从生产线全面停工，到机器轰鸣、订单回流，常州大江饲料有限公司在经历4个月的生死博弈后重获新 生。这家拥有33年历史的老牌企业曾因2亿元债务濒临破产，但在常州新北区法院、属地奔牛镇人民政 府及专业机构的协同救治下，不仅化解了1.6亿元债务，更实现职工零下岗、各项工作稳中有进的发展 势头。这场"府院联动"与大数据赋能的破产重整实践，成为全国优化营商环境的"常州样本"。 2亿债务压顶，老牌名企命悬一线 成立于1992年的常州大江饲料有限公司，曾是常州农业领域的金字招牌。"常大"商标连续多年蝉联常州 市知名商标，其饲料产品辐射整个华东市场。然而自2020年起，多重危机接踵而至：债务违约引发连环 诉讼，法定代表人涉案失联，资产接连被查封。至2024年破产受理前，企业自行统计的对外债务已高达 2亿元，如同一艘即将沉没的巨轮。 当常州新北区法院裁定受理破产清算时，承办法官敏锐捕捉到一线生机——"常大"商标知名度仍在，生 产许可证尚未失效，厂区毗邻奔牛港的区位优势突出。一场与时间赛跑的拯救行动迅即展开。常州新北 区法院与大江公司所在地的新北区奔牛镇政府建立分工协作的府院联动机制，实现法院与政府相关部 门"互联互通、信息共享、 ...

为得到全体债权人的认可，在投资人提交了关于重整投资的承诺函后，在法院的指导下，管理人拟定重 整计划草案，并与奔牛镇政府共同研究，三易其稿，最终确定草案。依据重整计划草案，大江公司的抵 押债权100%清偿，税收债权100%清偿，普通债权清偿比例为17%。最终选定股权转让模式即存续式破 产重整，使得大江公司在主体延续的同时，企业的优质资产和具有重整价值的资源予以保留在企业，保 留原企业的主体资格，通过引入战略投资人，免除超额债务。这不仅有助于减轻企业的负担，还能使资 源得到更有效的配置，促进企业的长期发展。 从生产线全面停工，到机器轰鸣、订单回流，常州大江饲料有限公司在经历4个月的生死博弈后重获新 生。这家拥有33年历史的老牌企业曾因2亿元债务濒临破产，但在常州新北区法院、属地奔牛镇政府及 专业机构的协同救治下，不仅化解了1.6亿元债务，更实现职工零下岗、各项工作稳中有进的发展势 头。这场"府院联动"与大数据赋能的破产重整实践，成为全国优化营商环境的"常州样本"。 常州法院创新破产重整机制，为企业提供司法保障 2亿债务压顶，老牌名企命悬一线 成立于1992年的常州大江饲料有限公司，曾是常州农业领域的金字招牌。"常 ...

9月19日，扬州法院"媒体看法院"活动第二站走进广陵法院，聚焦该法院"执破一体化"工作相关举措及成效。扬子晚报/紫牛新闻记者采访了解到，广陵法 院积极构建"执破一体化"工作格局，发挥执行程序和破产程序的叠加优势，助推区域经济高质量发展。2022年以来，共审结破产案件234件、公益清算案 件264件，化解不良债权72亿元，释放房地产资源8.4万㎡，妥善安置职工600余人，超3年以上未结破产案件实现动态"清零"。扬州某实业公司破产重整 案、扬州某旅行社公司破产重整案被评为全省法院破产审判典型案例。 据介绍，该院"执破融合"案件简易程序适用率93%，平均审理天数55天，有效提升此类破产案件的办理效率。法院建立"终本"执行案件台账，对符合"执 转破"条件的企业，根据其履行能力、"终本"案件数、标的额实行"红、黄、蓝"分类管理。对蓝色等级企业，督促履行义务，保障申请执行人合法权益； 对黄色等级企业，约谈被执行人，告知破产风险；对红色等级企业，就财务状况、资产负债情况等因素识别评估，按符合重整、庭外和解、强制清算、破 产清算等情形分类施策，畅通市场主体救治和退出渠道。 据了解，该院与政府职能部门就破产企业招商引资、职工社 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of executing court decisions to protect the legal rights of winning parties, with a focus on a "100-day offensive" initiative to enhance execution quality and efficiency [1] - The initiative targets key issues, cases, and regions, aiming to convert "paper rights" into "real money" through precise efforts in execution [1] - The initiative includes collaboration between courts and government, addressing long-standing unresolved cases related to labor disputes, maintenance fees, and personal injury compensation through cross-execution strategies [1] Group 2 - The standardization of execution is identified as crucial for the high-quality development of execution work, with the provincial court organizing a guide based on research to improve execution practices [2] - A new guideline has been established to publicly disclose key progress information in execution cases, promoting transparency and accountability in the execution process [2] - The initiative aims to enhance the execution team's quality and efficiency by adhering to established norms and standards while addressing practical challenges in execution [2]

