Core Insights - The mobile rental platform "Qingyun Rental" has suddenly collapsed, leaving a financial gap of over 1 billion yuan, affecting thousands of investors who had invested amounts ranging from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of yuan [1][2][3] - The platform had claimed an annualized return rate of 16.8% and began experiencing withdrawal difficulties in September 2023, leading to widespread investor concern [2][3][4] Company Overview - "Qingyun Rental" positioned itself as a leading mobile rental platform, claiming to have a strong financial background and operations in over 200 cities, serving more than 1 million users [2][3] - The company operated by recruiting investors to purchase various models of Apple phones, which were then rented out to generate rental income [5][6] Investment Model - The investment model involved purchasing Apple phones, with returns based on the rental income generated. For example, an iPhone 16 Pro Max was procured at 9,760 yuan and could yield a total return of 10,306 yuan over a 4-month rental period [5][6] - The platform encouraged longer investment periods and multiple phone purchases to maximize returns, with investment terms of 4, 6, and 12 months [5][6] Investor Experiences - Many investors reported that they initially received returns but faced withdrawal issues starting in September 2023, leading to significant financial losses [9][10] - Reports indicate that employees were also affected, with some having to purchase phones themselves to maintain their jobs, leading to further financial strain [11][13] Company Structure and Ownership - "Qingyun Rental" is operated by Wuhan Qingqing Era Network Technology Co., Ltd., which was established in 2020 with a registered capital of 150 million yuan. The company is partially owned by Shenzhen Aigao Chuangke Holdings Co., Ltd. [15][16] - Aigao Group, the parent company, recently increased its stake in Shenzhen Aigao Chuangke, becoming the controlling shareholder [15][16] Legal and Investigative Actions - Multiple investors and employees have filed reports with local authorities, and investigations are currently underway regarding the company's operations and the financial losses incurred [16]

近日，据奔流新闻报道，曾在全国布局300家门店、宣称"依托国资与港股上市背景"的手机租赁平台"青云租"突然爆雷：资金链断裂、员工欠薪、总部解 散，留下超10亿元的资金窟窿，数千名投资者从数万元到上百万元的投入化为泡影，而这些投资大多来自亲戚朋友的相互推荐。 另据蓝鲸新闻报道，曾经"青云租"招募商户入驻投资，资金折算成不同型号的苹果手机，之后平台将手机租赁出去后收取租金差价，投资手机越多、时间 越久收益越高，宣称年化收益率16.8%，从今年9月开始"青云租"出现"提现困难"，大量投资者几十万、甚至上百万本金至今无法收回。 号称年化收益率16.8% 9月底出现兑付问题 "青云租"一直以来都把自己包装为手机租赁平台的头部，从APP页面到线下投资者招募海报，"青云租"对外宣称自己"固定实力雄厚"，是上市公司旗下产 业，业务遍布200多个城市，累计服务用户超过100万人。 这种规模也成为了"青云租"日后招徕投资者的重要话术，"因为客户多、企业订单量大，所以公司不断拓展业务，需要更多商户入驻"。据上海证券报报 道，"青云租"公司运营模式主要是向社会人员吸纳投资，资金折算成不同型号的苹果手机，投资者依托平台将手机租赁出去后 ...

Core Insights - The mobile rental platform "Qingyun Rent" has suddenly collapsed, leaving a financial gap of over 1 billion yuan, affecting thousands of investors who had invested amounts ranging from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of yuan [1][2][19] - The platform had claimed an annualized return rate of 16.8% and had been experiencing withdrawal difficulties since September [2][11] Company Overview - "Qingyun Rent" positioned itself as a leading mobile rental platform, claiming to have a strong financial background and operations in over 200 cities, serving more than 1 million users [2][19] - The company was established in 2020 with a registered capital of 150 million yuan, and it is a subsidiary of the Hong Kong-listed company Aigo Group [19] Business Model - The operational model involved attracting investments from individuals, converting funds into different models of Apple phones, and renting them out to generate rental income [5][19] - The platform encouraged longer investment periods and larger quantities of phones to maximize returns, with specific examples showing potential profits from various rental periods [6][12] Investor Experience - Many investors reported smooth initial withdrawals, but issues began in September, leading to an inability to withdraw funds [11][12] - Investors often entered the platform through recommendations from friends or family, with some investing significant amounts based on trust in their connections [12][14] Employee Experience - Employees were reportedly required to purchase phones themselves to maintain their positions, leading to significant financial losses for many [16][17] - A significant number of employees were also misled about the company's financial health and were pressured to invest their own money into the business [17][18] Current Situation - As of now, multiple reports have been filed with local authorities regarding the company's collapse, and investigations are ongoing [19]

Core Viewpoint - The mobile rental platform "Qingyun Rent" is facing allegations of a financial crisis, with users reporting issues with cash withdrawals and the closure of physical stores, despite the company's claims of stability and a recent merger with a Hong Kong-listed company [1][6][7]. Group 1: Company Operations - Qingyun Rent has announced its merger with Hong Kong-listed company Aigo Group (00328.HK), claiming to be the first mobile rental platform with a Hong Kong stock company background [1]. - The platform continues to operate its services through the Alipay mini-program, offering various mobile devices for rent, including the iPhone 17 Pro Max at a rental rate of 21.80 yuan per day [4]. - The company's business model involves attracting investments from individuals, converting funds into mobile devices, and generating rental income with an annualized return of up to 16.8% [6]. Group 2: Financial Issues - Since mid-September, users have reported difficulties in withdrawing funds from the Qingyun Rent platform, leading to concerns about the company's financial stability [7]. - Despite the negative reports, some accounts have attempted to refute the claims, asserting that the company's operations are stable and that delays in withdrawals are due to corporate restructuring and financing [7]. Group 3: Physical Presence - The physical store of Qingyun Rent located in Huaqiangbei Century Plaza has been closed for several months, with no new locations found in Shenzhen [6]. - Local merchants have indicated that the store had poor business performance, primarily attracting customers for free services rather than mobile rentals [6].

Core Viewpoint - The mobile rental platform "Qingyun Rent" is suspected of a major financial collapse, leading to significant investor losses and employee layoffs, with allegations of fabricated performance metrics [1][3][5]. Group 1: Company Operations - "Qingyun Rent" was promoted as a leading mobile rental platform, claiming a robust business model that involved attracting investments to purchase mobile phones for rental, with annual returns up to 16.8% [3][5]. - The company had previously boasted a network of 300 stores across various cities, supported by claims of backing from state-owned enterprises and insurance guarantees [3][5]. - Reports indicate that over 110,000 mobile phones were supposedly rented out, with a significant number of these phones allegedly concentrated in two villages in Henan province, raising suspicions about the legitimacy of the business operations [1][12]. Group 2: Employee Experiences - Employees were reportedly pressured to invest in mobile phones, with some taking loans or mortgaging properties to meet performance targets, leading to substantial financial losses [1][9]. - Many employees expressed doubts about the company's operations, noting that they were primarily focused on recruiting new investors rather than expanding the rental market [11][12]. - A significant portion of the phones in circulation was found to be linked to employee investments, suggesting a potential Ponzi scheme structure where returns were paid using new investors' funds [12][13]. Group 3: Investor Concerns - Investors began to report difficulties in withdrawing funds starting in mid-September, with many alleging unpaid salaries and unfulfilled promises from the company [5][6]. - The company's claims of financial stability were contradicted by the eventual closure of its operations, leading to widespread investor outrage and calls for legal action [1][5]. - Investigations revealed that many of the supposed rental transactions were likely fabricated, with evidence suggesting that the company may have engaged in fraudulent practices [12][13].