【环球时报报道 记者 白云怡】"奉劝有关人士不要以自己的霸权逻辑'镜像'中国。"7月23日，中国驻阿 根廷使馆发言人就美国候任驻阿大使彼得·拉梅拉斯涉华谬论发表谈话，批评美方有关人士的言论充斥 意识形态偏见和冷战零和思维，让人不禁感到"门罗主义"卷土重来的阵阵寒意。22日，拉梅拉斯在提名 确认听证会上污名化中国与当地的合作，并扬言将利用大使职位，遏制中国在阿根廷的影响力。此番言 论在阿引发强烈批评。 "美国驻阿候任大使尚未抵达布宜诺斯艾利斯，已引发激烈争议。"墨西哥《千禧年报》报道称，拉梅拉 斯在听证会上不仅攻击中国，还声称将支持阿右翼总统米莱、推动左翼前总统克里斯蒂娜受到审判等， 这引发这个南美国家政界的强烈反应，多名省长、议员等接连发声，批评拉梅拉斯的言论"充满傲慢和 干涉主义"。 据报道，拉梅拉斯声称，"阿根廷有23个省，每个都有自己的政府，可能会与外部势力比如中国或其他 国家谈判，在当地开展项目。而这也可能导致中国方面的腐败问题。"他宣称，"我作为大使的职责之一 就是走访所有省份，与省长们建立真正的对话和伙伴关系。" 此番言论迅速引发阿根廷火地岛省省长梅莱拉的强烈批评。他率先在社交媒体X上表示，"一名 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the geopolitical tensions between the U.S. and China, particularly focusing on U.S. Secretary of State Rubio's efforts to persuade Southeast Asian countries to distance themselves from China through punitive tariffs [1][6] - Southeast Asian nations, including Malaysia and the Philippines, have openly rejected U.S. threats, indicating a desire to maintain their supply chains and not align with U.S. policies [1][3] - China's response, led by Foreign Minister Wang Yi, includes significant trade agreements with ASEAN countries, such as the "China-ASEAN Free Trade Area 3.0," which aims to eliminate tariffs on over 7,000 products and reduce green product tariffs by 80% [3][6] Group 2 - The article highlights the strategic partnership between South Korea's SK Group and Chinese battery manufacturers, indicating a shift in supply chain dynamics in response to U.S. policies [4] - Vietnam's formal entry into the Shanghai Cooperation Organization marks a significant geopolitical shift, undermining its previous defense agreements with the U.S. [4][6] - The effectiveness of China's strategy is illustrated by the immediate economic repercussions faced by Vietnam, including a 4.3% drop in its stock market and disruptions in trade due to U.S. agreements [6][8] Group 3 - The article emphasizes the failure of the U.S. "Indo-Pacific Economic Framework," which lacks concrete tariff details and market access mechanisms, rendering it ineffective [6] - Brazil's President Lula publicly opposes U.S. tariffs, leveraging the strong trade relationship with China, which has seen trade volumes exceed $150 billion, particularly in soybean exports [6][8] - Canada is also seeking closer ties with China following U.S. tariffs on Canadian lumber, indicating a broader trend of countries reassessing their economic alliances in light of U.S. policies [6][8]

Core Viewpoint - The joint military exercise between the United States and Panama aimed at enhancing the defense capabilities of the Panama Canal amidst concerns over China's increasing presence in the region [1][3]. Group 1: Joint Military Exercise - The joint exercise took place from July 13 to July 18, focusing on preparing for security threats to the Panama Canal and other strategic infrastructures [1]. - The U.S. Southern Command deployed three helicopters, including two UH-60 Black Hawks and one CH-47 Chinook, to participate in the exercise at three Panamanian air force bases [1]. Group 2: U.S.-China Relations - The exercise has been framed by U.S. media as a response to perceived threats from China, with claims that China is expanding its military and economic influence in the Western Hemisphere [3]. - U.S. Defense Secretary Mark Esper and former President Trump have previously expressed concerns about China's control over the Panama Canal, which is vital for global trade [3][4]. Group 3: Responses from China and Panama - Chinese officials have repeatedly denied allegations of attempting to control the Panama Canal, asserting that such claims are unfounded and serve as a pretext for U.S. expansionism [3]. - Panamanian President Laurentino Cortizo has also rejected the notion of Chinese interference, emphasizing Panama's sovereignty over the canal [4].

