector, believing it can enjoy both Beta and Alpha [4]. Core Viewpoints of the Report - Policy interpretation: Since 2022, reform measures for public funds have been gradually implemented, focusing on fees, assessment, and compensation. Future reforms are expected to be fully rolled out in the next three years. Floating fees will expand coverage, and fee reform phases are about to be implemented. Benchmark constraints and assessment will influence industry allocation and investment focus [4]. - Impact on public funds: The industry pattern will be optimized, with benchmark constraints potentially forcing active equity funds to become "quasi - passive". Investment research will first follow the benchmark and then pursue excess returns. Passive products will continue to develop, and channels, talent, and back - end operations will face corresponding adjustments [4]. - Impact on securities companies: The profit contribution of publicly - held funds by securities companies will show greater differentiation, and the advantage of securities companies in selling equity index funds will expand [4]. - Investment analysis opinion: The non - banking financial sector is a sector that can enjoy both Beta and Alpha, and its investment value is promising [4]. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 1. Policy Interpretation: Promote the High - quality Development of the Public Fund Industry in Multiple Dimensions - Regulatory roadmap: Since 2022, the roadmap and schedule for the high - quality development of public funds have become clearer. Reforms started with fee reduction and are now being comprehensively rolled out. The "Action Plan" covers aspects not implemented in the 2022 "Opinions" [8][10][12]. - Comparison of 2022 and 2025 reform requirements: The 2025 requirements are more detailed and quantitative, covering aspects such as overall requirements, differentiated development, long - term incentive constraints, and product innovation [13]. - Key points of the "Action Plan": It includes establishing a floating management fee mechanism, reducing investor costs, increasing the scale and proportion of equity investment, establishing a performance - based assessment system, strengthening regulatory classification evaluation, and enhancing compensation management [14][15][16][18][19][20]. - Reasons for the "Three - Year Goal": Investor risk preferences have declined, leading to a slowdown in the growth of public funds, especially new equity funds. The "Long - term Capital Market Entry" has set a 10% quantitative requirement for public fund capital entry [27][25]. - Fee reform: It aims to establish a floating fee mechanism linked to performance and reduce investment costs. It also expands the scope of fee reduction and promotes the development of floating - rate funds [31][32][36]. - Differentiated competition: Fee reduction and classification supervision will optimize the industry pattern, benefiting public funds strong in equity and index products [44][48]. - Benchmark constraints and long - term assessment: In the short term, industry allocation will be adjusted; in the long term, the focus will return to fundamental research, and turnover will decrease [49][50]. - Product innovation: The development of equity and fixed - income + products will be promoted to meet market demand [53][57]. - Research and investment capabilities: The co - management model may become the future development trend of the industry [58]. 2. Impact on Public Funds: Analysis from Research and Investment, Products, Channels, Talent, and Back - end Operations - Research and investment: Benchmark constraints may force active equity funds to become "quasi - passive". The co - management model may be adopted to improve research and investment capabilities [63][58]. - Products: The passive trend will continue, and equity index products and fixed - income + products will have development opportunities [69][74]. - Channels: Public funds should strengthen self - sales and investment advisory channels to reduce dependence on代销 channels. The combination of fund investment advisory and direct sales platforms may bring opportunities for large public funds to enter the wealth management market [78][84]. - Talent: For researchers, the "department wall" between research and investment should be broken; for fund managers, hierarchical management should be implemented [90][93]. - Back - end operations: Fee reduction will raise the break - even point, and financial technology may be an effective means to cope with fee reduction in the short term [94][95]. 3. Impact on Securities Companies: Analysis from Public Fund Business, Sales, and Allocation - Public fund business: The "Action Plan" will directly impact the income of publicly - held funds by securities companies, potentially compressing their profit contribution in the short term [102]. - Sales: The similar classification evaluation mechanism will benefit securities companies' sales, and they will maintain their advantage in selling equity index funds [106]. - Allocation: Securities companies should strengthen research on high - weight benchmark targets and explore non - public fund customers [4]. 4. Investment Analysis Opinion - The non - banking financial sector can enjoy both Beta and Alpha, and its investment value is promising. The Beta logic lies in the promotion of the transformation of household savings into investments and the entry of long - term funds into the market. The Alpha logic is that the non - banking financial sector is under - allocated and has low valuations [4].

Report Summary 1. Market Overview - The Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.04% to close at 3455.97, the Shenzhen Component Index rose 1.72% to close at 10393.72, and the ChiNext Index rose 3.11% to close at 2128.39. The total trading volume of A-shares in the two markets was 1639.7 billion yuan. The top-performing sectors were non-bank finance (4.46%), national defense and military industry (3.36%), and computer (2.99%), while the bottom-performing sectors were coal (-1.00%), petroleum and petrochemical (-0.57%), and transportation (-0.21%) [2][6] 2. Stock ETFs - The top trading volume stock ETFs were Huatai-PineBridge CSI 300 ETF (up 1.65%, discount rate 1.59%), Cathay CSI All-Securities Company ETF (up 5.37%, discount rate 5.36%), and ChinaAMC SSE STAR Market 50 ETF (up 1.85%, discount rate 1.79%) [3][7] 3. Bond ETFs - The top trading volume bond ETFs were ChinaAMC SSE Benchmark Market-Making Corporate Bond ETF (down 0.01%, discount rate 0.03%), Haitong CSI Short-Term Financing Bond ETF (down 0.01%, discount rate -0.02%), and Bosera Shenzhen Benchmark Market-Making Credit Bond ETF (down 0.03%, discount rate 0.02%) [4][9] 4. Gold ETFs - Gold AU9999 rose 0.34% and Shanghai Gold rose 0.26%. The top trading volume gold ETFs were HuaAn Gold ETF (up 0.27%, discount rate 0.28%), E Fund Gold ETF (up 0.21%, discount rate 0.25%), and Bosera Gold ETF (up 0.23%, discount rate 0.31%) [12] 5. Commodity Futures ETFs - ChinaAMC Feed Soybean Meal Futures ETF fell 1.32% with a discount rate of -1.20%, CCB E Fund YiSheng Zhengzhou Commodity Exchange Energy and Chemical Futures ETF rose 0.45% with a discount rate of -0.86%, and Dacheng Nonferrous Metals Futures ETF rose 0.30% with a discount rate of 0.46% [13][14] 6. Cross-Border ETFs - The previous trading day, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 1.19%, the Nasdaq Composite rose 1.43%, the S&P 500 rose 1.11%, and the German DAX rose 1.60%. Today, the Hang Seng Index rose 1.23% and the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index rose 1.15%. The top trading volume cross-border ETFs were E Fund CSI Hong Kong Securities Investment Theme ETF (up 8.51%, discount rate 8.63%), GF CSI Hong Kong Innovative Drug ETF (up 0.69%, discount rate 0.53%), and ChinaAMC Hang Seng Tech ETF (up 1.26%, discount rate 1.54%) [15] 7. Money Market ETFs - The top trading volume money market ETFs were Silver HuaRiLi ETF, Huabao TianYi ETF, and CCB TianYi Money Market ETF [17][18]