同时，辽宁高院出台《执行案件主要流程节点进度公开指引》，要求全省法院主动向当事人公开执 行立结案、财产查控、案款管理等关键节点进度信息，以公开促公正树公信，在自觉接受监督下严格规 范执行程序，提升执行效率和水平。 来源：人民法院报 本报讯（记者 黄艳辉 严怡娜 通讯员 黄绘如 马志鹏）9月12日，记者从辽宁省高级人民法院执行局 获悉，即日起至年末，辽宁高院组织全省法院开展执行工作"百日攻坚"专项行动，围绕执行质效提升、 执行工作指引编写、执行工作信息公开、交叉执行、执破融合、薄弱法院帮扶等6项主要任务，针对重 点问题、重点案件、重点地区精准发力，集中攻坚，力求做实做优执行工作，让更多"纸上权益"加速兑 现为"真金白银"。 专项行动开展期间，辽宁法院将进一步强化府院联动，"立审执"协调配合，做实交叉执行、执破融 合，持续聚力攻坚小标的案件，通过交叉执行，化解一批涉农民工工资、劳务纠纷、赡养费、抚养费、 扶养费、交通事故人身损害赔偿等小标的涉民生执行积案，"小切口"破解"执行难"问题，促推执行质效 整体提升；通过执破融合处理一批"僵而不死"的终本案件，加速"僵尸企业"破产出清，通过破产重整、 破产和解等方式助力危 ...

Core Viewpoint - The bankruptcy system has become an important legal path for corporate relief and resource regeneration, transforming from a state of imminent auction to a business-friendly environment [1] Group 1: Bankruptcy System and Management - The bankruptcy trial in Shanghai not only concerns the survival of individual enterprises but also plays a crucial role in optimizing resource allocation and stimulating market vitality [1] - Bankruptcy administrators are essential in the bankruptcy process, acting as the main drivers and executors of bankruptcy affairs, directly impacting the business environment [2] - Each bankruptcy case is unique and complex, requiring administrators to balance the interests of various stakeholders, including financial institutions, suppliers, employees, and creditors [2] Group 2: Challenges Faced by Bankruptcy Administrators - The management industry is facing severe challenges, including talent loss, team shrinkage, and an increasing proportion of cases with insufficient assets to cover bankruptcy costs [3] - Many bankruptcy administrators experience threats and harassment, reflecting a lack of professional protection and clarity in their roles and compensation mechanisms [3][4] - A significant number of bankruptcy cases do not have enough assets to pay for administrative fees, leading to a lack of willingness among administrators to take on cases [3] Group 3: Government and Judicial Coordination - The bankruptcy process involves collaboration among various government agencies and public service institutions, highlighting the need for a coordinated approach [5][6] - The government and judiciary's collaborative mechanism is seen as a key measure to address administrative bottlenecks in bankruptcy procedures [6] - Despite the deployment of collaborative mechanisms at the city level, challenges remain at the grassroots level, particularly in accessing banking information and tax incentives [6] Group 4: Changing Public Perception - The number of bankruptcy cases in Shanghai has been rapidly increasing, yet the success rate of restructuring and reconciliation remains low [9] - There is a prevalent stigma associated with bankruptcy, often viewed as a failure, which discourages companies from seeking timely relief [9][10] - Early initiation of bankruptcy procedures could significantly improve the chances of successful restructuring and recovery for distressed companies [10] Group 5: Recommendations for Improvement - Suggestions include lowering the threshold for restructuring, improving the connection between out-of-court restructuring and judicial restructuring, and establishing a financing support platform for distressed companies [10][11] - Enhancing public awareness and understanding of bankruptcy processes is crucial for improving cooperation among various stakeholders involved in bankruptcy cases [11]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the innovative "live sealing and live deduction" execution model implemented by the Suixian People's Court to address the challenges faced by enterprises in a complex economic environment, balancing the protection of creditors' rights with the survival and operational capacity of businesses [1][5]. Group 1: Execution Model Innovation - The "live sealing and live deduction" model aims to replace harsh measures with flexible strategies, allowing enterprises to maintain their operational capabilities while ensuring creditors' rights are protected [1][5]. - Since 2025, the court has seen a 35% year-on-year increase in cases resolved through flexible sealing, with the actual amount executed in enterprise cases rising by 40% [1]. Group 2: Mechanisms for Execution - A "live sealing" identification mechanism has been established, focusing on key enterprise cases by assessing asset status, industry outlook, repayment willingness, and operational viability [2]. - Essential production materials and equipment are subject to "live sealing," allowing companies to continue operations under court supervision, while non-core or idle assets are handled through traditional sealing methods [2]. - An innovative asset replacement mechanism has been explored, allowing companies to replace sealed key production equipment or liquid funds with effective guarantees or easily liquidated assets [2]. Group 3: Risk Management - A dynamic supervision system has been created for enterprises under the "live sealing and live deduction" model, requiring regular reporting on production, finances, and the use of sealed assets [3]. - A special joint fund account is mandated for sales proceeds, ensuring that funds are used for debt repayment and essential operational expenses [3]. - A risk warning and interruption mechanism is in place to convert "live sealing" to "dead sealing" if high-risk behaviors are detected, ensuring accountability [3]. Group 4: Collaborative Resolution - The court has integrated mediation processes at critical stages of execution to facilitate settlements, promoting the dual benefits of the "live sealing and live deduction" model [4]. - A "government-court linkage" mechanism supports key enterprises facing temporary difficulties, coordinating government assistance in policy support and financing [4]. - A "credit incentive" system is being explored to help enterprises restore credit and market presence after fulfilling settlement agreements [4]. Group 5: Overall Impact - The "live sealing and live deduction" model represents a balanced approach between judicial authority and enterprise survival, contributing to a favorable business environment and supporting economic development [5]. - The court's ongoing commitment to a civil execution philosophy aims to continuously improve the execution mechanism, providing robust judicial support for high-quality economic and social development [5].

