新华社北京12月17日电 日前，司法部发布规范涉企行政执法专项行动第三批典型案例，其中某地市场 监管局执法人员违反执法行为规范案引发广泛关注。该案中，16名行政执法人员向多家小微企业和个体 工商户索要、收受红包礼金，最终被严肃追责。 近日召开的中央经济工作会议提出要营造良好的营商环境。惩治"微腐败"、规范执法权，是打通政策落 实"最后一公里"的关键一环，对于切实为企业松绑减负，营造稳定、公平、透明的法治化营商环境有重 要意义。 约束执法人员行为，守住公平廉洁底线，才能让企业直观感受到执法温度与法治诚意。管住"微权力"、 治理"微腐败"必须持之以恒。既要完善监督机制，杜绝暗箱操作，整治执法人员行为不当等问题，也要 持续健全制度设计，统一执法标准，明确"可为"和"不可为"的界限。 近年来各级各地通过发布典型案例、建立负面清单、推行"扫码入企"、落实罚缴分离等措施，逐步构建 起自查自纠与外部监督相结合的长效机制。随着制度笼子越扎越牢、监督手段日益精准，"微腐败"的生 存空间必将越来越小，各类经营主体的活力将愈加涌动。（新华社记者吉哲鹏 陈永强） 行政执法人员本应是良好营商环境的守护者，然而却成了企业负担的制造者、企 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need to address "micro-power" and "micro-corruption" within administrative law enforcement to protect the interests of small and micro enterprises, which are vital to the economy [1][2]. Group 1: Issues Identified - Administrative law enforcement personnel have been found to engage in corrupt practices, such as soliciting bribes from small businesses, undermining the intended supportive role of these officials [1]. - The case highlighted reflects a broader issue of the need to optimize the business environment and protect the legitimate rights of enterprises, particularly small and micro businesses that are vulnerable to such abuses [1]. Group 2: Proposed Solutions - The article suggests that to combat "micro-corruption," it is essential to improve supervision mechanisms, eliminate opaque practices, and establish clear boundaries for lawful conduct [2]. - Various measures have been implemented, including the publication of typical cases, the establishment of negative lists, and the promotion of external oversight, which aim to create a long-term mechanism for self-examination and external supervision [2].

近年来各级各地通过发布典型案例、建立负面清单、推行"扫码入企"、落实罚缴分离等措施，逐步构建 起自查自纠与外部监督相结合的长效机制。随着制度笼子越扎越牢、监督手段日益精准，"微腐败"的生 存空间必将越来越小，各类经营主体的活力将愈加涌动。 近日召开的中央经济工作会议提出要营造良好的营商环境。惩治"微腐败"、规范执法权，是打通政策落 实"最后一公里"的关键一环，对于切实为企业松绑减负，营造稳定、公平、透明的法治化营商环境有重 要意义。 约束执法人员行为，守住公平廉洁底线，才能让企业直观感受到执法温度与法治诚意。管住"微权力"、 治理"微腐败"必须持之以恒。既要完善监督机制，杜绝暗箱操作，整治执法人员行为不当等问题，也要 持续健全制度设计，统一执法标准，明确"可为"和"不可为"的界限。 新华社北京12月17日电（新华社记者吉哲鹏、陈永强）日前，司法部发布规范涉企行政执法专项行动第 三批典型案例，其中某地市场监管局执法人员违反执法行为规范案引发广泛关注。该案中，16名行政执 法人员向多家小微企业和个体工商户索要、收受红包礼金，最终被严肃追责。 行政执法人员本应是良好营商环境的守护者，然而却成了企业负担的制造者、企业 ...

整治"微腐败"是营造良好发展环境的重要基础。经济发展和民生改善相互牵动、互为条件。"微腐 败"既损害群众利益，更破坏发展环境。我们每年开展优化营商环境专项监督，常态整治"担当作为不尽 心、争创一流缺雄心、服务群众不贴心、遵规守纪缺戒心"等作风问题。优良作风是良好营商环境的"金 字招牌"。近年来，达州成功引进10个百亿级制造业项目，"3+3+N"现代产业集群整体重塑，高质量发 展步伐更加坚实，为保障和改善民生夯实物质基础。以清风正气护航经济发展，还需进一步构建亲清政 商关系，杜绝靠企吃企谋私利等现象。 整治"微腐败"关键在于管住"微权力"。我们梳理形成乡镇（街道）、村（社区）履职事项清单，聘 请群众担任村级党风政风监督员，从小事入手铲除腐败滋生土壤。阳光是最好的防腐剂，群众是最好的 监督者。要充分发挥群众监督作用，畅通参与渠道，让"蝇贪蚁腐"无处遁形。 反腐败是否见成效，惠民生是否见真功，群众最有发言权。持续推动反腐败斗争向基层延伸、向群 众身边延伸，扎紧制度笼子，深化以案促改，涵养廉洁文化，引导党员干部将遵规守纪体现到增进群众 感情、维护群众利益上来，监督执纪的力度就能更好转化为造福民生的温度，让人民群众生活 ...

