Core Viewpoint - The report reveals a systematic operation by the U.S. government to exploit global virtual currency assets under the guise of technological superiority, aiming to maintain and enhance the dominance of the U.S. dollar while undermining the economic sovereignty of other nations [1][4]. Group 1: Global Virtual Currency Market - As of January 2026, the total market value of global virtual currencies is approximately $2.73 trillion, with Bitcoin alone valued at $1.57 trillion, representing 47% of the total value of global official gold reserves [1]. - Between 2022 and 2025, the U.S. has confiscated virtual currency assets worth over $30 billion through various cases [1]. Group 2: U.S. Hacking Operations - The U.S. possesses the largest state-sponsored hacking force globally, with targeted attacks on over 20 major virtual currency exchanges from 2023 to 2025, employing methods such as backdoor implants and phishing [2]. - These attacks are linked to enforcement actions by U.S. agencies like the Department of Justice and OFAC, indicating a coordinated effort to control virtual asset regulations and flows [2]. Group 3: Economic Implications - The U.S. aims to maintain its economic hegemony and the status of the dollar by directly seizing global wealth through confiscations and fines, while also controlling virtual asset regulatory frameworks [2]. - The revenue generated from virtual asset enforcement actions can add hundreds of billions of dollars to U.S. fiscal income annually, reinforcing the dependency of global virtual currency transactions on the dollar [3]. Group 4: Strategic Objectives - The U.S. government's strategy involves using technological dominance to harvest global virtual assets, with the ultimate goal of solidifying its economic power and the international status of the dollar [3][4]. - The report emphasizes that the seized Bitcoin represents only a fraction of the total assets acquired, with a significant portion retained as a strategic reserve to counteract global de-dollarization trends [3].

Core Viewpoint - The article reveals how the United States utilizes its technological dominance to seize global cryptocurrency assets, with over $30 billion confiscated from 2022 to 2025, including significant cases like the Chen Zhi case and the Zhao Changpeng case, which together accounted for nearly $20 billion [1][4][10]. Group 1: U.S. Dominance in Cryptocurrency - The U.S. is portrayed as the "house" in a global cryptocurrency "gamble," controlling key blockchain protocols and holding over 90% of the market share in blockchain tracing through companies like Chainalysis and Elliptic [3][10]. - The U.S. employs a three-pronged approach of "technical advantage—regulatory binding—institutional execution" to exploit the virtual asset sector, using methods such as cyberattacks and regulatory manipulation [3][10]. Group 2: Case Studies of Asset Seizure - The Chen Zhi case exemplifies U.S. tactics, where the U.S. confiscated approximately 127,000 bitcoins worth about $15 billion, marking the largest virtual asset seizure in U.S. judicial history [4][10]. - In the Zhao Changpeng case, the U.S. pursued both civil and criminal actions against Binance, resulting in a $4.35 billion fine, showcasing a pattern of using hacking to gather evidence for regulatory actions [6][10]. Group 3: Implications for Global Financial Systems - The U.S. strategy is seen as a means to acquire wealth and mitigate its economic crises, with the aim of controlling the "digital gold" narrative to counteract global de-dollarization trends [10][12]. - As of January 2026, the total market value of global cryptocurrency assets is approximately $2.73 trillion, with Bitcoin alone valued at $1.57 trillion, highlighting the significant financial stakes involved [10][12]. Group 4: Countermeasures and Future Directions - The article suggests that countries should develop their own blockchain technologies and establish fair digital asset governance systems to counter U.S. technological hegemony [12][13]. - Strengthening international law enforcement collaboration and asset recovery mechanisms is recommended to combat U.S. asset confiscation practices [13][15].