专家认为，从双边贸易角度来看，巴西对美国市场的依赖程度相对较低也给了卢拉政府"说不"的底气。 卢拉10日接受巴西媒体采访时说："巴美贸易只占巴西国内生产总值（GDP）的1.7%，并不是说没有美 国我们就活不了。" 不容忍干涉内政 特朗普在关税信函中要求巴西停止对前总统博索纳罗的司法调查。国际舆论认为，特朗普政府通过加征 关税等对巴西政府施压，有干涉巴西内政的意图。 美国总统特朗普日前在社交媒体上公布致巴西总统卢拉的信函，称将自8月1日起对从巴西进口的商品征 收50%的关税，同时要求巴西停止对前总统博索纳罗的司法调查。巴西政府及总统卢拉都强硬发声批驳 特朗普，并表示将"对等回应"美国。 巴西专家认为，特朗普政府对巴西加征关税等行为无理无据，体现出美国对拉美一贯的霸道和霸凌。无 论是从卢拉政府坚持独立自主的现行政策，还是从美国"门罗主义"给巴西带来的历史伤痛来看，卢拉政 府均无法容忍美方行为。 不接受"贸易不公平说" 特朗普在信函中声称美国与巴西的贸易关系"非常不公平"，但巴西专家和媒体都注意到，美国在对巴西 贸易中实际上享有顺差。 卢拉批评特朗普的指责失实，指出2024年美国在对巴西贸易中约有70亿美元顺差，过 ...

Group 1 - The U.S. government has implemented unilateral tariff policies against several Latin American countries since February, causing widespread concern and strong opposition among these nations [1] - Latin American leaders criticized the U.S. tariff policies at the CELAC summit, stating that they violate multilateralism principles and disrupt the global economic order [1] - Luis Almagro, the Secretary-General of the Organization of American States, warned that if Latin America succumbs to U.S. pressure to cut trade ties with China, it would lead to severe regional economic disaster, as China is a primary trade partner for almost all Latin American countries [1][6] Group 2 - The U.S. has faced challenges in its tariff war with China, failing to rally allies for a united front against China, as evidenced by the lack of mention of tariffs or China in the G7 finance ministers' joint statement [2] - Rick Crawford, Chairman of the U.S. House Intelligence Committee, emphasized the need for more actions in the Western Hemisphere to curb China's growing influence in Latin America [2] Group 3 - The recent Fourth China-Latin America Forum, held in Beijing, reflects a new geopolitical trend in Latin America, with countries actively supporting the forum amid the ongoing U.S.-China rivalry [4] - Despite historical U.S. dominance in Latin America, the region's geopolitical significance has diminished, leading to reduced U.S. investment and influence over the years [4] Group 4 - Almagro criticized the Trump administration for pressuring Latin American countries to sever trade ties with China, asserting that such actions would be economically disastrous for the region [6] - The increasing economic ties between Latin America and China have diminished U.S. control over the region, as over 30 Latin American countries have developed closer trade relations with China [6][9]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes that China's engagement in Latin America is framed as a cooperative effort rather than a replacement of existing powers, particularly in the context of Colombia's participation in the Belt and Road Initiative [1][12] - The recent collaboration between China and Colombia reflects a broader trend of strengthening ties among global southern countries, occurring against a backdrop of the U.S. retreating from aggressive economic policies due to concerns over potential recession [2][22] - The article highlights the significant shift in the economic, political, and demographic weight of developing countries, which is expected to shape international relations in the coming years [3] Group 2 - The article discusses the U.S. strategy in Latin America under the Trump administration, which has been focused on undermining cooperation between Latin American countries and China [5][21] - It outlines two primary methods employed by the U.S.: exerting pressure and coercion on Latin American governments, and openly supporting far-right political movements to alter the political landscape in favor of conservative agendas [6][13] - Specific examples include U.S. pressure on Panama to withdraw from the Belt and Road Initiative and support for Costa Rica's criticism of Huawei's 5G network [10][11] Group 3 - The article notes that the U.S. has intensified sanctions against Cuba and Nicaragua, aiming to create a "sanitary cordon" around these countries while also applying pressure on Brazil regarding its potential involvement in the Belt and Road Initiative [11][12] - It highlights the strategic importance of Colombia as a long-time U.S. ally, which is now pursuing a different diplomatic path under President Gustavo Petro, aligning more closely with China [18][21] - The article also mentions the upcoming elections in Brazil, which are expected to be a significant battleground for U.S. influence, particularly with the potential re-election of President Lula [19][20] Group 4 - The article concludes that the U.S. strategy in Latin America, characterized by unilateralism and coercive measures, has led to increased distrust among key regional countries towards U.S. influence [21][22] - It emphasizes that the relationship between Latin America and China is becoming increasingly essential, as evidenced by the outcomes of the fourth China-Latin America and Caribbean Community (CELAC) forum [23] - The article argues that the failure of imperialism in Latin America will depend not only on international participation but also on the resilience of progressive forces and the public's ability to resist historical ties between elite groups and U.S. hawkish interests [23][24]

