Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of addressing superficial rectification in ecological and environmental protection inspections, highlighting the persistence of issues due to formalism and ineffective measures [1][2] - There is a need for a problem-oriented approach to ensure effective resolution of environmental issues, moving beyond mere surface-level actions [1] - Strengthening the use of inspection results in the management of officials is crucial, linking these results to performance evaluations and promotions to encourage genuine efforts rather than superficial compliance [1] Group 2 - The newly issued "Regulations on Ecological and Environmental Protection Inspections" includes a dedicated chapter on rectification, promoting systematic and clear management of rectification tasks [2] - Establishing a dynamic tracking mechanism using digital platforms for real-time monitoring of rectification progress is essential to avoid "last-minute fixes" and "material-based rectification" [2] - Emphasizing the role of technology in supervision, such as satellite remote sensing and big data analysis, can help identify gaps and weak points in rectification efforts [2] Group 3 - Encouraging public participation in the rectification process is vital, with a focus on transparency and accountability through timely disclosure of rectification plans and results [3] - Setting up reporting platforms for citizens to provide effective leads and rewarding them can enhance community involvement in supervision [3] - Supporting NGOs, media, and volunteers in the oversight process fosters a collaborative governance model among the government, enterprises, and the public [3]