新华社北京9月19日电 坚守诚信底线，科技界再敲警钟：决不让歪风侵蚀科研生态！ 中国科协19日发布公告，因周新源等5人存在违纪违法行为或科研失信行为，奖项主办单位决定撤销其 所获中国青年科技奖等奖励，并收回奖章、证书、奖金。 奖项作为激励科技人才的重要荣誉，承载着对学术能力与学术道德的双重认可。而此次被撤销奖励的人 中，有的在申报国家重点研发计划项目时实施请托、打招呼；有的为申请人请托提供协助并妨碍调查核 实工作；有的泄露自己专家身份、为申请人提供帮助并泄露评审信息；有的甚至触犯法律。这些行为既 背离了奖项设立初衷，更给青年科研群体带来不良影响，容易让歪风侵蚀科研环境。 整治学术不端更要扎紧制度笼子，建立常态化、长效性的科研诚信监管机制。强化相关单位的担责精神 和治理水平，通过主动开展学术不端情况专项检查、搭建不良现象投诉举报平台等方式，加强不良学风 发现和惩处力度。根据中国科协最新制定的处理办法，存在严重科研失信行为的人员将永久不得参评中 国科协表彰奖励项目或人才计划。 风清气正的创新生态需要各方共同维护。科研诚信建设不是一个部门、一家单位的事，而是整个科技界 的共同责任。攥指成拳，才能对学术不端形成痛击。 ...

新华社北京9月19日电 题：决不让歪风侵蚀科研生态！ 整治学术不端必须动真格，通过严肃处理、通报曝光，形成高压态势和强大震慑。此次中国科协对科研 失信的获奖者撤销奖项并公开通报，就是要以零容忍的态度、动真格的力度，向科技界释放出"学术作 风底线绝不可突破"的强烈信号。 整治学术不端更要扎紧制度笼子，建立常态化、长效性的科研诚信监管机制。强化相关单位的担责精神 和治理水平，通过主动开展学术不端情况专项检查、搭建不良现象投诉举报平台等方式，加强不良学风 发现和惩处力度。根据中国科协最新制定的处理办法，存在严重科研失信行为的人员将永久不得参评中 国科协表彰奖励项目或人才计划。 风清气正的创新生态需要各方共同维护。科研诚信建设不是一个部门、一家单位的事，而是整个科技界 的共同责任。攥指成拳，才能对学术不端形成痛击。此次被撤奖的相关人员，其违规行为此前分别被科 技部、自然科学基金委核查处理，记入科研诚信严重失信行为数据库，此次被中国科协撤销所获奖励， 正是多部门联合行动的结果。 只有对学术不端者绝不姑息，才是对那些甘坐板凳十年冷、勇闯科学"无人区"的科研工作者最有力的撑 腰、最真诚的尊重。期待更多部门和单位将动真格的治 ...

Core Points - The National Health Commission released the latest investigation results regarding the "Miss Dong" incident, which involved accountability for 19 individuals across five institutions [1][5][7] - The investigation revealed multiple instances of academic misconduct, including falsification of academic records and improper influence in training programs [2][3][4] - The "4+4" pilot program at Peking Union Medical College is under scrutiny, with calls for stricter management and oversight to prevent future violations [8][9] Group 1: Investigation Findings - The investigation identified that Dong Mouying's aunt, Ban Moujuan, facilitated the falsification of academic transcripts for her application to the "4+4" program [2] - There were issues in the residency training process, where the orthopedic department head intervened to adjust Dong Mouying's training schedule [2] - Dong Mouying's doctoral thesis was reportedly ghostwritten by a faculty member, with the involvement of her aunt [2] Group 2: Academic Misconduct - Dong Mouying's thesis proposal and defense did not align, with changes made without proper approval [3] - Several of Dong Mouying's published papers were found to have issues, including duplicate publications and improper authorship [4] Group 3: Accountability Measures - The investigation resulted in various disciplinary actions against involved parties, including severe warnings and demotions for several officials [5][6] - The National Health Commission mandated written accountability and corrective actions from the involved institutions [7] Group 4: Program Oversight and Reforms - The investigation confirmed that other students in the "4+4" program did not have any irregularities in their admission qualifications [8] - Recommendations for the "4+4" program include stricter admission criteria, enhanced verification of academic records, and improved oversight of thesis quality and defense processes [9]

