Group 1 - The trade friction between China and the EU has intensified, with China imposing temporary tariffs on dairy products imported from the EU, ranging from 21.9% to 42.7% [1] - The tariffs target EU cheese, milk, and cream, justified by China as a response to excessive subsidies from the EU that harm local industries [1] - The conflict originated from the EU's imposition of tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, prompting China to retaliate with targeted measures against various EU products [1][6] Group 2 - The Netherlands is particularly affected, especially Nexperia, a subsidiary of China's Wingtech Technology, which faced asset freezes and leadership changes by the Dutch government citing national security [2] - China's countermeasures included banning exports from Nexperia's Chinese factories, leading to significant disruptions in global supply chains, particularly in the automotive and electronics sectors [2] - The Dutch government’s actions were based on Cold War-era laws, and the swift response from China has put pressure on Dutch businesses [2][10] Group 3 - France has expressed strong dissatisfaction with China's tariff measures, calling for a united EU response, including potential investigations or lawsuits at the WTO [4] - The French agricultural sector, particularly cheese and cream exports, stands to suffer significantly from the increased tariffs, prompting protests from farmers [4] - The French government emphasizes the need for a coordinated action to protect agricultural interests and prevent internal chaos within the EU [4][8] Group 4 - The investigation into EU dairy subsidies began in August last year, with preliminary findings indicating excessive subsidies leading to low-priced dumping in China [6] - The situation reflects a broader pattern of retaliatory measures, with China emphasizing that the Netherlands must bear the consequences of its actions [6] - The ongoing trade tensions highlight the complexities of international trade, where both sides are urged to seek dialogue and avoid escalation [11] Group 5 - The EU's internal divisions are evident, with countries like Germany preferring negotiation over confrontation due to their significant investments in China [8] - The Dutch government has paused some intervention measures, but the core issues remain unresolved, with Nexperia's new CEO threatening legal action for $8 billion [8] - The trade conflict serves as a warning for the EU to engage in negotiations to prevent mutual economic losses, as both sides explore potential solutions [10][11]

当地时间25日，一名尼日尔外交消息人士透露，针对美国限制尼公民入境，尼方已采取反制措施，从本 周起停止向美国公民发放签证。 尼日尔 这名消息人士表示，尼日尔"已全面永久停止向所有美国公民发放签证，并无限期禁止美国公民入境"。 尼日尔政府这一决定基于对等原则，体现这个西非国家维护主权的外交政策导向。 本月16日，美国总统特朗普签署公告，将此前受美方全面和部分入境限制的国家数量从19个扩大至40 个。在该政策下，尼日尔公民被美国实施全面入境限制。 （资料图） 来源 | 央视新闻客户端 ...

巴西总统卢拉：但关键在于对等原则，如果美国对我们征收50%的关税，我们也将对其征收50%的关 税。 ...

| 中美日内瓦经贸会谈联合声明后,中美关税调整 圆 美国对中国关税变化 | | 中国对美国关税变化 | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 保留 | 10%基准关税 | 10%基准关税 | 儒醫 | | 初始90天内暂停实施 | 24% "对等关税" | 24%反制关税 | 初始90天内暂停实施 | | 取消 中美日内瓦经贸会谈联合声明后,中美关税调整 | 91%加征关税 | 91%反制关税 | 取消 Canlina 1 | 对于这样的会谈结果，商务部发言人指出，这一举措符合两国生产者和消费者的期待，也符合两国利益 和世界共同利益。 中美谈判取得重要成果，背后的三个看点不容忽视。 5月12日，中美双方发布《中美日内瓦经贸会谈联合声明》。根据声明内容，本次中美经贸高层会谈取 得实质性进展，双方大幅降低双边关税水平。 面对美方多轮加征关税的施压，中方始终保持战略定力，秉持理性态度，采取反制措施坚决维护自身利 益。 本次中美经贸会谈处处体现出对等原则。如，会谈前地点选择在第三国，规避主场外交。 在谈判结果上，对等原则也体现得尤为明显。一是在关税减让幅度上，双方均取消91%的关税。二是在 有争 ...