Group 1 - The core idea emphasizes the importance of addressing minor issues to prevent larger problems in governance and party conduct [1][2][4] - The concept of "micro-warning" is crucial for establishing a solid defense against issues related to party conduct, highlighting that small deviations can lead to significant risks [2][4] - The historical context of the party's self-revolution is linked to the practice of "micro-warning," which has been a consistent theme throughout its century-long struggle [3] Group 2 - The complexity and broad scope of governance in a large party necessitate a focus on minor issues to prevent cascading failures in conduct [4] - The implementation of the Central Eight Regulations reflects a commitment to addressing both minor and major issues in party conduct, promoting a culture of accountability [3][4] - The ongoing emphasis on "micro-warning" serves as a guiding principle for maintaining the party's integrity and political character over time [4]

Core Points - The Anhui provincial government is intensifying efforts to address issues that disregard and harm the interests of the public, focusing on corruption and mismanagement at the grassroots level [1][2] - A significant number of cases have been investigated, with 26,900 issues identified and 33,400 individuals dealt with, including 8,257 disciplinary actions and 487 cases referred to the judiciary [2] - The province has implemented measures to ensure that public funds and benefits are returned to the people, recovering 795 million yuan in misappropriated assets [2] Group 1 - The case of a village committee member who misappropriated over 200,000 yuan highlights the commitment to tackling "micro-corruption" and restoring public trust in local governance [1] - The Anhui provincial government is focusing on various sectors, including education, healthcare, and social services, to rectify prominent issues affecting the public [2] - The implementation of a health information sharing system across 2,406 medical institutions has significantly reduced patient costs, saving nearly 600 million yuan [2][3] Group 2 - The government aims to enhance the public's sense of security and satisfaction by ensuring that all promised compensations and benefits are delivered [2] - Continuous education and enforcement of regulations are planned to maintain the momentum of these reforms and ensure long-term effectiveness [3] - The sharing of medical examination results has led to substantial savings for patients, exemplified by a case where a patient saved 1,793 yuan due to reduced duplicate testing [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the issue of corruption and inefficiency within a local government agency in Hunan Province, where a livestock station official exploited his position to delay the processing of animal quarantine certificates unless bribes were given by the applicants [1][2]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A local livestock station in Huaihua City was found to have excessive delays in issuing animal quarantine certificates, with some applicants taking over ten days to receive their documents despite the process being able to be completed in one day if all materials were in order [1]. - Investigations revealed that the official in charge, Yang, used vague reasons to delay applications and suggested that applicants provide gifts to expedite the process [1]. Group 2: Impact on Stakeholders - The delays caused significant financial losses for farmers, with one farmer reporting losses of several tens of thousands of yuan due to the inability to sell pigs on time [1]. - The investigation involved interviews with over ten farmers, confirming that the practice of requiring gifts for service was widespread [1]. Group 3: Response and Accountability - Following the investigation, Yang admitted to his wrongdoing and was disciplined for his actions, which included taking advantage of farmers' urgent needs [1]. - The local disciplinary committee took steps to rectify the situation by ensuring that affected farmers received their certificates and issued apologies [1]. Group 4: Broader Implications - The case illustrates a broader issue of "micro-corruption" within local government agencies, where small powers are misused to exploit citizens, undermining public trust and government credibility [2]. - The article calls for strict measures against such practices, emphasizing the need for enhanced supervision, transparent reporting channels for citizens, and stronger institutional frameworks to prevent similar occurrences in the future [2].

Core Points - The article highlights a case of corruption within a public welfare institution in Hubei, where a staff member embezzled funds intended for elderly care through fraudulent procurement practices [2][6][7] - The investigation revealed that the staff member, Li, manipulated procurement records and engaged in cash transactions to siphon off funds, leading to significant financial losses for the welfare institution [4][5][6] Group 1: Corruption Details - The welfare institution, which serves vulnerable populations, experienced a doubling of per capita annual consumption without a corresponding increase in the number of residents, raising red flags for investigators [2][3] - Li was found to have embezzled a total of 35,272 yuan over three years through 107 fraudulent transactions, with amounts ranging from 37 yuan to 1,658 yuan [4][5] - The investigation uncovered that Li had been diverting funds from social elderly care fees for personal expenses, totaling over 170,000 yuan from December 2018 to March 2023 [5][6] Group 2: Institutional Failures - The lack of oversight and accountability within the welfare institution allowed Li to operate without detection, as procurement, accounting, and reporting responsibilities were concentrated in one individual [6][7] - The local government failed to implement adequate supervision and control measures, contributing to the environment that enabled the corruption to flourish [6][7] - In response to the corruption case, the local authorities initiated a comprehensive reform of welfare institutions, including the establishment of a big data supervision platform to monitor financial activities and improve accountability [7]