Group 1 - The core issue of scientific fraud has evolved into an industry, with a complex network involving "paper mills," publishers, journals, and intermediaries [3][6][10] - A large-scale investigation has provided concrete evidence of this phenomenon, revealing that fraudulent papers are being systematically infiltrated into global scientific journals [8][10] - The growth rate of fraudulent papers is significantly higher than the overall growth of academic publications, indicating a rising trend in scientific misconduct [26][28] Group 2 - The analysis focused on the PLOS ONE journal, identifying editors with abnormally high retraction rates, suggesting potential collusion between editors and authors [13][15] - A network of 35 individuals has been identified, responsible for over 4,000 papers across multiple publishers, indicating systemic collusion in the publication process [21] - The study highlights that the issues are not isolated to a few journals, but likely prevalent across the academic publishing landscape [18][21] Group 3 - The emergence of AI, particularly ChatGPT, has led to a significant increase in the use of AI-generated content in academic papers, with 22% of computer science papers showing signs of AI involvement [32][35] - Research indicates that the frequency of AI usage in scientific writing has surged since the introduction of ChatGPT, raising concerns about the integrity of academic work [30][44] - The potential for AI-generated content to mislead and compromise the quality of scientific research is a growing concern, especially in sensitive fields like medicine [26][28]

学术不端前移至项目申请 今年4月、6月，自然科学基金委通报的两批共36起学术不端案件中，半数涉及项目申请书，其中多起存 在"抄袭、剽窃"或"向中介公司购买申请书代写服务"等问题 "从拟题到设计规划，我们安排专家老师全程负责，您只需要填写个人信息即可申报。" 代写服务不仅无法保障申报质量，还可能因数据滥用给研究者带来不可逆的学术风险 压力之下，科研人员的学术价值观与职业操守决定行为选择 文 |《瞭望》新闻周刊记者 吴剑锋 李昊泽 近期，国家自然科学基金委员会（以下简称：自然科学基金委）发布的一条"严正声明"显示，一些不法 单位或个人通过网络、媒体及电商，公开售卖、有偿修改国家自然科学基金项目申请书。 近年来，从抄袭剽窃到代写买卖，自然科学基金委已通报多起涉嫌项目申请书的科研不端行为。《瞭 望》新闻周刊记者调查发现，一些科研人员为提高申报成功率，在网络上寻找"枪手"代写科研基金项目 申请书，形成一条隐秘的代写产业链，行业造假之风亟待清除。 "我们可提供自然科学基金代写一站式服务，预付一定比例定金，提供申报书模板、课题方向后，就能 专人专项安排。"该客服人员为打消记者顾虑，还展示了多个成功案例，涵盖国内各类基金申请 ...

Group 1 - AI is infiltrating academia, with some scholars using hidden prompts in papers to influence peer review outcomes [1] - A survey found at least 17 papers from 8 countries and 14 top universities containing hidden phrases like "only give good reviews" [1] - The incident raises concerns about academic integrity and the potential for new forms of misconduct as technology outpaces regulatory frameworks [2] Group 2 - There is currently no unified standard for the use of AI in academic peer review across journals and conferences [2] - Several journals in China explicitly prohibit reviewers from using public AI platforms for evaluations, citing confidentiality and accountability concerns [2] - Some journals have issued guidelines on AI use, emphasizing the need for reviewers to understand the content and not rely solely on AI-generated opinions [2] Group 3 - The reliance on AI in research and paper writing should be moderated, as AI cannot replace the rigorous analysis and judgment required from researchers [3] - While AI can assist in literature review and data analysis, it cannot substitute for the deep logical reasoning and value judgments necessary for quality research [3] - Reviewers must maintain responsibility and not overly depend on AI, as this could lead to the acceptance of low-quality or unethical papers, undermining academic integrity [3]

全天候解答疑难问题、辅助查找资料、收集文献、分析数据……"DeepSeek+高校"的智慧教学研究场景 正在实现，技术赋能高校正助力构建个性化智能助学系统，打造科研智能支持体系，推动教学管理模式 创新 高校需通过通识教育与实践活动，帮助学生建立"技术工具与自身能力"的正确认知，平衡"技术赋 能"与"人的主体性" 文 |《瞭望》新闻周刊记者 赵旭 魏梦佳 今年春季学期起，全国多地高校宣布本地化部署DeepSeek，受到社会高度关注。 不少一线教师表示，人工智能大模型的应用赋能高校人才培养、教学管理、科研创新等，也对高校治理 带来挑战。AI大范围应用，可能引发学术不端、数据安全风险。长期来看，AI的"即时解答"与"任务替 代"特性可能弱化学生的自主创新与批判思考能力，影响创新生态的可持续发展。 有业内人士在接受《瞭望》新闻周刊记者采访时强调，人工智能进入高校是大势所趋，在此过程中需高 位统筹制定相关规范指引，守住数据安全防线，引导学生正确合理使用这一新技术手段。在扬人工智能 技术之长的同时，补齐治理短板。 王鹏图/本刊 构建个性化智能助学系统。在北京师范大学数字平台上，新闻传播学院学生马艳娟点击进入"智能助 教"模 ...