Group 1 - The Secretary-General of the Organization of American States, Almagro, emphasized the critical importance of trade with China for Latin America, warning that cutting ties could lead to severe economic disaster [1][3] - Almagro noted that China is either the largest or second-largest trading partner for nearly all Latin American countries, and removing China from trade equations would result in a significant regional economic crisis [3] - In 2024, trade between China and Latin America is projected to reach a historical high of $518.47 billion, reflecting a year-on-year growth of 6.0% [3] Group 2 - Colombia is China's fifth-largest trading partner in Latin America, with trade volume reaching 149.63 billion yuan in 2024, marking a 13.1% increase and exceeding 120 billion yuan for four consecutive years [4] - Argentina is nearing an agreement to export beef offal to China, with expectations that by the first quarter of 2025, China will account for 56.4% of Argentina's total beef exports [4] - China is providing new opportunities for cooperation with Latin American countries, offering more alternatives compared to Europe and the United States [4]

Core Viewpoint - The spokesperson of the Chinese Embassy in Argentina criticized the remarks made by the outgoing U.S. State Department's Special Envoy for Latin America, Carone, regarding the currency swap cooperation between China and Argentina, labeling them as outdated Monroe Doctrine rhetoric [1] Group 1 - The currency swap cooperation between China and Argentina is described as a mutually beneficial arrangement decided by two sovereign nations, and the U.S. has no right to interfere [1] - The spokesperson emphasized that following U.S. "orders" is not true freedom, but rather the greatest form of unfreedom [1] - The Chinese side advised the U.S. to focus on practical cooperation with other countries instead of sowing discord [1]

全盘否定拜登路线，取而代之以门罗主义和缓和政策，并附加以鲜明的意识形态偏好和关 税威胁 文：国金宏观宋雪涛、赵宏鹤 上任两个多月，特朗普2.0看似是一场乱局，比如朝令夕改的关税威胁、出其不意的领土诉求、疾风暴 雨的政府裁员、全周无休的媒体轰炸。但实际上，特朗普2.0的政治逻辑清晰连贯，对美国现状有认 知，对长期愿景有规划，对短期举措有安排。 一、现状认知和长期愿景 正如他的标志性口号"Make America Great Again"，在特朗普眼中，美国或许已经不那么伟大。 特 朗普生于1946年，是二战结束后的第一年，也是"马歇尔计划"启动的前一年。可以说，他的人生几乎 与Pax Americana完全重叠，在70年岁月里目睹了美国在战后成为头号强国、在冷战中曲折胜出、以 绝对实力主导世界秩序的完整过程。 两相对比，不难感受特朗普近年的心境。到2016年，美国仍然拥有强大的账面实力，却已饱受非法移 民、贫富差距、工业凋敝、身份政治等问题的困扰。拜登政府的四年任期过后，又进一步增加了债台高 筑、通胀高企、外事缠身等新问题。 如今，美国主导战后世界秩序所依托的科技、军事和美元优势地位，已经被不同程度动摇，除了后 ...