Core Insights - The company, a traditional chemical enterprise, has successfully transitioned into high-value sectors such as new energy and new materials by investing 2.3 billion yuan in an electronic materials project [1] - The company faced severe financial distress and potential delisting three years ago due to complex debt and corporate structure issues [2][3] - The judicial system played a crucial role in facilitating the company's restructuring and debt resolution through innovative legal frameworks [4][5] Group 1: Company Transformation - The company initiated a strategic shift from traditional phosphate mining to high-value new materials, marking a significant transformation in its business model [1] - The restructuring process involved a tailored "execution + bankruptcy reconciliation" plan, which effectively addressed the company's debt crisis and improved its financial structure [3][4] Group 2: Judicial and Government Support - The collaboration between the judiciary and local government was pivotal in the restructuring process, establishing a permanent mechanism for coordinated efforts to resolve corporate crises [6][7] - The establishment of specialized working groups by the local government helped address various operational challenges faced by the company during its restructuring [7] Group 3: Market Engagement - The company initially struggled to attract investors due to its financial instability but successfully engaged multiple potential investors through a strategic "split recruitment" approach [8][9] - The innovative use of investment banks as intermediaries facilitated better market outreach and attracted strategic investors for the company's core business segments [10] Group 4: Future Outlook - The local court has been recognized for its contributions to high-quality development, indicating a commitment to fostering a supportive legal environment for business recovery and growth [11] - The company aims to leverage its restructuring experience to enhance local government initiatives for attracting investment and upgrading industries [11]

Core Insights - The 2024 administrative trial work in Heze aims to enhance judicial efficiency and service to the public while promoting high-level rule of law [2][5] - A significant decrease in first-instance administrative cases is noted, with 1,578 cases filed in 2024, a 35.2% drop from 2,435 cases in 2023, marking the largest decline in the province [2] - The administrative cases cover 32 areas of administrative management, with a high proportion related to "administrative penalties," "administrative enforcement," "administrative confirmation," and "government information disclosure" [2] Group 1: Judicial Efficiency and Quality Improvement - The court is implementing regular data meetings and special work promotion meetings to enhance case handling efficiency [3] - A fast-track trial mechanism is being established, with dedicated teams for expedited cases and complex cases led by senior judges [3] - The integration of smart court initiatives is underway, utilizing case management platforms to modernize trial work [3] Group 2: Collaborative Governance and Dispute Resolution - The court is actively involving social forces in dispute resolution, including hiring dedicated mediators and engaging public representatives in mediation efforts [3][4] - A pre-litigation mediation center is established to review cases before they reach court, promoting early resolution [3] - A joint meeting system for administrative trials and responses is being implemented to encourage the use of administrative review channels for dispute resolution [3][4] Group 3: Strengthening Government and Judicial Cooperation - A task list for government-court collaboration has been developed to address common issues in administrative enforcement [4] - Judicial recommendations are being sent to relevant departments to prevent and resolve disputes effectively [4] - Legal education initiatives are being conducted for government officials to enhance their understanding of the law and improve administrative practices [4]

Core Viewpoint - The launch of the "One-Stop Credit Repair" platform aims to streamline the credit repair process for restructured and reconciled enterprises, providing efficient solutions for businesses to overcome credit difficulties and re-enter the market [1][2] Group 1: Credit Repair Process - The "One-Stop Credit Repair" platform digitizes the credit repair process, allowing for a unified approach to handle tax, finance, and judicial credit repairs [1] - The platform addresses the challenges faced by restructured and reconciled enterprises, which previously had to navigate multiple departments and faced inconsistent rules and systems [2] Group 2: Collaboration and Efficiency - The initiative involves collaboration between the court and various administrative departments to create a coordinated approach for credit repair, enhancing government management efficiency [2] - Enterprises can submit a single application through the platform, covering seven categories of credit repair needs, thus optimizing the process from "multiple visits" to "one-stop service" [2] Group 3: Goals and Future Directions - The implementation of this credit repair mechanism aims to help distressed enterprises reintegrate into the market and improve the quality of bankruptcy restructuring [2] - The court plans to continue exploring reforms in the credit repair mechanism to support high-quality economic and social development [2]