有日本方面消息称，日本政府企图在修订"安保三文件"时，对"无核三原则"中不运进核武器的原则进行 修改。此举引发日本各界强烈担忧。日本长崎市议会和广岛市议会分别于本月8日和9日通过意见书，要 求日本政府坚持"无核三原则"。 据央视新闻消息，日本执政党自民党21日公布众议院选举竞选承诺，其中包括修订"安保三文件"、放宽 武器出口限制、修改宪法等内容。 自民党公布的竞选承诺围绕经济、地方、外交与安全保障、社会保障、修改宪法5个方面展开。在外交 与安全保障方面，包括修订《国家安全保障战略》在内的"安保三文件"、取消对武器出口的5种类型限 制、设立国家情报局和对外情报机关等。 日本首相高市早苗19日在记者会上宣布，将于23日解散众议院，2月8日举行众议院选举。 ...

日本首相高市早苗19日在记者会上宣布，将于23日解散众议院，2月8日举行众议院选举。（央视新闻） 自民党公布的竞选承诺围绕经济、地方、外交与安全保障、社会保障、修改宪法5个方面展开。在外交 与安全保障方面，包括修订《国家安全保障战略》在内的"安保三文件"、取消对武器出口的5种类型限 制、设立国家情报局和对外情报机关等。 有日本方面消息称，日本政府企图在修订"安保三文件"时，对"无核三原则"中不运进核武器的原则进行 修改。此举引发日本各界强烈担忧。日本长崎市议会和广岛市议会分别于本月8日和9日通过意见书，要 求日本政府坚持"无核三原则"。 日本执政党自民党1月21日公布众议院选举竞选承诺，其中包括修订"安保三文件"、放宽武器出口限 制、修改宪法等内容。 ...

○特朗普：已就格陵兰岛未来合作制定框架 暂时不会加征关税 当地时间1月21日，美国总统特朗普在其社交媒体"真实社交"发文称，基于他与北约秘书长马克·吕特的会晤，他们已经就格陵兰岛乃至整个北极地区的未来 合作框架达成了一致。如果这项方案最终得以落实，将对美国和所有北约成员国都大有裨益。 特朗普表示将不会实施原定于2月1日的关税措施。 ○欧盟委员会：欧盟领导人紧急峰会将按计划举行 ○欧洲议会宣布无限期冻结欧美贸易协定审议工作 ○特朗普：已就格陵兰岛未来合作制定框架 暂时不会加征关税 ○普京证实将与到访的美总统特使会晤 ○约旦、阿联酋等国发表联合声明 决定加入所谓"和平委员会" ○德国慕尼黑将迎来两只大熊猫 特朗普称暂不会对欧洲八国加征关税 欧洲议会冻结欧美贸易协定审议工作 欧盟委员会发言人21日表示，欧盟领导人紧急峰会将按计划于当地时间22日晚间举行。据称，尽管美国总统特朗普表示不会采取武力夺取格陵兰岛，也不会 对部分欧盟国家施加关税，但欧盟方面仍将继续推进相关会议安排。 △欧洲议会（资料图） 当地时间21日，欧洲议会国际贸易委员会主席朗格宣布，针对欧盟与美国贸易协定的审议将无限期冻结。 朗格称，目前欧盟的主权和 ...

Group 1 - The Nagasaki and Hiroshima city councils passed resolutions on the 8th and 9th, respectively, urging the Japanese government to uphold the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" which state "not possessing, not producing, and not allowing the introduction of nuclear weapons" [2][3] - The Nagasaki city council's resolution emphasized that previous Japanese cabinets have consistently upheld the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" as a national policy and expressed strong opposition to any attempts by the government to amend these principles [2] - The Hiroshima city council unanimously passed a resolution expressing concerns over the ruling party's attempts to modify the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" and urged the government to take the sentiments of the citizens of the atomic bombed cities seriously [2] Group 2 - The "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" were officially adopted as national policy by the Japanese Diet in 1971, and the 2022 "Security Three Documents" reaffirmed that the basic stance of adhering to these principles would not change [3] - Japan's adherence to the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" has been a significant measure for the international community to assess whether Japan is genuinely pursuing a path of peaceful development [3] - There are concerns regarding Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's consideration to amend the principle of not allowing the introduction of nuclear weapons during the revision of the "Security Three Documents" [3]

Core Viewpoint - The Nagasaki and Hiroshima city councils have passed resolutions urging the Japanese government to uphold the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles," which state that Japan will not possess, manufacture, or introduce nuclear weapons [1] Group 1: Legislative Actions - The Nagasaki City Council passed a resolution on the 8th, emphasizing that previous Japanese cabinets have consistently upheld the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" and that any attempt to amend these principles is "absolutely unacceptable" [1] - The Hiroshima City Council unanimously passed a resolution on the 9th, expressing strong concerns over the ruling party's attempts to modify the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" and urging the government to take the sentiments of the atomic bomb victims seriously [1] Group 2: Historical Context - The "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" were officially adopted as national policy by the Japanese Diet in 1971 and were reaffirmed in the 2022 "Security Three Documents," which stated that the fundamental stance of adhering to these principles would not change [1] - Japan's commitment to the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" has been a significant measure for the international community to assess whether Japan is genuinely pursuing a path of peaceful development [1] Group 3: Government Considerations - Prime Minister Fumio Kishida is reportedly considering modifying the principle regarding the introduction of nuclear weapons during the revision of the "Security Three Documents" [1]

