Workflow
战争牛市
icon
Search documents
黄金飞升,谁在“爆买”?
Jin Shi Shu Ju· 2025-09-29 12:29
Core Insights - The current surge in gold prices is driven by two main forces: central banks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) [1] - Gold prices reached a new historical high of $3,830, marking a year-to-date increase of over 45% [1] - Deutsche Bank's report indicates that the influence of ETFs on gold pricing has increased by 50% over the past three years, supporting their bullish target price of $4,000 for gold [1] Group 1: ETF Influence - ETF investors are experiencing one of the highest gold holdings years since the product's inception, with the SPDR Gold Shares ETF being particularly popular [1] - The assets under management (AUM) for ETFs in dollar terms are 70% higher than in 2020, yet the current gold holdings of 15 million ounces are still below the 17 million ounces seen in 2020, indicating potential for growth [1][2] - A recent analysis using the Granger causality test revealed that changes in gold prices drive ETF fund flows, rather than the other way around [2] Group 2: Demand Dynamics - Official demand from central banks is less sensitive to price changes, with an annual increase of 400 to 500 tons of gold demand over the past three years coinciding with significant price increases [4] - In contrast, jewelry demand is highly sensitive to price fluctuations, with rising gold prices leading to decreased jewelry demand, and increased jewelry demand potentially signaling a bearish outlook for gold prices [4] - ETF investors exhibit lower demand elasticity, which may explain why gold prices have consistently exceeded analyst predictions [4] Group 3: Market Trends - Recent data from Michael Hartnett's weekly fund flow report indicates a record inflow of $17.6 billion into gold funds over the past four weeks, highlighting strong demand for gold ETFs [5] - Hartnett attributes the rise in precious metal prices to inflation policies and a "war bull market," suggesting that despite being overbought from a tactical perspective, gold should be held long-term due to its structural underallocation in portfolios [5]