转自：扬子晚报 1月9日，《人民日报》推出新征程纪检监察工作高质量发展系列报道之二。 文章指出，作风就是形象，作风就是力量。中央八项规定不是五年、十年的规定，而是长期有效的铁规 矩、硬杠杠。 "这么多年了，对这名同事始终只闻其名，不见其人。"天津市宁河区纪委监委从反映的问题线索入手深 挖细查，对相关人员依规依纪处理，对履行主体责任不力的党组织严肃问责，并进一步在全区范围内开 展"长期不在岗"专项整治。 这一由点及面的治理实践，体现的正是标本兼治的治理逻辑：精准惩治、系统施治，查办一起案件、解 决一类问题。 严肃纠治"快递送礼"，严肃纠治借培训考察等名义公款旅游，严肃纠治奢华装修楼堂馆所，严肃纠 治"吃公函"、超标准接待……2025年1—11月，全国共查处享乐主义、奢靡之风问题12.8万起，批评教 育和处理16.2万人。 整治形式主义、官僚主义，同样是一刻不停、动真碰硬。 2025年，各级纪检监察机关加强对《整治形式主义为基层减负若干规定》执行情况的监督检查，紧盯文 山会海、调研考察和横向交流中的形式主义等问题，加强监督纠治，严肃查处违规违纪问题。配合同级 党委整治形式主义为基层减负专项工作机制办公室做好典型问 ...

据中央纪委国家监委网站消息，12月22日，中央纪委国家监委公布了2025年11月全国查处违反中央八项 规定精神问题汇总情况。当月，全国共查处违反中央八项规定精神问题31754起，批评教育和处理40306 人，其中党纪政务处分29184人，这是连续第147个月公布月报数据。 | | | | | | | | | | 全国查处违反中央八项规定精神问题统计表 | | | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | | | 级别 | | | | | | 问题类型 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 形式主义、官僚主义问题 | | | | | | 享乐主义、奢靡之风问题 | | | | | 时期 | 项目 | 总 计 | 불 部 级 | 地 厅 级 | 昌 处 级 | 乡科 级及 以下 | 贯彻党中央 重大决策部 署有令不行 、有禁不 止,或者表 态多调门高 ...

Group 1 - The central government has reported a total of 21,843 cases of violations of the Eight-point Regulation in May, with 28,189 individuals receiving criticism or punishment, including 2 provincial-level and 98 departmental-level officials [1] - Among the violations, 11,730 cases were related to formalism and bureaucratism, with the highest number of issues (9,868 cases) concerning lack of responsibility and action that severely impacts high-quality development [1] - Additionally, 10,113 cases of hedonism and extravagance were reported, including 5,285 cases of illegal acceptance of valuable gifts and 2,229 cases of improper dining [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of a stable and effective institutional system for the construction of the Party's good conduct, which has been continuously improved since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China [1] - The implementation of the Central Eight Regulations and the focus on combating the "Four Winds" (formalism, bureaucratism, hedonism, and extravagance) are key components of the Party's internal regulations [1][2] - The Party has established a series of regulations and documents to address the new manifestations of formalism and bureaucratism, which are characterized by concealment and technicality [2][3] Group 2 - The evaluation of leadership effectiveness includes loyalty to responsibilities, courage to take action, and the ability to maintain the interests of the masses [3][4] - The Party emphasizes the need to reduce burdens on grassroots levels, which is crucial for enhancing governance efficiency [4][5] - The Party's commitment to frugality and opposition to extravagance is reinforced through strict adherence to regulations regarding gifts and hospitality [5][6] Group 3 - The Party has implemented strict regulations to combat corruption related to improper dining and entertainment practices, which are seen as breeding grounds for corruption [6][7] - The focus on controlling the construction of government buildings reflects a commitment to using limited resources effectively for public welfare rather than ostentation [7][8] - The Party aims to transform institutional constraints into internal recognition and behavioral consciousness among all members [7]

Core Viewpoint - The article reports on the national situation regarding violations of the Central Eight Regulations, highlighting the number of cases and disciplinary actions taken in April this year [2]. Summary by Relevant Sections - In April, a total of 18,845 cases of violations of the Central Eight Regulations were investigated, resulting in 24,559 individuals being criticized or dealt with, including 100 officials at the provincial and ministerial level and 1,113 at the county and department level [2]. - Among the violations, 9,658 cases were related to formalism and bureaucratism, with 12,845 individuals receiving criticism or disciplinary actions. The most significant issues involved a lack of responsibility and action in economic and environmental protection, with 8,329 cases reported [2]. - Additionally, 9,187 cases of hedonism and extravagance were addressed, affecting 11,714 individuals. Specific violations included 5,097 cases of accepting valuable gifts and cash, 1,149 cases of improper allowances or benefits, and 1,853 cases of inappropriate dining [2].

Core Viewpoint - The emphasis on frugality and hard work is a traditional virtue of the Chinese nation and a key factor for the Communist Party's enduring commitment to its original aspirations [1][2]. Group 1: Importance of Frugality and Hard Work - The concept of frugality and hard work is highlighted as essential for maintaining the Party's integrity and connection with the people, preventing corruption and extravagance [1][2]. - Historical examples illustrate that frugality leads to stability and prosperity, while extravagance can result in downfall [1][2]. Group 2: Implementation of Central Eight Regulations - Since the 18th National Congress, the Party has initiated the Central Eight Regulations to combat extravagance, starting with small measures like regulating mooncakes and greeting cards [2]. - The campaign against extravagance has transformed societal norms, making frugality a common pursuit across the Party and society [2]. Group 3: Current Context and Future Directions - The current period is crucial for advancing national rejuvenation, and the Party recognizes the importance of continuing to promote frugality and hard work [3]. - The 2024 Central Economic Work Conference and the Government Work Report emphasize the need to "live frugally," reflecting the Party's commitment to these values [3]. Group 4: Educational and Regulatory Measures - The Party aims to enhance education on the Central Eight Regulations, encouraging leaders to set examples in frugality and oppose waste [4]. - There is a focus on strict oversight and addressing hidden forms of extravagance, linking the fight against extravagance with anti-corruption efforts [4]. - Immediate action is required to address prominent issues raised by the public, ensuring that the campaign against extravagance is effectively integrated into broader anti-corruption strategies [4].