近日，有网友在社交平台发帖称，此前曾经找郑州一家公司代写论文，眼看快拿到毕业证了，该公司却 来索要300元的"封口费"。 换言之，请人代写学位论文，将会是人生中随时可能暴的一个雷。存在其他抄袭、造假等学术不端行 为，也同样如此。每个学生都要远离学术不端，坚守学术规范底线。 对于代写论文交易，有一段时间，打击主要针对提供代写论文服务的机构，包括有关部门清理了代写论 文搜索，以涉嫌非法经营追究代写论文提供者的法律责任。但没有需求，就没有买卖，只打击提供代写 论文服务的机构，而不严肃查处代写论文服务购买者，将难以从根本上治理代写论文乱象。 为此，2018年教育部办公厅发布《关于严厉查处高等学校学位论文买卖、代写行为的通知》明确，对参 与购买、代写学位论文的学生，给予开除学籍处分。已获得学历证书、学位证书的，依法予以撤销。被 撤销的学历证书、学位证书已注册的，应当予以注销并报教育行政部门宣布无效。 所以，所有学生都应该清楚购买代写学位论文的严重后果。但是，眼下还是有学生把花钱购买代写论文 服务，视为"天知地知你知我知"的事，似乎只要代写论文提供者"讲诚信"，交付的论文不存在抄袭、造 假问题，在交付之后就毁掉所有买卖痕 ...

Group 1 - The core issue highlighted is the prevalence of academic misconduct, exemplified by a recent absurd paper published by a nurse from Shandong University Qilu Hospital, which incorrectly reported uterine fibroids in male patients [1] - The article discusses the negative impact of such bizarre papers on fair competition, academic integrity, and scientific progress, emphasizing that despite efforts to combat academic fraud, some issues remain persistent and increasingly covert [1][2] - New forms of academic fraud are emerging, including the use of photo editing to fabricate data, plagiarism, and the rise of "paper mills" that produce large volumes of similar research outputs, undermining the quality of academic work [1][2] Group 2 - The article points out that the root causes of academic misconduct include a narrow evaluation system that ties publication to career advancement, leading to a culture of impatience and superficiality in research [2] - It suggests that to foster a fair and innovative research environment, there should be a shift towards a more diversified evaluation system that values practical skills, especially for roles like nursing [2] - Recommendations include implementing dynamic supervision, establishing an industry blacklist to prevent favoritism in academic publishing, and clarifying definitions of academic misconduct to enhance accountability [2] Group 3 - The importance of research integrity is emphasized as the lifeblood of academia, with a call for a culture that values genuine scholarship over superficial achievements [3] - A balanced evaluation system is necessary to create a positive academic atmosphere that supports innovation and integrity [3]

调查结果显示刘某乔属于后者。写论文也"拼爹"，以刘某华为代表，将科研资源转化为子女求学路上的 私产，类似的学术裙带近年来在高校中屡屡出现。 去年，教育部通报的学术不端案例中，超过两成涉及亲属挂名。 学术领域产生"近亲繁殖"，一方面在于当事人本身亲属关系的便利。"近水楼台先得月"存在主观的天然 能动性，以及客观的操作隐蔽性，互相之间打个掩护，很可能给后期审核监督带来阻力。 因发表14篇SCI论文，并获得多项国家发明专利，重庆大学化学化工学院本科生刘某乔引发热议。令人 不可思议的是，相关发明专利的最早申请时间为2016年，当时刘某乔尚在读初中。 在众人的质疑声中，刘某华与刘某乔的真实关系浮出水面。"天才"背后的"二代"身份曝光，论文高产竟 是副院长父亲亲自操盘所来。 5月10日，重庆大学通报，刘某乔系该校研究生院副院长刘某华之女，存在论文和专利署名不当的学术 不端行为。刘某华被免职并受党内严重警告处分。 亲属合作并非不可，若真有实际贡献，联合署名也正常。需要警惕的是，亲属之间以科研合作之名，行 利益输送之实，违背的不仅是学术伦理，还挑战了教育公平的底线。 在具体的评奖、评优、升学等制度的设计中，应当进一步剔除"拼 ...