Group 1 - The Japanese government, led by Prime Minister Suga Yoshihide, aims to revise the "Security Three Documents" by the end of this year, with plans to establish an expert committee as early as spring to discuss necessary defense enhancements and budget allocations [1][3] - The revision will focus on strengthening defense capabilities, including increasing defense spending, modifying the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles," and lifting restrictions on arms exports to develop offensive military capabilities [4][6] - The opposition parties have criticized the Suga administration, labeling it as the "most dangerous Liberal Democratic Party government since World War II," and expressing concerns that Japan is being led towards becoming a "war state" [6][8] Group 2 - Japan is enhancing its military cooperation with the Philippines, with discussions on a framework for providing weapons and technology to bolster the military capabilities of partner nations [3][6] - The opposition has raised alarms over the rising defense budget, arguing that it detracts from social welfare spending and poses risks to Japan's constitutional commitments [8]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles revolves around Japan's Prime Minister, Sanae Takaichi, advocating for the modification of security-related documents in light of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, suggesting a need to enhance Japan's defense capabilities [1][2] - Takaichi emphasized the importance of improving Japan's sustained combat capabilities, indicating that the ongoing conflict could lead to prolonged military engagements [1] - The proposed budget for the fiscal year 2026 is expected to reach 122 trillion yen (approximately 5.5 trillion RMB), with a defense budget set to hit a record high of 9 trillion yen [1] Group 2 - The Chinese Foreign Ministry expressed concerns that Japan's moves to expand its military capabilities challenge the post-war international order and threaten regional peace and stability [2] - Takaichi's government aims to achieve a defense spending target of 2% of GDP two years ahead of schedule, alongside further easing of weapon export restrictions and discussions on revising Japan's "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" [2] - The commentary from experts suggests that Takaichi's remarks may be a pretext to justify the enhancement of Japan's military strength and the introduction of advanced weaponry [1]

Group 1 - The Japanese government is advancing military expansion measures, raising concerns among various sectors and citizen groups regarding the contradiction with Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution, which emphasizes peace principles [1] - Legal experts argue that the current security laws, including the "Collective Self-Defense" provisions, violate the constitutional framework and have led to the establishment of the so-called "Security Three Documents" [1] - There is a call to take action to prevent the ongoing trend of military policy advancement in Japan [1] Group 2 - Comments made by Prime Minister Suga Yoshihide in the Diet are viewed as crossing legal boundaries and deviating from Japan's longstanding stance on China, necessitating a retraction [3] - Legal experts assert that Suga's remarks regarding Taiwan are illegal and significantly impact Japan-China relations, urging for an immediate retraction and acknowledgment of the error [5]

Group 1 - A gathering of political, academic, and civic leaders in Japan demanded Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo retract his erroneous statements regarding Taiwan to prevent further damage to Japan-China relations [1][3] - Former Ministry of Foreign Affairs official Sunzaki Takashi emphasized that the Taiwan issue is purely an internal matter for China and criticized Kishi's linkage of Taiwan to Japan's "survival crisis" as absurd [1][3] - Lawmaker Hiraoka Hideo stated that Kishi's statements, made to please his support base, are unacceptable and could lead to significant economic losses for Japan [3][4] Group 2 - Senator Ibo Yoichi expressed concerns over Japan's increasing military presence in the southwestern islands and the rising defense budget, which he believes could escalate regional tensions [3][4] - Senator Takara Saya suggested that Kishi's provocative remarks are intended to create an atmosphere for further military expansion and revision of Japan's security policies [3][4] - Professor Haba Kumiko highlighted Japan's historical colonial rule over Taiwan, urging the government to exercise caution in its statements regarding the Taiwan issue [4]

Core Viewpoint - The current Japanese Prime Minister, Kishi Suga, maintains a firm stance on promoting Japan-China strategic mutual relations while also asserting Japan's position on the Taiwan issue, which has drawn criticism and concern from various quarters, including China [1][2]. Group 1: High City's Statements and Intentions - High City's remarks regarding Taiwan represent a distorted understanding of China, influenced by her lack of diplomatic experience and her right-wing conservative background [2][3]. - The statements are seen as an attempt to align with U.S. interests, particularly in the context of potential Taiwan Strait conflicts, indicating a shift in Japan's defense posture [2][3]. - High City aims to create a sense of external crisis to garner public support for increased defense spending and military reforms in Japan [3][6]. Group 2: Security Policy Developments - High City is pushing for revisions to Japan's "Three Security Documents," which could mark a significant shift from Japan's post-war defense policy of "defensive defense" to a more proactive military stance [6][7]. - The proposed changes include discussions on modifying Japan's "non-nuclear principles" and increasing defense spending, reflecting a response to U.S. pressures for greater military contributions [7][8]. - The urgency of these revisions is tied to High City's desire to establish a legacy and stabilize Japan-U.S. relations amid rising geopolitical tensions [7][8]. Group 3: Regional Implications and Reactions - High City's comments have raised concerns about escalating tensions in Northeast Asia, potentially igniting conflicts in the Taiwan Strait and complicating regional security dynamics [11][12]. - The U.S. may leverage this situation to strengthen military alliances in the Asia-Pacific, which could provoke stronger countermeasures from China and further complicate the strategic landscape [12][13]. - Domestic opposition in Japan is growing, with public protests against High City's remarks, indicating a potential backlash that could affect her political standing [11][14]. Group 4: Future of Japan-China Relations - The relationship between Japan and China is at a critical juncture, with potential scenarios ranging from continued provocations leading to confrontation, to limited compromises resulting in a state of low trust [14][15]. - A possible path to recovery in Japan-China relations hinges on High City taking substantive actions to correct her statements and address the concerns of both domestic and international stakeholders [16][17]. - The ongoing diplomatic crisis may lead to a reevaluation of Japan's foreign policy, particularly if High City fails to navigate the pressures from both China and the U.S. effectively [17][18].