Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the inappropriate linking of parental social resources to education, which contradicts the principle of equal education for all children [1][2] - The requirement for parents to disclose their social resources has been criticized as a means of classifying families and potentially creating a hierarchy among students based on their parents' backgrounds [1][2] - There is a growing trend of schools conducting surveys to gather information about parents' social resources, which is seen as a shift from nurturing children's potential to a more utilitarian approach focused on resource competition [2][3] Group 2 - The article argues that education should not be treated as a business that integrates parental social resources, and that the relationship between schools and families should not be a medium for profit exchange [3] - With the declining birth rate in certain regions, the education market is shifting towards a buyer's market, suggesting that schools that continue to adopt a profit-driven mindset may face obsolescence [3] - The importance of maintaining the original educational mission and principles, such as "education for all," is emphasized as essential for fostering true educational equity and developing capable individuals for the future [3]

Group 1 - The conflict between Harvard University and the federal government represents a broader struggle between the American education system and government policies, with implications for international students, particularly from China [2][3] - Over 900 students and faculty across the U.S. have had their statuses revoked, with many being Chinese, raising concerns of racial discrimination [3] - The number of Chinese students studying in the U.S. has declined, with 277,000 in 2022, a 4.2% decrease from the previous year, while India has surpassed China as the largest source of international students [6][7] Group 2 - The cost of studying in the U.S. has risen significantly, with annual expenses ranging from 200,000 to 600,000 RMB, making it increasingly difficult for students to afford [22] - The tightening of H-1B visa policies has resulted in a low acceptance rate for Chinese students, with only 11% successfully obtaining a visa, leading to a high likelihood of returning to China [22][30] - The job market for returning Chinese students is becoming increasingly challenging, with many finding employment in lower-tier positions such as study consultants and English teachers, rather than in high-demand fields [26][30] Group 3 - The current educational landscape is criticized for being overly focused on ideology and utilitarianism, straying from the original goals of education which prioritize personal development over technical skills [32][34] - The perception that studying abroad guarantees social mobility and wealth inheritance is becoming unrealistic, as the global educational system fails to provide the expected outcomes [39][40] - The article suggests a return to the fundamental purpose of education, emphasizing the importance of nurturing independent and passionate individuals rather than merely producing skilled workers [40][41]