转自：扬子晚报 1月9日，《人民日报》推出新征程纪检监察工作高质量发展系列报道之二。 文章指出，作风就是形象，作风就是力量。中央八项规定不是五年、十年的规定，而是长期有效的铁规 矩、硬杠杠。 "这么多年了，对这名同事始终只闻其名，不见其人。"天津市宁河区纪委监委从反映的问题线索入手深 挖细查，对相关人员依规依纪处理，对履行主体责任不力的党组织严肃问责，并进一步在全区范围内开 展"长期不在岗"专项整治。 这一由点及面的治理实践，体现的正是标本兼治的治理逻辑：精准惩治、系统施治，查办一起案件、解 决一类问题。 严肃纠治"快递送礼"，严肃纠治借培训考察等名义公款旅游，严肃纠治奢华装修楼堂馆所，严肃纠 治"吃公函"、超标准接待……2025年1—11月，全国共查处享乐主义、奢靡之风问题12.8万起，批评教 育和处理16.2万人。 整治形式主义、官僚主义，同样是一刻不停、动真碰硬。 2025年，各级纪检监察机关加强对《整治形式主义为基层减负若干规定》执行情况的监督检查，紧盯文 山会海、调研考察和横向交流中的形式主义等问题，加强监督纠治，严肃查处违规违纪问题。配合同级 党委整治形式主义为基层减负专项工作机制办公室做好典型问 ...

转自：北京日报客户端 随着社交平台的崛起，有些不良思潮似乎找到了新的传播阵地。一段时间以来，历史虚无主义、极端女 权主义、泛娱乐主义等不良思潮借机粉墨登场，宣扬"1644史观""男性必须无条件付出""躺平即正义"等 话题，在网上持续引发争议。 社交平台作为人们可以自由进入的公共空间，承担一定的社会责任、恪守一定的行为边界乃是应有之 义。如果任由不良思潮蔓延扩散，不仅会破坏网络生态环境，还会扰乱人心、侵蚀社会信任基础，必须 引起高度警惕。 一 这些不良思潮通过稀释理论色彩、肢解其原本易于辨识的形态，不仅可以掩盖深层的政治或社会意图， 而且可以轻松"逃过"平台初步审核，渗透进资讯、社交、娱乐甚至学习场景，无孔不入。 在这过程中，有些平台非但没有筑起堤坝，反而有意无意地为这股精心伪装过的"浑水"开了闸门，成为 不良思潮的"放大器"。平台的热搜榜、推荐流、评论区仿佛一只"看不见的手"，时常默许甚至推动那些 能挑动情绪、制造争议的内容。于是，歪曲历史的"奇谈"可能比正史科普获得更高流量权重，炫富猎奇 的视频往往比踏实奋斗的故事传播更广。 今年以来，有些平台因破坏网络生态被约谈，也反映其正在为内容管理失序付出代价。它们有 ...

据中央纪委国家监委网站消息，12月22日，中央纪委国家监委公布了2025年11月全国查处违反中央八项 规定精神问题汇总情况。当月，全国共查处违反中央八项规定精神问题31754起，批评教育和处理40306 人，其中党纪政务处分29184人，这是连续第147个月公布月报数据。 | | | | | | | | | | 全国查处违反中央八项规定精神问题统计表 | | | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | | | 级别 | | | | | | 问题类型 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 形式主义、官僚主义问题 | | | | | | 享乐主义、奢靡之风问题 | | | | | 时期 | 项目 | 总 计 | 불 部 级 | 地 厅 级 | 昌 处 级 | 乡科 级及 以下 | 贯彻党中央 重大决策部 署有令不行 、有禁不 止,或者表 态多调门高 ...

Group 1 - The core issue in Europe is the rising tension between native populations and immigrants, particularly in the UK, where tens of thousands of anti-immigrant protesters clashed with anti-racism demonstrators [1][3] - The anti-immigrant protesters are primarily native white British citizens who feel that immigrants are taking their jobs and benefits, while the anti-racism protesters are often immigrants themselves, fearing job loss and deportation [3][4] - This conflict is not limited to the UK; similar issues are present in major European countries like France and Germany, where low birth rates and a reliance on immigration for labor have created societal strains [4][8] Group 2 - The economic situation in Europe has worsened due to the energy crisis exacerbated by the Russia-Ukraine conflict, leading to rising energy prices and layoffs in many companies [4][8] - Many native Europeans are now forced to take jobs they previously looked down upon, but these jobs are increasingly occupied by immigrants, leading to further frustration among the native population [5][6] - The economic sustainability of social welfare systems in major European economies like Germany is being questioned, with concerns that the current model may not be maintainable in the long term [8]

Group 1 - The central government has reported a total of 21,843 cases of violations of the Eight-point Regulation in May, with 28,189 individuals receiving criticism or punishment, including 2 provincial-level and 98 departmental-level officials [1] - Among the violations, 11,730 cases were related to formalism and bureaucratism, with the highest number of issues (9,868 cases) concerning lack of responsibility and action that severely impacts high-quality development [1] - Additionally, 10,113 cases of hedonism and extravagance were reported, including 5,285 cases of illegal acceptance of valuable gifts and 2,229 cases of improper dining [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of a stable and effective institutional system for the construction of the Party's good conduct, which has been continuously improved since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China [1] - The implementation of the Central Eight Regulations and the focus on combating the "Four Winds" (formalism, bureaucratism, hedonism, and extravagance) are key components of the Party's internal regulations [1][2] - The Party has established a series of regulations and documents to address the new manifestations of formalism and bureaucratism, which are characterized by concealment and technicality [2][3] Group 2 - The evaluation of leadership effectiveness includes loyalty to responsibilities, courage to take action, and the ability to maintain the interests of the masses [3][4] - The Party emphasizes the need to reduce burdens on grassroots levels, which is crucial for enhancing governance efficiency [4][5] - The Party's commitment to frugality and opposition to extravagance is reinforced through strict adherence to regulations regarding gifts and hospitality [5][6] Group 3 - The Party has implemented strict regulations to combat corruption related to improper dining and entertainment practices, which are seen as breeding grounds for corruption [6][7] - The focus on controlling the construction of government buildings reflects a commitment to using limited resources effectively for public welfare rather than ostentation [7][8] - The Party aims to transform institutional constraints into internal recognition and behavioral consciousness among all members [7]

Core Viewpoint - The article reports on the national situation regarding violations of the Central Eight Regulations, highlighting the number of cases and disciplinary actions taken in April this year [2]. Summary by Relevant Sections - In April, a total of 18,845 cases of violations of the Central Eight Regulations were investigated, resulting in 24,559 individuals being criticized or dealt with, including 100 officials at the provincial and ministerial level and 1,113 at the county and department level [2]. - Among the violations, 9,658 cases were related to formalism and bureaucratism, with 12,845 individuals receiving criticism or disciplinary actions. The most significant issues involved a lack of responsibility and action in economic and environmental protection, with 8,329 cases reported [2]. - Additionally, 9,187 cases of hedonism and extravagance were addressed, affecting 11,714 individuals. Specific violations included 5,097 cases of accepting valuable gifts and cash, 1,149 cases of improper allowances or benefits, and 1,853 cases of inappropriate dining [2].